Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.98
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Rechtsidee PROSEDING SEMINAR UNSA RATU ADIL RECHTSTAAT Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus JOURNAL EQUITABLE Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Jurnal Restorative Justice Surakarta Law and Society Journal UNTAG Law Review CERMIN: Jurnal Penelitian Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian LEGAL BRIEF Risalah Hukum International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC) Aksiologi : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum International Journal of Community Service SCHOOLAR: Social and Literature Study in Education IBLAM Law Review Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Al-Khidmah Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Journal Evidence Of Law Jurnal Penyuuhan dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat (JPPM) SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Jurnal Adijaya Multidisiplin Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal Jaksa: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Dan Politik Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora Media Hukum Indonesia (MHI) Activa Yuris: Jurnal Hukum SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah
Frans Simangunsong
Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 71 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 71 Documents
Search

 4   5   6   7   8 
Urgensi Penggunaan Ganja Bagi Disabilitas Untuk Kepentingan Medis Ditinjau Dari Ius Constitutum Saputra Marpaung, Agung Risky; Simangunsong, Frans
Aksiologi : Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Sosial Vol 3, No.2 (2023) : April
Publisher : Indonesian Journal Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47134/aksiologi.v4i1.148

Abstract

The purpose of writing this journal, to conduct research and describe the urgency of using class I Narcotics (cannabis) as a treatment therapy reviewed from the perspective of health law. This research uses normative legal research methods with a statue approach, conceptual approach, and case approach in which various related literature in this study as secondary data that will strengthen the research argumentation. The results showed that juridically the provisions of the use of medical cannabis categorised as Class I Narcotics for the purposes of medical services in Indonesia are specifically not regulated in the Health Law, but only limited to the regulation of narcotics in general as regulated in the Health Law. However, looking at the benefits and use value of medical cannabis that have been previously researched by experts abroad, it does not rule out the possibility for Indonesia in this case to also conduct further research on the benefits of medical cannabis as a treatment therapy.
State Responsibility In Providing Compensation To Victims of Gross Human Rights Violations Fakhruzy, Agung; Krisnadi Nasution; Ahmad Sholikhin; Frans Simangunsong
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i1.286

Abstract

The philosophical basis for providing compensation lies in the state's responsibility for its failure to prevent crimes. From a juridical perspective, Article 35 of Law Number 26 of 2000 on the Human Rights Court indicates that the provision of compensation is still dependent on a court decision. As such, even when gross human rights violations have occurred and victims are identified, if the accused is not proven guilty in court, they cannot be held accountable for providing compensation to the victims. This situation has the potential to create a vertical normative conflict with Article 28 of the 1945 Constitution, particularly regarding fundamental human rights that must be fulfilled by the state. This study aims to examine the principles and the role of the state in providing compensation to victims of gross human rights violations. It employs a normative legal research method with a conceptual and philosophical approach, and data collection is carried out through literature review and legal document analysis. The research findings show that the principle of state responsibility in providing compensation to victims of gross human rights violations must be grounded in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights (UDHR), the Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power, and the International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights (ICCPR).
Amicus Curiae Sebagai Alat Bukti Dalam Proses Pembuktian Sistem Peradilan Pidana Indonesia Anwar, Cecareno Gilbrani; Simangunsong, Frans
Socius: Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 3, No 3 (2025): October 2025
Publisher : Penerbit Yayasan Daarul Huda Kruengmane

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.5281/zenodo.17390193

Abstract

Amicus curiae is a third party that provides information, opinions, or legal analysis to the court to assist in decision-making. In the Indonesian criminal justice system, the existence of amicus curiae is still limited, but its potential is significant as additional evidence, especially in complex cases involving the public interest. This study aims to analyze the role of amicus curiae in providing factual and legal information, its relevance as evidence, and the challenges of its implementation in Indonesia. The normative legal research method uses a Statutory approach and a Conceptual Approach. The results of the study indicate that although not explicitly regulated in the Criminal Procedure Code, the practice of amicus curiae can strengthen the criminal justice process by providing an independent third-party perspective, especially in cases of human rights violations, corruption, and transnational crimes. The existence of Amicus Curiae is only limited to being a guideline in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System. However, in reality, Amicus Curiae does not yet have binding legal force as a process of evidence in the Indonesian criminal justice system. Therefore, in the future, Indonesia will regulate in Laws and Regulations regarding the existence of amicus curiae in the Indonesian Criminal Justice System.
PEMBUKTIAN GRATIFIKASI SEKSUAL DALAM PEMBERANTASAN TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI Marsella, Dian Dwi; Simangunsong, Frans
Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Vol. 3 No. 3 (2023): Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance
Publisher : Gapenas Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53363/bureau.v3i3.362

