p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.325
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MANAJEMEN HUTAN TROPIKA Journal of Tropical Forest Management Kertha Semaya Masalah-Masalah Hukum Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan Jurnal Daulat Hukum Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri) Halu Oleo Law Review JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial WAJAH HUKUM Jurnal Yuridis Veteran Law Review DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Mulawarman Law Review Jurnal Papatung : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Pemerintahan dan Politik Unnes Law Journal Law Research Review Quarterly JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) Law Development Journal IBLAM Law Review Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Abdimas Le Mujtamak Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Journal of Law and Legal Reform Referendum International Journal of Law and Society International Journal of Sociology and Law International Journal of Social Science and Humanity Jurnal Hukum Statuta IPSSJ Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Legal Synchronization of Bankruptcy Asset Distribution: Prioritizing Workers Over State Taxes (An Analysis of the Constitutional Court Decision No. 67/PUU-XI/2013 Regarding the Position of Workers and State Taxes in Bankruptcy Asset Distribution) Andre Rizaldy; Muthia Sakti; Iwan Erar Joesoef
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v2i2.194

Abstract

This study examines the legal conflict between workers' wage claims and state tax obligations in bankruptcy proceedings under Indonesian law, focusing on the constitutional imperative to prioritize workers' rights. The Introduction contextualizes the tension between Article 95(4) of the Labor Law, which mandates wage prioritization, and tax legislation granting precedence to state claims, highlighting the landmark Constitutional Court Decision No. 67/PUU-XI/2013 that affirmed workers' constitutional rights to timely wages. Employing a Method of normative legal research, the analysis integrates statutory and case approaches, reviewing laws on bankruptcy (UU No. 37/2004), labor rights, and taxation, alongside judicial decisions and international frameworks like ILO Conventions No. 100 and 111. Results reveal that while the Constitutional Court’s decision established workers’ absolute priority over tax claims, regulatory disharmony persists due to conflicting provisions in the Tax Law (UU KUP) and the 2020 Job Creation Law (UU Cipta Kerja), which ambiguously subordinates tax claims only to secured creditors. Discussion underscores the necessity for legal synchronization to align labor and tax regulations, ensuring compliance with Gustav Radbruch’s principles of legal certainty and Hans Kelsen’s normative hierarchy. The study advocates legislative reforms to codify workers’ priority in bankruptcy, drawing parallels with Malaysia’s Employment Act 1955 and France’s AGS system, which institutionalize wage protection. By addressing regulatory contradictions, Indonesia can harmonize constitutional mandates with fiscal policies, balancing social justice and economic stability.
Procedure for Transfer of Trademark Rights as a Debt Settlement Measure in Corporate Bankruptcy Proceedings : Case Study of PT. Nyonya Meneer's Bankruptcy Fachri Hafizd Selian; Muthia Sakti; Iwan Erar Joesoef
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v2i2.203

Abstract

This study examines the transfer of trademark rights as a means of debt settlement in corporate bankruptcy proceedings, using the bankruptcy case of PT Nyonya Meneer as a case study. The main issue addressed is how trademarks, as intangible intellectual property with high economic value, can be used as debt settlement assets during bankruptcy. This research employs a normative legal method with statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by a review of relevant court decisions. The analysis focuses on the relationship between the provisions of Law No. 37 of 2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations and Law No. 20 of 2016 on Trademarks. Trademarks may be transferred or sold to fulfill the debtor's obligations. Theoretical foundations include the Creditors’ Bargain Theory (Thomas H. Jackson) and the principle of wealth maximization (Richard A. Posner), emphasizing collective settlement and asset value optimization. The findings reveal that trademark transfer in bankruptcy is not explicitly regulated, creating a legal gap that affects the effectiveness of debt settlement and the protection of creditors’ rights. In the PT Nyonya Meneer case, the trademark despite its potential as a debt settlement instrument was not utilized optimally. Therefore, direct transfer of trademarks to creditors as a form of debt payment can be seen as an alternative solution, provided it is conducted under the principles of justice, legal certainty, and efficiency. This study recommends further regulation on the management and transfer of intellectual property within the bankruptcy regime to address the challenges of modern business practices.
Principle of Good Faith in Holding the Third General Meeting of Shareholders for Minority Shareholders Eriz Syawaldi Sitompul; Iwan Erar Joesoef; Suherman Suherman
International Journal of Sociology and Law Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): May : International Journal of Sociology and Law
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijsl.v2i2.601

