Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.822
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA Jurnal Penelitian Fisika dan Aplikasinya (JPFA) Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika JURNAL ILMIAH PENDIDIKAN FISIKA AL BIRUNI Jurnal Penelitian Pembelajaran Fisika FKIP e-PROCEEDING Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA (JPPIPA) Momentum: Physics Education Journal Bubungan Tinggi: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Studies in Philosophy of Science and Education Experiment: Journal of Science Education Indonesian Journal of Teaching in Science Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika International Journal of Research and Community Empowerment Dedikasi: Journal of Community Engagement and Empowerment Jurnal Intelek Dan Cendikiawan Nusantara Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Journal of Dedication in Community (JoDiC)
Setyo Admoko
Unknown Affiliation
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Environmental Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 46 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 6 Documents
Search
Journal : Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika

 1 
Pengembangan Lembar Kerja Berbasis Collaborative Argumentation Learning Model (CALM) Untuk Meningkatkan Keterampilan Argumentasi Ilmiah Materi Pemanasan Global Ashfy, Aulia Camila; Admoko, Setyo
IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): Volume 13 Nomor 2 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Scientific argumentation plays an important role in learning. The facts obtained show that students' argumentation skills are still relatively low. Difficulty building arguments is caused by students having difficulty understanding the concept of argumentation, difficulty using relevant evidence to support arguments, and difficulty constructing logical arguments. The low level of students' ability to argue is also due to conventional learning activities and not yet practicing argumentation skills. So we need learning models and tools that can train students to develop scientific argumentation skills, namely worksheets based on the Collaborative Argumentation Learning Model (CALM). This development research aims to describe the validity of CALM-based worksheets to improve scientific argumentation skills on global warming material. This research uses a 4-D development model with 4 stages, namely define, design, develop and disseminate. However, this research is limited to the develop stage. The CALM-based worksheet to improve students' scientific argumentation skills on global warming material that has been developed is included in the very valid category in terms of content and construction aspects. This is based on the worksheet validity results of 96% in the very valid category, so that the worksheet developed is very valid and suitable for use in learning activities.
Validitas LKPD Berbasis Collaborative Argumentation Learning Model (CALM) untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Literasi Sains Peserta Didik Pramesti, Ardhia; Admoko, Setyo
IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Vol. 13 No. 2 (2024): Volume 13 Nomor 2 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

The purpose of this study was to evaluate the validity of worksheets based on the Collaborative Argumentation Learning Model (CALM) in order to improve students' science literacy level on alternative energy materials. An R&D approach combined with the ADDIE development model was the methodology used in this study. The three stages used in this research are: analysis, which involves identifying students' needs related to student worksheets on alternative energy materials; design, which involves organizing the worksheets created; and development, which involves collecting and validating the worksheets. The construction and content components of the LKPD can be used to evaluate its validation. One high school teacher and two knowledgeable lecturers became the three validators whose results were calculated as part of the data analysis technique. The advantages of the worksheets include being able to train science literacy indicators, using the argumentation-based CALM learning approach, and including real-world situations. The first recommendation from the validators was to pay close attention to the elements of scientific argumentation used as well as the signs of science literacy. The findings showed that the average validity score from the three validators was 96.21% for the content aspect and 97.22% for the construction aspect. This finding shows that the average value of the overall validity of the worksheet, with very valid criteria, is 96.72%. Thus, it can be said that the use of CALM-based worksheets to improve science literacy related to alternative energy content is appropriate for use during the educational process. This study shows that students benefit from using the argumentation component in physics learning, and this can be one way to help students become more savvy in science literacy.
Validitas LKPD Berbasis Argumentasi dengan Bantuan Web Energy4Me untuk Meningkatkan Kemampuan Pemecahan Masalah pada Peserta Didik SMA Maysaputri, Yunita; Admoko, Setyo
IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Vol. 13 No. 3 (2024): Volume 13 Nomor 3 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This research was to find the validity of the worksheet based on argumentation assisted by the energy4me web to improve problem-solving abilities on alternative energy material. This research is using the R&D method with a 4D development model. This model use four stages, namely define, design, develop and disseminate. The validity of the worksheet is assessed from two aspects, namely content and construction. The data collection technique used in this research includes validation of worksheet obtained from the results of three validators. The instrument used in this research is the worksheet based on argumentation assisted by the energy4me web to improve problem solving abilities. The data obtained was analyzed through an assessment of the LKPD which was developed using quantitative descriptive methods. This data was obtained from the results of the validity of worksheets which had been validated by three validators, namely two physics expert lecturers and a high school physics teacher. The results of the validity analysis of the worksheet show that the overall average score obtained in the content aspect is 97.91% in the validest category, while in the construction aspect it is 97.22% in the very valid category. Based on these results, the average value of validity for all aspects was found to be 97.74% in the validest category, so it can be concluded that the worksheet based on argumentation assisted by the energy4me web to improve problem solving abilities in alternative energy materials is suitable for use and application in the learning process.   Keywords: Workssheet, Problem-Solving Ability, Alternative Energy      
PENGEMBANGAN LKPD MODEL PEMBELAJARAN LEARNING CYCLE 5E PADA MATERI FLUIDA DINAMIS UNTUK MENINGKATKAN KETERAMPILAN ARGUMENTASI ILMIAH SISWA Asfiyah, Hilmi; Admoko, Setyo
IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Vol. 14 No. 1 (2025): Volume 14 Nomor 1 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ipf.v14n1.p17-24

