Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.262
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE JURE Pandecta Jurnal Dinamika Hukum Arena Hukum Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL ON LANGUAGE, RESEARCH AND EDUCATION STUDIES Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum dan Ekonomi Islam Media Iuris JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science International Journal of Business, Law, and Education POLITICA: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Ascarya: Journal of Islamic Science, Culture and Social Studies UNES Journal of Swara Justisia International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Jurnal Multidisiplin Madani (MUDIMA) International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences Hakam : Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam dan Hukum Ekonomi Islam International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Indonesia Law Reform Journal (ILREJ) Human Rights in The Global South (HRGS) Asian Journal of Law and Humanity Warkat Journal of International Islamic Law, Human Right and Public Policy RechtJiva
Rachmi Sulistyarini
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 59 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 59 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Legal Protection of Female Workers Through Marriage Agreements In Ponorogo Regency Dody Syahrul Irawan; Abdul Rachmad Budiono; Rachmi Sulistyarini
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i1.354

Abstract

Ponorogo Regency is one of the regions sending a significant number of female migrant workers (TKW), reaching 30,793 in the 2022–2024 period. The high number of Indonesian migrant workers (PMI) is correlated with the increase in divorce cases at the Ponorogo Religious Court, particularly divorce cases filed by wives. This situation raises legal issues, particularly regarding the division of joint assets, which often disadvantage migrant workers as the economically dominant party during the marriage. This study aims to analyze the urgency of a prenuptial agreement as an instrument of legal protection for migrant workers from a notarial law perspective. The research method used is empirical juridical with a statutory approach and field interviews. Normatively, the provisions of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, which were expanded through Constitutional Court Decision Number 69/PUU-XIII/2015, have provided legal space for couples to enter into a prenuptial agreement before and during the marriage. However, research results indicate that the implementation of prenuptial agreements in Ponorogo remains low due to limited legal literacy, inadequate outreach, and cultural barriers that view such agreements as a sign of mistrust. Therefore, prenuptial agreements are urgently needed as a preventative measure to ensure legal certainty, justice, and the protection of migrant workers' assets, as well as to minimize joint property disputes in divorce. (Law No. 1 of 1974).
Certainty of Determining Heirs of Different Religions And Implications In Preparing An Inheritance Certificate Sevira Eka Nur Salsabila; Abdul Rachmad Budiono; Rachmi Sulistyarini
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 22 No. 1 (2026): June
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i1.360

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal certainty in determining heirs of different religions and its implications in the issuance of a Certificate of Inheritance (SKW) in the Indonesian legal system. The problem of interfaith inheritance creates a dilemma between the normative provisions of Islamic inheritance law that prohibit inheritance between parties of different religions and the demands of justice in a pluralistic society. Normatively, the Compilation of Islamic Law emphasizes that religious differences are a barrier to inheritance, so that non-Muslim heirs do not have the right to inherit from Muslim heirs. However, in judicial practice, the Supreme Court through its jurisprudence provides a solution through the mechanism of mandatory wills to bridge the tension between legal certainty and substantive justice. This study uses a normative juridical research method with a statutory regulatory approach and a case approach, particularly through an analysis of court decisions related to interfaith inheritance. The results of the study indicate that the certainty of determining heirs of different religions is not only determined by written legal norms, but also by the development of jurisprudence that provides legal protection for non-Muslim heirs through mandatory wills. The implications of issuing a SKW place notaries in a limited position, namely, merely formalizing legal facts based on court rulings and not having the authority to determine the status of heirs. Therefore, notaries are required to exercise prudence and ensure that every deed they create complies with applicable law to ensure its legal validity
Settings On The Search Index Deletion Mechanism In Order To Ensure Legal Certainty Anas Rafi Prakasya; Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto; Rachmi Sulistyarini
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 22 No. 2 (2026): September in progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i2.376

Abstract

The digital transformation in Indonesia has triggered fundamental changes in social and economic structures, but in parallel, it has given rise to the risk of permanent negative digital footprints that are destructive to human dignity, as confirmed in the case of the online loan data leak (the case of Indra and Aishah). The main legal problem lies in the existence of incomplete norms and regulatory disharmony between the judicial approach in the ITE Law (PP PSTE 71/2019), which requires a court ruling, and the administrative-autonomous paradigm in the PDP Law 27/2022. This study uses a normative legal method through a statute approach, a conceptual approach, and a comparative approach with prescriptive-analytical analysis techniques. The results show that the current judicial mechanism triggers "Absolute Segregation of Justice" due to cost barriers reaching 16 months of the minimum wage (UMP) and systemic delays (WJP score of 0.52). This study formulates a reconstruction of the mechanism through the transfer of authority from the judiciary to an independent PDP Supervisory Agency. This reconstruction is based on the ethical justification of data subject sovereignty and the application of the Balancing Test procedure through a transparent variable combination matrix. The study's conclusion confirms that the transformation to an administrative pathway is a legal imperative to address the compliance trap for ESOs and ensure legal certainty and the effective and efficient rehabilitation of data subjects' reputations in the era of surveillance capitalism.
Child Protection In Marriage Dispensation: Harmonization of Regulations From The Perspective of The Child Protection Law Aura Shava Dhinda Salsabila; Rachmi Sulistyarini; Djumikasih
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 22 No. 3 (2026): December in progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i3.384

