p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.142
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MANAJEMEN HUTAN TROPIKA Journal of Tropical Forest Management Masalah-Masalah Hukum Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Daulat Hukum Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri) Halu Oleo Law Review JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial WAJAH HUKUM Jurnal Yuridis Veteran Law Review DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Mulawarman Law Review Jurnal Papatung : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Pemerintahan dan Politik Law Research Review Quarterly JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) Law Development Journal IBLAM Law Review Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Abdimas Le Mujtamak Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Journal of Law and Legal Reform Referendum International Journal of Law and Society International Journal of Sociology and Law International Journal of Social Science and Humanity Jurnal Hukum Statuta IPSSJ Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara PALAR : Pakuan Law Review Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI)
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Justice in the Administration and Settlement of Bankruptcy Estate by Auction in Relation to the Recovery of Creditors’ Claims Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution; Iwan Erar Joesoef; Heru Sugiyono
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i3.616

Abstract

This study aims to examine the aspect of justice in the administration and settlement of bankrupt assets by the Curator, particularly concerning the repayment of receivables to creditors in the context of auction minutes issued by the KPKNL Samarinda. The research adopts a normative juridical method, legislation approach and conceptual approach, and is connected to a case study approach focusing on the auction process in the bankruptcy case of PT Karebet Mas Indonesia (in bankruptcy). The results of this study indicate that the Curator, in administering and settling unsold bankrupt assets, may proceed with a private sale (underhand sale) with the approval of the supervising judge, based on a limit value obtained from an independent appraiser’s valuation, provided that at least two public auctions have been conducted without success. The distribution of assets to creditors must observe the principle of pari passu pro rata, which ensures equal treatment according to their respective priorities.In the event that the settlement process of the bankrupt estate has been declared completed, yet the creditors have not received full repayment of their claims, the general provisions under Article 1131 of the Indonesian Civil Code shall apply, namely that all of the debtor’s assets constitute collateral for the fulfillment of their debts. This study recommends an amendment to Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, to regulate in a detailed, specific, and comprehensive manner the requirements for the underhand sale of bankrupt assets by the Curator. Such regulation is necessary to ensure justice and legal certainty for bankrupt debtors and creditors, particularly regarding the repayment of claims for concurrent creditors.
Legal Liability Framework of a Bankrupt Guarantor (Corporate Guarantee) Toward Creditors in Credit Agreements with Debtors : Analysis of Decision No. 318/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022 from the Jakarta Commercial Court Mohammad Rizky Siregar; Muthia Sakti; Iwan Erar Joesoef
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i3.649

Abstract

This research examines the legal responsibility of corporate guarantors declared bankrupt for their obligations to creditors in loan agreements, analyzing Court Decision No. 318/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Commercial Court Jakarta Central. The study addresses the legal complexities arising when a corporate guarantee becomes insolvent before the principal debtor defaults, creating jurisdictional conflicts between bankruptcy law and guarantee obligations. Using normative legal research methodology with a juridical normative approach, this study analyzes the application of Article 229(2) in conjunction with Article 278(6) of Law No. 37/2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (K-PKPU) and Article 1381 of the Civil Code. The research reveals that the curator's action in obstructing and rejecting PT KawanCicil Teknologi Utama's claim registration against the bankrupt guarantor without proper judicial determination constitutes conduct not based on applicable laws and regulations. The findings demonstrate that when a guarantor is declared bankrupt and the debtor is in default, the Supervisory Judge and Curator must accept PT KawanCicil Teknologi Utama as a creditor with rights to the debtor's assets during asset liquidation proceedings. The study concludes that bankruptcy declaration of a guarantor does not automatically terminate guarantee obligations under Article 1381 of the Civil Code, as bankruptcy is not enumerated among the causes of contract termination. This research contributes to legal certainty in corporate guarantee enforcement within Indonesia's bankruptcy framework and provides recommendations for legislative harmonization between conflicting provisions in bankruptcy law.
Limitation of Environmental Organizations' Right to Sue Against Limited Production Forest Area : Case Study of Decision Number: 16/Pdt.G/LH/2023/PN.Bkn Ekko Harjanto; Iwan Erar Joesoef; Irwan Triadi
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i3.661