Abstract

The aim of this research is to develop Student Worksheets (LKPD) using the Learning Cycle 5E learning model to train scientific argumentation skills and test the results of the validity, practicality and effectiveness of the LKPD. The Research & Development (R&D) method is applied then the model is through ADDIE (Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, Evaluation). The research subjects were 10 class XI students. The research object is through Learning Cycle 5E learning LKPD based on Toulmin argumentation patterns. The instruments applied were LKPD validation sheets, student response questionnaires, and pretest and posttest questions. The results of this research show that the validity of the LKPD is assessed based on the appropriateness aspects of the material, work instructions, questions, scientific argumentation skills, and the 5E Learning Cycle model, getting an average percentage of 81.25%, 91.67%, 83.3%, 100%, and 100%. each with excellent criteria, valid and suitable for use. The practicality of the LKPD is based on student responses through the LKPD aspects, the 5E Learning Cycle model, motivation, Fluid Dynamics material, and scientific argumentation, obtaining an average percentage of 82%, 88%, 88.5%, 88%, respectively. and 91.5% with very strong criteria. The effectiveness of the LKPD is determined from the pre and posttest results. The test given has a high interpretation category and an average n-gain score of 0.716. So that the 5E Learning Cycle learning LKPD developed is feasible and effective in improving students' argumentation skills. Similar 5E Learning Cycle model-based LKPD can be created to improve students' argumentation skills in other physics materials
Validitas Lembar Kerja Berbasis Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern (TAP) Materi Energi Alternatif Guna Meningkatkan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis Peserta Didik Sari, Eka Putri Dian Nata; Admoko, Setyo
IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Vol. 12 No. 1 (2023): Volume 12 Nomor 1 Tahun 2023
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis hasil validitas lembar kerja berbasis Toulmin’s Argumentation Pattern (TAP) untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis pada materi energi alternatif. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah metode R&D dengan model pengembangan ADDIE. Dalam penelitian ini terdapat tiga tahapan yang digunakan adalah tahap analisis (analyse) yaitu menentukan kebutuhan peserta didik mengenai lembar kerja materi energi alternatif, tahap desain (design) yaitu merencanakan lembar kerja yang dikembangkan, dan tahap pengembangan (development) yaitu Menyusun dan melakukan validasi. Validitas lembar kerja dinilai pada aspek didaktik, aspek konstruktif, dan aspek teknis. Teknik analisis dilakukan dengan menghitung hasil validitas lembar kerja dari 3 validator yang terdiri dari 2 dosen ahli dan 1 guru SMA. Kelebihan lembar kerja ini adalah menggunakan model pembelajaran PBL, berbasis TAP, berisikan masalah autentik, melatihkan indikator berpikir kritis. Kekurangannya adalah lembar kerja belum berbasis digital. Saran utama dari validator adalah memperhatikan indikator berpikir kritis dan komponen TAP yang digunakan.Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa rata-rata nilai validitas dari ketiga validator pada aspek didaktik sebesar 94,2%, pada aspek konstruktif didapatkan nilai sebesar 100,0%, dan aspek teknis didapatkan nilai sebesar 91,7%. Berdasarkan hasil tersebut rata-rata nilai validitas lembar kerja secara keseluruhan sebesar 95,3% dengan kriteria sangat valid. Sehingga dapat disimpulkan bahwa lembar kerja berbasis TAP untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis pada materi energi alternatif layak untuk digunakan dalam proses pembelajaran. Implikasi dari penelitian ini adalah memberikan dampak yang positif kepada peserta didik terkait penggunaan TAP dalam pembelajaran fisika sehingga dapat dijadikan salah satu solusi untuk meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis peserta didik.
Problem Based Learning dalam Meningkatakan Keterampilan Berpikir Kritis: Analisis Bibliometrik Pada Rentang Tahun 2015 – 2024 Wanti, Wilujeng Trismaya; Admoko, Setyo
IPF: Inovasi Pendidikan Fisika Vol. 14 No. 2 (2025): Volume 14 Nomor 2 Tahun 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/ipf.v14n2.p148-160

