Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
3.957
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal SIGn Jurnal Hukum RIO LAW JURNAL JURNAL ILMIAH GLOBAL EDUCATION IBLAM Law Review Journal of Lex Theory (JLT) Journal of Lex Philosophy (JLP) Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review (GRLSPR) ADVANCED PRIVATE LEGAL INSIGHTS
Nawi, Syahruddin
Unknown Affiliation
Humanities Computer Science & IT Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
The Evidentiary Strength of Land Title Certificates in Civil Cases: A Study of Decisions of the Makassar District Court Syah, A. Nurul Annisa Dela Putri; Nawi, Syahruddin; Poernomo, Sri Lestari
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 2: Oktober 2025 - Maret 2026
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i2.558

Abstract

Land title certificates are normatively designed as the strongest evidentiary tool; however, their validity is frequently annulled by court decisions due to the negative publication system, which is at odds with the positive trend in national agrarian law. This research aims to analyze the dualism in the legal construction of evidentiary strength, evaluate its relativity in dispute practice at the Makassar District Court, and examine the juridical implications of Article 64 of Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 on legal certainty. The research method applies an empirical juridical type, combining dogmatic analysis of legislation with a study of field facts through interviews with judges and a review of court decisions. The research results reveal a dogmatic conflict between the certificate as an authentic deed with “perfect” value under the Civil Code and the “strong” predicate under Law Number 5 of 1960. Empirical findings at the Makassar District Court confirm that the certificate’s strength is relative, where the five-year rechtsverwerking protection fortress is consistently set aside by judges if bad faith or substantial legal defects are proven. Furthermore, the implementation of Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 introduces a new paradigm: “administrative amnesty” after five years, while maintaining avenues for judicial correction in civil disputes. This study concludes that the legal certainty of current certificates is dichotomous: administratively absolute yet judicially open, thereby recommending layered due diligence in every rights transfer to guarantee material validity.
Co-Authors Abbas, Ilham Abda Abda Ahmad Zulfikar Alam, Saiful Andairah, Nur Arief, Anggreany Arief, Muh. Arsyad, Nasrullah Azis, Muawanatul Baharuddin, Efryanti Baharuddin, Muhammad Fadil Basir, Basir Buana, Andika Prawira Busthami, Dachran S Dwi Handayani Hanapi, Muh Ali Islam, Andi Abdi Karim, Indah Khair, Agung Miftahul Khalid, Hasbuddin Komalasari. M, Firlyanti Lestari, Eridani Tri Mahban, Muhammad Ali Makkuasa, Anzar Mapakaya, Amri Mirnawanti Wahab, Mirnawanti Muhammad Ilyas Muhammad Kamal Mustari, Sartika Nur, Andi Ardian Pratiwi, Batari Ayu Pusvita Aziza, Dian Eka Putri, Andra Monica Qahar, Abdul Razak, Askari Renaldi, Reno Rifdah, Faradibah Rijal , Syamsul Risma, Andi S. Sugiharto Sahban, Muh. Salle, S. Salle, Salle Salmawati Salmawati, Salmawati Sofyang Sofyang Sri Lestari Poernomo Syah, A. Nurul Annisa Dela Putri Syam, Mahdys Tamsil, Andi Muhammad Ikram Wahab, Mirnawati Zainuddin, Zainuddin