Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 36 Documents
Search

Perlindungan Hukum Substantif bagi Perusahaan Penanaman Modal Asing terhadap Wanprestasi dalam Pelaksanaan Kontrak Kerja Konstruksi Christy Antoni Sitompul; I Made Kantikha; Markoni; Joko Widarto; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Agustus 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3464

Abstract

This study is motivated by the imbalance of bargaining power and the weak implementation of the pacta sunt servanda principle in construction service practices, which affects the effectiveness of legal protection for Foreign Direct Investment (FDI) companies. This research aims to analyze the forms of breach of contract by the Employer and examine the effectiveness of substantive legal protection within the national legal system toward PT. Global Contractor Indonesia. The study employs a normative juridical method with statutory and case study approaches, analyzed descriptively and prescriptively. Normatively, contractual relations are governed by the Indonesian Civil Code as lex generalis, as well as the Construction Services Law and the Investment Law as lex specialis. The findings reveal breaches of contract in the form of delayed and reduced payments, unilateral changes to the scope of work without formal amendments, and neglect of administrative obligations. These findings indicate that substantive legal protection is conditional, as it depends on contractual compliance. Therefore, strengthening contract design, ensuring balanced risk allocation, harmonizing regulations, and enhancing effective regulatory supervision are necessary to ensure legal certainty and minimize breaches of contract.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Atas Penyelewengan Dana Operasional Oleh Departemen Sumber Daya Manusia di PT. Global Hotma Abadi Jaya Hotma Dame Silaban; Markoni; I Made Kantikha; Joko Widarto; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Agustus 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3473

Abstract

Misappropriation of corporate operational funds may cause financial losses and give rise to legal liability for individuals, directors, and corporations. The case at PT. Global Hotma Abadi involved the Human Resources Department through visa cost mark-ups, fictitious employee additions, manipulation of overseas workers’ salary allowances, and unauthorized expense claims. This study aims to analyze the forms, processes, and legal liability arising from such misappropriation using theories of legal liability and corporate theory. The research employs a normative legal method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that weak internal supervision, the absence of periodic audits, and ineffective control systems were the main factors enabling the misconduct. The actions fulfill the elements of unlawful acts under Article 1365 of the Indonesian Civil Code, resulting in civil liability in the form of compensation for the perpetrators, while directors may also bear responsibility for negligence in supervision. The study recommends strengthening internal audits, implementing risk-based supervision, and developing whistleblowing systems within the company.
Perlindungan Hukum Konsumen terhadap Praktik Penghangusan Kuota Internet oleh Penyelenggara Jasa Telekomunikasi di Indonesia Herlina; Markoni; Helvis; Idris Wasahua; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Agustus 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3474

Abstract

The rapid development of mobile telecommunications services has made internet access a primary necessity. However, the practice of forfeiting unused internet data quotas raises legal issues concerning consumers’ legal position, legal protection, and the liability of telecommunications service providers. This study employs contract law theory, legal protection theory, and legal interpretation and construction theory, using a normative juridical method with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that although consumers are formally bound by valid contractual agreements, their substantive position remains unequal due to the dominant role of service providers in determining service terms and conditions. The forfeiture of unused data quotas prevents consumers from fully benefiting from services they have already paid for, thereby conflicting with the principles of balance and good faith in contract law. Furthermore, legal protection remains ineffective because no adequate compensation mechanism is provided, despite the existence of actual consumer losses that satisfy the elements of legal liability. Therefore, stricter regulations and improved service policies are necessary to ensure fairness, accountability, and effective consumer protection.
Pertanggungjawaban Hukum Rumah Sakit dan Penyelenggara Sistem Elektronik (PSE) atas Kebocoran Data Rekam Medis Elektronik Eros Syah Warongan; Irman Jaya; Rita Alfiana; Annisa Fitria; Tuti Elawati
SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Vol. 5 No. 4 (2026): SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum, Agustus 2026
Publisher : LPPM Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Ekonomi 45 Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/seikat.v5i4.3475

