Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Penguatan Mekanisme Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris dalam Menjalankan Jabatan Berdasarkan Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris Kadek Ari Armando Sutama; Johannes Ibrahim Kosasih; I Made Pria Dharsana
Jurnal Impresi Indonesia Vol. 5 No. 5 (2026): Jurnal Impresi Indonesia
Publisher : Riviera Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58344/jii.v5i5.7754

Abstract

Mekanisme pemanggilan Notaris dalam proses peradilan sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris (UUJN) dan Kode Etik Notaris mensyaratkan adanya persetujuan dari Majelis Kehormatan Notaris (MKN). Tujuan penelitian ini adalah menganalisis mekanisme pemanggilan Notaris yang diindikasikan melanggar norma hukum serta merumuskan model penguatan perlindungan hukum bagi Notaris. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Bahan hukum primer meliputi UUJN dan peraturan pelaksana, sedangkan bahan hukum sekunder meliputi literatur, jurnal hukum, dan pendapat ahli. Teknik pengumpulan dilakukan melalui studi kepustakaan, kemudian dianalisis dengan metode penafsiran gramatikal, sistematis, dan teleologis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa dalam praktiknya mekanisme persetujuan MKN belum berjalan optimal, ditandai dengan keterlambatan pemberian persetujuan, ketidakjelasan tindak lanjut terhadap persetujuan fiktif positif, serta terjadinya pemanggilan berulang dalam perkara yang sama. Kondisi ini menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum bagi Notaris maupun aparat penegak hukum. Model penguatan perlindungan hukum terhadap Notaris harus dilakukan secara komprehensif melalui tiga pendekatan: regulatif (rekonstruksi norma Pasal 66 UUJN), kelembagaan (penguatan kapasitas MKN), dan profesionalitas (pembinaan berkelanjutan oleh Ikatan Notaris Indonesia). Implikasi penelitian ini diharapkan dapat memberikan rekomendasi kebijakan bagi pembuat undang-undang dalam menyempurnakan UUJN serta menjadi acuan bagi praktisi hukum dalam memahami mekanisme perlindungan hukum Notaris
Legal Protection of Temples as Sacred Areas and Tourist Destinations in Bali Gede Parta Wijaya; Johannes Ibrahim Kosasih
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 3 No. 2 (2026): June: International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v3i2.950

Abstract

This study examines the legal protection of temples in Bali as both sacred areas and tourist destinations. Temples hold profound ontological, epistemological, and axiological significance as spiritual centers, cultural heritage, and symbols of Balinese identity. However, the rapid growth of tourism has created tensions between sacred values and economic interests, leading to commodification and violations of customary norms. The research employs normative legal methods to analyze existing frameworks, including Law No. 10 of 2009 on Tourism, Law No. 32 of 2009 on Environmental Protection and Management, Bali Provincial Regulation No. 5 of 2020 on Cultural Tourism, and the Decree of the Central Council of Hindu Dharma Indonesia (PHDI). Findings reveal that while these instruments provide a foundation, they remain insufficient in addressing the dualism of authority between state law and customary law. Theories of legal pluralism and living law highlight the coexistence of state regulations and traditional village norms, emphasizing the need for harmonization. The study concludes that temple protection must integrate formal legal frameworks with local wisdom, ensuring sustainable tourism that respects sanctity, cultural identity, and community participation. This approach strengthens Bali’s position as both a global tourist destination and a center of spiritual civilization.
The Legality of the Surrogate Mother Agreement Reviewed from Indonesian Civil Law Yohanes I Wayan Suryadi; Ni Luh Made Mahendra Wati; I Wayan Wesna Astara; I Gusti Bagus Suryawan; Johannes Ibrahim Kosasih
Lex Publica Vol. 12 No. 1 (2025)
Publisher : APPTHI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58829/lp.12.1.2025.279

