Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 3 Documents
Search
Journal : Jurnal Agripet

Pengaruh Substitusi Daun Indigofera dengan Silase Daun Pepaya serta Jenis Kemasan Berbeda terhadap Kualitas dan Sifat Fisik Wafer Dewi Febrina; Iis Muliati; Anwar Efendi Harahap; Sadarman Sadarman; Fitrah Khairi; Novia Qomariyah
Jurnal Agripet Vol 23, No 1 (2023): Volume 23, No. 1, April 2023
Publisher : Agricultural Faculty

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17969/agripet.v23i1.28277

Abstract

ABSTRAK. Penelitian bertujuan mengetahui kualitas fisik (warna, aroma, tekstur,) serta sifat fisik (kerapatan, berat jenis, kadar air) wafer dengan perbedaan komposisi substrat (substitusi daun indigofera/DI dengan silase daun pepaya/SDP) dan kemasan berbeda. Rancangan Acak Lengkap (RAL) berfaktor (4x4), 3 ulangan digunakan pada penelitian ini. Faktor H merupakan komposisi substrat (substitusi DI dengan SDP) yaitu, H1= SDP 0% + DI 30%; H2= SDP 2% + DI 28%; H3= SDP 4% + DI 26%; H4 = SDP 6% + DI 24%; faktor N adalah jenis kemasan, N0 = tanpa dikemas; N1= plastik; N2= kertas; N3= karung goni. Kualitas fisik (warna, aroma, tekstur) dan sifat fisik (kadar air, berat jenis, kerapatan) wafer merupakan parameter yang diukur. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan interaksi (P0,01) antara komposisi substrat dan jenis kemasan memengaruhi aroma dan tekstur wafer. Komposisi substrat (P0,01) sangat nyata memengaruhi berat jenis dan aroma wafer. Jenis kemasan (P0,01) sangat nyata memengaruhi kualitas fisik (aroma, warna, tekstur) dan sifat fisik (kadar air). Substitusi 28% DI dengan 2% SDP pada wafer yang dikemas dengan karung goni menghasilkan tekstur wafer terbaik (tidak berlendir, tekstur padat dan kasar dan skor 3,44) dan substitusi 24% DI dengan 6% SDP yang dikemas dengan karung goni menghasilkan aroma wafer terbaik (skor 3,46 aroma khas wafer).(Effect of substitution of indigofera leaves with papaya leaf silage and different types of packaging on the quality and physical properties of wafers)ABSTRACT. The aims of this study to determine the quality of physical (aroma, color, texture) and the properties of physical (compactness, density, moisture content) of wafers with substrate composition (substitution of indigofera leaves/IL with papaya leaf silage/PLS) and different packaging. The study used a factored completely randomized design (CRD) (4x4) with 3 replications. The H factor is the composition of the substrate (substitution of IL with PLS), namely, H1= PLS 0% + IL 30% H2= PLS 2% + IL 28%; H3= PLS 4% + IL 26%; H4 = PLS 6% + IL 24%; factor N is the type of packaging, N0 = no packaging; N1= plastic; N2= paper; N3 = gunny sack. Parameters measured were quality of physical (color, texture, aroma) and properties of physical (specific gravity, density and moisture content) of wafers. The results showed that the interaction between the type of packaging and the composition of the substrate (P0.01) affected the texture and aroma of wafers. Composition of substrate significantly (P0.01) affected the density and aroma of wafers. The type of packaging significantly (P0.01) affected the physical quality (aroma, color, texture) and physical properties (moisture content). Substitution of 28% IL with 2% PLS on wafers with gunny sack resulted in the best texture of wafer (coarse, dense and not slimy texture, score 3.44) and substitution of 24% DI with 6% SDP with gunny sack packaging with the best aroma of wafer (typical wafer aroma, score 3.46).
Pengaruh Perbedaan Bahan Perekat dan Sumber Filtrat terhadap Fraksi Serat dan Kualitas Fisik Wafer Ransum Komplit Adli Adli; Dewi Febrina; Zumarni Zumarni; Fitrah Khairi; Sadarman Sadarman
Jurnal Agripet Vol 22, No 1 (2022): Volume 22, No. 1, April 2022
Publisher : Agricultural Faculty

