Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 2 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Social Science

Extending Policy Implementation Theory for Natech Risk Governance: The KIKA-717 Model for Earthquake and Tsunami Mitigation in an Industrial Coastal City Akhmad Taufan Maulana; Andriansyah Andriansyah; Nani Nurani Muksin; Evi Satispi; Azhari Aziz Samudra
Journal Of Social Science (JoSS) Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Journal of Social Science
Publisher : Al-Makki Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57185/9wecbc84

Abstract

Natural technological (natech) risks pose complex governance challenges in industrial coastal cities exposed to earthquakes and tsunamis. While policy implementation theories such as Edwards III remains influential, their explanatory power is limited when applied to multi-hazard, multi-actor, and technology-intensive disaster contexts. This study examines the implementation of Cilegon City Regulation No. 7/2017 on disaster management in Cilegon, Indonesia, a highly industrialized coastal city facing significant earthquake and tsunami risk. Using a qualitative case study approach involving in-depth interviews, document analysis, and field observation, this research identifies structural, institutional, and governance gaps that constrain effective mitigation. The findings demonstrate that deficiencies in communication, fragmented resource management, limited public participation, weak public trust, and rigid bureaucratic structures undermine policy effectiveness. To address these limitations, this study proposes the KIKA-717 model, an extended policy implementation framework integrating communication enhancement, integrated resource management, trust-based disposition, adaptive bureaucratic structure, public participation and partnership, information technology integration, and policy adaptability and learning. The model offers a transferable analytical and practical framework for strengthening disaster mitigation governance in industrial coastal cities facing natech risks.
Resolutive Policy Model for the Settlement of Land Tenure Conflicts in National Strategic Projects: A Case Study of Rempang Eco City, Indonesia Chandra Bhakti; Azhari Aziz Samudra; Rahmat Salam
Journal Of Social Science (JoSS) Vol 5 No 2 (2026): Journal of Social Science
Publisher : Al-Makki Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57185/wx19ab63

Abstract

This research examines land tenure and social conflicts arising from the Rempang Eco City National Strategic Project (NSP) on Rempang Island, Riau Islands Province, Indonesia. The goal is to identify the root causes of the conflict and propose a policy model to resolve land disputes in strategic development projects involving indigenous communities. A qualitative case study approach was used, with data collected through in-depth interviews, document analysis, and field observations, followed by thematic analysis using NVivo 12 software. The findings reveal that the Rempang conflict is a multidimensional issue rooted in structural inequality, marginalization of indigenous identity, and policy failures. The conflict reflects tensions between national economic development goals and the socio-cultural rights of indigenous communities over their traditional lands. Key factors driving the conflict include unclear land tenure, weak recognition of indigenous land rights, inadequate policy communication, limited public participation, and fragmented bureaucratic coordination. The conflict has been exacerbated by a security-based approach, leading to social and psychological impacts on affected communities. Drawing on policy implementation theories (Van Meter & Van Horn; Mazmanian & Sabatier) and conflict theories (resource conflict and identity conflict), the study proposes an Adaptive Collaborative Conflict Resolution Policy Model. This model emphasizes deliberative dialogue, recognition of local identity, agrarian justice, and adaptive policy implementation, providing a framework for resolving land tenure conflicts in National Strategic Projects and similar development contexts.