Abstract

This research explores the legality of surrogate mother (uterus rental) agreements under Indonesian civil law, particularly given the absence of clear regulations governing such arrangements. The study aims to examine both the legal status of surrogate mother agreements and the legal status of children born through surrogacy, based on the provisions of the Indonesian Civil Code. This is a normative legal study employing a statutory approach, with secondary data collected through literature review and analyzed using descriptive-analytical methods. The findings indicate surrogate mother agreements are not legally valid under Indonesian civil law, as they fail to meet the essential requirements for a valid contract. The legal status of children born from such agreements depends on specific conditions. If the intended (biological) parents wish to establish a legal relationship with the child, they must go through an adoption process. Furthermore, the marital status of the surrogate mother determines the child’s legal status: (a) if the surrogate mother is legally married, the child is presumed to be the legitimate child of the surrogate and her spouse; (b) if the surrogate mother is unmarried or widowed, the child is considered to be born out of wedlock.
Penegakan Hukum atas Kejahatan Siber Bermodus Pesan Whatsapp dalam Sektor Perbankan I Gede Krisna Dana Yasa; Johannes Ibrahim Kosasih; I Made Aditya Mantara Putra
Verdict: Journal of Law Science Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): Verdict: Journal of Law Science
Publisher : CV WAHANA PUBLIKASI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59011/vjlaws.5.2.2026.374-385

Abstract

The rapid advancement of digital information and communication technology has significantly transformed banking services by enabling customers to conduct financial transactions through electronic platforms with greater efficiency, accessibility, and convenience. Despite these benefits, technological developments have also created opportunities for cybercrime, particularly through the misuse of WhatsApp as a medium for fraudulent activities targeting banking customers. This phenomenon raises important legal issues concerning the regulatory framework governing digital communication via WhatsApp and the effectiveness of law enforcement mechanisms in addressing cybercrime that results in financial losses for banking customers. Accordingly, this study examines two principal issues: (1) the legal regulation governing the use of WhatsApp digital messaging in relation to cybercrime within the banking sector; and (2) the implementation of law enforcement against perpetrators of WhatsApp-based cybercrime that causes customer losses. This research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches to analyze relevant legal principles and regulations. The findings demonstrate that the legal framework governing cybercrime is primarily established under the Law on Electronic Information and Transactions, the Personal Data Protection Law, the Indonesian Criminal Code, and various regulations concerning the banking sector. Law enforcement is implemented through the imposition of criminal penalties and monetary fines aimed at providing legal certainty and deterrence. Nevertheless, the effectiveness of law enforcement remains constrained by several challenges, including limited public awareness of cyber threats, technological limitations in digital investigations, and difficulties in identifying and prosecuting cybercrime perpetrators operating through electronic communication platforms.
Digital Transformation of Land Transaction Income Tax Reporting through the Coretax System Ni Made Dwi Wulandari; Johannes Ibrahim Kosasih; I Made Aditya Mantara Putra
Jurnal Smart Hukum (JSH) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2027): October-January
Publisher : Inovasi Pratama Internasional. Ltd

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55299/jsh.v5i2.2030

Abstract

The digital transformation of tax administration through the Coretax System has altered the mechanisms for fulfilling and verifying Income Tax obligations arising from the transfer of land and/or building rights. Although this transformation has strengthened service integration, it has also created functional tension because digital tax validation is a prerequisite for signing a deed, whereas the authentication of deeds by public officials requires certainty regarding the sequence, timing, and presence of the parties. This study analyzes the regulatory framework and legal implications of migrating Income Tax reporting to the Coretax System and reconstructs its implementing norms to ensure legal certainty in the event of system failure. This normative legal study employs statutory and conceptual approaches, supported by a limited sociological approach to contextualize the analysis, and applies qualitative-prescriptive analysis. The findings indicate that procedural misalignment, the absence of a uniform emergency mechanism, and the unclear allocation of responsibility for system disruptions may delay transactions and increase legal risks for taxpayers and Land Deed Officials (PPATs). The study proposes a three-stage model comprising pre-signing compliance, the signing session, and post-signing reconciliation, supported by a digital force majeure clause, an audit trail, and an official escrow account as emergency instruments. By placing tax compliance before the authentication session, the model ensures that digital efficiency does not undermine the authenticity of deeds or the legal protection of the parties
Pick-Up Service Transaction Manipulation Crimes in the Banking Legal Domain: A Model for Customer Legal Protection I Made Aditya Mantara Putra; Johannes Ibrahim Kosasih; I Putu Suwantara
Journal of Law and Social Politics Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): Journal of Law and Social Politics
Publisher : Politeknik Siber Cerdika Internasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59261/jlsp.v4i4.270