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17969/agripet.v22i1.21634

Abstract

ABSTRACT. Pelepah sawit dapat diolah dengan penambahan filtrat abu sekam padi (FASP) dan filtrat abu tandan kosong (FATK) selanjutnya digunakan sebagai bahan pembuatan wafer. Perbedaan sumber filtrat dan bahan perekat dalam pembuatan wafer memengaruhi fraksi serat dan kualitas fisik. Penelitian bertujuan mengetahui pengaruh sumber filtrat dalam pengolahan pelepah sawit dan bahan perekat berbeda dalam pembuatan wafer terhadap fraksi serat dan kualitas fisik. Rancangan acak lengkap berfaktor 2 x 3 dengan 3 ulangan digunakan dalam penelitian. Faktor F : sumber filtrat : F1= FATK dan F2 = FASP. Faktor L: bahan perekat, L1 = molases; L2. onggok; L3. tepung tapioka. Parameter yang diukur adalah kualitas fisik (kerapatan partikel dan daya serap air) serta fraksi serat (serat detergen asam/acid detergent fiber (ADF), hemiselulosa, selulosa, lignin dan serat detergen netral/neutral detergent fiber (NDF). Data dianalisis dengan analisis variansi selanjutnya analisis ragam dengan uji jarak berganda Duncan/Duncan Multiple Range Test (DMRT). Pelepah sawit yang diolah dengan sumber filtrat berbeda tidak memengaruhi kualitas fisik (daya serap air dan kerapatan partikel) serta kandungan selulosa dan hemiselulosa, tapi memengaruhi (P0,05) kandungan ADF, lignin dan NDF. Penggunaan bahan perekat berbeda dalam pembuatan wafer tidak memengaruhi kerapatan partikel tapi memengaruhi (P0,05) daya serap air dan fraksi serat (ADF, lignin, hemiselulosa, NDF, dan selulosa). Interaksi sumber filtrat dalam pengolahan pelepah sawit dengan bahan perekat dalam pembuatan wafer memengaruhi (P0,05) fraksi serat dan kualitas fisik. Pelepah sawit yang diolah dengan FASP selanjutnya dibuat wafer berbahan perekat molases menghasilkan fraksi serat terbaik (NDF 43,03%; ADF 40,29%; lignin 12,62%; selulosa 24,63%; hemiselulosa 2,74%) dan pelepah sawit yang diolah dengan FATK selanjutnya dibuat wafer berbahan perekat tepung tapioka menghasilkan kualitas fisik terbaik.(The effect of differences of adhesive and filtrates sources on fiber fraction and physical quality of complete ration wafer)ABSTRAK. Palm fronds can be processed with the addition of rice husk ash filtrate (RHAF) and empty bunches ash filtrate (EBHF) and then used as an ingredient in making wafers. Difference source of the filtrate and adhesive material in wafer making affect the fiber fraction and physical quality. The study aimed to determine the effect of the filtrate source in the processing of palm fronds and different adhesives in wafer making on the fiber fraction and physical quality. A completely randomized design with a factorial pattern, 2 x 3 with 3 replications was used in the study. Factor F : filtrate source : F1 = RHAF and F2 = EBHF. Factor L : adhesive material, L1 = molasses; L2 = tapioca by product ; L3 = tapioca flour. The measured parameters are physical quality (particle density and water absorption) and fiber fraction (ADF, hemicellulose, lignin, cellulose, and NDF). Data were analyzed by analysis of variance and the differences were analyzed by DMRT test. Palm fronds treated with different filtrate sources did not affect the physical quality (water absorption and particle density) and cellulose and hemicellulose content, but affected (P0.05) the content of ADF, lignin and NDF. The use of different adhesives in wafer making did not affect particle density but affected (P0.05) water absorption and fiber fraction (ADF, lignin, hemicellulose, NDF, and cellulose). The interaction of the filtrate source in the processing of palm fronds with the adhesive in wafer making affected (P0.05) the fiber fraction and physical quality. Palm fronds which were processed with RHAF then formed wafers with molasses as an adhesive, producing the best fiber fraction (NDF 43.03%; ADF 40.29%; lignin 12.62%; cellulose 24.63%; hemicellulose 2.74%) and palm fronds which were processed with EBAF then formed wafers with tapioca flour adhesive, resulting in the best physical quality.
Benefits of Soybean Pulp and Brown Rice Flour for Improving Carcass Performance and Reducing Fat Content in Peking Duck Ayuti, Siti Rani; Mudastsir, Mudastsir; Delima, Mira Sukma; Ferasyi, Teuku Reza; Akmal, Muslim; Qomariyah, Novia; Andriani, Mira; Sadarman, Sadarman; Amalo, Filphin Adolfin; Subagyo, Djoko
Jurnal Agripet Vol 25, No 2 (2025): Volume 25, No. 2 October 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Agriculture

