Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
10.67
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) Afkaruna: Indonesian Interdisciplinary Journal of Islamic Studies Jurnal Cita Hukum Jurnal Media Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum International Journal of Law Reconstruction Fair Value: Jurnal Ilmiah Akuntansi dan Keuangan Jurnal Kreativitas PKM Unes Law Review Sang Pencerah: Jurnal Ilmiah Universitas Muhammadiyah Buton Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Syntax Idea JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI Dinasti International Journal of Education Management and Social Science Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN JHR (Jurnal Hukum Replik) LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Penegakan Hukum dan Keadilan International Journal of Engineering, Science and Information Technology JHCLS EduBiologia: Biological Science and Education Journal International Journal of Social Service and Research Journal of Social Research Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) International Journal Management and Economic (IJME) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Kasta: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan Justice Voice International Journal of Emerging Issues in Islamic Studies Journal of Sustainable Development and Regulatory Issues Tasyri' Metris: Jurnal Sains dan Teknologi Jurnal Magister Ilmu Hukum : Hukum dan Kesejahteraan Jurnal As-Syar’i: Jurnal Bimbingan & Konseling Keluarga Binamulia Hukum Amwaluna: Jurnal Ekonomi dan Keuangan Syariah Dame Journal of Law al Hairy | Journal of Islamic Law Jurnal Ekonomi, Manajemen, Akuntansi dan Keuangan
Machmud, Aris
Al Azhar Indonesia University
Religion Aerospace Engineering Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Astronomy Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 86 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 86 Documents
Search

 5   6   7   8   9 
Teori Keadilan John Rawls dan Relevansinya dalam Formulasi Kebijakan Pembagian Harta Bersama di Era Kontemporer: Teori Keadilan John Rawls dan Relevansinya dalam Formulasi Kebijakan Pembagian Harta Bersama di Era Kontemporer Heri Sulaiman; Lusi Marwati; Salman Alfarezi; Tri Sulistiowati; Aris Machmud
al Hairy | Journal of Islamic Law Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): al Hairy
Publisher : Yapilin Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64344/hry.v1i1.13

Abstract

The problem of justice in the division of joint property after divorce has become increasingly complex in the contemporary era, along with social, economic, and legal changes. This article discusses John Rawls' theory of justice, especially the principle of justice as fairness, and its relevance in formulating joint property division policies. The purpose of this study is to examine the extent to which Rawls' theory can provide a normative framework in assessing and improving joint property division policies to be more equitable. The method used is qualitative research with a juridical-philosophical approach, through literature analysis of Rawls' works and positive legal regulations in force in several countries, including Indonesia. The research findings show that Rawls' principles of justice, especially the difference principle and the principle of equal freedom, can be used to build a joint property division system that pays attention to the balance between individual rights and protection of economically vulnerable parties. In conclusion, the formulation of joint property division policies based on Rawls' theory will encourage the creation of a legal system that is not only legalistic, but also guarantees substantive justice for both parties. Therefore, the integration of Rawlsian justice values ​​in legislation is very relevant to answer the challenges of justice in the dynamics of contemporary society.
Who Supervises the Supervisors: Between Public Complaints and Legal Certainty ? Mochammad Hasan; Suparji Suparji; Aris Machmud; Wawan Munawar; Mochamad Choirul Huda
Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System Vol. 6 No. 2 (2026): Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System
Publisher : Journal of Human Rights, Culture and Legal System

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53955/jhcls.v6i2.1030

Abstract

Effective supervision of criminal investigations is essential to ensure accountability, legal certainty, and the protection of individual rights within the criminal justice system. However, the institutional placement of the Bureau for Investigation Supervision within the Criminal Investigation Agency raises concerns regarding supervisory independence and the effective resolution of public complaints. This study examines the effectiveness of investigation supervision in handling public complaints, identifies institutional constraints on independent oversight, and develops an institutional model for strengthening investigative accountability. The research employs normative legal research through statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, supported by institutional documents, complaint data, and interviews with relevant officials and legal practitioners. The study produces three principal findings. First, substantive public complaints remained consistently high, reaching 3,488 cases in 2023, 3,782 in 2024, and 3,770 in 2025, while substantive supervisory activities represented approximately 47.5 percent, 44.5 percent, and 49.9 percent respectively, indicating a persistent gap between supervisory demand and institutional response. Second, structural dependence within the investigative hierarchy, limited authority to enforce supervisory recommendations, and inconsistent complaint resolution weaken supervisory independence and undermine legal certainty. Third, effective reform requires transforming the Bureau into an independent Investigation Supervision Division that reports directly to the Chief of the Indonesian National Police and operates through an integrated supervisory structure at national, regional, and district levels. The proposed institutional reconstruction would strengthen supervisory independence, ensure effective corrective action, improve investigative accountability, and provide greater legal certainty for individuals seeking justice.
Impoverishment of Perpetrators of Criminal Acts of Corruption as A Form of Punishment Alternative Rangga Sasmita; Muhammad Khatab; Aris Machmud
Dame Journal of Law Vol 2 No 1 (2026): DJL
Publisher : Yapilin Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64344/djl.v2i1.85