Abstract

Child marriage remains a legal and social issue in Indonesia despite the existence of regulations regarding child protection in the national legal system. Law Number 35 of 2014 concerning Child Protection expressly requires parents to prevent child marriage as a form of protection for children's rights to growth and development. However, on the other hand, Law Number 16 of 2019 concerning Marriage still provides space through the marriage dispensation mechanism that can legalize child marriage through a court decision. This condition creates disharmony in regulations and impacts legal uncertainty in child protection. This study aims to analyze the harmonization of marriage dispensation regulations from the perspective of the Child Protection Law and examine legal certainty regarding child protection in the practice of marriage dispensation in Indonesia. This study uses a normative legal research method with a conceptual approach and a case approach. The legal materials used include laws and regulations, court decisions, scientific journals, and legal literature analyzed using grammatical and systematic interpretation methods. The research results indicate that there is a dualism in the regulations between the Child Protection Law and the Marriage Law, resulting in weak legal protection for children. Furthermore, the ambiguity of the phrase "very urgent reasons" in the marriage dispensation creates multiple interpretations and high levels of judicial discretion in granting marriage dispensation requests. Therefore, regulatory harmonization, strict limitations on marriage dispensations, and strengthening of the child protection paradigm in judicial practice are needed to achieve legal certainty oriented toward the best interests of children.
The Civil Rights of an Individual in a Certificate of Inheritance Proven  to Have Been Based on Forged Documents Candrika Arivia Apriliani; Rachmi Sulistyarini; M. Sudirman
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 22 No. 3 (2026): December in progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i3.387

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the civil rights of lawful heirs affected by a Certificate of Inheritance Rights proven to have been issued on the basis of forged documents and to examine the forms of civil liability arising from such unlawful conduct. This research employs a normative legal research method using both statutory and case approaches through the examination of legislation, legal doctrines, and the Supreme Court Decision Number 1470 K/Pid/2023. The findings demonstrate that document forgery in the preparation of a Certificate of Inheritance Rights gives rise to legal consequences in the form of the loss of inheritance rights, loss of recognition as a legal subject within inheritance relations, and deprivation of the right to control and enjoy the deceased’s estate. Such conduct constitutes an unlawful act that contravenes the principles of legal protection and legal certainty. Civil liability toward the aggrieved lawful heirs is based on Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code through the provision of compensation, the annulment of the legally defective Certificate of Inheritance, and the restoration of the original legal condition through the reinstatement of the lawful heirs’ legal status. The novelty of this research lies in its focus on the restoration of heirs’ civil rights resulting from the forgery of a Certificate of Inheritance from the perspective of legal protection and victims’ rights recovery.
The Ratio Legis of Article 35(a) of Law Number 23 of 2006 on Population Administration Muhammad Rizki Nurdin Sidauruk; Rachmi Sulistyarini; Nur Chanifah
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 22 No. 4 (2027): March in progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i4.400

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the ratio legis underlying the enactment of Article 35 letter (a) of Law Number 23 of 2006 concerning Population Administration, which regulates the registration of marriages based on a court determination, particularly in the context of interfaith marriages. The study is motivated by a normative conflict between Article 2 paragraph (1) of Law Number 1 of 1974 concerning Marriage, which stipulates the validity of marriage based on religious law, and Article 35 letter (a) of Law Number 23 of 2006, which provides an opportunity for marriage registration through a court ruling. This research employs a normative legal research method with statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. Primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials are analyzed using descriptive-analytical and argumentative techniques. The research gap lies in the absence of studies that specifically position Article 35 letter (a) as the central object of ratio legis analysis and connect it to the disharmony between the legal regime of marriage and population administration law. Previous studies have generally focused on the legality of interfaith marriages, human rights protection, or judicial decision analysis, without systematically examining the legislative purpose of the norm and its implications for the consistency of the national legal system. The novelty of this study lies in the reconstruction of the ratio legis of Article 35 letter (a) as an instrument of population administration, which is then analyzed within the framework of vertical and horizontal legal harmonization between the population administration regime and national marriage law. Accordingly, this study not only explains the underlying legislative intent but also proposes a regulatory harmonization construct based on the theory of legal certainty as a model for resolving normative disharmony that has not been previously offered in the literature. The findings indicate that the existence of Article 35 letter (a) generates normative disharmony, resulting in legal uncertainty and divergent interpretations in judicial practice. From a legal perspective, interfaith marriages do not fulfill the validity requirements under national marriage law. Therefore, regulatory harmonization is required to ensure legal certainty, consistency in law enforcement, and synchronization between the population administration system and marriage law.
Legal Certainty on Dishonorable Notary Dismissal for Serious Violations Gama Dwipa Dinar Nur Rensa; Rachmi Sulistyarini; Amelia Sri Kusuma Dewi
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 22 No. 4 (2027): March in progress
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v22i4.410

