Articles
<![CDATA[TEO-DEMOKRASI BERBASIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN: Studi Komparatif atas Respons S.M. Zafar dan Mehdi Bazargan tentang Sistem Pemerintahan Islam ]]>
<![CDATA[Suharto, Toto]]>
<![CDATA[ WALISONGO Vol 22, No 1 (2014): “RELASI AGAMA DAN NEGARA (POLITIK)†]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[IAIN Walisongo Semarang ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This article seeks to examine and analyze how the response of two contemporaryIslamic thinkers of democracy. Both thinkers are S.M. Zafar and Mehdi Bazargan.They have a typical thinking about the system of government. Zafar offers asystem of government based on the Theo-democrcy parliamentary, because of hisopposition to the military system in Pakistan. Whiles Bazargan offers the systemof government based on Theo-democracy, because of his opposition to the âulamÄâsystem of Khomeiniâs government. They are looked theo-democrcy governance asa system that needs to be implemented in an Islamic state.Artikel ini ditujukan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis bagaimana respons duapemikir Islam kontemporer terhadap demokrasi. Kedua pemikir itu adalah S.M.Zafar dan Mehdi Bazargan. Mereka memiliki pemikiran yang khas mengenaisistem pemerintahan. Zafar menawarkan sebuah sistem pemerintahan yang berdasarkanteo-demokrasi parlementer, karena ketidaksetujuannya dengan sistempemerintahan militer di Pakistan. Sedangkan Bazargan menawarkan sebuahsistem pemerintahan yang berdasarkan teo-demokrasi, karena sikap oposisinyaterhadap sistem pemerintahan âkeulamaanâ Khomeini. Keduanya memandangpemerintahan teo-demokrasi sebagai sistem yang perlu dilaksanakan dalamsebuah negara Islam.]]>
<![CDATA[TEO-DEMOKRASI BERBASIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN: STUDI KOMPARATIF ATAS RESPONS S.M. ZAFAR DAN MEHDI BAZARGAN TENTANG SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN ISLAM ]]>
<![CDATA[Suharto, Toto]]>
<![CDATA[ Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan Vol 22, No 1 (2014): Relasi Agama dan Negara ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LP2M - Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
<![CDATA[This article seeks to examine and analyze how the response of two contemporary Islamic thinkers of democracy. Both thinkers are S.M. Zafar and Mehdi Bazargan. They have a typical thinking about the system of government. Zafar offers a system of government based on the Theo-democrcy parliamentary, because of his opposition to the military system in Pakistan. Whiles Bazargan offers the system of government based on Theo-democracy, because of his opposition to the âulamÄâ system of Khomeiniâs government. They are looked theo-democrcy governance as a system that needs to be implemented in an Islamic state.***Artikel ini ditujukan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis bagaimana respons dua pemikir Islam kontemporer terhadap demokrasi. Kedua pemikir itu adalah S.M. Zafar dan Mehdi Bazargan. Mereka memiliki pemikiran yang khas mengenai sistem pemerintahan. Zafar menawarkan sebuah sistem pemerintahan yang berÂdasarkan teo-demokrasi parlementer, karena ketidaksetujuannya dengan sistem pemerintahan militer di Pakistan. Sedangkan Bazargan menawarkan sebuah sistem pemerintahan yang berdasarkan teo-demokrasi, karena sikap oposisinya terhadap sistem pemerintahan âkeulamaanâ Khomeini. Keduanya memandang pemerintahan teo-demokrasi sebagai sistem yang perlu dilaksanaÂkan dalam sebuah negara Islam.]]>
<![CDATA[Gagasan Pendidikan Muhammadiyah dan NU sebagai Potret Pendidikan Islam Moderat di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Suharto, Toto]]>
<![CDATA[ ISLAMICA: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol 9, No 1 (2014): Islamica ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Program Pascasarjana UIN Sunan Ampel Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (442.892 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15642/islamica.2014.9.1.81-109
