Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.032
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MANAJEMEN HUTAN TROPIKA Journal of Tropical Forest Management Masalah-Masalah Hukum Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i Perspektif : Kajian Masalah Hukum dan Pembangunan JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM Jurnal Cahaya Keadilan JMM (Jurnal Masyarakat Mandiri) Halu Oleo Law Review JURNAL EDUCATION AND DEVELOPMENT NUSANTARA : Jurnal Ilmu Pengetahuan Sosial WAJAH HUKUM Jurnal Yuridis Veteran Law Review DIVERSI : Jurnal Hukum PALAR (Pakuan Law review) Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Mulawarman Law Review Jurnal Papatung : Jurnal Ilmu Administrasi Publik, Pemerintahan dan Politik Law Research Review Quarterly JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Zaaken: Journal of Civil and Business Law Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) Law Development Journal IBLAM Law Review Refleksi Hukum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Abdimas Le Mujtamak Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Rechtsvinding Referendum International Journal of Law and Society International Journal of Sociology and Law International Journal of Social Science and Humanity Jurnal Hukum Statuta IPSSJ KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia (JPHI) ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure
Iwan Erar Joesoef
Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 63 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 63 Documents
Search

 3   4   5   6   7 
Sosialisasi Pola Asuh Efektif dan Harmonis untuk Mencegah Kenakalan Remaja Satino Satino; Yuliana Yuli Wahyuningsih; Atik Winanti; Marina Ery Setyawati; Iwan Erar Joesoef
KREATIF: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara Vol. 5 No. 3 (2025): Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Nusantara
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/kreatif.v5i3.7999

Abstract

Juvenile delinquency is a social phenomenon that often occurs during the transition from childhood to adulthood. Adolescence is known as a phase of identity discovery that is vulnerable to the influence of various external and internal factors. One of the main factors influencing adolescents' tendency to engage in deviant behavior is the family environment. The family plays a crucial role as the first social environment that provides values, norms, and controls for children's behavioral development. This study aims to determine the extent of family influence, particularly parenting styles, communication quality, and family unity, on the emergence of juvenile delinquency. The research method used is a descriptive qualitative approach with data collection techniques through literature review and in-depth interviews with several adolescents and their parents. Data were analyzed to identify the relationship between parenting styles and family dynamics with adolescent behavior. The results show that families with disharmony, minimal communication, and overly authoritarian or permissive parenting styles have a higher tendency to produce deviant behavior in children. Adolescents from such families are more vulnerable to negative associations, social pressure, and have difficulty controlling their emotions. Conversely, families that implement democratic parenting styles, provide emotional attention, and foster open communication tend to foster more emotionally, socially, and morally stable adolescents. This research confirms that strengthening the family's role is key to preventing juvenile delinquency. This can be achieved through improving the quality of communication between family members, implementing parenting styles that balance control and freedom, and maintaining harmony within the household. In this way, the family can function optimally as the first line of defense in shaping positive adolescent character and behavior, thereby minimizing the risk of delinquency.
Liability of Parking Management for Consumer Vehicles Loss in Parking Facilities: (A Case Study of the Supreme Court of Indonesia Decision No. 2078K/Pdt/2009) Okhtiara, Farizka; Joesoef, Iwan Erar
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v7i2.8401

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal liability of parking operators for the loss of consumers’ vehicles within parking areas, with specific reference to Supreme Court Decision No. 2078K/Pdt/2009. The research examines the legal nature of parking arrangements, the validity of exculpatory clauses printed on parking tickets, and the extent of the operator’s responsibility under Indonesian civil law and consumer protection law. Using a normative juridical method supported by a statutory and case approach, this study identifies the parking agreement as a deposit contract, thereby imposing a legal obligation on operators to safeguard and return the vehicle entrusted to them. The findings reveal that any exculpatory clause that shifts liability to consumers is null and void pursuant to Article 18 of the Consumer Protection Law. The Supreme Court decision further confirms that liability for vehicle loss arises from the operator’s failure to provide adequate supervision and security. The research concludes that parking operators bear strict responsibility for securing vehicles within their premises and must implement appropriate risk-management measures, including the use of insurance. These conclusions reinforce the need for enhanced consumer protection standards and clearer operational obligations within parking services.
Itikad Baik Dalam Pendaftaran Merek: Studi Perlindungan Hukum Pemilik Merek Terkenal Di Indonesia Medisita Nurfauziah Istiqmalia; Iwan Erar Joesoef
Jurnal Penegakan Hukum Indonesia Vol. 2 No. 3 (2021): Edisi Oktober 2021
Publisher : Scholar Center