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the principle of good faith , which is a fundamental aspect of corporate governance, which ensures fair treatment for all shareholders, including minority shareholders. This study examines the application of good faith in the third General Meeting of Shareholders (GMS) in relation to the protection of minority shareholders, focusing on Decision Number 389/PDT.P/2019/PN.CKR. This study aims to analyze the court's reasons behind the issuance of the Niet Ontvankelijke Verklaard decision at the third GMS and to evaluate the legal protection mechanisms available to minority shareholders. This study uses a normative juridical approach, by analyzing legal norms and judicial precedents related to corporate governance and shareholder rights. The research findings reveal that minority shareholders often face legal uncertainty and procedural disadvantages in GMS decisions, especially when the principle of good faith is not upheld. The court's rejection of the third GMS application highlights the need for a more comprehensive legal framework to protect the interests of minority shareholders and ensure a fair corporate decision-making process. This study contributes to the corporate governance discourse by emphasizing the importance of procedural fairness and legal certainty in shareholder meetings
Interpretation of Debt-to-Equity Conversion for Goods Purchase Transactions Under POJK 14/2019 Muhammad Rausyan Fikry; Iwan Erar Joesoef; Diani Sadia Wati
International Journal of Social Science and Humanity Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Social Science and Humanity
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Sosial Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijss.v2i2.388

Abstract

Interpretation of debt-to-equity swap provisions for goods purchase transactions as stipulated in the Financial Services Authority Regulation (POJK) Number 14/POJK.04/2019 concerning Affiliated Transactions and Conflicts of Interest in Certain Transactions. The principle of openness and fairness in transactions between affiliated parties, including in the context of debt-to-equity swaps. However, this provision does not explicitly regulate the conversion of debt arising from goods purchase transactions, thus creating room for legal interpretation regarding whether business debt from operational activities can be converted into equity participation through the issuance of new shares. This study aims to analyze the implementation of debt-to-equity conversion as a financial restructuring strategy, with a focus on legal certainty and protection of public shareholders based on POJK 14/2019. The study uses a normative legal approach with the method of statutory regulations and case studies on PT SLJ Global Tbk. The results of the study indicate that PT SLJ Global Tbk has complied with the formal procedures of POJK 14/2019, including information disclosure, GMS approval, and unaffiliated creditor criteria. However, the conversion of business debt creates legal ambiguity due to the lack of clarity as to whether the debt meets the definition of “loan” in POJK 14/2019. In addition, the dilution of public shares by 34.32% without adequate protection mechanisms indicates a lack of legal certainty. The study recommends normative interpretation and strengthening of regulations to ensure fairness and legal certainty in the practice of debt conversion. Keywords: ; ; ; ;
THE PRINCIPLE OF ACCURACY IN FAMOUS TRADEMARK REGISTRATION: AN ANALYSIS OF COURT RULING NUMBER 36/PDT.SUS-MEREK/2024/PN.NIAGA.JKT.PST Arifin, Azzahra; Joesoef, Iwan Erar
JCH (Jurnal Cendekia Hukum) Vol 10, No 1: JCH (JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM)
Publisher : LPPM STIH Putri Maharaja

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33760/jch.v10i1.1078

Abstract

The trademark registration system in Indonesia, namely First to File, is often misused by unscrupulous individuals to register trademarks similar to well-known brands. This study aims to analyze and address issues related to trademark registration in Indonesia, including the First to the File system in trademark registration, primarily based on the “Jollibee vs Jollybe” trademark dispute, by integrating the use of one of the General Principles of Good Governance (AUPB), namely the principle of accuracy. Implementing AUPB can reduce the potential for conflicts and trademark disputes in the future. This study uses a statute approach by prioritizing primary and secondary data sources collected through literature research and uses qualitative descriptive analysis techniques. The results of this study indicate that the First to File system in trademark registration in Indonesia only provides legal protection after the Trademark is registered. Therefore, applying the Principle of Care in AUPB as a guideline in the trademark registration process is essential. However, suppose there is an error made by the trademark examiner when registering a trademark. In that case, it can be accounted for by creating a report addressed to the Indonesian Ombudsman to obtain mediation, consolidation, or adjudication.
Justice in the Administration and Settlement of Bankruptcy Estate by Auction in Relation to the Recovery of Creditors’ Claims Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution; Iwan Erar Joesoef; Heru Sugiyono
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i3.616