<![CDATA[This article deals with the educational ideas of Muhammadiyah and Nahdatul Ulama as representing the portrait of moderate Islamic education in Indonesia. The problems addressed includes whether both organizations have certain moderate ideas regarding education to seed their moderate character. Using actual philosophy approach, this study reveals that educational institutions of Muhammadiyah are characterized by a special subject matter called Al-Islam dan Kemuhammadiyahan. With the concept of objective identity of Muhammadiyahâs education, this subject matter is designed to be an instrument for Muhammadiyah to seed the moderate character of its students. Meanwhile, NUâs educational institutions are characterized by subject matter called Aswaja dan Ke-NU-an. Through the concept of SNP-Plus, this institution serves as an instrument for NU to seed the character of moderate Islam. Both organizations therefore share the same ideas to strengthen a moderate Islamic education in Indonesia on the basis of their own cultural traditions.]]>
<![CDATA[KEBIJAKAN EKONOMI GLOBAL DINEGARA SEDANG BERKEMBANG: Tinjauan Teori, Problematika dan Interaksi Kebijakan Perdagangan dan Industrialisasi ]]>
<![CDATA[Suharto, Toto]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Ekonomi Pembangunan: Kajian Masalah Ekonomi dan Pembangunan Vol 3, No 1 (2002) : JEP Juni 2002 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammdaiyah Surakarta ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.23917/jep.v3i1.3924
<![CDATA[It is generally speaking that a country must consider industrial and trade sector in making its global economical policies, as both of them are significant role to supporting national economic growth. According to the writer, when we discuss about experiences in the case of implementing industrial and trade policies in the developing countries, there are three dominant perspective analysis as written in the developmental literature, namely Neoclassical perspective, Structural perspective and Radical perspective. Furthermore, the problem in the industrial and trade policies mostly occurs on three main issues, those are exporting policy, importing policy, and strategic options of industrialization which lies on between import substituting industry or export promoting industry. In this paper, the writer also analyzing economical globalization issue as a big challenge nowadays and proposing strategic anticipatory actions that the developing countries should prepare.]]>
<![CDATA[TATA KELOLA KEAMANAN TEKNOLOGI INFORMASI MENGGUNAKAN COBIT 5 (STUDI KASUS PADA DINAS KOMUNIKASI DAN INFORMASI KOTA SUKABUMI) ]]>
<![CDATA[., lelah]]>;
<![CDATA[Suharto, Toto]]>
<![CDATA[ JURNAL GAUNG INFORMATIKA Vol 12 No 1 (2019): Jurnal Gaung Informatika Vol.12 No 1 Januari 2019 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[JURNAL GAUNG INFORMATIKA ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (213.114 KB)
<![CDATA[DISKOMINFO Sukabumi city is Office that has the task of implementing regional authority in field of management of Information and Communication Technology. The consequence of application of Information and Communication Technology (ICT) is with emergence of security risks. As happened in Sukabumi City Government Information System, hacking occurs by unauthorized parties. There are several ways to maintain information security, by applying information security to information technology layer technically or by doing governance. The implementation of this governance is a necessity and has become a necessity and a demand. One of them is using COBIT 5 framework with the COBIT for information security section, which focuses on information security and provides more complete guidelines and practices for information security professionals and other related parties at each interprise level. In a study at DISKOMINFO Kota Sukabumi, the selection of the COBIT 5 framework domain, was taken by mapping the organization's objectives with EG COBIT and ITRG goals. From the election was taken the enabler of EDM01, APO01, APO02, APO03, BAI02, DSS03, DSS05. The results show that Information Technology security management in DISKOMINFO is still at level 1.]]>
<![CDATA[THE PARADIGM OF THEO-ANTHROPO-COSMOCENTRISM: REPOSITION OF THE CLUSTER OF NON-ISLAMIC STUDIES IN INDONESIAN STATE ISLAMIC UNIVERSITIES ]]>
<![CDATA[Suharto, Toto]]>
<![CDATA[ Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan Vol 23, No 2 (2015): Agama dan Sains untuk Kemanusiaan ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LP2M - Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21580/ws.23.2.308