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal regulation governing the dishonorable dismissal of notaries due to serious violations of their statutory duties and prohibitions and to formulate a normative reformulation of the relevant legal provisions. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and case approaches through the analysis of legislation, legal doctrines, and relevant judicial decisions. Unlike the study by Iman Zenza Bronica, which focuses on the benchmarks for administrative sanctions, the research of Nur Afni Hidayanti, which examines the legal consequences of violations on the validity of notarial deeds, and the study by Nilna Muna Yuliandari, which analyzes legal remedies against the dismissal of notaries, this research specifically addresses the ambiguity of Article 12(d) of Law Number 2 of 2014, particularly the phrase "serious violation" as the legal basis for dishonorable dismissal. The findings reveal that the provision fails to satisfy the principles of legal clarity, predictability, coherence, and consistency, thereby allowing subjective interpretation in the imposition of sanctions and resulting in disparities in the treatment of similar violations. The novelty of this study lies in the formulation of objective criteria for determining serious violations, including repeated violations, criminal offenses related to the exercise of notarial duties carrying a statutory maximum imprisonment of less than five years, and violations committed during a period of temporary suspension, as the basis for reformulating Article 12(d) of the Law on Notarial Office. This reformulation is expected to provide more measurable guidelines for the Notary Supervisory Council in imposing sanctions consistently and to serve as a reference for legislators in improving the legal framework governing the dismissal of notaries.
Reconstructing Judges’ Legal Reasoning in Ultra Petita Rulings: Normative Parameters of Judicial Activism for Achieving Substantive Justice Muhammad Zuhri; Rachmi Sulistyarini; Mardian Wibowo
Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam Vol. 13 No. 1 (2026): Politica: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara dan Politik Islam
Publisher : Prodi Tata Negara (Siyasah) IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/politica.v13i1.16071

Abstract

The prohibition against ultra petita under Article 178(3) of the HIR aims to ensure legal certainty. However, judicial practice sometimes permits ultra petita rulings in the interests of substantive justice and effective enforcement. The absence of measurable normative parameters has resulted in disparities in judicial decisions and legal uncertainty. This study aims to reconstruct judges’ legal reasoning (ratio decidendi) in issuing ultra petita rulings based on the principle of judicial activism. This normative legal study employs statutory, conceptual, case-based, and philosophical approaches. Legal materials were analyzed qualitatively and prescriptively by examining Supreme Court Decision No. 1090 K/Pdt/2018 alongside No. 840 PK/Pdt/2019 and comparative case law. An ultra petita ruling can only be justified when supported by an objective and measurable ratio decidendi, namely, when it has a direct causal relationship with the causa petendi, constitutes a logical consequence necessary for effective enforcement, and does not violate the principle of audi et alteram partem. The novelty of this study lies in the formulation of seven cumulative normative parameters for the application of judicial activism. These parameters provide prescriptive guidance for judges to harmonize substantive justice, legal certainty, and utility, while preventing arbitrary rulings and minimizing jurisprudential disparities in civil courts. 
Implikasi Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Terhadap Hak Mewaris Anak Luar Kawin di Indonesia Chikita Murti Wiliyandari; Rachmi Sulistyarini; R. Imam Rahmat Sjafi'i
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 9 No. 2 (2026): JUNE
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v9i2.13573

