Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

LEGAL REASONING OF THE JUDGE'S DECISION REGARDING GOVERNMENT PROCUREMENT CONTRACT GUARANTEE CLAIM A Malik, Djamil; Erwin, Yulias; Nurjannah Septyanun
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v6i1.966

Abstract

The decision is a written legal text made by an authorized judge, and its legal product is categorized as a crown. However, despite being considered a crown, a judge's decision is not exempt from examination by legal scholars. The optics used in the examination process are based on various perspectives, including hermeneutics as the fundamental basis for interpreting the text (decision). Substantively, hermeneutics has three main streams of thought, namely as a theoretical (methodological), philosophical, and critical hermeneutics, each with different understandings. Hermeneutics as a method focuses more on the effort to capture and reveal the meaning of the text, while philosophical hermeneutics goes beyond that and emphasizes "capturing meaningful meaning," implying that the meaning of the text can be continuously produced through a dialectical process. On the other hand, critical hermeneutics focuses on the aspect of disclosing the meaning of the author's ideological interests. This research aims to examine the legal reasoning in Decision No. 272 / PDT.G / 2017 / PN.BDG regarding the Government Procurement Contract Guarantee Claim from the perspective of Hans Georg Gadamer's Hermeneutic Circle. The research type is normative doctrinal, using secondary data sources consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials with a conceptual approach, statutory approach, and case study. The research findings suggest that the process of claiming a bank guarantee through the judicial institution can be carried out by the Procurement Committee (PPK) as long as they obtain authorization from the Budget User, who is the owner of the work (bouwheer). This is due to the hybrid nature of government procurement contracts, which distinguishes them from private contracts, and the clarity of the scope of authority of the Budget User serves as the establishment of formal justice, acting as a bridge (epistemology) toward substantive justice.
KEBIJAKAN HUKUM PIDANA TERHADAP PROSES MERARIQ DALAM PERSPEKTIF KUHP 2023 Akbar, Muhammad Padil; Harun, Rina Rohayu; Erwin, Yulias
JURNAL DARUSSALAM: Pemikiran Hukum Tata Negara dan Perbandingan Mazhab Vol. 4 No. 2 (2024): Jurnal Darussalam: Pemikiran Hukum Ketatanegaraan dan Perbandingan Mazhab
Publisher : STIS Darussalam Bermi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59259/jd.v4i2.173

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian adalah untuk mengetahui dan memahami Kebijakan Hukum Pidana terhadap Proses Merariq dalam Perspektif KUHP 2023. Bagaimana Aspek kepastian hukum proses merariq berdasarkan KUHP 2023 dan bagaimana proses merariq pada Masyarakat sasak dan kaitannnya dengan perbuatan pidana, Penelitian dilakukan denganm pendekatan yuridis normatif. Kesimpulan dari penelitian ini adalah: 1 Di dalam hukum pidana ada 2 (dua) hukum yang berbeda yang digunakan oleh masyarakat yaitu hukum pidana yang bersumber pada peraturan tidak tertulis (hukum pidana adat) dan hukum yang bersumber pada KUHP dan peraturan undang-undang yang tertulis lainnya. 2 Hukum pidana adat mengatur tindakan yang melanggar keadilan dan keamanan di tengah masyarakat sehingga menyebabkan terganggunya ketentraman serta keseimbangan masyarakat untuk memulihkan ketentraman dan keseimbangan tersebut maka dibutuhkan suatu aturan yang mengatur tentang delik adat. Hukum pidana adat adalah hukum yang hidup (living law) dan akan terus hidup selama ada manusia dan budaya dan tidak akan dapat dihapus dengan peraturan parundang-undangan yang tertulis. Andaikata ada undang-undang yang menghapus peraturan hukum pidana adat maka hukum pidana perundang-undangan akan kehilangan sumber kekayaannya oleh karena hukum pidana adat lebih erat hubungannya dengan antropologi dan sosiologi daripada perundang-undangan.