Abstract

The development of information technology in the healthcare sector has encouraged the transformation of conventional medical records into Electronic Medical Records (EMRs) integrated through the Satu Sehat application. However, this digitalization has raised legal issues concerning the leakage of sensitive electronic medical record data. This study aims to analyze the legal liability of the parties involved, particularly hospitals and Electronic System Operators (ESOs), for data breaches occurring within the system. The study employs the theories of legal protection and legal liability as analytical frameworks. The research method used is normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches. The findings indicate that legal liability for electronic medical record data breaches should be determined based on a causality model distinguishing between human error and system failure. Data breaches resulting from weaknesses in electronic systems place ESOs as the predominantly liable party, whereas breaches arising from internal management errors place hospitals as the predominantly liable party. Therefore, the most appropriate liability model within the Satu Sehat application is shared liability. This study concludes that a clear allocation of responsibilities between hospitals and ESOs is necessary. Accordingly, it is recommended that the government strengthen regulatory frameworks and supervisory mechanisms, while the Ministry of Health enhance the security of the Satu Sehat application system.
Analisis Yuridis Penyelesaian Sengketa Sertifikat Ganda pada Bidang Tanah oleh Kantor Pertanahan Kota Administrasi Jakarta Barat : (Studi Kasus Putusan Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Jakarta Nomor: 521/G/2023/PTUN.JKT) Jusuf, Jusuf; Markoni, Markoni; Permata Budi Asri, Dyah; Kantikha, I Made; Elawati, Tuti
Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan Vol. 5 No. 3 (2026): September : Inovasi: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora dan Pendidikan
Publisher : Lembaga Pengembangan Kinerja Dosen

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/inovasi.v5i3.6552

Abstract

Multiple land certificate disputes constitute one of the most complex land administration problems and directly affect legal certainty of land rights. The issuance of duplicate certificates by the West Jakarta Administrative City Land Office creates uncertainty regarding the lawful right holder and causes material and immaterial losses to injured parties. This study aims to analyze the settlement process of multiple certificate disputes under Indonesian law and to examine the level of legal certainty provided to parties harmed by such issuance. The research applies dispute resolution theory and legal certainty theory using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. The findings indicate that dispute settlement may be conducted through administrative mechanisms, including document examination, verification of physical and juridical data, and certificate cancellation by the Land Office, as well as through judicial mechanisms by filing a lawsuit with the Administrative Court (PTUN). However, implementation remains ineffective due to incomplete documentation, weak verification procedures, and inconsistency in enforcing court decisions. The existence of multiple certificates reflects procedural failure that undermines normative legal certainty. Although Administrative Court decisions provide formal legal certainty, they do not fully guarantee substantive restoration of rights. Therefore, improvements in land governance, digitalization of land registration, and strengthened internal supervision are urgently required.
Validity and Legal Consequences of Peace Agreements in The Settlement of Sexual Harassment Cases Hartoto Suci Rahayu; Markoni; Dyah Permata Budi Asri; I Made Kanthika; Tuti Elawati
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v6i3.3102

Abstract

The settlement of sexual harassment cases through peace agreements based on contracts remains a practice commonly found in society. This practice raises complex legal issues as it lies at the intersection of civil law and criminal law. On one hand, civil law recognizes contracts as legally binding instruments provided that the legal requirements of validity are fulfilled. On the other hand, sexual harassment constitutes a criminal offense, meaning that its resolution cannot rely solely on the agreement of the parties involved. This study aims to analyze the settlement of sexual harassment cases through contractual peace agreements from the perspectives of civil law and criminal law. The research employs a normative legal method using statutory and conceptual approaches. The legal materials consist of primary and secondary sources, which are analyzed qualitatively. The findings indicate that peace agreements in sexual harassment cases may be considered legally valid only if they fulfill the legal requirements of a contract, particularly the existence of free consent and a lawful cause. From a criminal law perspective, a peace agreement between the perpetrator and the victim does not eliminate the unlawful nature of sexual harassment, as such acts involve public legal interests protected by the state. Therefore, peace agreements may only operate within the civil law domain and cannot be used as a basis to negate criminal law enforcement processes.