Abstract

Environmental law enforcement provides space for environmental organizations to file lawsuits in the interests of environmental conservation as regulated in Article 92 of Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management. However, in practice, the right to sue environmental organizations is not always accepted by the courts, especially when it concerns certain areas such as Limited Production Forests. This study aims to analyze the material of environmental organizations' lawsuits based on Decree Number 16/PDT.G/LH/2023/PN.BKN. This study uses a normative juridical method and a case study approach with data sources in the form of court decision documents and related laws and regulations. The results of the study show that in this case, this Decision shows that it recognizes the active role of environmental organizations in supervising and suing permit applications for forest areas. In this case, the plaintiff organization argued that the defendant's actions in carrying out exploitation activities in the Limited Production Forest area had violated the law and harmed the ecological function of the forest, thus fulfilling the elements of an unlawful act as regulated in Article 1365 of the Civil Code. This finding resulted in an understanding of the analysis related to the material of the environmental organization's right to sue as an instrument of social control and supervision of forest area utilization policies.
Legal Reform in Indonesia’s Natural Resource Exploitation: A Study of SOE Privatization and Corporate Responsibility Suherman, Suherman; Joesoef, Iwan Erar; Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi; Kholiq, Abdul; Phuoc, Jeong Chun
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): July, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i3.20064

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the exploitation of natural resources by State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), particularly in forest management and mining, which do not contribute to the prosperity of the people. The scope of this research focuses on SOEs that control vital natural resources affecting the livelihoods of many people. This research employs a normative juridical method with a historical approach to privatization and an analysis of John Ruggie’s principles regarding Government and Private Responsibility for Human Rights (“Protect, Respect and Remedies”), as well as collecting data as library research.  The findings indicate that such exploitation is carried out by SOEs (with share-persero) as a result of the privatization in the 1980s and 1990s, leading to liberalization. The study of John Ruggie’s principles highlights the obligation of both the State and SOEs to prevent the exploitation of natural resources. The study concludes that the SOE engaged in resource management operate as “persero” entities, with shares partially owned by the private sector, leading to unfair business competition. Article 33 (2) and (3) of the Constitution mandates that natural resource management should be carried out by SOEs of which ownership is 100% by the State (“perum”) or through Cooperatives, as stipulated in Article 33 of the Constitution. The authors have proposed the liberalization results in the of SOEs (Persero), enabling private management, which raises concerns over monopolistic practices, unfair competition, and rationally impacts the potential of natural resources based on privatization and liberalization factors.
TANTANGAN DAN SOLUSI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PATEN DALAM ERA INOVASI DIGITAL DI NEGARA BERKEMBANG Irwan Triadi; Iwan Erar Joesoef; Iswanti Rachmanisa; Vedita Akbar; Fandy Gultom; Rofi Ayyasy; Brian Mochamad F.
Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal Vol. 2 No. 03 Juni (2025): Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal
Publisher : PT Wahana Global Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital yang sangat pesat telah mengubah wajah inovasi global dan mendorong lahirnya berbagai invensi berbasis perangkat lunak, kecerdasan buatan, Internet of Things (IoT), blockchain, hingga big data. Di perkembangan teknologi digital ini, keberadaan sistem perlindungan hukum terhadap suatu invensi menjadi sangat penting untuk menjaga hak eksklusif para pencipta serta mendorong inovasi keberlanjutan. Namun, pada negara berkembang khususnya Indonesia, sistem hukum paten masih menghadapi berbagai tantangan dalam merespons karakteristik unik dari inovasi digital yang berisfat dinamis, nonkonvensional dan lintas batas. Tantangan tersebut meliputi keterbatasan regulasi, kurangnya literasi hukum paten, biaya administrasi yang tinggi dan belum optimalnya kapasitas institusional yang berpotensi menghambat perkembangan inovasi local dan menurunkan daya saing global yang mana berpotensi untuk melemahkan daya saing nasional di pasar global seta mengurangi insentif bagi para innovator untuk melindungi dan mengkomersialkan hasil karya mereka. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi tantangan utama yang dihadapi negara berkembang dalam melindungi invensi digital melalui sistem paten dan menawarkan solusi untuk menjadikan sistem hukum paten kuat, inkulisif dan adaptif terhadap perkembangan teknologi, dengan solusi tersebut diharapkan negara berkembang dapat lebih maksimal dan memberdayakan potensi innovator local dan berperan aktif dalam ekositem dan inovasi global.
The Validity of Direct Appointment Construction Contracts by State-Owned Enterprises to Their Subsidiaries After the Implementation of the Job Creation Law: A Study on Conflicts of Interest in the Procurement of Construction Consultancy Services Within PT PLN (Persero) Aslihatin Zuliana; Iwan Erar Joesoef; Suherman Suherman
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 4 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i4.777