Abstract

Background: Pick-up service cash deposits increase convenience but expose customers to risks of manipulation during cash handover, transaction recording, and account crediting. The issue does not arise from a complete regulatory void; rather, existing banking, consumer-protection, anti-fraud, contractual, and governance rules do not specifically integrate the risk allocation and evidentiary safeguards required for this service. Objective: This study analyzes when irregularities in pick-up service cash transactions constitute banking crimes or general crimes and formulates a customer-protection model. Methods: Normative legal research was conducted through statutory and conceptual analysis of banking, consumer-protection, anti-fraud, and related legal materials. One interview concerning supervisory practices was used solely as supporting contextual material and analyzed descriptively to identify operational vulnerability points; it did not alter the normative research design. Results: Manipulation of bank records, bookkeeping, documents, or transaction data by legally specified banking actors may fall within applicable banking-crime provisions, whereas the appropriation of entrusted funds or the use of deceit without such manipulation is assessed under applicable general criminal law. Internal fraud is treated as a governance and risk classification rather than as an independent offense. The study identifies eight operational vulnerability points, from scheduling to complaint handling, and proposes four protection layers: contractual, operational, institutional, and recovery protection. Conclusion: The Layered Customer Protection Model is proposed as a normative framework to strengthen legal certainty, evidentiary protection, internal controls, complaint handling, and pathways for customer recovery, subject to implementation and further empirical evaluation.
Co-Authors AA Ngr Mayun Narindra Anak Agung Istri Agung Anak Agung Ngurah Bagus Krisna Pratama Anak Agung Sagung Laksmani Dewi Arini, Desak Gde Dwi Ayu Dwi Ningrum Carlos M. Raymundo Demosthenes B. Vibandor Dewi, A.A Sagung Laksmi Dewi, Ni Luh Gde Cindy Listya Dwi Purnawan Dodik Saputra Feranika Anggasari Jayanti Gede Darwis Triadi Gede Parta Wijaya Gianyar, I Made I Gede Krisna Dana Yasa I Gusti Bagus Suryawan I Kadek Bayu Parwatha I Ketut Kasta Arya Wijaya I Ketut Widia I Made Aditya Mantara Putra I Made Arjaya I Made Arnawa I Made Arnawa I Made Aswin Ksamawantara I Made Mardika I MADE MINGGU WIDYANTARA, I MADE MINGGU I Made Pria Dharsana, I Made Pria I Made Suwitra I Nyoman Alit Puspadma I Nyoman Alit Puspadma I Nyoman Mahendra Guna I Nyoman Putu Budiartha I Nyoman Sukandia I Nyoman Sumardika I Putu Suwantara I Putu Suwantara I Putu Wiradharma Putra Yudha I Wayan Gde Wiryawan I Wayan Kartika Jaya Utama I Wayan Rideng I Wayan Wesna Astara Ida Bagus Dwi Jusarata Indah Permatasari Kadek Apriliani Kadek Apriliani Kadek Ari Armando Sutama Kadek Dwinta Pradnyasari Komang Krisna Yustika Putra Komang Sutriani Leovigildo C. Sentelices Mahaputra, I. B. Gd. Agustya Manaon Damianus Sirait Marcelo Roland C. Villafuerte Miel S. Bongon Ni Kadek Bella Kurnia Agustini Ni Luh Made Mahendra Wati Ni Luh Made Mahendrawati Ni Luh Putu Sri Laksemi Dharmapadmi Ni Made Dwi Wulandari Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Made Puspasutari Ujianti Ni Nyoman Putri Purnama Santhi Novyanti, Ni Wayan Regina Putri, Made Dhea Mulya Putu Ayu Sriasih Wesna R.A. Nanik Priatini R.A. Nanik Priatini Ryan Soma Ryan Soma Ryskiaden Markus SARI, Ni Made Arnita Selamet, I Ketut Styawati, Ni Komang Arini Sujana, I Nyoman Sumardika, I Nyoman Tjokorda Gede Agung Sayogaditya Widya Pramana Putra Wijaya, I Kadek Merta Yohanes I Wayan Suryadi