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17969/agripet.v25i2.44014

Abstract

Soybean pulp and brown rice flour have a high protein content to increase the nutrients of Pekingese duck feed. The experimental research method used a Factorial Design with 5 treatments and 5 replicates, the details of the treatment were as follows: Control (a0r0), addition of brown rice flour (a1, a2, a3 and a4), and soybean pulp (r1, r2, r3 and r4). Soybean pulp 3-12% and brown rice flour 4-16% respectively. The parameters observed were feed consumption, live weight, feed conversion, carcass weight, carcass percentage, abdominal fat percentage, and meat fat content. The data obtained were processed according to the complete random design diversity analysis. Duncan's Multiple Range Test tested the values of different parameters between treatments at a 95% confidence level. The results showed that the addition of 3-12% soybean meal and 4-16% brown rice flour did not have a significant effect (P0.05) on feed consumption, live weight, feed conversion, weight and carcass percentage, except for the percentage of abdominal fat and fat content of Peking ducks. The addition of 12% soybean meal and 16% brown rice flour (a4r4) was able to reduce the percentage of abdominal fat by 47.5% and the content of meat fat by 55.2% compared to the control. This study concludes that the addition of 12% (r4) soybean pulp and 16% (a4) brown rice flour per kg of feed can reduce the percentage of abdominal fat and fat content of Peking ducks.
Co-Authors Adegbeye, Moyosore Joseph Adi Candra, Adi Adli Adli Adli, Danung Nur Agustin Bayu Prasetyo Agustin Bayu Prastyo Ahmad Sofyan Ahmad, Zuri Alexander Kurniawan Sariyanto Putera Alfian, Aldi Amirul Faiz Mohd Azmi, Amirul Faiz Mohd Andriani, Mira Anuraga Jayanegara Anwar Efendi Harahap Aprilliza AM, Mozart Nuzul Ayuti, Siti Rani Bahauddyin, Bahauddyin Bayu Prastyo, Agustin D. Febrina Danung Adli Delima, Mira Sukma Dewi Febriana Dewi Febrina Dwi Haryanta Endo Surya Ramadhan Faiz Mohd Azmi, Amirul Fatati Fatati Fazly, Mhd Filphin Adolfin Amalo Fitrah Khairi Fitrah Khairi Fitrah Khairi Fitrah Khairi Fungki Firma Mulia Gholib Gholib Gholib Gholib Gholib, Gholib Hafid, Agus Hardiyanto, La Ode Hendri Hendri Hendri Hidayati Hidayati Ichwan Ilyazar, Mohammad Iis Muliati Imam Gazali Infitria, Infitria Irawan, Agung Irawati, Evi Jiyanto, Jiyanto Jul Andayani Juliantoni, Jepri Jully Handoko Koswara, Eko Laconi, Erika Budiarti Lisman, Jon Maharaja, M. Adil Marina Revitriani Miftahush Shirothul Haq Mudastsir, Mudastsir Muslim Akmal Novia Qomariyah Novia Qomariyah Novia Qomariyah Novia Qomariyah Pajri Anwar Pandra, Andika Peter, Reski Prastyo, Agustin Bayu Qomariyah, Novia Rahman Rahman Rahmi Febriyanti Rahmi Febriyanti Rakhmad Perkasa Harahap Randi Mulianda Restu Misrianti Rinaldi, Satria Trisna Rizki Amalia Nurfitriani Rizki Amalia Nurfitriani Rizki Amalia Nurfitriani Rizki Amalia Nurfitriani Rizki Amalia Nurfitriani, Rizki Rony, Zahara Tussoleha Rovi Purba Saadilah Mursid Saleh, Eniza Sastrawan, Sandri Satria Trisna Rinaldi Satria Trisna Rinaldi Sirajuddin Sirajuddin Sri Novianti Sri Novianti Sri Ramayanti Subagyo, Djoko Suci Desraini Romli Sukmara, Anne Teguh Wahyono Teguh Wahyono Teja Kaswari Teuku Reza Ferasyi Tri Rachmanto Prihambodo Tri Regina Putri Weno, Weno Yunilas Yusuf Aldito Oktafyan Zulkarnain Zulkarnain Zulkarnain Zulkarnain Zulkarnain Zumarni, Zumarni