Abstract

Corruption crimes uses the theory of reverse proof or reversal of the burden of proof but in a balanced manner The type of evidence in this study is the type of proof of cases of gratification crimes. There are 2 problems studied in this study, namely the first, whether the proof of Gratification of sexual services in the procedural law of criminal acts in Indonesia The second, How to Expand the Meaning in Article 12b  research using statutory  approaches and concepts supported by prescriptive techniques. In eradicating the criminal act of gratification, this evidentiary system will be convicted if the defendant cannot prove the property he owns within the opportunity given by the judge in in court to be obliged to prove that the defendant did not commit a criminal act of gratification. The difficulty in the reverse application system in terms of legal substance is still weak because it is still limited to the recognition of the rights of the accused, not the obligation of the accused to carry out evidence
SEKTOR PERBANKAN di COVID-19 Bidari, Ashinta Sekar; Simangunsong, Frans; Siska, Karmina
Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Vol 9 No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gresik

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55129/jph.v9i1.1129

Abstract

ABSTRAKPandemi Covid-19 membuat pemerintah membuat kebijakan semi-lockdown, dimana adalam kebijakan ini semua aktivitas akan dilakukan dari rumah, misalnya belajar dari rumah, bekerja, beribadah dan sebagainya akan dilakukan dari rumah. Guna dari kebijakan ini adalah agar masyarakat dapat menerapkan social distancing. Namun kebijakan lockdown ini bertentangan dengan industri tertentu yang tidak dapat melakukan pekerjaan dari rumah, seperti ojek online dan pedagang kaki lima, dimana para industri tersebut tidak bisa mendapatkan pemasukan jika hanya berdiam dirumah . Hal itu akan mempengaruhi ekonomi masyarakat dan menimbulkan masalah bagi debitur yang telah melakukan peminjaman dalam perbankan. Oleh karena itu, dalam hal ini pemerintah membuat stimulasi dalam bidang perbankan bagi masyarakat debitur yang terdampak Covid-19. Sejauh ini, kinerja perbankan dapat dikategorikan masih dalam keadaan baik dan masih terjaga meskipun sedang terjadi wabah Covid-19 ini. Namun jika dalam waktu yang panjang wabah ini belum juga terselesaikan, maka keadaan kinerja  ekonomi perbankan kemungkinan akan mengalami penurunan atau memburuk. Karena keadaan kinerja perbankan untuk beberapa bulan bahkan beberapa tahun kedepan akan sangat bergantung kepada bagaimana penanganan Covid-19 dimasa sekarang. Kata kunci : Covid-19, Kebijakan Pemerintah, Kinerja Perbankan
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Aparat Kepolisian Yang Melakukan Pembunuhan Berencana Azizah Nurina Putri; Frans Simangunsong
Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/terang.v1i2.345

Abstract

Indonesia is a nation that abides by the Constitution of 1945 and Pancasila. Indonesia has encountered a multitude of illicit issues, both collective and individual, in recent years. One such offense is homicide with premeditation. This is a common occurrence in communities, families, and even police departments. Police officers are commonplace individuals who are susceptible to committing unlawful acts, notwithstanding the responsibilities and functions they perform. A considerable number of National Police personnel have been convicted of premeditated homicide. Consequently, the objective of this study is to ascertain the following: 1) the protocols governing the submission of petitions by suspects accused of premeditated homicide committed by police officers; and 2) the legal defense strategies employed by such suspects. The author addressed the issues addressed in this study from two perspectives: an empirical juridical approach and a normative juridical approach. Secondary data was acquired through literature reviews (Library Research), whereas primary data was obtained through field investigations (Field Research). In public trials, police officers occupy the same position as other civilians, according to research findings. Defense efforts may be initiated during a public trial by having the "Pledoi" read aloud. The indictment and defense cannot be presented until the judge declares the conclusion of the case examination. The written defense is submitted subsequent to the prosecutor's submission of the demands. The Pledoi comprises the following: the defendant's identity, an introductory section, a description of the objections raised against the charges filed, an indictment, the facts that were disclosed during the trial, a juridical analysis, and a concluding section.
Indonesian State Intelligence Agency’s Responsibility in Negligence Wiretapping Evidence of Terrorism Suspect Aryasepta Syaelendra; Frans Simangunsong
Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2024): Juni : Terang : Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum
Publisher : Asosiasi Peneliti dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62383/terang.v1i2.364