Abstract

Problem Based Learning (PBL) merupakan model pembelajaran yang dapat diterapkan untuk mengembangkan keterampilan berpikir kritis. Seiring meningkatnya perhatian terhadap efektivitas dan penerapan PBL dalam konteks pendidikan, jumlah penelitian terkait pun terus bertambah. Penelitian ini mengkaji tren perkembangan penelitian tentang Problem Based Learning (PBL) dalam meningkatkan keterampilan berpikir kritis selama sepuluh tahun terakhir (2015–2024) melalui pendekatan bibliometrik menggunakan VOSviewer. Sebanyak 191 artikel yang diambil dari basis data Scopus untuk kemudian dianalisis berdasarkan distribusi publikasi per-tahun, tipe dokumen, sumber jurnal, kata kunci, afiliasi institusi, dan negara. Hasil analisis menunjukkan bahwa publikasi terkait PBL dan berpikir kritis mengalami fluktuasi dengan lonjakan signifikan pada masa pascapandemi. Indonesia menjadi negara dengan kontribusi publikasi tertinggi, didominasi oleh institusi pendidikan tinggi. Kata kunci “critical thinking” dan “Problem Based Learning” menjadi topik yang paling sering diteliti, dengan fokus utama pada bidang pendidikan, khususnya sains dan medis. Analisis visualisasi mengungkapkan lima kluster utama dalam riset ini, termasuk pendidikan komputasi, matematika, dan fisika, serta sosial. Meski penelitian PBL dalam pendidikan fisika masih terbatas, tren menunjukkan peningkatan yang menjanjikan dalam beberapa tahun terakhir. Hal ini menunjukkan bahwa PBL merupakan pendekatan yang efektif dan fleksibel dalam mengembangkan keterampilan berpikir kritis lintas disiplin ilmu dan memberikan kontribusi penting dalam inovasi pembelajaran abad ke-21.
Co-Authors A'yun, Septy Kurrota Abdul Kholiq Ahmad Abtokhi Alhusni, Hanan Zaki Ali Djamhuri AMIROH, FARIDATUL Amiruddin, Mohd Zaidi Bin Ardhia Pramesti Arisanti, Aini Aryani, Heny Asfiyah, Hilmi Ashfy, Aulia Camila Aswiroh, Aswiroh AZIZAH ANWARUDIN, GABRIELA Binar Kurnia Prahani Cahyani, Tia Rahmi CHOLIMATUS SYADIAH, NUR Damarsha, Adrian Bagas Dawana, Irgy Redityo Dwikoranto Edelweiss, Mozza Pinkan EKA OKTAVIA, VIVI ELIANA, DINA Fitriana Fitriana Habibi Habibi Haj, Febri Syahrul Hermin Budiningarti Imam Sucahyo INDA SAFITRI, WAHYU IRVAN BAHARSYAH, ACHMAD Krisanti, Galuh Dwi Lestari, Nurita Apridiana Mahfudloh, Durriyah Amirotul Maysaputri, Yunita Muhammad Nur Hudha Munzulatur Rohmah Mustafaroh, Vinka Amalia Muthi'ah, Lathifatul Nadi Suprapto NIKI BAGUS WAHYUNE S, MUCHAMMAD Novitasari Novitasari Nur Hanifah Nurlailiyah, Alfi OKTAFIA, RINA Paramita, Uci Vebia Pramesti, Ardhia Pratiwi, Ananda Dwi Puteri, Alfini Yunita Putra, Handika Tusuka Putri, Rahmah Trinita Qiro’ah, Innita Fashihatul Rizaldi, Dimas Fahmi RIZKI RAHMAN, NIZAR Rizki, Iqbal Ainur Rohmah, Azizatul Nur Rohmah, Nur Lailatur Rusmaya, Anggita S Supriyono Safitri, Afaurina Indriana Sari, Eka Putri Dian Nata Sari, Irasikah Julia Sherliyanti, Yeni Shinta, Chamila El SULIYANAH SULIYANAH SULIYANAH Suliyanah, S. Syafira, Riska TRIWINDA PENGUKIR, RANI Utama Alan Deta Uulaa, Rizki Fitri Rahima Wanti, Wilujeng Trismaya Zainuddin, Abu