Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA PENERTIBAN PENGGUNAAN TENAGA LISTRIK PADA PERUSAHAAN LISTRIK NEGARA DI UNIT INDUK DISTRIBUSI RIAU DAN KEPRI Armi, Muhammad Husni; Afrita, Indra; Basri, Hasan
JOURNAL OF SCIENCE AND SOCIAL RESEARCH Vol 9, No 1 (2026): February 2026
Publisher : Smart Education

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54314/jssr.v9i1.5817

Abstract

Abstrack: This sociological legal research analyzes the settlement of Penertiban Pemakaian Tenaga Listrik (P2TL) disputes at PLN Riau and Riau Islands Distribution Unit, which is primarily conducted through non-litigation channels (internal mediation) and litigation as a last resort. The findings indicate that while procedures align with regulations, implementation remains ineffective in achieving justice due to low legal and technical literacy among customers, lack of procedural transparency, and a legal power imbalance between PLN and consumers. To address these obstacles, it is essential to enhance public education, strengthen PLN’s internal accountability, and provide proportional legal protection for customers to ensure a more transparent dispute resolution process oriented toward legal certainty. Keywords: Dispute Resolution, Electricity Use Inspection (P2TL), PT PLN (Persero), Sociological Jurisprudence. Abstrak: Penelitian hukum sosiologis ini menganalisis penyelesaian sengketa Penertiban Pemakaian Tenaga Listrik (P2TL) pada PLN Unit Induk Distribusi Riau dan Kepri yang dilakukan melalui jalur non-litigasi (mediasi internal) sebagai mekanisme utama dan jalur litigasi sebagai upaya terakhir. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun prosedur telah sesuai regulasi, pelaksanaannya belum efektif mencapai keadilan akibat rendahnya literasi hukum pelanggan, kurangnya transparansi prosedur, serta ketidakseimbangan posisi hukum antara PLN dan konsumen. Untuk mengatasi hambatan tersebut, diperlukan peningkatan edukasi masyarakat, penguatan akuntabilitas internal PLN, dan pemberian perlindungan hukum yang proporsional bagi pelanggan guna mewujudkan penyelesaian sengketa yang lebih transparan dan berorientasi pada kepastian hukum. Kata Kunci: Penyelesaian Sengketa, Penertiban, Tenaga Listrik. Hukum Sosiologi.
LAW ENFORCEMENT IN ONLINE FRAUD CASES IN THE JURISDICTION OF THE PEKANBARU CITY RESORT POLICE Isnaini, Muhammad; Triana, Yeni; Afrita, Indra
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), February 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v7i2.594

Abstract

In reality, online fraud cases are increasingly prevalent within the Pekanbaru City Police Department, necessitating strict law enforcement. The purpose of this study is to analyze law enforcement in online fraud cases within the Pekanbaru City Police Department and to analyze the actions of the police in resolving online fraud cases within the Pekanbaru City Police Department. The method used is sociological legal research. Based on the research results, it is known that law enforcement against online fraud within the Pekanbaru City Police Department has shown progress, but still faces several obstacles. Legally, this crime is regulated in the Criminal Code and Law Number 19 of 2016 on Electronic Information and Transactions, which provides the legal basis for law enforcement officers to prosecute online fraud perpetrators. The Pekanbaru Police have investigated investigations and inquiries using digital technology, including tracking electronic transactions and identifying the perpetrators' social media accounts. Furthermore, law enforcement also prioritizes victim protection through legal assistance and mediation. However, several significant obstacles remain, including: the difficulty of tracing the perpetrators' identities due to the use of anonymous accounts or domiciles outside the jurisdiction, limited apparatus resources in dealing with technological developments, and slow coordination across relevant agencies such as banks and digital platforms. These obstacles can result in delayed legal proceedings, while victims' losses continue to mount. The Pekanbaru Police's actions in handling online fraud cases include prevention, investigation, prosecution, and law enforcement. In prevention, the Police conduct outreach through social media and educational campaigns to raise public awareness of fraudulent methods. During the investigation and inquiry phase, authorities utilize digital forensics, social media account monitoring, electronic transaction analysis, and coordination with relevant agencies. The City Police also detain eligible perpetrators, confiscate digital and physical evidence, and complete case files for trial.
IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE PRINCIPLES IN THE SETTLEMENT OF MISCELLANEOUS CRIMES BY THE POLICE OF THE REPUBLIC OF INDONESIA Situmorang, Urbanus; Harahap, Irawan; Afrita, Indra
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), February 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

From a legal perspective, this article has the potential to reduce the effectiveness of Restorative Justice in building social reconciliation and reducing recidivism. Therefore, there is a need to review the wording of the article to better align it with the principles of Restorative Justice and legal certainty. The purpose of this research is to analyze the legal provisions regarding Restorative Justice in the settlement of minor crimes by the Indonesian National Police and to analyze the application of Restorative Justice principles in the settlement of minor crimes by the Indonesian National Police. The method used is normative legal research. Based on the research results, it is known that the legal provisions for Restorative Justice in the resolution of minor crimes by the Indonesian National Police have a fairly strong normative basis, although they have not been fully codified in the Criminal Procedure Code. The primary legal basis for the implementation of Restorative Justice by the police stems from discretionary authority as specified in the Indonesian National Police Law, which provides room for police officers to act according to their own judgment in the public interest. This regulation was then clarified and reinforced through Indonesian National Police Regulation Number 8 of 2021 concerning the Handling of Criminal Acts Based on Restorative Justice, which regulates the material and formal requirements, settlement mechanisms, and limitations of the application of Restorative Justice. Thus, legally, Restorative Justice in the resolution of minor crimes is a legitimate criminal law policy, based on controlled discretion, and intended to realize substantive justice, efficient law enforcement, and maintain social order. The application of Restorative Justice principles in resolving minor crimes by the police essentially reflects the core values of Restorative Justice, namely the principles of restoration, participation, perpetrator responsibility, a balance between legal certainty and substantive justice, and the protection of human rights. The principle of restoration is realized through efforts to redress the victim's losses and restore social relationships; the principle of participation is realized through dialogue and deliberation between the victim and the perpetrator; while the principle of perpetrator responsibility is reflected in an admission of guilt and a willingness to correct the consequences of the criminal act. However, the implementation of these principles still faces challenges, particularly related to the potential for subjectivity in the use of discretion, inconsistent application across regions, and the risk of neglecting victims' rights if the reconciliation process is not conducted voluntarily and equitably. Therefore, although conceptually and normatively, the application of Restorative Justice by the police is in line with the objectives of modern criminal law, in practice, strengthened oversight and consistency of implementation are still needed to ensure compliance with the principles of legal certainty and equality before the law.