Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
5.514
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal International Journal of Evaluation and Research in Education (IJERE) JOURNAL OF INDONESIAN ISLAM Jurnal Al Bayan: Jurnal Jurusan Pendidikan Bahasa Arab Progresiva : Jurnal Pemikiran dan Pendidikan Islam Indonesian Journal of Islam and Muslim Societies JURNAL KARSA (Terakreditasi No. 80/DIKTI/Kep/2012) PALASTREN KARSA: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Keislaman (Journal of Social and Islamic Culture) Musawa : Jurnal Studi Gender dan Islam Al Tarbawi Al Haditsah AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Jurnal Obsesi: Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini International Journal Ihya' 'Ulum al-Din Indonesian Journal of Islamic Early Childhood Education Edukasi Islami: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam RAUDHAH Al-Hikmah: Jurnal Agama dan Ilmu Pengetahuan Abdau: Jurnal Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah al-Aulad: Journal of Islamic Primary Education Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Mashdar: Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hadis JURNAL RAUDHAH Tahdis: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Al-Hadis SYARIATI : Jurnal Studi Al-Qur'an dan Hukum AR-RIAYAH : Jurnal Pendidikan Dasar Journal of Early Childhood Education Istinarah: Riset Keagamaan, Sosial dan Budaya Akademika : Jurnal Pemikiran Islam EDUKASI Jurnal Syaikh Mudo Madlawan
Marhumah Marhumah
State Islamic University (UIN) Of Sunan Kalijaga Yogyakarta
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 48 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis

 1 
The Anatomy of Ingrid Mattson’s Interpretation of the Qur’an: History, Authority, and Translation Problems Ahmad Saefudin; Ahmad Rafiq; Marhumah Marhumah
AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Vol 5, No 1 (2021)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (328.669 KB) | DOI: 10.29240/alquds.v5i1.2300

Abstract

Many contemporary thinkers have introduced various theories in Quranic studies. For example, Fazlur Rahman with double movement theory, Gadamer through a fusion of the horizon, and Abdullah Saeed with contextual interpretation. Meanwhile, Ingrid Mattson’s thoughts on the interpretation of the Koran have not been widely studied by scholars. Mattson has placed the historical context, the personal context of the reader, and the context of the reader's understanding as an integral part of the theory of interpretation. This article wishes to dissect the anatomy of Mattson's interpretation of the Koran. With the historical textual criticism approach popularized by Muhammad Mustafá Azami, this study concludes that apart from historical aspects, the interpretation of the Koran is also strongly influenced by the authority of the rulers at that time, individual charisma (ulama), and the consensus of religious experts. The reduction of God’s message is also very vulnerable to the rampant action of translating the Koran from Arabic into ajam (non-Arabic) language. These three aspects are the constructs of Mattson's thought in his hermeneutical study. Therefore, it is hoped that this academic discourse will add to the style of thinking of scholars in the field of Qur'an studies, which previously have colored contemporary exegesis studies.
Dekonstruksi Pemahaman Surah Al-Qashash Ayat 56 Terhadap Justifikasi Kekafiran Abu Thalib Agus Anwar Sipahutar; Nur Imam Mahdi; Ahmad Rafiq; Marhumah Marhumah
AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Vol 5, No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (592.797 KB) | DOI: 10.29240/alquds.v5i2.2431