Abstract

Wiretapping evidence include in confidential evidence which need to be guarded and become State Intelligence needs for prove at trail court purpose, this become crutial to keep in mind this confidential evidence is State Intelligence’s responsibility to keep convidential secret. negligence nor deliberate State Intelligence personel in keeping wiretapping evidence that usually form as voice convertation record or personal text massages from suspects and/or terorism executant becomes important when it comes to confidential guarantee remembering it writtens on Undang – undang, proofing convidential evidence on court are needs to prove for the purpose of next investigation. State Intelligence can get permission doing wiretapping for the next six month untill undetermined time limit, Lack of laws in which regulates specifically regarding the responsibilities of the Intelligence Agency if negligence occurs in preserving evidence becomes important and not limited to code of ethics sanctions. Using normative juridical methods to find out the basic basis for the importance of updating the Intelligence Agency's code of ethics in accounting for the evidence carried by each personnel. Apart from that, this research also aims to determine the form of accountability of the State Intelligence Agency in its responsibilities.
THE BASIS OF THE CORRUPTION ERADICATION COMMISSION’S AUTHORITY TO CARRY OUT CONFISCATION IN CORRUPTION CRIMES Ilahi, Mubarooq; Simangunsong, Frans
IBLAM LAW REVIEW Vol. 4 No. 1 (2024): IBLAM LAW REVIEW
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat (LPPM IBLAM)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52249/ilr.v4i1.299

Abstract

The issue is about the basis of the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission to confiscate corruption crimes that have not been enforced by permanent law (inkrach) from the district court. This study aims to find out what is the basis for the authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission to confiscate in corruption crimes and how the legal position of seized goods in corruption crimes. By using normative research methods, it can be concluded that: 1. The basis of authority of the Corruption Eradication Commission is Law Number 30 of 2002 Article 47 paragraph 1 of Law Number 30 of 2002 concerning the Corruption Eradication Commission and Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the eradication of corruption as amended by Law Number 20 of 2001 concerning Amendments to Law Number 31 of 1999 concerning the Eradication of Corruption crimes. 2. The legal position of confiscated goods will certainly be used as evidence by the Corruption Eradication Commission as law enforcement. However, there are often obstacles in the management of confiscated goods. Then confiscated goods can also be auctioned even though there has been no permanent force legal decision (inkrach) from the district court.
PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM PENDUDUK NON PERMANEN YANG TIDAK MEMILIKI SKPNP DALAM ADMINISTRASI KEPENDUDUKAN Putri, Serliana Novita Rossalia Ardiana; Simangunsong, Frans
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 2 No. 6 (2023): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Desember 2023
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v2i6.1087

Abstract

Perlindungan hukum bagi penduduk non permanen yang belum memiliki Surat Keterangan Penduduk Non Permanen (SKPNP) perlu mendapat perhatian khusus dalam kerangka administrasi kependudukan. Administrasi kependudukan memiliki peran strategis dalam mendukung kebijakan, pengambilan keputusan, dan layanan publik. Penduduk non permanen, yang sering tinggal dalam jangka waktu tertentu di suatu wilayah dan menghadapi tantangan dalam mendapatkan pengakuan hukum. Dimana identitas pribadi tersebut memiliki signifikansi besar sebagai tanda pengenal sekaligus indikator status kewarganegaraan seseorang, yang menjadi kunci untuk memperoleh hak-hak yang bersangkutan.Bagian Atas Formulir  Metode yang diterapkan adalah pendekatan yuridis normatif, yang melibatkan analisis bahan kepustakaan dengan merujuk pada peraturan perundang-undangan dan analisis sumber pustaka atau data sekunder terkait hukum administrasi. Diharapkan hasil penelitian ini dapat meningkatkan pemahaman mengenai pengaturan hukum dalam konteks tersebut dan memberikan rekomendasi untuk perbaikan atau peningkatan pengetahuan hukum bagi aparatur penegak hukum dalam menangani kasus seperti ini. Dari penelitian dan analisis yang telah dilakukan, perlu diketahui mengenai perlindungan hukum bagi penduduk non permanen yang belum memiliki SKPNP dalam administrasi kependudukan. Maka, penduduk non permanen harus berhak mendapatkan perlindungan hukum dalam penyelenggaraan kependudukan, dan memberikan rekomendasi kepada pemerintah, instansi terkait, dan penduduk tidak tetap untuk memperbaiki penyelenggaraan penduduk tidak tetap.
Legal Consequences of Difference in The Results of Two Visum Et Repertum in Proving Criminal Case in Indonesia Firmansyah, Muhammad; Simangunsong, Frans
Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Vol. 7 No. 1 (2024): Februari 2024
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jhmo.v7i1.9659