Abstract

Corruption in Indonesia has become a complex issue, systematically, structurally, and massively damaging the governance system. As a result, the exercise of state power cannot fully focus on public interest due to the widespread influence of corrupt behavior. This situation has raised public concern over the increasing prevalence of corruption, which causes significant losses to the state. This article employs a juridical legal approach. The findings indicate that impoverishment can serve as an alternative punishment that effectively deters corrupt actors. However, efforts to eradicate corruption through the impoverishment of corruptors in Indonesia have not been optimally implemented. The legal process has not yet exerted significant pressure through the confiscation of assets obtained from corruption or the restitution of state losses resulting from such crimes. A firmer implementation is necessary so that corruptors face a real deterrent effect in accordance with applicable laws and regulations. This research is expected to assist in identifying and analyzing the current legal regulations related to the impoverishment of perpetrators of corruption crimes, particularly in the context of asset confiscation from criminal proceeds. In addition, this research aims to examine and evaluate the implementation of court decisions against perpetrators of corruption crimes concerning asset recovery or the confiscation of unlawfully acquired wealth.
Profit-Sharing Agreements on Agricultural Land:  the Study of Socio Legal: Perjanjian Bagi Hasil di Lahan Pertanian: Studi Sosio-Legal Mulyono Mulyono; Fokky Fuad; Aris Machmud
Dame Journal of Law Vol 2 No 1 (2026): DJL
Publisher : Yapilin Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64344/djl.v2i1.87

Abstract

Profit sharing on agricultural land is common in rural communities in Indonesia. Profit sharing on agricultural land is generally carried out according to customary law in the form of mutual trust between landowners and cultivators. The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal culture in profit sharing on agricultural land for cultivators in Lamongan Regency and Kediri Regency. This study uses empirical legal research methods and the theory of Legal Culture. The researcher conducted field research in Lamongan Regency and Kediri Regency, East Java by conducting in-depth interviews for three months with respondents who are farmers and rice field owners who understand the Legal Culture of Farmers and Agricultural Cultivators. This study shows that agricultural land owners in Lamongan and Kediri show more profitable dominance than cultivators because of sustainable land ownership, which is a crucial production factor, while cultivators are vulnerable because they do not have land to meet their needs, even if they have land, the area is less than five hundred square meters.
Separation of Halal and Non-Halal Food Product Places by Retail Business Actors: Comparative Study of PP Number 42 of 2024 with The Dubai Food Code: Pemisahan Tempat Produk Makanan Halal dan Non-Halal oleh Pelaku Usaha Ritel: Studi Perbandingan PP Nomor 42 Tahun 2024 dengan Dubai Food Code Arfiana Fitri Ashari; Amoury Adi Sudiro; Aris Machmud
Dame Journal of Law Vol 2 No 1 (2026): DJL
Publisher : Yapilin Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.64344/djl.v2i1.88

Abstract

The existence of unclear information on processed food product labels, especially related to halal ingredients, raises concerns for Muslim consumers who are entitled to get products in accordance with sharia. This study aims to study and compare the regulation of the separation of halal and non-halal product places by retail businesses based on Government Regulation No. 42 of 2024 and the Dubai Food Code. The method used is a normative legal approach with comparative legal analysis of the provisions of the two regulations. The results of this study indicate that although Indonesia has a legal basis regulates the obligation to physically separate halal and non-halal product palices, its implementation is still weak due to the absence of technical guidelines and structured supervision. In contrast, Dubai has established clear operational standards. Fields findings also reinforce the conclusion that retail businesses in Indonesia have not fully implemented the obligation of separation and transparency, as seen in products. This study recommends strengthening technical regulations and supervisory mechanisms at the retail level to protect the right of Muslim consumers as a whole.
Does the Going Concern Principle Provide a Sense of Justice for Debtors in Bankruptcy? Aris Machmud; Anas Lutfi
KASTA : Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Agama, Budaya dan Terapan Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): August
Publisher : Lembaga Bale Literasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/kasta.v6i3.3543

