Articles
<![CDATA[Sharia Insurance Disputes Through Sharia Arbitration: A Legal Discourse ]]>
<![CDATA[Sawitri Yuli Hartati]]>;
<![CDATA[Sodikin]]>
<![CDATA[ Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): GJMI - Maret ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT. Gudang Pustaka Cendekia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59435/gjmi.v4i3.2072
<![CDATA[Sharia insurance in Indonesia is growing, because along with the increasingly complex disputes between parties, which cannot be avoided between Islamic insurance companies and policyholders, this is even though both of them help and protect each other. The problem is regarding the legal basis for sharia insurance dispute resolution which is still scattered in several laws and regulations. This has become a discourse and issue of legal norms for sharia arbitration as an option for sharia insurance dispute resolution, and so far the resolution of sharia insurance disputes through sharia arbitration is regulated by Supreme Court Regulation Number 14 of 2016. The research method used is descriptive normative. The research method used is descriptive normative by analyzing regulations laws governing sharia dispute resolution. The results of this study explain that state policy in managing sharia insurance disputes is still a discourse, so that constitutional authority still uses Article 58 of Law no. 48 of 2009 concerning Judicial Power. Therefore, it is necessary to amend Law No. 30 of 1999, specifically regarding the article regarding the District Court, which must be supplemented by the Religious Courts and procedures for resolving disputes through sharia arbitration.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Certainty for Creditors Due to Legal Efforts to Postpone Debtors' Debt Payment Obligations ]]>
<![CDATA[Sodikin Sodikin]]>;
<![CDATA[Roosdiana Harahap]]>
<![CDATA[ Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 4 No. 4 (2026): GJMI - April ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT. Gudang Pustaka Cendekia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59435/gjmi.v4i4.2096
<![CDATA[The Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) is a legal procedure that allows debtors who are unable, or expect to be unable, to continue paying their due and collectible debts to seek legal recourse. Debtors in such situations can initiate legal action during the PKPU process. However, the question arises: what is the legal certainty for creditors following the Constitutional Court's decision that encourages debtors to pursue legal action? This study uses a descriptive normative research method to analyze the legal issues related to such actions. The findings indicate that the legal recourse available to debtors in specific circumstances significantly impacts creditors. This leads to uncertainties regarding payment, especially if the debtor decides to file for legal action. Additionally, these uncertainties can affect the creditor's business operations. The Constitutional Court's decision, subsequently reinforced by a Circular Letter from the Supreme Court, does not adequately address the gaps in legal certainty faced by creditors. This situation complicates creditors' efforts to secure their rights, which are the obligations of the debtor.]]>
<![CDATA[Tanggung Jawab Debitor Atas Hak Tanggungan Dalam Perjanjian Kredit Menurut Putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta Nomor 358/Pdt/2019/PT.DKI ]]>
<![CDATA[Sodikin Sodikin]]>;
<![CDATA[Roosdiana Harahap]]>
<![CDATA[ Gudang Jurnal Multidisiplin Ilmu Vol. 4 No. 7 (2026): GJMI - Juli ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[PT. Gudang Pustaka Cendekia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59435/gjmi.v4i7.2214
<![CDATA[Kasus posisi yang terjadi adalah pada putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta Nomor 358/PDT/2019/PT DKI memutuskan untuk menerima permohonan banding dan menguatkan putusan Pengadilan Negeri Jakarta Selatan. Amar putusan ini menetapkan sahnya perjanjian kredit, menyatakan tergugat cedera janji, dan menghukum tergugat melunasi utang atau merelakan objek jaminan dieksekusi. Permasalahannya adalah bagaimana tanggung jawab debitor yang wanprestasi terhadap perjanjian utang dan apa implikasinya putusan pengadilan tersebut terhadap para pihak. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif normatif yang merupakan pendekatan penelitian yang bertujuan untuk menganalisis fenomena tanggung jawab debitur atas hak tanggung terhadap perjanjian kredit yang bermasalah. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan, bahwa putusan Pengadilan Tinggi Jakarta Nomor 358/Pdt/2019/PT.DKI, tanggung jawab debitor yang melakukan wanprestasi (cedera janji) dalam perjanjian kredit dengan jaminan hak tanggungan meliputi kewajiban melunasi seluruh sisa utang pokok beserta bunga, serta menghadapi konsekuensi eksekusi objek jaminan oleh kreditor demi memulihkan kredit bermasalah.]]>
