Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Sharia Cryptocurrency Regulations and Fatwas: A Maqasid Shariah Analysis Regulasi dan Fatwa Kripto Syariah: Analisis Maqasid Syariah Ramadhan, Ahmad Syauqi Azmi; Sukti, Surya
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2468

Abstract

Abstract: The growing use of cryptocurrency has triggered debates about its compatibility with Islamic law, especially in countries with a strong commitment to sharia economics. This study seeks to compare the legal regulations and religious fatwas on cryptocurrency in Indonesia and Malaysia, evaluated through the Maqasid Shariah framework. Using a normative-comparative legal approach, this research relies on statutory analysis, conceptual reviews, and cross-country comparisons. Key sources include DSN-MUI Fatwa No. 140/2021, Bappebti regulations, the Securities Commission Malaysia’s Guidelines on Digital Assets, and resolutions from the Shariah Advisory Council of Bank Negara Malaysia. Findings indicate that Malaysia shows stronger sharia governance through mandatory audits and public literacy initiatives, while Indonesia provides clearer legal certainty by codifying fatwas and regulations. These findings suggest that each country can learn from the other: Indonesia may strengthen governance, and Malaysia may enhance legal certainty. The contribution of this paper lies in its novelty of applying Maqasid Shariah to a comparative legal study of cryptocurrency, offering relevant implications for policymakers and sharia authorities.
SiTelinga sebagai Inovasi Layanan KTP-El Ramah Disabilitas Tuna Rungu Berbasis Keadilan Fiqih Syari’ah di Kota Palangka Raya Andreyansyah, Muhammad Diky; Sukti, Surya; Mayasari, Novita
Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama Vol 8 No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Jayapangus Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37329/kamaya.v8i4.5042

Abstract

Persons with hearing disabilities in Palangka Raya continue to face obstacles in accessing Electronic Identity Card (KTP-El) services, particularly due to communication barriers and the limited availability of disability-friendly facilities. This study aims to formulate an innovative KTP-El service model based on the principles of Islamic jurisprudential justice through the development of “SiTelinga,” a system designed to accommodate the specific needs of the hearing-impaired. A qualitative approach was employed using a literature study of population administration regulations and Islamic legal concepts related to justice and ease (raf‘u al-haraj).  The findings indicate that the service innovations developed—such as enhanced visual communication, sign language interpreter support, staff training, and disability-inclusive service programs—effectively reduce communication barriers and improve service quality. From the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence, these innovations align with the principles of al-‘adalah (justice), al-masyaqqah tajlibu al-taysīr (facilitating ease in the presence of hardship), and the objectives of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah in safeguarding public welfare.  In conclusion, SiTelinga has the potential to serve as an inclusive KTP-El service model for persons with hearing disabilities grounded in Islamic jurisprudential justice, offering not only alignment with Islamic ethical principles but also a promising contribution to the development of inclusive public services in other regions.
Otoritas Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Terhadap Pengawasan Pembuangan Limbah Cair Pabrik Kelapa Sawit Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur Berdasarkan Hukum Normatif Dan Syariah Minallah, Tohirokhi; Sukti, Surya; Setiarno, Muhammad Lutfi
Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama Vol 8 No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Jayapangus Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37329/kamaya.v8i4.5059

Abstract

The management of palm oil mill effluent (POME) in East Kotawaringin Regency has become a crucial issue due to its potential to cause water pollution and ecosystem degradation. Discharging effluent that exceeds quality standards not only violates statutory regulations but also contravenes Islamic principles prohibiting environmental damage (fasad fil-ardh). This study aims to analyze the authority of the Environmental Agency (DLH) in supervising the disposal of palm oil mill effluent based on normative law and to examine its alignment with environmental law principles from the perspective of Sharia. The research employed a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach, utilizing legal analysis of statutory regulations, Islamic environmental jurisprudence literature, and field data obtained through interviews and document analysis. The results indicate that normatively, DLH holds full authority to conduct routine inspections, collect effluent samples, enforce administrative sanctions, and provide guidance to companies. However, the implementation of supervision faces challenges such as limited human resources, insufficient budget, and low industry awareness. From the Sharia perspective, such supervision aligns with the human responsibility as khalifah (steward) on earth to preserve the environment and prevent damage. In conclusion, the effectiveness of effluent supervision requires strengthening institutional capacity, increasing legal awareness based on Sharia values, and fostering active community collaboration to achieve a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment in accordance with both positive law and Sharia principles.
Moral Dilemma Of Sellers In The Practice Of Manipulation Of Institutional Purchase Transaction Notes From The Perspective Of Islamic Business Ethics Assyifa; Sukti, Surya
Al-Kharaj: Journal of Islamic Economic and Business Vol. 7 No. 4 (2025): All articles in this issue include authors from 3 countries of origin (Indonesi
Publisher : LP2M IAIN Palopo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24256/kharaj.v7i4.8314