Abstract

This study aims to examine the aspect of justice in the administration and settlement of bankrupt assets by the Curator, particularly concerning the repayment of receivables to creditors in the context of auction minutes issued by the KPKNL Samarinda. The research adopts a normative juridical method, legislation approach and conceptual approach, and is connected to a case study approach focusing on the auction process in the bankruptcy case of PT Karebet Mas Indonesia (in bankruptcy). The results of this study indicate that the Curator, in administering and settling unsold bankrupt assets, may proceed with a private sale (underhand sale) with the approval of the supervising judge, based on a limit value obtained from an independent appraiser’s valuation, provided that at least two public auctions have been conducted without success. The distribution of assets to creditors must observe the principle of pari passu pro rata, which ensures equal treatment according to their respective priorities.In the event that the settlement process of the bankrupt estate has been declared completed, yet the creditors have not received full repayment of their claims, the general provisions under Article 1131 of the Indonesian Civil Code shall apply, namely that all of the debtor’s assets constitute collateral for the fulfillment of their debts. This study recommends an amendment to Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, to regulate in a detailed, specific, and comprehensive manner the requirements for the underhand sale of bankrupt assets by the Curator. Such regulation is necessary to ensure justice and legal certainty for bankrupt debtors and creditors, particularly regarding the repayment of claims for concurrent creditors.
Legal Liability Framework of a Bankrupt Guarantor (Corporate Guarantee) Toward Creditors in Credit Agreements with Debtors : Analysis of Decision No. 318/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022 from the Jakarta Commercial Court Mohammad Rizky Siregar; Muthia Sakti; Iwan Erar Joesoef
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i3.649

Abstract

This research examines the legal responsibility of corporate guarantors declared bankrupt for their obligations to creditors in loan agreements, analyzing Court Decision No. 318/Pdt.Sus-PKPU/2022/PN Commercial Court Jakarta Central. The study addresses the legal complexities arising when a corporate guarantee becomes insolvent before the principal debtor defaults, creating jurisdictional conflicts between bankruptcy law and guarantee obligations. Using normative legal research methodology with a juridical normative approach, this study analyzes the application of Article 229(2) in conjunction with Article 278(6) of Law No. 37/2004 on Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (K-PKPU) and Article 1381 of the Civil Code. The research reveals that the curator's action in obstructing and rejecting PT KawanCicil Teknologi Utama's claim registration against the bankrupt guarantor without proper judicial determination constitutes conduct not based on applicable laws and regulations. The findings demonstrate that when a guarantor is declared bankrupt and the debtor is in default, the Supervisory Judge and Curator must accept PT KawanCicil Teknologi Utama as a creditor with rights to the debtor's assets during asset liquidation proceedings. The study concludes that bankruptcy declaration of a guarantor does not automatically terminate guarantee obligations under Article 1381 of the Civil Code, as bankruptcy is not enumerated among the causes of contract termination. This research contributes to legal certainty in corporate guarantee enforcement within Indonesia's bankruptcy framework and provides recommendations for legislative harmonization between conflicting provisions in bankruptcy law.
Limitation of Environmental Organizations' Right to Sue Against Limited Production Forest Area : Case Study of Decision Number: 16/Pdt.G/LH/2023/PN.Bkn Ekko Harjanto; Iwan Erar Joesoef; Irwan Triadi
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i3.661

Abstract

Environmental law enforcement provides space for environmental organizations to file lawsuits in the interests of environmental conservation as regulated in Article 92 of Law Number 32 of 2009 concerning Environmental Protection and Management. However, in practice, the right to sue environmental organizations is not always accepted by the courts, especially when it concerns certain areas such as Limited Production Forests. This study aims to analyze the material of environmental organizations' lawsuits based on Decree Number 16/PDT.G/LH/2023/PN.BKN. This study uses a normative juridical method and a case study approach with data sources in the form of court decision documents and related laws and regulations. The results of the study show that in this case, this Decision shows that it recognizes the active role of environmental organizations in supervising and suing permit applications for forest areas. In this case, the plaintiff organization argued that the defendant's actions in carrying out exploitation activities in the Limited Production Forest area had violated the law and harmed the ecological function of the forest, thus fulfilling the elements of an unlawful act as regulated in Article 1365 of the Civil Code. This finding resulted in an understanding of the analysis related to the material of the environmental organization's right to sue as an instrument of social control and supervision of forest area utilization policies.
Legal Reform in Indonesia’s Natural Resource Exploitation: A Study of SOE Privatization and Corporate Responsibility Suherman, Suherman; Joesoef, Iwan Erar; Bakhtiar, Handar Subhandi; Kholiq, Abdul; Phuoc, Jeong Chun
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): July, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i3.20064