<![CDATA[Consumer Position Theory in Relation to Criminal Law Policies on Glue Abuse ]]>
<![CDATA[Widarsono Widarsono]]>;
<![CDATA[Sodikin Sodikin]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Vol. 7 No. 2 (2026): Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. Publikasi Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59141/jiss.v7i2.2209
<![CDATA[This study discusses the legal vacuum surrounding the abuse of addictive substances, particularly in cases of illegal glue use among young people, which has become increasingly concerning for society. Across Indonesia, there have been several cases of death resulting from the misuse of addictive substances contained in glue. The main issue examined concerns criminal law policy as part of state legal politics and the theory of consumer position in relation to the abuse of glue containing addictive substances. The research method employed is normative descriptive, utilizing both legislative and conceptual approaches. The results of the study explain that, according to the Consumer Position Theory, a contract is not a prerequisite for imposing an obligation on business actors to protect consumers. This obligation exists regardless of whether a contractual relationship is established. Therefore, with or without a contract between business actors and consumers, the responsibility of business actors to protect their consumers remains. Business actors must not prioritize profit alone. Moreover, even if a business actor has informed consumers about the potential hazards of a product to life or health, this does not automatically exempt the business actor from criminal liability. Each case must instead be examined individually based on its specific circumstances.]]>
<![CDATA[PRESERVING TRADITION: THE ADAT LAW SYSTEM OF THE BADUY COMMUNITY AND ITS CONSTITUTIONAL RELEVANCE ]]>
<![CDATA[Sodikin Sodikin]]>;
<![CDATA[Abdul Kahar Maranjaya]]>
<![CDATA[ Kanun Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol 27, No 1: April 2025: Customary Law and development in Indonesia ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Syiah Kuala ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[The Baduy adat law community is a distinct group that operates within a socio-cultural framework deeply rooted in their traditions. Central to this framework is the adat institution, which serves as the foundation for their governance system. In the Kanekes adat village, the structure and role of the adat institution reflect an adat state system that is derived from the values of their ancestors, known as Karuhun, and is consistent with the principles of Indonesian constitutional law. This study employs a juridical normative methodology to examine and analyze the conditions of the Kanekes Adat Village from a constitutional perspective. The findings reveal that the Baduy adat law community possesses characteristics that have sustained their adat institutions for thousands of years. They adhere to the norms of the Sunda Wiwitan religion, emphasizing the importance of upholding the values of the Karuhun, which serve as guiding principles (Pikukuh) that must be followed. The governance system they adopt is characterized as an adat state law system, which democratically distributes authority among various institutions. The apex of power and leadership resides with the Puun, who plays a crucial role in maintaining the community's traditions and governance. This structure not only reflects the community's commitment to their cultural heritage but also contributes to the broader framework of adat constitutional law in Indonesia, ensuring its relevance for future generations.]]>
<![CDATA[Tanggung Jawab Negara Terhadap Hak Perlindungan Data Pribadi di Era Digitalisasi ]]>
<![CDATA[Anisa Asmir Anisa]]>;
<![CDATA[Sodikin Sodikin]]>
<![CDATA[ ULIL ALBAB : Jurnal Ilmiah Multidisiplin Vol. 5 No. 9: Agustus 2026 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. Ulil Albab Corp ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56799/jim.v5i9.18163
