Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 35 Documents
Search

Position Permission Divorce for Civil Servants at the Class 1A Religious Court Office in Makassar Baharuddin, Muhammad Fadil; Nawi, Syahruddin; Pusvita Aziza, Dian Eka
ADVANCED PRIVATE LEGAL INSIGHTS Vol. 1 No. 1 (2025): ADVANCES PRIVATE LEGAL INSIGHTS (APRIL)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Study This aiming For know and understand mechanism submission permission for Civil servants who carry out divorce at the Class 1A Religious Court Office in Makassar. And for know and understand factor affecting​ submission permission for Civil servants who carry out divorce at the Class 1A Religious Court Office in Makassar. Research This use method study empirical that is a approach or method knowledge based​ observation direct , observation , and observation . Research results This show Civil servants who want to submit application permission divorce must with legitimate reasons​ to official authorized Then official authorized to form team advisory after That call second split party husband wife simultaneously or individually . Officials give advice to be able to harmony Back but if second split party or one of them party want to divorce so both of them must make statement want to divorce . The factors that influence submission permission divorce that is factor internal and external factors external . Recommendations given​ writer that is Firstly, civil servants at the Class 1A Religious Court in Makassar must own permission If want to carry out divorce . The second one give certainty law and sense of justice in take or emit permit decision letter divorce for civil servants.
Implementation of Law No. 23 of 2011 Concerning Zakat Management in Poverty Alleviation (Baznas Pangkep Regency) Septiana, Nur Fajri; Nawi, Syahruddin; Busthami, Dachran S.
Golden Ratio of Law and Social Policy Review Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): January - June
Publisher : Manunggal Halim Jaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52970/grlspr.v4i2.1660

Abstract

The purpose of this study is 1) to examine and analyze the implementation of Law No. 23 of 2011 on Zakat Management in alleviating poverty (Baznas Pangkep Regency), and 2) to identify and analyze the factors affecting the implementation of Law No. 23 of 2011 on Zakat Management. This research employs an empirical legal research method, conducted at the Baznas Pangkep Regency office. Data were collected through interviews and questionnaires, and analyzed descriptively. The findings of the study show that the implementation of Law No. 23 of 2011 on zakat management in alleviating poverty at Baznas Pangkep Regency has not been optimal. This is due to several challenges in zakat management, such as limited public outreach about the importance of zakat, and the insufficiently effective economic empowerment programs aimed at improving the long-term welfare of mustahik. The factors influencing the implementation of Law No. 23 of 2011 include legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture. Based on the findings, the study recommends: 1) Baznas Pangkep Regency should enhance the socialization of Law No. 23 of 2011 on zakat management comprehensively to the public, develop professional human resources, and ensure zakat management runs effectively, transparently, and accountably in accordance with Islamic principles; 2) Baznas Pangkep Regency should strengthen mustahik economic empowerment programs and improve zakat distribution to ensure it reaches the targeted groups for sustainable poverty alleviation.
The Evidentiary Strength of Land Title Certificates in Civil Cases: A Study of Decisions of the Makassar District Court Syah, A. Nurul Annisa Dela Putri; Nawi, Syahruddin; Poernomo, Sri Lestari
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 2: Oktober 2025 - Maret 2026
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i2.558

Abstract

Land title certificates are normatively designed as the strongest evidentiary tool; however, their validity is frequently annulled by court decisions due to the negative publication system, which is at odds with the positive trend in national agrarian law. This research aims to analyze the dualism in the legal construction of evidentiary strength, evaluate its relativity in dispute practice at the Makassar District Court, and examine the juridical implications of Article 64 of Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 on legal certainty. The research method applies an empirical juridical type, combining dogmatic analysis of legislation with a study of field facts through interviews with judges and a review of court decisions. The research results reveal a dogmatic conflict between the certificate as an authentic deed with “perfect” value under the Civil Code and the “strong” predicate under Law Number 5 of 1960. Empirical findings at the Makassar District Court confirm that the certificate’s strength is relative, where the five-year rechtsverwerking protection fortress is consistently set aside by judges if bad faith or substantial legal defects are proven. Furthermore, the implementation of Government Regulation Number 18 of 2021 introduces a new paradigm: “administrative amnesty” after five years, while maintaining avenues for judicial correction in civil disputes. This study concludes that the legal certainty of current certificates is dichotomous: administratively absolute yet judicially open, thereby recommending layered due diligence in every rights transfer to guarantee material validity.
Transformation of Foundation Law in the Management of Private Higher Education in Indonesia Alwi, Faisal; Nawi, Syahruddin; Fahmal, Muin; Qamar, Nurul; Mumin, Khadizah Haji Abdul
Indonesian Journal of Legal Community Engagement Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): July-December, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jphi.v8i2.33399

Abstract

The Indonesian government has implemented various policies to ensure that higher education management operates in a controlled, structured, and aligned manner with academic norms and national education goals. However, various challenges in the implementation of these regulations, including internal conflicts within foundations, often affect the quality of higher education. This study aims to analyze the impact of internal foundation conflicts on higher education management, education quality, and the achievement of national education goals. Using an empirical legal approach, this research focuses on the role of foundations in managing private higher education institutions in the LLDIKTI Region IX. The analysis is conducted using Good Governance principles involving transparency, accountability, and participation, as well as the theory of Legal Pluralism to understand the relationship between state law and social norms. The findings show that foundations, as nonprofit organizations, face various obstacles due to legal gaps between education providers and implementers. Legal reform is necessary to improve the governance of resources and finances effectively. Legal reforms emphasizing transparency, accountability, and financial sustainability are critical solutions to optimizing the management of private higher education. Governance transformation of foundations is urgently needed for private higher education to sustainably achieve the goals of national education
A Comparative Study of the Concept of Adultery Offenders in At-Tasyri’ Al-Jina’i Al-Islami and the Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 on Jinayat Law Tamin, Andi Muhammad Firdaus; Nawi, Syahruddin; Djanggih, Hardianto; Makkuasa, Anzar
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 29 No 1 (2026): December 2025 - May 2026
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/452j1j81

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and compare the concept of zina offenders in At-Tasyri’ Al-Jina’i Al-Islami by Abdul Qadir Audah with the provisions stipulated in Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014 concerning Jinayat Law. This study is important to understand how the concepts of classical Islamic criminal law found in the literature of fiqh jinayah are adopted and adapted within the regional positive legal system in Aceh, which has special authority in implementing Islamic law. This research employs a normative legal research method using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches. The legal materials consist of primary legal sources, namely At-Tasyri’ Al-Jina’i Al-Islami and Aceh Qanun Number 6 of 2014, as well as secondary legal materials in the form of books, scientific journals, and relevant previous studies. The analysis is conducted using a descriptive-comparative method to identify similarities and differences in the legal concepts contained in the two sources. The results show that both share similarities in their theological foundation, objectives of punishment, and the principle of caution in proving the offense of zina through confession and the testimony of four witnesses. However, fundamental differences exist in the definition of zina, the classification of offenders, and the types of sanctions imposed. At-Tasyri’ Al-Jina’i Al-Islami distinguishes offenders between muhsan and ghairu muhsan with sanctions of stoning and flogging, whereas the Aceh Qanun simplifies the classification of offenders and only imposes flogging as the principal punishment. These differences indicate a process of adaptation and positivization of Islamic law within the Indonesian national legal system by considering aspects of public welfare, the effectiveness of law enforcement, and human rights principles