Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Kebijakan Pemerintah dalam Upaya Perlindungan Pengungsi Asing Zainuddin Zainuddin; Ismail Koto
Jurnal Penelitian Hukum De Jure Vol 25 No 3 (2025): Edisi November
Publisher : Law Policy Strategy Agency, Ministry of Law of The Republic of Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/dejure.2025.V25.267-276

Abstract

As part of its responsibility to address refugee-related issues, Indonesia enacted Presidential Regulation No. 125 of 2016 concerning the Handling of Refugees from Abroad. This study is more in-depth than previous studies because it focuses on more specific legal regulations at the presidential regulation level. This provides the legal basis for the protection of foreign refugees in Indonesia and serves as the official guideline for managing asylum seekers and international refugees. This regulation is more operational, for example, shelter mechanisms such as shelter, accommodation and health and education, as well as basic services, and coordination with UNHCR/IOM, but does not provide formal legal status for refugees. One implementation is the relocation of asylum seekers from Immigration Detention Centers (Rudenim) to temporary shelters, thus enabling the provision of basic needs, which is facilitated and funded by the International Organization for Migration (IOM). The main differences between the international obligations of ratifying conventions and domestic authority through Presidential Regulations lie in their source, binding nature, and implications for the legal status and rights of refugees specifically. This regulation is seen as an alternative to ratifying the 1951 Convention and the 1967 Protocol Relating to the Status of Refugees, which Indonesia has not yet ratified. Presidential Regulation Number 125 of 2016 outlines several important provisions, including key definitions, detention mechanisms, shelter procedures, and protection measures for asylum seekers and refugees. This regulation consists of 45 articles detailing the coordination mechanism between government agencies in managing refugees. Based on Article 2 paragraph (1), the handling of asylum seekers and refugees is carried out through cooperation between the central government and the United Nations (UN).
PERBUATAN MELAWAN HUKUM OLEH DEBITUR YANG TIDAK MENEBUS HUTANGNYA DALAM PERJANJIAN GADAI PADA SAAT JATUH TEMPO DI PT. PEGADAIAN Mayang Maisarah Kemit; Surya Perdana; Ismail Koto
Didaktik : Jurnal Ilmiah PGSD STKIP Subang Vol. 12 No. 03 (2026): Volume 12 No. 3, September 2026 Public
Publisher : STKIP Subang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36989/didaktik.v12i03.18946

Abstract

This research focuses on the case of Supreme Court Decision Number 1440 K/Pdt/2024 which examines a civil case at the cassation level. The defendants pawned a large amount of gold jewelry to Pegadaian, but after maturity, it was not redeemed. The debtor obtained a loan by submitting gold as collateral for the pawn. However, the debtor did not fulfill his obligation to repay the debt according to the agreed agreement so that PT Pegadaian filed a lawsuit. This research is a type of normative research using secondary data sources and the results of the research are analyzed qualitatively. Based on the results of the research, the pawn agreement at PT Pegadaian according to positive law in Indonesia is a valid agreement regulated by the Civil Code (KUHPerdata) and supervised by the Financial Services Authority (OJK). This system guarantees legal certainty, protects consumer rights, and authorizes PT Pegadaian (Persero) to auction collateral if the customer does not pay the debt. The application of the law for defendants (debtors) who commit Unlawful Acts (PMH) at PT Pegadaian (Persero) is that the debtor is obliged to pay compensation, the pawn agreement can be canceled, and the debtor must still pay off his debt. Collateral can be legally confiscated, auctioned, or returned to the original owner if it is proven that the goods are the result of a crime. Supreme Court Decision Number 1440 K / Pdt / 2024 states that the defendant must fulfill his payment obligations to the plaintiff, namely PT Pegadaian (Persero).
Co-Authors Abd. Rasyid Syamsuri Adek Sikumbang Alyafedri, Youfan Andrea Hynan Poeloengan Asliani Harahap Atikah Rahmi Aziz Hasibuan, Muhammad Anwar Benito Asdhie Kodiyat, M.S Bunyamin Chansrakaeo, Ruetaitip Daniel Vinato Destri Budi Nugraheni Duma Indah Sari Lubis Erni Elvisyahri Erwin Asmadi Faisal Faisal Faisal Faisal Faisal Fathin, Fathiyyah Jamil Fauzi, Ahmad Hanifah, Ida HARIYANTO HARIYANTO Hazmi Rusli Heni Pujiastuti HERI APRIANDA FAISAL Ibrahim Nainggolan Ida Hanifah Ida Hanifah Ida Hanifah Ida Nadirah Ida Nadirah Ilham Syahputra Angkat Imširović, Mirela Jacob, John Tumba Jaholden Jaholden Khairul Imam Batubara Koto, Zulkarnain Lidia Salma Sagala Lilawati Ginting Lira Nova Eliza Lubis, Ikhsan Mayang Maisarah Kemit Mhd Teguh Syuhada Lubis Muhammad Rizki Manurung Muslim Mubarrok Mutiara Fadia Silalahi Nadirah, Ida Nainggolan, Ibrahim Nur Putri Hidayah Nurhilmiyah Nurhilmiyah Onny Medaline Onny Medaline Medaline Perdana, Surya Rachmad Abduh Radhiya Febrina Tri Annisa Zuhra Rahimah Rahimah Rahimah Rahimah Rajarif Syah Akbar Simatupang Ramadhani, Rahmat Ramlan Ramlan Reyhana Alviemuna Nasution Rizka Syafriana Romy Affandi Tarigan Ruetaitip Chansrakaeo Sahari, Alpi Salamat Siregar, Padian Adi Salman Siregar Saragih, Rayani Sari Lubis, Duma Indah SATIYA CITRA DEWI Soraya Sakinah Sri Armaini Surya Perdana Surya Perdana Sutrisno Sutrisno Tarmizi Taufik Hidayat Lubis Taufik Siregar Tengku Erwin Syahbana Triono Eddy Ummi Salamah Lubis Vita Mayastinasari Wicaksono, Galih Wasis Zainuddin Zainuddin, Zainuddin Zainuddin, Zainuddin Zulkarnain Koto Zulkarnein Koto