<![CDATA[Data pribadi mencakup informasi penting yang berkaitan dengan seseorang, sehingga keamanan data pribadi merupakan hak asasi manusia yang harus dijamin dan dihormati. Dengan meningkatnya kasus pelanggaran privasi dan penyalahgunaan data pribadi, penting bagi negara untuk memiliki peraturan perundang-undangan yang efektif untuk melindungi hak privasi warganya. Permasalahannya tentang bagaimana tanggung jawab negara dalam melindungi hak perlindungan data pribadi sesuai dengan putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 151/PUU-XXII/2024. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah metode deskriptif normatif adalah pendekatan penelitian yang bertujuan untuk menggambarkan secara sistematis suatu fenomena atau keadaan saat ini. Hasil penelitian menjelaskan bahwa konstitusi dan peraturan perundang-undangan menjadi landasan hukum bagi negara dalam melindungi warga negara. Semua orang berhak untuk melindungi dirinya sendiri, keluarganya, kehormatannya, martabatnya, dan atau harta benda yang dikuasainya. Kesimpulannya yang diperoleh adalah terjadinya pergeseran paradigma hukum dari komoditas menjadi hak asasi manusia, maksudnya negara menegaskan bahwa di era digital, data pribadi bukan lagi sekadar komoditas ekonomi atau aset bisnis, melainkan eksistensi dari privasi dan martabat manusia. Negara bertanggung jawab mengintervensi pasar digital guna memastikan tidak ada eksploitasi data sepihak oleh korporasi maupun instansi publik.]]>
<![CDATA[DRY NEEDLING AND HYPERTENSION EXERCISE IN REDUCING BLOOD PRESSURE AMONG HYPERTENSIVE PATIENTS AT RISK OF STROKE IN CILACAP REGENCY ]]>
<![CDATA[Muttaqin, Wahyu Wahid]]>;
<![CDATA[Sodikin, Sodikin]]>;
<![CDATA[Subroto, Wishnu]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi Vol. 10 No. 3 (2026): Volume 10, Nomor 3, June 2026 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LPPM Universitas Jambi ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.22437/jiituj.v10i3.55161
<![CDATA[Hypertension is a major risk factor for stroke and a public health issue. Nonpharmacological interventions such as dry needling and hypertension exercise programs serve as complementary approaches to blood pressure control. To evaluate the effectiveness of a combination of dry needling and a hypertension exercise program in lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients at risk for stroke in Cilacap Regency. A quasi-experimental pretest–posttest study with a control group. Sample: 40 hypertensive patients at risk for stroke, divided into an intervention group and a comparison group. The combination of dry needling and hypertension exercise was administered for four weeks. Systolic and diastolic blood pressure were measured before and after the intervention. Comparative statistical tests were performed with a significance level of p < 0.05. After four weeks, the intervention group showed a significant reduction in blood pressure compared to the comparison group. The average decrease in systolic blood pressure was 20.1 mmHg and in diastolic blood pressure was 11.9 mmHg in the intervention group (p < 0.05). The control group experienced a smaller reduction, and the difference between the groups was statistically significant. The combination of dry needling and hypertension exercises is effective in lowering blood pressure in hypertensive patients at risk for stroke. This study adds to the empirical evidence regarding the effects of dry needling and hypertension exercises on the community population in Cilacap Regency.]]>
<![CDATA[Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pemerintah Dalam Tata Kelola Hutan ]]>
<![CDATA[Abdul Kahar Maranjaya]]>;
<![CDATA[Sodikin Sodikin]]>;
<![CDATA[Abdul Azis Muhammad]]>
<![CDATA[ Indonesian Journal of Innovation Multidisipliner Research Vol. 4 No. 3 (2026): Juli - September ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Institute of Advanced Knowledge and Science ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.69693/ijim.v4i3.2055
<![CDATA[Berbagai masalah di bidang kehutanan seperti rusaknya hutan yang berakibat banjir yang terjadi di berbagai wilayah Indonesia, khususnya di provinsi Aceh, Sumatera Utara dan Sumatera Barat merupakan tata kelola kehutanan yang tidak baik. Pemerintah diberi kewenangan tidak mampu mengatasi kerusakan hutan, sehingga kewenangannya dipertanyakan. Pada kenyataannya pemerintah bertanggung jawab secara hukum administrasi negara atas tata kelola hutan yang tidak baik, yang menguasai dan berwenang mengatur serta mengurus segala sesuatu yang berkaitan dengan hutan. Permasalahan dalam studi ini adalah bagaimana tanggung jawab hukum pemerintah dalam tata kelola hutan yang merupakan kewenangannya dalam perspektif hukum administrasi negara. