Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.806
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL CENDEKIA HUKUM Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Majalah Ilmiah Warta Dharmawangsa Reswara: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat NOMOI Law Review Bisnis Net : Jurnal Ekonomi dan Bisnis Law_Jurnal Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Bhinneka Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JPPM : Jurnal Pengabdian dan Pemberdayaan Masyarakat
Andi Maysarah
UNIVERSITAS DHARMAWANGSA
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 31 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 31 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
DETERMINATION OF SUSPECTS IN CORRUPTION CRIMES BY POLICE INVESTIGATORS FROM A DUE PROCESS OF LAW PERSPECTIVE Basar Achmad S Purba; Andi Maysarah; Dian Hardian Silalahi
NOMOI Law Review Vol 7, No 1 (2026): May Edition
Publisher : NOMOI Law Review

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30596/nomoi.v7i1.31051

Abstract

The extensive authority of Police investigators in determining suspects of corruption crimes often intersects with issues of arbitrariness and fundamental human rights protection. This study aims to analyze the reconstruction of suspect determination procedures based on Law Number 20 of 2025 and its juridical implications. As a theoretical and practical reference for legal practitioners, this research underscores the urgency of procedural compliance to ensure legal certainty. Employing normative legal research with statute and conceptual approaches , the discussion highlights a paradigm shift from broad discretion to mandatory scientific evidence, specifically requiring definitive state loss audits and "Special Case Exposure" involving external experts. The analysis confirms that the validity of suspect determination strictly depends on these limitative boundaries. The conclusion asserts that any violation constitutes an excess of power, rendering the suspect status null and void and the evidence invalid (fruit of the poisonous tree). Consequently, this research suggests that law enforcement must strictly adhere to these procedural safeguards to uphold the supremacy of due process in corruption eradication.
Co-Authors Afriani, Dwi Tika Andi Dico Gagarangga Antoro, Budi Asrindah, Asrindah Ayu Trisna Dewi Azmi Saputra Bambang Hendra Siswoyo Basar Achmad S Purba Cinta, Aura Dewi Wahyuni Dian Hardian Silalahi Dino Febriansyah Sitorus Fandi Iskandar Sopang Firah, Al Gustiana, Zelvi Ismail Ismail Junaidi, Listya Devi Kusbianto Kusbianto Lukman Hakim Siregar Mierna Zulkarnain Muhammad Azani Ramadhan B Nasution Nasution, Asrindah Pebry Aisyah Putri Batubara Putri Nabilah Rahmat Hidayat Matondang Rani Rahim Rilawadi Sahputra Rina Melati Sitompul Sabrina Aulia Rahmah Safira, Sri Yulia Sarah Nasution Sartika, Cici Satria, Welnof Septia, Tri Yelly Siregar, Lukman Hakim Siswoyo, Bambang Hendra Sopang, Fandi Iskandar Suhariyanti Sunarto Sunarto Suparman Suparman Tantri Naratama ZULIAH, AZMIATI