Abstract

In criminal cases, visual evidence is used to reveal the cause and effect of a criminal act. If there are two different visual outcomes in Brigadier Joshua's case, then the question arises as to which choice of visum will be recognized as valid evidence by the judge in considering his decision. The formulation of the problem in this study is how the legal consequences of the difference in the results of two visum et repertum in the evidence system in Indonesia. This study aims to examine the legal consequences of the difference in the results of the two visum et repertum in proving criminal cases in Indonesia. This study used normative legal research. The approach used in this study is to use a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The results of this study showed that the case of the visual results in Brigadier Josua had 2 different results. Therefore, the principle of Indonesian criminal procedural law, finding material truth is very important in proof in the criminal justice process. What is meant by "incriminalibus probantiones bedent esse luce clariores" is that evidence in a criminal case must be brighter than clear. There will be legal confusion in determining which law enforcement officials will be used as a benchmark in assessing valid evidence according to the rules of the Criminal Procedure Code if there are differences in the results of visum et repertum in a criminal case. The procedures outlined in the Instruction of the Chief of Police Number: INS/E/ 20/IX/75 concerning procedures for making visum et repertum and its revocation must be followed in making visum et repertum. To find out the cause and effect of a criminal act that occurs, as well as to collect information and seek the objective truth of a criminal act related to the relationship between the act and the consequences it causes.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Adhitya Wijayanto Agung Fakhruzy Ahmad Sholikhin Akbar Galih Hariyono Alan Rizki Dui Reandi Amelia, Mays Anang Pratama Widiarsa Andhijaya, Moch Ramadhan Dewa Anwar, Cecareno Gilbrani Ardaful Abror Jauhari, Ahmad Arie Mangesti, Yovita Arief Syahroni, Muh. Arrofi, Rendi Aryasepta Syaelendra Ashinta Sekar Bidari, SH, MH., Ashinta Sekar Azizah Nurina Putri Azizah, Aprilia Dela Nurul Berlian Sesaria Bintoro, Arifah Moerfitria Budiarsih Budiarsih Canygia Cesar Putra Kedua Chairul Farid, Achmad Dahlan, Rudiyanto Deawit Sutriadi Dendy Valerian Wibowo Dianita Putri Oktavia Damayanti Dika Rahmat Nasution Donu Bani, Ferdinand Erny Herlin Setyorini, Erny Herlin Fardayana, M. Taj Bahy Farisi, Salman Ferdiansyah M. A Geuvarra, Arsyah Guntur, Sundaru Harap, Arsangela Putri Hendarto, Vanya Agatha Hervina Puspitosari, Hervina Ilahi, Mubarooq Ilmi, Iqbal Miftahul Imron, Muhamad Karmina Siska Krisnadi Nasution Lovitya Trisnanti, Ines M. Bagus Istighfariyo Mangesti, Yovita Arie Maria Novita Apriyani Marsella, Dian Dwi Mohammad Mohammad Muhammad Firmansyah, Muhammad Muhammad Iqbal Firdaus Murtadlo, Aly Nickholas Hartono Nugraha, Narendra Putra Nur Bintang Alfina Laila Pamungkas, Yudha Andra Pramesti, Yohana Putri Prasetya, Arya Prasetyo, Teguh Pribadi, Muhammad Teguh Puji Utomo, Sutrisno Putra Samudra, Kaharudin Putri, Serliana Novita Rossalia Ardiana R.Rivaldi Aldanta RACHMAN HAKIM, ARIEF Rachman, Moch. Nur Rachmatullah, Gaung Agung Raj Ravicky Fardenias Rhafshanjanie Prawira Negara Rimbawani Sushanty, Vera Ronny Ronny Saputra Marpaung, Agung Risky Satria, I Gde Sandy Serliana Novita Rossalia Ardiana Putri Sibarani, Tagor Siska, Karmina Siti Badriyah Siti Badriyah Siti Rochmah Sitohang, Kalvin A Slamet Suhartono Sofiah Ely Sri Endah Wahyuningsih Sucipto, Malakh Joy Barak Syofyan Hadi Tri Budiman, Nanang Tri Oktaviani, Indah Walujo Tjahjono, Agus Wardana, Andi Kusuma Widayata, Andhika Tedja Windi Jannati M.A.S Winny Savitri WIWIN YULIANINGSIH Wiwin Yulianingsih Yahya, Faris Helmi