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to examine the exploitation of natural resources by State-Owned Enterprises (SOEs), particularly in forest management and mining, which do not contribute to the prosperity of the people. The scope of this research focuses on SOEs that control vital natural resources affecting the livelihoods of many people. This research employs a normative juridical method with a historical approach to privatization and an analysis of John Ruggie’s principles regarding Government and Private Responsibility for Human Rights (“Protect, Respect and Remedies”), as well as collecting data as library research.  The findings indicate that such exploitation is carried out by SOEs (with share-persero) as a result of the privatization in the 1980s and 1990s, leading to liberalization. The study of John Ruggie’s principles highlights the obligation of both the State and SOEs to prevent the exploitation of natural resources. The study concludes that the SOE engaged in resource management operate as “persero” entities, with shares partially owned by the private sector, leading to unfair business competition. Article 33 (2) and (3) of the Constitution mandates that natural resource management should be carried out by SOEs of which ownership is 100% by the State (“perum”) or through Cooperatives, as stipulated in Article 33 of the Constitution. The authors have proposed the liberalization results in the of SOEs (Persero), enabling private management, which raises concerns over monopolistic practices, unfair competition, and rationally impacts the potential of natural resources based on privatization and liberalization factors.
TANTANGAN DAN SOLUSI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PATEN DALAM ERA INOVASI DIGITAL DI NEGARA BERKEMBANG Irwan Triadi; Iwan Erar Joesoef; Iswanti Rachmanisa; Vedita Akbar; Fandy Gultom; Rofi Ayyasy; Brian Mochamad F.
Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal Vol. 2 No. 03 Juni (2025): Integrative Perspectives of Social and Science Journal
Publisher : PT Wahana Global Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi digital yang sangat pesat telah mengubah wajah inovasi global dan mendorong lahirnya berbagai invensi berbasis perangkat lunak, kecerdasan buatan, Internet of Things (IoT), blockchain, hingga big data. Di perkembangan teknologi digital ini, keberadaan sistem perlindungan hukum terhadap suatu invensi menjadi sangat penting untuk menjaga hak eksklusif para pencipta serta mendorong inovasi keberlanjutan. Namun, pada negara berkembang khususnya Indonesia, sistem hukum paten masih menghadapi berbagai tantangan dalam merespons karakteristik unik dari inovasi digital yang berisfat dinamis, nonkonvensional dan lintas batas. Tantangan tersebut meliputi keterbatasan regulasi, kurangnya literasi hukum paten, biaya administrasi yang tinggi dan belum optimalnya kapasitas institusional yang berpotensi menghambat perkembangan inovasi local dan menurunkan daya saing global yang mana berpotensi untuk melemahkan daya saing nasional di pasar global seta mengurangi insentif bagi para innovator untuk melindungi dan mengkomersialkan hasil karya mereka. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengidentifikasi tantangan utama yang dihadapi negara berkembang dalam melindungi invensi digital melalui sistem paten dan menawarkan solusi untuk menjadikan sistem hukum paten kuat, inkulisif dan adaptif terhadap perkembangan teknologi, dengan solusi tersebut diharapkan negara berkembang dapat lebih maksimal dan memberdayakan potensi innovator local dan berperan aktif dalam ekositem dan inovasi global.
Co-Authors Abdul Kholiq Abrielmovich, Biyandra Timothee Aditama Candra Kusuma Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Amanda Aurelia Andre Rizaldy Angel Evelyn Ariel Lois Arifin, Azzahra Arjuna, Muhammad Gaung Syah Army Setyo Wibowo Arumdhani, Nathaniela Putri Aslihatin Zuliana Atik Winanti Azura, Dinda Maurizka Brian Mochamad F. Denaya Annisa Diani Sadia Wati Dinda Maurizka Azura Dinda Maurizka Azura Ekko Harjanto Eriz Syawaldi Sitompul Fachri Hafizd Selian Faisal Fachri Faisal Fachri FANDY GULTOM Fauzan Alsadilla Hermawan Furqon, Abdil Azizul Handar Subhandi Bakhtiar Haryanto, Imam Heru Sugiyono Ilham Mahendra, Renaldy Indri Syahfitri Irwan Triadi Iswanti Rachmanisa Jingga Ardeanti Putri Joseph, Michael Geovani Kusumadewi, Dimitria Pawestri Ligina Tesalonika Lutfi, Khoirur Rizal Marina Ery Setyawati Marina Ery Setyawati Medisita Nurfauziah Istiqmalia Mikie Aditya Wicaksana Mohammad Rizky Siregar Mohd Muzakki Adli Muhammad Aby Rafdi Al Juhdi Muhammad Hafizh Izzulhaq Muhammad Helmi Fahrozi Muhammad Imaduddin Zikky Muhammad Rausyan Fikry Muthia Sakti Muttaqin, Sumayya Nugroho, Satrio Septian Padmo, Aditya Pardomuan, Jaury Douglas Parulian Panjaitan, Mardongan Phuoc, Jeong Chun Putri, Khairunnisa Wiladi Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti Redhina Elfahra Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution Rifky Anugrah Adha Rivan Dwiputra Malem Riyanto, Rajwa Khaicirinu Rofi Ayyasy Satino Satria Aldyan Firmanda Sekar Ayuning Pramewari Suherman Suherman SH Suherman Suherman Suherman, Suherman Surya Husada, Vikram Tasya Darosyifa Tri Adji Prasetya Wibowo Vedita Akbar Vikram Surya Husada Wahyu Widiyaningrum Wati, Diani Sadia Yuliana Yuli Wahyuningsih