Abstract

Deconstruction of Understanding of Surah Al-Qashash Verse 56 Against the Justification of Abu Talib's disbeliefThis paper discusses the deconstruction of the interpretation of the justification of the mufassirin scholars regarding the disbelief of Abu Thalib as the uncle of the Prophet Muhammad in understanding surah al-Qashas verse 56. The author approaches by understanding the tafsir al-ma'tsur. This method is by understanding the verse before surah Al-Qashas verse 56 and after the verse, when the verse already has the same understanding relationship, then looks for verses that have the same topic, then looks for hadiths that have a relevant relationship to the topic being discussed. , so that we arrive at the analysis and the conclusion that the word "ahbabka" in the verse is not referred to as Abu Thalib, but to the uncle of the Prophet. another. So it can be concluded that Abu Thalib lived in a state of faith and died in a state of faith
Mutasyabihat Hadith According Ibn Hajar al-‘Asqalani in His Fath al-Bariy Syarh Shahih al-Bukhariy (Study of Understanding of Hadith) Munawar, Ali Mahfuz; Marhumah, Marhumah; Haris, Abdul
AL QUDS : Jurnal Studi Alquran dan Hadis Vol. 8 No. 1 (2024)
Publisher : Institut Agama Islam Negeri (IAIN) Curup

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29240/alquds.v8i1.8950

Abstract

“Ayat Mutasyābihāt” studies are often discussed differently from “Hadith Mutasyābihāt” studies “Hadith Mutasyābihāt” are traditions that are not yet clear in meaning and purpose because they contain a variety of meanings, so there is a need for in-depth research in order to obtain the proper meaning. The traditions that are said to be mutasyābihāt are traditions that enter into indicators, traditions pronounced by the Prophet symbolically, traditions found improbable in their eyes, traditions that are illogical or logical and metaphysical traditions or unknown meanings such as the afterlife, heaven, hell, the attributes of God, the torment of the grave and the apocalypse. This research will specialize the “hadits mutasyābihāt” which explains the nature of Allah by using the method of matan criticism and the understanding of hadith, from this study found differences of opinion in understanding the “hadith mutasyābihāt” there are those who reject “takwil” and those who preach their meanings by not reducing the majesty of God.
Co-Authors Abdul Haris Afifur Rochman Sya'rani Agung Danarta Agus Anwar Sipahutar Ahmad Rafiq Ahmad Rafiq Ahmad Rafiq, Ahmad Ahmad Saefudin Akmal Bashori Ali Mahfuz Munawar Alkhairi, Aulia Azmi Anik Widiastuti, Anik Anita Oktaviana Annafi Nurul Ilmi Azizah Arif Sirojul Mustafid Bashori, Akmal Danarta, Agung Dewi, Linda Atika Erni Munastiwi Fahmi MR, Moh Irsyad Faiqotul Mala Fantofik, Didy Fathurrohman, Rizal Fazlul Rahman Fazlul Rahman Feri Faila Sufa Hamidah Hamidah Hamruni Hamruni Hariyanti, Wahyu Eko Hidayah, Ahwil Lutan Indah Sri Anggita Karwadi Karwadi Karwadi Karwadi Khamim Zarkasih Putro Kholida Munasti Kurnianti, Lusia Nia Lilis Madyawati Lina Imroatus Sa'diyah Lusia nia kurnianti M . Sukaelan, M. Sukaelan M. Sukaelan M . Sukaelan M. Yusuf Amin Nugroho Mahdi, Nur Imam Mahmud Arif Mala, Faiqotul Maragustam Maragustam, Maragustam Mohamad Ardin Suwandi Muhammad Aziz Muslim Muhammad Shaleh Assingkily Muhammad Shaleh Assingkily Muyyassaroh, Iffah Khoiriyatul Naimah Naimah Na’imah Na’imah Nurhikmah Pohan Nur’ainy, Nur’ainy Pajar Hatma Indra Jaya Purwanto, Setyoadi Ranti Ranti Safi’ah Ririn Setiawati Risnawati, Atin Rosalia Sciortino Ruslan Rasid Sigit Tri Utomo Siti Aisyah Siti Nur Hidayah Sofwatun Nida, Sofwatun Syukri Fathudin Achmad Widodo Tita Pertamawati Uswatun Hasanah Wibowo, Sembodo Ardi Yusuf, Syaifulloh Zahra, Dwi Noviatul Zainuddin, Nurkhamimi Zarkasi Zarkasi Zulkipli Lessy Zulkipli Lessy