Abstract

The principle of sustainability (going concern) must create a mutual understanding of the parties in resolving business disputes, debts, and receivables. The principle of good faith in an obligatory agreement guarantees legal certainty for the parties. Failing to meet obligations in a commercial deal does not automatically lead to insolvency, since bankruptcy is viewed as a final option. This study aims to investigate how the going concern principle is applied to debtor organizations within Indonesia’s bankruptcy framework. The methodology follows a normative juridical model, relying on a statutory approach along with prescriptive analysis, and incorporates pertinent primary and secondary legal materials. The results show that there are disharmony and inconsistency of bankruptcy regulations and the Company Law related to the settlement of debtor assets and universal bankruptcy principles, so that a renewal of bankruptcy law is needed, one of which is related to the concept of going concern in bankruptcy considerations through the solvency approach of debtor entities. Creditors can file for bankruptcy if the debtor’s financial statements receive a going concern audit opinion from the auditor because it more accurately describes the company’s health condition. Therefore, the bankruptcy process must consider the going concern principle so that it can provide justice to debtors and creditors in resolving their business disputes.
Co-Authors A. Habib Amanatullah Rahdar Abdul Majid Adi Faqdhi Akbar Aji Andika Mufti Akhmad Ikraam Amanatullah Rahdar, A. Habib Amir Firmansyah Amoury Adi Sudiro Amoury Adi Sudiro Amoury Adi Sudiro Anas Lutfi Anas Lutfi Anas Lutfi Anis Rifai Anissa Permatasari Arfiana Fitri Ashari Artani, Khairi Anggita Asep Maksum Azhari Dzulqarnain Burhanuddin, Sitti Khairunisa Caskiman Caskiman Davai, Niki Dea Amalia Novela Dini Hardianti Edy Sanyoto Ega Pribadi Feby Nurhisyam Firdaus, Gede Fitriana, Raysa Fokky Fuad Fokky Fuad Fokky Fuad Fokky Fuad Guritna, Murshafatimah Cecille Harliani, Eni Henry Arianto Heri Sulaiman Heriyanto, Puji Hidayah, Yusup Ilham Muzzaki Intan Zania Khairunnisa, Adriana Kun Mardiwati Rahayu L. Tobing, AS Leonardus Lesmana Lubis, Rendy Lubis, Rahmad Lusi Anindia Rahmawati Lusi Marwati Lutfi, Anas Maghucu, Prosper Maguchu, Prosper Markoni Markoni Martini, Titin Mochamad Choirul Huda Mochammad Hasan Mubarok, Djihadul Muhammad Amin Muhammad Amin Muhammad Khatab Muhammad Rizki Muhammad Rizki Mulyono Mulyono Musoffa Musoffa Narayana, Raden Abyan Aradea Nasrullah Nasrullah Nasrullah Nasrullah Novita Sari Nurhisyam, Feby Nurini Aprilianda Okta Thaharah Susanto Parbuntian Sinaga Permatasari, Anissa Priatmoko, Muhammad Pribadi, Ega Prosper Maguchu Putri, Adityas Rachmawati Rahmadina, Wilsa Rakhsan Ghifari Rangga Sasmita Rizky Maulana Nugraha Rohaya, Nizla Rohayah, Nizla Rohman, Saipul Rohmatilah, Roudoh Roudoh Rohmatilah Rusfiantini, Rina Sadino Sadino Sadino Sadino Sadino Sadino Sadino Sadino, Sadino Saipul Rohman Salman Alfarezi Sanyoto, Edy Saraswati, Mardiana Satrio, Bagas Putra Sidiq, Muhammad Maulana Ibnu Sisca Debyola Widuhung Sisca Debyola Widuhung Siti Farhani Suartini Suartini, Suartini Sudiro, Amoury Adi Sunaryo, Euis Suparji Suparji Suparji Suparji Suparji Suparji Syafitri Jumianto Syafitri Jumianto Syarif Hidayat Syarif Hidayat Tardjono, Heriyono Tri Sulistiowati Vishnu, Andhika Wahyu, Alifa Achmad Wasitaatmadja, Fokky Fuad Wasitaatmaja, Fokky Fuad Wawan Munawar Widhiawati, Premita Fifi Wijaya, Maulana Yanci Libria Fista Yasmine, Inge Yusup Hidayah Yusup Hidayat Yusup Hidayat Yusup Hidayat Yusup Hidayat Yusup Hidayat Zul Karnen