Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Sharia Cryptocurrency Regulations and Fatwas: A Maqasid Shariah Analysis Regulasi dan Fatwa Kripto Syariah: Analisis Maqasid Syariah Ramadhan, Ahmad Syauqi Azmi; Sukti, Surya
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i1.2468

Abstract

Abstract: The growing use of cryptocurrency has triggered debates about its compatibility with Islamic law, especially in countries with a strong commitment to sharia economics. This study seeks to compare the legal regulations and religious fatwas on cryptocurrency in Indonesia and Malaysia, evaluated through the Maqasid Shariah framework. Using a normative-comparative legal approach, this research relies on statutory analysis, conceptual reviews, and cross-country comparisons. Key sources include DSN-MUI Fatwa No. 140/2021, Bappebti regulations, the Securities Commission Malaysia’s Guidelines on Digital Assets, and resolutions from the Shariah Advisory Council of Bank Negara Malaysia. Findings indicate that Malaysia shows stronger sharia governance through mandatory audits and public literacy initiatives, while Indonesia provides clearer legal certainty by codifying fatwas and regulations. These findings suggest that each country can learn from the other: Indonesia may strengthen governance, and Malaysia may enhance legal certainty. The contribution of this paper lies in its novelty of applying Maqasid Shariah to a comparative legal study of cryptocurrency, offering relevant implications for policymakers and sharia authorities.
SiTelinga sebagai Inovasi Layanan KTP-El Ramah Disabilitas Tuna Rungu Berbasis Keadilan Fiqih Syari’ah di Kota Palangka Raya Andreyansyah, Muhammad Diky; Sukti, Surya; Mayasari, Novita
Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama Vol 8 No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Jayapangus Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37329/kamaya.v8i4.5042

Abstract

Persons with hearing disabilities in Palangka Raya continue to face obstacles in accessing Electronic Identity Card (KTP-El) services, particularly due to communication barriers and the limited availability of disability-friendly facilities. This study aims to formulate an innovative KTP-El service model based on the principles of Islamic jurisprudential justice through the development of “SiTelinga,” a system designed to accommodate the specific needs of the hearing-impaired. A qualitative approach was employed using a literature study of population administration regulations and Islamic legal concepts related to justice and ease (raf‘u al-haraj).  The findings indicate that the service innovations developed—such as enhanced visual communication, sign language interpreter support, staff training, and disability-inclusive service programs—effectively reduce communication barriers and improve service quality. From the perspective of Islamic jurisprudence, these innovations align with the principles of al-‘adalah (justice), al-masyaqqah tajlibu al-taysīr (facilitating ease in the presence of hardship), and the objectives of maqāṣid al-sharī‘ah in safeguarding public welfare.  In conclusion, SiTelinga has the potential to serve as an inclusive KTP-El service model for persons with hearing disabilities grounded in Islamic jurisprudential justice, offering not only alignment with Islamic ethical principles but also a promising contribution to the development of inclusive public services in other regions.
Otoritas Dinas Lingkungan Hidup Terhadap Pengawasan Pembuangan Limbah Cair Pabrik Kelapa Sawit Kabupaten Kotawaringin Timur Berdasarkan Hukum Normatif Dan Syariah Minallah, Tohirokhi; Sukti, Surya; Setiarno, Muhammad Lutfi
Kamaya: Jurnal Ilmu Agama Vol 8 No 4 (2025)
Publisher : Jayapangus Press

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37329/kamaya.v8i4.5059

Abstract

The management of palm oil mill effluent (POME) in East Kotawaringin Regency has become a crucial issue due to its potential to cause water pollution and ecosystem degradation. Discharging effluent that exceeds quality standards not only violates statutory regulations but also contravenes Islamic principles prohibiting environmental damage (fasad fil-ardh). This study aims to analyze the authority of the Environmental Agency (DLH) in supervising the disposal of palm oil mill effluent based on normative law and to examine its alignment with environmental law principles from the perspective of Sharia. The research employed a normative juridical method with a qualitative approach, utilizing legal analysis of statutory regulations, Islamic environmental jurisprudence literature, and field data obtained through interviews and document analysis. The results indicate that normatively, DLH holds full authority to conduct routine inspections, collect effluent samples, enforce administrative sanctions, and provide guidance to companies. However, the implementation of supervision faces challenges such as limited human resources, insufficient budget, and low industry awareness. From the Sharia perspective, such supervision aligns with the human responsibility as khalifah (steward) on earth to preserve the environment and prevent damage. In conclusion, the effectiveness of effluent supervision requires strengthening institutional capacity, increasing legal awareness based on Sharia values, and fostering active community collaboration to achieve a clean, healthy, and sustainable environment in accordance with both positive law and Sharia principles.