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51749/jphi.v2i3.10

Abstract

One of the disputed cases of the ALSTYLE Mark filed by Gildan Active-wear which proved its brand fame filed a legal action against the same trademark owner as the Darmanto trademark owner. The Commercial Court and Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia have given different considerations to the protection of marks in the settlement of Mark disputes. The formulation of this problem is how well-known trademarks are protected in Indonesia in the event that similar marks have been registered and how the judges of the Commercial Court consider legal protection for well-known marks. This research method uses normative juridical legal research methods with analysis techniques using qualitative data. The result of this research is the legal protection of the right holder of a well-known trademark in the event that there is a trademark that has been registered at the Directorate of IPR, then based on the legalprovisions of the Directorate of IPR trademarks can cancel a brand that has the same in essence and in its entirety to a well-known mark for similar goods. The criteria for a well-known brand can be seen from the general knowledge of the public and the reputation of the brand which is obtained due to intense promotion and investment. Second, the legal consideration of the Panel of Judges states that even though trademark registration follows a first to file system it does not mean neglecting the good faithof a well-known brand and overriding the status of a well-known trademark belonging to Gildan Activewear SRL.
Disharmoni Putusan Pengadilan Hubungan Industrial dan Mahkamah Agung dalam Perselisihan Hak Pasca Undang-Undang Cipta Kerja Angel Evelin Saragih Sitio; Iwan Erar Joesoef; Atik Winanti
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/44eqjp39

Abstract

The disharmony of judicial decisions between the Industrial Relations Court and the Supreme Court in resolving rights disputes following the enactment of the Job Creation Law reflects inconsistencies in legal application, which may lead to legal uncertainty for workers. This study aims to analyze the factors causing such disharmony and to examine its implications for the principle of legal certainty in the settlement of industrial relations disputes. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and case approaches, focusing on a comparative analysis of decisions issued by the Industrial Relations Court and the Supreme Court in rights dispute cases. The findings indicate that the disharmony of decisions is primarily caused by differences in judicial interpretation of legal norms after the Job Creation Law, inconsistencies in the application of legal principles, and the absence of standardized interpretative guidelines. These conditions weaken legal certainty and potentially disadvantage workers as the more vulnerable party in industrial relations. This study proposes a harmonization framework through strengthening legal interpretation guidelines and ensuring consistency in applying the principle of legal certainty as a means to achieve uniformity in resolving rights disputes. Therefore, this research is expected to contribute both theoretically and practically to the development of labor law in Indonesia.
Institutional Reformulation in Music Royalty Management in Indonesia: A Comparative Study with Germany and France Abdul Haris Nafis; Suherman Suherman; Iwan Erar Joesoef
Rechtsvinding Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1783

Abstract

The normative management of song and/or music copyright royalties in Indonesia has been designed to adhere to a one-gate system through the National Collective Management Institute (LMKN), but in practice it is still colored by institutional fragmentation at the sectoral Collective Management Institution (LMK) layer, high operational cost cuts, and weak transparency in the Song and/or Music Information System (SILM). This research aims to analyze juridical problems and the implications of institutional fragmentation on the transparency of royalty management, as well as to formulate an ideal institutional reformulation model based on comparative studies with the Gesellschaft für musikalische Aufführungs- und mechanische Vervielfältigungsrechte (GEMA) in Germany and the Société des auteurs, compositeurs et éditeurs de musique (SACEM) in France. The research uses normative juridical methods with legislative, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The results of the study show that the root of the problem stems from the weakness of the substance of the regulation that legitimizes the multiplicity of LMKs, thereby triggering financial inefficiency, overlapping authority, and low distribution accountability. Comparative studies show that the success of GEMA and SACEM rests on institutional centralization, strict state supervision, and transparent audits. This study recommends an integrated one-stop institutional reconstruction accompanied by a revision of Government Regulation Number 56 of 2021 to ensure legal certainty and openness for creators, musicians, and copyright holders.
Perlindungan Hukum Hak Kreditor dalam Sita Umum Kepailitan yang Bersinggungan dengan Sita Pidana Korupsi Hendra Parulian; Iwan Erar Joesoef; Heru Sugiyono
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 4 No. 2 (2026): ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/20wdpq51