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the legal implications of the relationship between children born out of wedlock and their biological fathers, particularly in relation to inheritance rights following Constitutional Court Decision Number 46/PUU-VIII/2010. The research addresses the normative tension between civil law recognition of paternity and the concept of lineage (nasab) within Indonesia’s plural legal system. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, this study examines legal materials and judicial practices. The findings indicate that while the Constitutional Court decision expands civil recognition based on biological proof, it does not fully harmonize with inheritance regimes, especially within Islamic law, resulting in legal uncertainty, inconsistent judicial interpretation, and administrative barriers in inheritance processes. Therefore, the effectiveness of legal protection for children born out of wedlock depends on regulatory harmonization and consistent legal interpretation. The novelty of this study lies in its systematic analysis of the unresolved normative conflict between civil relationship and lineage concepts and its practical implications for inheritance law, offering a conceptual framework for legal harmonization to ensure certainty and justice.     Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis implikasi yuridis hubungan hukum anak luar kawin dengan ayah biologisnya, khususnya terkait hak waris pasca Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 46/PUU-VIII/2010. Penelitian ini berangkat dari adanya ketegangan normatif antara pengakuan hubungan keperdataan dan konsep nasab dalam sistem hukum Indonesia yang pluralistik. Metode yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa putusan tersebut memperluas pengakuan hubungan keperdataan berbasis pembuktian biologis, namun belum sepenuhnya terharmonisasi dengan sistem kewarisan, khususnya dalam hukum Islam, sehingga menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum, inkonsistensi putusan hakim, serta hambatan administratif dalam praktik kewarisan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan harmonisasi regulasi dan keseragaman penafsiran hukum. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis sistematis terhadap konflik normatif antara hubungan keperdataan dan nasab serta implikasi praktisnya dalam hukum kewarisan, yang menghasilkan kerangka konseptual untuk mewujudkan kepastian dan keadilan hukum.
Co-Authors Abdul Madjid ABDUL RACHMAD BUDIONO Abdul Rachmad Budiono Adityadarma Bagus Priasmoro Suryono Putro Afifah Kusumadara Ahmad Wildani Taufiqi Akib, Muhammad Kibar Amelia Sri Kusuma Dewi, Amelia Anas Rafi Prakasya Aris Tri Wibowo Aura Shava Dhinda Salsabila Ayu Putu Kusuma Wardhani Budi Santoso Budianto, Willy Budiono, Abdul Rachmat Bustomi, Muhammad Nizar Candrika Arivia Apriliani Chikita Murti Wiliyandari Cindy Olivia Susanto Cyrilus Bomas Bolok Werang Dhia Al Uyun Dhiana Puspitawati Dian Dombat Pejoreza Dian Dombat Pejoreza Djumikasih Djumikasih Dody Syahrul Irawan Dwi Budi Santoso Dyah Ayu Wisnuwardhani FADLI, MOH Fathanah, Rahdinal Fathul Laila Fuad, Helmy Ziaul Gama Dwipa Dinar Nur Rensa Ganindha, Ranitya Halim, Bima Ridho Hamidah, Siti Hamidi Masykur Hanif Nur Widhiyanti Hanif Nur Widhiyanti Hashifah, Adinda Salwa Hasnadewi, Nada Hayati, Asna Nurul Hidayat, Fitri I Nyoman Nurjaya I. Nyoman Nurjaya Imam Koeswahyono Ira Nur Istiqomah Istiqomah, Ira Nur Iwan Permadi Januar, Inri Kodir, Abdul - Kresna Ramadhan Wijaya Luth, Tohir M. Natsir Asnawi M. Sudirman Mardian Wibowo Miftahus Sholehudin MOH FADLI Mohammad Fadli Mohammad Hamidi Masykur Muhammad Rizki Nurdin Sidauruk Muhammad Zuhri Muhtadhy, Jailani Muktiono Muktiono Naufal Anfasa Firdaus Nugraha, Sigit Nurhadi Nur Chanifah Nur Chanifah Nurwijayanti Patricia Audrey Ruslijanto Pearl Princila Br. Manurung Prasada, Dewa Krisna Putri, Dinae Qurbani , Indah Dwi R. Imam Rahmat Sjafi'i Ramdhan, Syaffi' Rangga Raditya Ridwan Fariz Maulana Riskawati, Shanti Rosyida Tri Yunita Safa'at, Rachmat Safa’at, Rachmad Saleh, Farah Labita Putri Insyira Maharani Salsabila, Shindy Nabila Samuel Fajar Hotmangara Tua Siahaan Santoso, Budi Satria Amiputra Amimakmur Semadi, I Komang Yoga Sevira Eka Nur Salsabila Sinar Tamba Tua Pandiangan Siti Hamidah Siti Rohmah Standy Wico Sugiri, Bambang Sulistyorini, Hastuti Tahir Luth Tahir Luth Tambunan, Rico J.R. Thohir Luth Tiara Aninditha Ummu Salamah Ummu SALAMAH Ummu Salamah Utami Widiati Yenny Eta Widyanti Zamiatun, Arda Zham-Zham, Lelly Muridi