Abstract

This study examines the moral dilemma experienced by household furniture store sellers when facing requests for invoice manipulation from institutional buyers. This phenomenon is rarely discussed despite reflecting the conflict between economic interests and ethical responsibility in institutional transactions. The research aims to explain the forms of moral dilemma faced by sellers, how sellers interpret and respond to these dilemmas, and the application of Islamic business ethics principles as a resolution framework. A qualitative approach with phenomenological design was employed to understand the subjective experiences of sellers. Data were collected through semi-structured interviews and participant observation with household furniture store owners in Kecipir, Palangka Raya who serve institutional purchases. Findings reveal three patterns of invoice manipulation: price increases exceeding actual transactions, provision of blank stamped invoices, and addition of fictitious items. Sellers experience internal conflict between maintaining integrity and retaining regular customers as stable income sources. These practices violate the principles of amanah, shiddiq, justice, and tabligh in Islamic business ethics. The root cause lies in structural injustice characterized by the absence of employee compensation policies and weak internal control systems in institutions. The study concludes that strengthening spiritual awareness, establishing fair compensation policies, improving audit systems, and implementing strict sanctions are necessary to address this moral dilemma. The findings contribute to developing the concept of moral dilemma in Islamic business ethics, particularly in the context of institutional transactions that have been rarely examined previously.
An Analysis of Islamic Business Ethics Among Muslim Business Actors in the Shopee Marketplace in Palangka Raya Alfia, Siti; Sukti, Surya
JIMEK : Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Ekonomi Vol. 8 No. 02 (2025): JIMEK Vol 08 No 02 2025
Publisher : Fakultas Ekonomi Universitas Kadiri

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30737/jimek.v8i02.7138

Abstract

The development of digital technology has brought significant changes to the trading system, including the emergence of marketplaces such as Shopee, which is widely utilized by Muslim businesses in Palangka Raya City. This ethics study aims to analyze how Islamic business values are applied in online buying and selling practices by these businesses. The study used a descriptive qualitative approach using observation and in-depth interviews with active Muslim sellers on Shopee. The data were analyzed through stages of reduction, presentation, and drawing conclusions based on Islamic ethical principles such as the prohibition of usury (riba), the avoidance of gharar (unlawful activity), and the application of justice, honesty, and benefits (maslahat). The results show that Muslim businesses generally strive to maintain their business activities in accordance with sharia. In terms of transactions, most avoid interest-bearing loans and choose cash payment methods, Islamic bank transfers, or cash on delivery (COD) to reduce the possibility of usury. Clarity of product descriptions and price transparency are maintained to avoid gharar (unlawful activity), while speculative promotions such as sweepstakes or "mystery boxes" are avoided to avoid elements of maysir. Furthermore, they are committed to upholding fairness in pricing and service, behaving honestly with customers, and making their business a means of social welfare that benefits the surrounding community. This study concludes that Muslim business owners in Palangka Raya generally reflect Islamic business ethics, despite still facing technical obstacles and limited sharia literacy. Islamic ethics has proven relevant in facing the dynamics of the modern digital economy and serves as an important moral foundation for realizing blessings, consumer trust, and a balance between profit and social benefit.      
Islamic Economic Ethics in the Formulation of Export Import Policy in the Modern Era Mainah, Mut; Sukti, Surya
Et-Tijarie Vol 10, No 1: Juni 2025
Publisher : Universitas Trunojoyo Madura

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21107/ete.v10i1.28353

Abstract

The era of economic globalization is growing, so that the application of Islamic ethics in import activities in Indonesia is becoming increasingly relevant to the global demand for sustainable and ethical business practices. This research aims to examine how Islamic ethics can be applied practically in import activities, as well as its impact on the economy and people's welfare. The method used in this study is qualitative with a literature study to evaluate the extent to which import policies can reflect Islamic values. The results of the study show that Islamic ethics not only regulates aspects of economic transactions but also morality in business, prohibits the import and import of goods that have haram elements, the practice of usury, and fraud, and emphasizes the balance between economic benefits and environmental sustainability and community welfare. Sharia-based import policies aim to support local economies, pay attention to social and environmental impacts, and ensure transparency and fairness. With the integration of Islamic values into global trade regulations, import policies can be instrumental in creating a fairer, more sustainable, and beneficial economic system for the wider community.