Abstract

This study examines the legal validity of direct appointment construction consultancy contracts between state-owned enterprises and their subsidiaries following the implementation of Indonesia's Job Creation Law. The research addresses critical questions regarding the formal legal mechanisms governing long-term unit-price framework agreements and their continued enforceability under amended procurement regulations. Employing a normative-jurisprudential methodology, the study systematically analyzes primary legal sources, including statutory provisions, government regulations, and corporate governance frameworks, alongside secondary legal materials and doctrinal commentaries. The analysis reveals that pre-Omnibus Law direct appointments complied with civil law contract validity requirements and sector-specific procurement regulations under Law No. 2/2017. Transitional provisions and the non-retroactivity principle preserved the enforceability of framework agreements executed prior to the Job Creation Law's enactment, while administrative amendments extending contract terms remained lawful under existing civil code provisions. The study demonstrates that direct appointment mechanisms achieve legal justification through constitutional mandates and legislative hierarchy, while providing utilitarian benefits through enhanced procurement efficiency and deployment of specialized technical expertise. The findings contribute to scholarly discourse on state-owned enterprise governance by elucidating how omnibus legislative reforms interact with contract doctrine and corporate governance norms, emphasizing the critical importance of robust conflict-of-interest safeguards in preventing procedural formalism from overshadowing substantive public interest outcomes.
Tinjauan Yuridis terhadap Penyelesaian Sengketa Merek Internasional antara Industri Berbeda Tasya Darosyifa; Ligina Tesalonika; Ariel Lois; Angel Evelyn; Aditama Candra Kusuma; Irwan Triadi; Iwan Erar Joesoef
Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): Juni : Referendum : Jurnal Hukum Perdata dan Pidana
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/referendum.v2i2.727

Abstract

International trademark infringement poses a complex challenge for brand owners due to jurisdictional variations and differing legal systems across countries. This study examines available legal remedies, ranging from non-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms such as Alternative Dispute Resolution (ADR) - encompassing negotiation, mediation, and arbitration - to formal litigation in national courts. ADR offers advantages in time efficiency, cost-effectiveness, and confidentiality, while litigation provides legal certainty through binding court decisions such as injunctions and damages awards. Preventive strategies including international trademark registration through the Madrid System and cooperation with customs authorities serve as crucial proactive protection measures. Furthermore, this research analyzes judicial considerations in cross-industry trademark disputes, including assessment of trademark similarity (visual, phonetic, conceptual), reputation of well-known marks, bad faith of infringers, and potential consumer confusion. Case studies such as Louis Vuitton vs. Louis Vuitton Dak and Zara Food vs. Zara Fashion demonstrate judicial application of the likelihood of confusion principle and anti-dilution doctrine even across different industries. The research employs normative legal methodology with statutory and secondary document analysis approaches. Findings confirm that legal strategy selection must consider infringement scale, jurisdiction, and business objectives, while international trademark protection requires integration of proactive registration, legal enforcement, and comprehensive understanding of global market dynamics.
PEMBERIAN KONSESI KEPADA INVESTOR DI ATAS TANAH ADAT DAN EKSISTENSI HUKUM ADAT. Joesoef, Iwan Erar
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 10 No 3 (2021)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.10.3.2021.361-379

Abstract

Pemberian konsesi oleh pemerintah kepada investor telah menimbulkan banyak konflik pertanahan antara investor-investor pemegang izin, lisensi ataupun konsesi dan masyarakat hukum adat. Data konflik yang telah dicatat oleh Komisi Nasional Hak Asasi Manusia, Aliansi Masyarakat Adat Nusantara maupun Sawit Watch telah mencapai 500-800 kasus konflik tanah antara investor-investor tersebut dan masyarakat hukum adat. Tehadap konflik-konflik tersebut Mahkamah Konstitusi Indonesia kemudian telah mengeluarkan putusan yaitu dalam Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No. 35/PUU-X/2012 yang memutuskan bahwa eksistensi hutan adat tidak lagi masuk sebagai bagian dari hutan negara. Artinya Pemerintah harus mengakui eksistensi tanah adat bukan merupakan tanah negara. Menjadi pertanyaan adalah bagaimana kebijakan pemerintah dalam memberikan izin konsesi kepada para investor yang akan mengelola sumber-sumber daya alam dan mineral di atas tanah adat dengan tetap menghargai hukum adat setempat. Penelitian penulisan konseptual ini adalah normatif yuridis dengan pendekatan teori yang dilakukan oleh Lon L. Fuller, yang menyatakan bahwa hukum tertulis yang tidak didasarkan pada hukum adat yang telah mengalami saringan, tidak akan mempunyai basis sosial yang kuat dan menjadi hukum yang tidak efektif serta mengakibatkan merosotnya wibawa hukum. Hasil kajian ini diharapkan pemerintah yang diberikan Hak Menguasai Negara dapat melakukan kewenangannya sesuai konstitusi khususnya dalam membuat kebijakan pemberian konsesi pemanfaatan sumber daya alam di atas tanah adat kepada investor, tanpa menimbulkan konflik hukum dengan Masyarakat Hukum Adat.
The Principle of Balance in Employment Agreements at Private Educational Institutions : Study of Employment Agreements at Ruhama Islamic College Muhammad Imaduddin Zikky; Iwan Erar Joesoef; Suherman Suherman
International Journal of Sociology and Law Vol. 1 No. 3 (2024): August : International Journal of Sociology and Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsl.v1i3.125