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah deskriptif-normatif, yang mendeskripsikan fenomena hukum berdasarkan norma hukum yang berlaku. Hasil penelitian ini menjelaskan bahwa Kewenangan pemerintah yang diberikan oleh undang-undang tersebut merupakan bentuk tanggung jawab negara yang secara hukum diberikan kepada pemerintah untuk dilaksanakan. Kewenangan pemerintah yang secara yuridis normatif telah diberikan, tetapi praktek kewenangan pemerintah tersebut tidak dilaksanakan sebagaimana mestinya. Kewenangan pemerintah yang tumpang tindih dan amburadul mengakibat bencana sebagaimana yang terjadi di Sumatera dengan terjadinya bencana banjir yang merupakan tata kelola hutan yang tidak baik. Tata kelola hutan yang merupakan bagian dari administrasi pemerintahan atau urusan pemerintahan yang menurut hukum administrasi negara perlu dikelola dengan tata pemerintahan yang baik sesuai dengan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik (AUPB). Dalam hal ini yang terjadi tidak dilaksanakannya sistem pemerintahan dengan menerapkan asas-asas umum pemerintahan yang baik.]]>
<![CDATA[Implementation of Social and Environmental Responsibility in Business Practices in Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Miskun Miskun]]>;
<![CDATA[Sodikin Sodikin]]>
<![CDATA[ J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 2: Februari 2026 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v5i2.13545
<![CDATA[Social and environmental responsibility is a vital aspect of sustainable business practices, where companies play a significant role in fostering social progress while also protecting the environment. In Indonesia, the importance of implementing social and environmental responsibility is becoming increasingly clear, spurred by rising public awareness and regulations that promote the active participation of the business sector in social and environmental initiatives. This article examines how social and environmental responsibility is integrated into Indonesian business practices by reviewing relevant legal foundations, such as Law Number 40 of 2007 concerning Limited Liability Companies. It also assesses how companies are executing social and environmental programs. The methodology used in this study is normative, focusing on the analysis of social and environmental responsibility as outlined in the Limited Liability Company Law. The findings indicate that, despite some progress, there are still challenges, including limited transparency, insufficient accountability, and inconsistencies in reporting. To strengthen social and environmental responsibility in sustainable development in Indonesia, greater collaboration is needed among the government, the business sector, and the community.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Pekerja Remote atau Tenaga Kerja Digital di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Dahlan Dahlan]]>;
<![CDATA[Sodikin Sodikin]]>
<![CDATA[ J-CEKI : Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 2: Februari 2026 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[CV. ULIL ALBAB CORP ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.56799/jceki.v5i2.14725
<![CDATA[Fenomena pekerja remote telah menjadi transformasi signifikan dalam lanskap ketenagakerjaan Indonesia, yang dipicu oleh kemajuan teknologi digital dan dipercepat oleh pandemi Covid-19. Namun, realitas kerja yang fleksibel ini berhadapan dengan kerangka hukum ketenagakerjaan yang masih bersifat konvensional. Penelitian normatif kualitatif ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kesenjangan hukum antara Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang Ketenagakerjaan dengan karakteristik kerja digital serta mengkaji bentuk perlindungan hukum yang diperlukan. Melalui metode studi dokumen dan analisis kesenjangan (gap analysis), penelitian ini mengungkap bahwa definisi “tempat kerja”, pengaturan “waktu kerja dan lembur”, serta tanggung jawab “Keselamatan dan Kesehatan Kerja (K3)” dalam regulasi yang ada tidak lagi relevan dan menciptakan kerentanan hukum bagi pekerja remote. Kerentanan utama teridentifikasi dalam aspek K3 digital (ergonomi dan kesehatan mental), status hubungan kerja yang ambigu, serta akses terhadap jaminan sosial. Ketidakjelasan ini berpotensi memicu sengketa hubungan industrial dan mengikis kepastian hukum. Meskipun terdapat respons awal dari beberapa kebijakan parsial dan praktik terbaik di tingkat perusahaan, temuan penelitian menegaskan urgensi harmonisasi hukum secara komprehensif. Oleh karena itu, penelitian ini merekomendasikan amendemen terbatas terhadap Undang-undang Ketenagakerjaan atau penerbitan peraturan khusus yang mencakup redefinisi konsep kerja, pengaturan K3 digital, skema jaminan sosial inklusif, dan mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa yang adaptif untuk menjamin keadilan dan perlindungan bagi tenaga kerja digital di Indonesia.]]>