<![CDATA[State Islamic Universities (UIN) in Indonesia nowadays has developed their study courses by opening the faculty of social science and humanities and the faculty of the natural science. This development is constitutionally “has gone beyond” scientific mandate of UIN, which only had the authority to execute the education in the cluster of religious sciences. Applying the approach of philosiphy of knowledge, this paper tried to commit the reposition the sciences of non Islamic studies cluster in UIN so that there is no gap between the two clusters, by offering the application of the paradigm of theo-antropo-cosmosentrism. Applying content analysis on texts related to the theme of the study, this paper offered the integration model of "Triangle of Science" which is based on the paradigm of Theo-anhropo-cosmosentrism. This paradigm tried to integrate the paradigms of theocentrism, anthropocentrism and cosmocentrism.***Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) di Indonesia dewasa ini telah mengembangkan wilayah studi Islamnya dengan membuka fakultas dalam ilmu-ilmu sosial-humaniora dan ilmu-ilmu kealaman. Perkembangan ini secara konstitusional telah “melampaui batas” mandat keilmuan UIN, yang hanya diberi kewenangan untuk menyelenggarakan pendidikan dalam rumpun ilmu agama. Tulisan ini dengan pendekatan filsafat ilmu mencoba mereposisi ilmu-ilmu non-rumpun ilmu agama yang ada di UIN, sehingga tidak terjadi gap antar keduanya, dengan menawarkan penggunaan paradigma teo-antropo-kosmosentrisme. Dengan analisis isi terhadap teks-teks yang terkait dengan tema kajian, tulisan ini menawarkan model integrasi “Segitiga Ilmu” yang berbasiskan pada paradigma teo-antropo-kosmosentrisme. Paradigma ini mencoba mengintegrasikan antara paradigma teosentrisme, antroposentrisme dan kosmosentrisme.]]>
<![CDATA[TEO-DEMOKRASI BERBASIS PERTANGGUNGJAWABAN: STUDI KOMPARATIF ATAS RESPONS S.M. ZAFAR DAN MEHDI BAZARGAN TENTANG SISTEM PEMERINTAHAN ISLAM ]]>
<![CDATA[Suharto, Toto]]>
<![CDATA[ Walisongo: Jurnal Penelitian Sosial Keagamaan Vol 22, No 1 (2014): Relasi Agama dan Negara ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[LP2M - Universitas Islam Negeri (UIN) Walisongo ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21580/ws.22.1.258
<![CDATA[This article seeks to examine and analyze how the response of two contemporary Islamic thinkers of democracy. Both thinkers are S.M. Zafar and Mehdi Bazargan. They have a typical thinking about the system of government. Zafar offers a system of government based on the Theo-democrcy parliamentary, because of his opposition to the military system in Pakistan. Whiles Bazargan offers the system of government based on Theo-democracy, because of his opposition to the ‘ulamā’ system of Khomeini’s government. They are looked theo-democrcy governance as a system that needs to be implemented in an Islamic state.***Artikel ini ditujukan untuk mengkaji dan menganalisis bagaimana respons dua pemikir Islam kontemporer terhadap demokrasi. Kedua pemikir itu adalah S.M. Zafar dan Mehdi Bazargan. Mereka memiliki pemikiran yang khas mengenai sistem pemerintahan. Zafar menawarkan sebuah sistem pemerintahan yang berdasarkan teo-demokrasi parlementer, karena ketidaksetujuannya dengan sistem pemerintahan militer di Pakistan. Sedangkan Bazargan menawarkan sebuah sistem pemerintahan yang berdasarkan teo-demokrasi, karena sikap oposisinya terhadap sistem pemerintahan “keulamaan” Khomeini. Keduanya memandang pemerintahan teo-demokrasi sebagai sistem yang perlu dilaksanakan dalam sebuah negara Islam.]]>
<![CDATA[MEMBINA KELUARGA MUSLIM DI ERA GLOBAL: Pergumulan antara Tradisi dan Modernitas ]]>
<![CDATA[Suharto, Toto]]>
<![CDATA[ Musawa Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Vol. 10 No. 2 (2011) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sunan Kalijaga State Islamic University & The Asia Foundation ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.14421/musawa.2011.102.205-214