Abstract

Based on The 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia (UUD 1945), especially in the Preamble to the Fourth Paragraph , the State of Indonesia has objective national For advance well-being general and enlightening life nation . This matter become base law for development national focus on improvement​ quality source Power human resources (HR) as the main capital .Education and skills is two element important in creating quality human resources . Article 26 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution confirms that every citizens have the right on education . Article 31 paragraph (3) also states that government responsible answer on maintenance education . This matter show internal state commitment provide access broad and equitable education​ for all over people of Indonesia.
COVID-19 as Force Majeure in Insurance Agreement Padmo, Aditya; Joesoef, Iwan Erar
Jurnal Mulawarman Law Review Vol 5 No 2: Mulawarman Law Review - December 2020
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Mulawarman University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30872/mulrev.v5i2.329

Abstract

Force majeure is an unexpected or unknown event which occur out of control that obstructs a party to fullfill the obligations in the agreement. This clause exempts the parties from the obligation to compensate either overall or partially for conducting default on contract. This research is normative legal research conducted by examining secondary, primary, and tertiary legal materials. As for research, conducted using conceptual approach and statute approach. The results show that COVID-19 is a relative force majeure. This condition affects the debtor’s economic ability to pay premiums to insurance companies every month. But according to article 1244 ICC the debtor must prove that the condition cannot be blamed on them. After it is proven article 1245 ICC can be applied which exempts the debtor from the obligation of compensation. In the face of COVID-19 as a force majeure insurance companies can implement an agreement restructuring policy in accordance with Financial Services Authority Regulations Number 14 of 2020. By implementing this policy insurance company can avoid the cancellation of the agreement due to force majeure.
Co-Authors Abdul Kholiq Abrielmovich, Biyandra Timothee Aditama Candra Kusuma Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Amanda Aurelia Andre Rizaldy Angel Evelyn Ariel Lois Arifin, Azzahra Arjuna, Muhammad Gaung Syah Army Setyo Wibowo Arumdhani, Nathaniela Putri Aslihatin Zuliana Atik Winanti Azura, Dinda Maurizka Brian Mochamad F. Denaya Annisa Diani Sadia Wati Dinda Maurizka Azura Dinda Maurizka Azura Ekko Harjanto Eriz Syawaldi Sitompul Fachri Hafizd Selian Faisal Fachri Faisal Fachri FANDY GULTOM Fauzan Alsadilla Hermawan Furqon, Abdil Azizul Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Haryanto, Imam Heru Sugiyono Ilham Mahendra, Renaldy Indri Syahfitri Irwan Triadi Iswanti Rachmanisa Jingga Ardeanti Putri Joseph, Michael Geovani Kusumadewi, Dimitria Pawestri Ligina Tesalonika Lutfi, Khoirur Rizal Marina Ery Setyawati Marina Ery Setyawati Medisita Nurfauziah Istiqmalia Mikie Aditya Wicaksana Mohammad Rizky Siregar Mohd Muzakki Adli Muhammad Aby Rafdi Al Juhdi Muhammad Hafizh Izzulhaq Muhammad Helmi Fahrozi Muhammad Imaduddin Zikky Muhammad Rausyan Fikry Muthia Sakti Muttaqin, Sumayya Nugroho, Satrio Septian Okhtiara, Farizka Padmo, Aditya Pardomuan, Jaury Douglas Parhusip, Alizcia Dora Parulian Panjaitan, Mardongan Phuoc, Jeong Chun Putri, Khairunnisa Wiladi Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti Redhina Elfahra Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution Rifky Anugrah Adha Rivan Dwiputra Malem Riyanto, Rajwa Khaicirinu Rofi Ayyasy Satino Satria Aldyan Firmanda Sekar Ayuning Pramewari Suherman Suherman SH Suherman Suherman Suherman, Suherman Surya Husada, Vikram Tasya Darosyifa Tri Adji Prasetya Wibowo Vedita Akbar Vikram Surya Husada Wahyu Widiyaningrum Wati, Diani Sadia Yuliana Yuli Wahyuningsih Zahranisza, Ayyza Rachma Zahranisza, Ayzza Rachma