Abstract

The intersection between general bankruptcy seizures and criminal seizures in corruption cases raises legal issues because it brings together private and public law regimes regarding the same object, namely the assets of the bankrupt debtor. This study aims to analyze the status of general bankruptcy seizures that conflict with criminal seizures for corruption, as well as the forms of legal protection for creditors’ rights based on Decision No. 16/Pdt.Sus-GLL/2017/PN. Niaga Jkt. The research method employed is normative legal research using a statutory approach, a case-based approach, and a conceptual approach, supported by primary, secondary, and tertiary legal sources. The research findings indicate that the panel of judges accepted the absolute jurisdiction exception and ruled that objections regarding the validity of criminal seizures fall within the jurisdiction of the criminal courts through the pre-trial mechanism. From the perspective of bankruptcy law, all assets of a debtor declared bankrupt are subject to general seizure for the benefit of all creditors, whereas criminal corruption law grants the authority to seize assets for the recovery of state losses. The conflict between these two regimes has the potential to hinder the liquidation of the bankrupt estate, delay the payment of creditors’ claims, and create legal uncertainty. Therefore, harmonization between bankruptcy law and criminal corruption law is necessary so that the protection of creditors’ rights and the interests of the state can be carried out in a balanced manner.
TANGGUNG JAWAB NEGARA (PEMERINTAH) ATAS GAGAL BAYAR PT. ASURANSI JIWASRAYA (PERSERO): STUDI PERLINDUNGAN NASABAH Redhina Elfahra; Iwan Erar Joesoef
JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 8, No 2 (2021): JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/justitia.v8i2.304-312

Abstract

PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Persero) perusahaan asuransi yang dimiliki oleh BUMN, pada tahun 2018 dan 2019 memberi pengumuman gagal bayar kepada nasabahnya. Penyebab terjadinya gagal bayar tersebut terjadi karena kesalahan dalam pengelolaan dana nasabah, mulai dari pengumpulan dana Produk JS. Saving Plan dan terjadinya penyimpangan dalam proses investasi aset yang diduga terdapat Perbuatan Melawan Hukum. Adapun rumusan masalah pada penelitian ini, diantaranya adalah tanggung jawab negara (pemerintah) atas gagal bayar PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Persero), serta bagaimana perlindungan hukum nasabah atas gagal bayar PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya (Persero). Penelitian hukum ini merupakan penelitian hukum normatif yang menggunakan data sekunder dengan pendekatan undang-undang (statute-approach) dan pendekatan kasus (case-approach) yang selanjutnya dianalisis secara kualitatif. Sebagai bentuk tanggung jawab, pemerintah memilih restrukturisasi polis untuk melakukan penyelamatan terhadap dana nasabah yang mengalami gagal bayar oleh PT. Asuransi Jiwasraya. Dibutuhkan perlindungan hukum represif dalam penanganan kasus jiwasraya karena sudah terjadi pelanggaran. Bentuk perlindungan hukum yang bisa dilakukan terhadap nasabah yang dirugikan yaitu, melalui perlindungan hukum dari aspek pidana maupun dari aspek perdata.
PRODUK ASURANSI BERBALUT INVESTASI DENGAN IMBAL HASIL PASTI PADA PERUSAHAAN ASURANSI JIWASRAYA Tri Adji Prasetya Wibowo; Iwan Erar Joesoef
JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 8, No 3 (2021): JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/justitia.v8i3.264-279

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana kedudukan hukum produk asuransi JS Saving Plan yang menawarkan imbal hasil pasti (fix return) di Perusahaan Asuransi Jiwasraya. Saat ini perusahaan asuransi jiwa sudah tidak hanya menawarkan jasa proteksi jiwa kepada masyarakat, namun telah berkembang dengan memberikan manfaat investasi dalam produknya. Hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa PT Asuransi Jiwasraya menjanjikan bunga yang tinggi kepada pemegang polis produk JS Saving berbalut investasi dan disertai dengan jaminan imbal hasil pasti. Metode penelitian yang dipakai yaitu berupa penelitian yuridis normatif di mana mendasarkan kepada bahan penelitian kepustakaan untuk mengkaji permasalahan. Kesimpulan penelitian adalah kebolehan perusahaan asuransi memberikan imbalshasil pasti patut dipertanyakan berdasarkan ketentuan peraturan yang berlaku di sektor asuransi. Resiko yang mungkin akan terjadi kemudian, PT Asuransi Jiwasraya akan mengalami gagal bayar dan mengalami kondisi keuangan perusahaan yang terpuruk. Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK) sebagai regulator perlu mengawasi produk asuransi berbalut investasi yang kemudian menyebabkan gagal bayar dan merugikan masyarakat.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM BAGI KONSUMEN ATAS INVESTASI ILEGAL PADA PERUSAHAAN YANG TIDAK MEMILIKI IZIN Mohd Muzakki Adli; Iwan Erar Joesoef
JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Vol 8, No 4 (2021): JUSTITIA : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Tapanuli Selatan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31604/justitia.v8i4.687-697

