Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 22 Documents
Search

Efficacy of Essential Nutrient Intake From Local Food Products Bada Fish (Rasbora Argyrotaenia) on The Nutritional Status of Stunting Toddlers Eva Yuniritha; Sri Darningsih; Fathmawati; Ayu Rafyoni; Helmizar
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 9 (2025): September
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i9.12708

Abstract

Stunting in toddlers poses a significant public health challenge worldwide, with Indonesia recording a prevalence of 27.70% in 2019. This research investigates the efficacy of essential nutrient intake from local food products, specifically Bada fish (Rasbora argyrotaenia), in improving the nutritional status of stunted toddlers. The study employs a three-phase experimental design: Phase I focuses on laboratory preparation of nutritional supplements; Phase II involves the development of standardized recipes for complementary foods; and Phase III implements a Single Blind Randomized Controlled Trial to assess intervention impacts. The target population consists of children under five living within the Ophir and Suka Menanti Health Center regions, with selection criteria rigorously defined. Ethical considerations were upheld throughout the study, adhering to relevant regulations. This investigation is poised to provide critical insights into leveraging local nutritional resources to address stunting in vulnerable populations. Data indicated significant post-intervention improvements in micronutrient adequacy (p<0.05), although overall energy and protein intake did not show significant changes (p>0.05). Nutritional assessments revealed enhanced weight-for-age and weight-for-height indices, while height-for-age scores showed no significant improvement, highlighting a potential limitation in the duration of the intervention. This study underscores the viability of incorporating fish-based supplements in dietary programs designed to address child malnutrition and suggests that sustained interventions, complemented by maternal education on nutritional practices, are crucial for promoting lasting health benefits.
Pengaruh Pemberian Sinbiotik, Probiotik, dan Prebiotik terhadap Depresi, Stres, dan Mood pada Orang Dewasa: Systematic Review dan Meta-Analisis: Effects of Synbiotic, Probiotic, and Prebiotic Supplementation on Depression, Stress, and Mood in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Habibi, Nur Ahmad; Gusnedi, Gusnedi; Nindrea, Ricvan Dana; Hasniyati, Rina; Afriza, Renita; Rusydi, Riska; Yuska, Defniwita; Darningsih, Sri; Zulkifli, Zulkifli; Ismanilda, Ismanilda; Handayani, Marni; Utami, Citra Tristi; Umar, Hermita Bus; Dwiyanti, Defriani; Yuniritha, Eva
Amerta Nutrition Vol. 9 No. 1SP (2025): AMERTA NUTRITION SUPPLEMENTARY EDITION Special 5th Amerta Nutrition Conferenc
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20473/amnt.v9i1SP.2025.420-430

Abstract

Background: Psychobiotics, including probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics, have been proposed to improve mental health through modulation of the gut–brain axis. However, findings from randomized controlled trials (RCTs) remain inconsistent, Objectives: To systematically review and synthesize evidence on the effects of probiotics, prebiotics, and synbiotics on depression, stress, and mood in adult populations. Methods: A comprehensive search was conducted in PubMed, yielding 531 articles, of which 14 RCTs met the inclusion criteria. Risk of bias was assessed using the Cochrane Risk of Bias Tool. Meta-analyses were performed using both fixed- and random-effects models in RevMan. The study protocol was registered in PROSPERO (CRD420251103338). Discussions: Ten RCTs (n = 881) assessing depression did not show consistent benefits (SMD = –0.72; 95% CI: –1.42 to –0.01; p-value = 0.05; I² = 96%). Six RCTs (n = 444) evaluating stress also showed non-significant effects (MD = –1.35; 95% CI: –3.70 to 1.01; p-value = 0.26; I² = 73%). Conversely, six RCTs (n = 376) demonstrated significant improvements in mood (MD = 0.73; 95% CI: 0.25 to 1.20; p-value = 0.003; I² = 75%). Meta-regression indicated that larger sample sizes were associated with more consistent improvements in mood (p-value = 0.04). Sensitivity analyses confirmed the stability of the findings, and no evidence of publication bias was detected. Conclusions: Probiotic, prebiotic, and synbiotic supplementation may provide beneficial effects on mood and could serve as a potential nutritional intervention to enhance psychological health. However, effects on depression and stress inconsistent.