<![CDATA[This article talks about the patterns of Muslims in raising families with respect to the modern era. The Muslim family often faces forms of identity crises, faced in the global era with the need to hold on to tradition, while at the same time conforming to modernity. The best way to face such a conflict would be to engage in dialogue traditions and modernity. In that context, it needs to be pointed out that Islam does not always give the answers hoped for by its believers with respect to socio-cultural realities. This fact is related to the transcendent nature of Islam, in the form of normative-dogmatic requirements. This ground has led to theological conflicts between the need to hold on to normative doctrine and the desire to give new perpectives towards the doctrine as to be interpreted historically. This conflict has often sparked theological, intellectual and social conflicts within Muslims as a whole. Therefore, the Islamic conception that aims to establish an economically independent, traditionally rich and emotionally sensitive family, needs to be discussed, so that Muslim families can continue to survive in the midst of the global realities.]]>
<![CDATA[Examining the Moderate Understanding of Islam among Higher Education Students of the State Institute of Islamic Studies Surakarta ]]>
<![CDATA[Toto Suharto]]>
<![CDATA[ Teosofi: Jurnal Tasawuf dan Pemikiran Islam Vol. 9 No. 1 (2019): June ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Department of Aqidah and Islamic Philosophy, Faculty of Ushuluddin and Philosophy, Sunan Ampel State Islamic University Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (502.098 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15642/teosofi.2019.9.1.60-80
<![CDATA[The study of radicalism among students of the State Institute of Islamic Studies (IAIN), Surakarta, showed a significant increase within the recent decade. Hence, this article attempts to analyze the level of moderate understanding of these students with a survey that involved 100 persons. The past educational background of each student was deeply explored to figure out the basics of their religious understanding. Meanwhile, qualitative and quantitative designs were employed to measure their understanding of moderate Islam. The results of the study showed that the students of IAIN Surakarta had a moderate understanding of Islamic teachings, according to an outcome of 87%. The high value was because the majority of the respondents had graduated from madrasah and pesantren, which had strongly emphasized cultivating moderate religious doctrines. This outcome was different from that of general high school graduate students, where they learned the doctrines from Rohani Islam or Rohis. Also, it was discovered that the Rohis commonly hold radical and intolerant religious doctrines. This is understandable as this community tends to understand Islamic doctrines textually, scripturally, and differently from the teachings promulgated by pesantren and madrasa.]]>
<![CDATA[Gagasan Pendidikan Muhammadiyah dan NU sebagai Potret Pendidikan Islam Moderat di Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Toto Suharto]]>
<![CDATA[ Islamica: Jurnal Studi Keislaman Vol. 9 No. 1 (2014): September ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Postgraduate Studies of Universitas Islam Negeri Sunan Ampel Surabaya, Indonesia ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
Full PDF (442.892 KB)
|
DOI: 10.15642/islamica.2014.9.1.81-109
<![CDATA[This article deals with the educational ideas of Muhammadiyah and Nahdatul Ulama as representing the portrait of moderate Islamic education in Indonesia. The problems addressed includes whether both organizations have certain moderate ideas regarding education to seed their moderate character. Using actual philosophy approach, this study reveals that educational institutions of Muhammadiyah are characterized by a special subject matter called Al-Islam dan Kemuhammadiyahan. With the concept of objective identity of Muhammadiyah?s education, this subject matter is designed to be an instrument for Muhammadiyah to seed the moderate character of its students. Meanwhile, NU?s educational institutions are characterized by subject matter called Aswaja dan Ke-NU-an. Through the concept of SNP-Plus, this institution serves as an instrument for NU to seed the character of moderate Islam. Both organizations therefore share the same ideas to strengthen a moderate Islamic education in Indonesia on the basis of their own cultural traditions.]]>