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui penyelesaian bagi perusahaan investasi yang tidak memiliki izin dan perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen yang menjadi korban investasi ilegal pada perusahaan investasi yang tidak memiliki izin. Penelitian ini menggunakan jenis penelitian yuridis-normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (konseptual approach). Pengumpulan data dari bahan sekunder dilakukan dengan metode studi kepustakaan (library research) dan dianalisa menggunakan metode kualitatif. Hasil Penelitian ini adalah penyelesaian bagi perusahaan investasi tentang tata cara mendapatkan perizinan yang sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan seperti halnya UU Administrasi Pemerintahan, UU Wajib Daftar Perusahaan dan peraturan perundang-undangan lainnya, yang mana mengatur tentang perizinan tersebut. Dengan adanya online system submission membuat perizinan lebih terintegrasi terhadap seluruh layanan perizinan berusaha. Kemudian bentuk perlindungan hukum bagi konsumen atas investasi ilegal dapat dilakukan dengan pengaduan kepada BKPN dan melaporkan ke SWI yang dibentuk oleh OJK, konsumen tersebut juga mempunyai hak untuk mengajukan gugatan secara perdata kepada perusahaan investasi tersebut dan apabila ditemukan suatu pelanggaran tindak pidana maka dapat diberlakukan sesuai dengan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku.
The Principle of Justice in the Minimum Capital Policy for Foreign Direct Investment (A Study of Fraudulent Foreign Direct Investment Companies in Bali) Khairunnisa Wiladi Putri; Iwan Erar Joesoef
Law Development Journal Vol 7, No 4 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.7.4.660-674

Abstract

Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) holds a strategic role in the Indonesian economy, particularly in fostering industrial development and creating employment opportunities. However, the minimum capital policy stipulated in Regulation No. 4 of 2021 of the Indonesian Investment Coordinating Board (BKPM) poses significant challenges for its implementation. This study aims to analyze the effectiveness of the policy, focusing on the case of fraudulent foreign direct investment companies in Bali, and to compare Indonesia’s minimum capital policy for foreign direct investment with similar policies in Vietnam. Using a normative legal approach with statutory, comparative, and case study methods, this study found that the uniform minimum capital requirement actually constrains investment potential in certain sectors, such as tourism, which should require more flexible capital provisions. Another finding indicates that weak supervision and law enforcement create loopholes for administrative manipulation, such as fictitious capital deposits and the use of nominees, ultimately undermining the integrity of the investment system and creating injustice for law-abiding business actors. Based on this analysis, this study recommends adjusting the minimum capital policy to be more responsive to each sector's characteristics, strengthening transparency in supervision, and implementing stricter law enforcement to prevent abuses that harm the national economy. The results of this study are expected to contribute to improving Indonesia’s investment policy, creating a fairer investment climate, and supporting sustainable and inclusive economic development.
Co-Authors Abdul Haris Nafis Abrielmovich, Biyandra Timothee Aditama Candra Kusuma Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Alizcia Dora Parhusip Amanda Aurelia Angel Evelin Saragih Sitio Angel Evelyn Ariel Lois Arifin, Azzahra Arjuna, Muhammad Gaung Syah Army Setyo Wibowo Arumdhani, Nathaniela Putri Aslihatin Zuliana Atik Winanti Azura, Dinda Maurizka Brian Mochamad F. Denaya Annisa Diani Sadia Wati Dinda Maurizka Azura Dinda Maurizka Azura Ekko Harjanto Eriz Syawaldi Sitompul Faisal Fachri Faisal Fachri FANDY GULTOM Fauzan Alsadilla Hermawan Furqon, Abdil Azizul Haryanto, Imam Hendra Parulian Heru Sugiyono Ilham Mahendra, Renaldy Indri Syahfitri Irwan Triadi Iswanti Rachmanisa Jingga Ardeanti Putri Joseph, Michael Geovani Khairunnisa Wiladi Putri Kusumadewi, Dimitria Pawestri Ligina Tesalonika Lutfi, Khoirur Rizal Marina Ery Setyawati Marina Ery Setyawati Medisita Nurfauziah Istiqmalia Mohammad Rizky Siregar Mohd Muzakki Adli Muhammad Aby Rafdi Al Juhdi Muhammad Hafizh Izzulhaq Muhammad Helmi Fahrozi Muhammad Imaduddin Zikky Muhammad Rausyan Fikry Muthia Sakti Nugroho, Satrio Septian Okhtiara, Farizka Padmo, Aditya Pardomuan, Jaury Douglas Parulian Panjaitan, Mardongan Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti Redhina Elfahra Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution Rifky Anugrah Adha Rivan Dwiputra Malem Riyanto, Rajwa Khaicirinu Rofi Ayyasy Satino Satria Aldyan Firmanda Sekar Ayuning Pramewari Suherman Suherman SH Suherman Suherman Suherman Suherman Surya Husada, Vikram Tasya Darosyifa Tri Adji Prasetya Wibowo Vedita Akbar Vikram Surya Husada Wahyu Widiyaningrum Wati, Diani Sadia Yuliana Yuli Wahyuningsih