Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.363
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Negara : Journal Ilmu Hukum JURNAL MAGISTER HUKUM UDAYANA Jurnal Ilmu Sosial dan Humaniora Bestuur Lentera Hukum FIAT JUSTISIA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Komunikasi Hukum Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER Hasanuddin Law Review Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Varia Justicia Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Udayana Journal of Law and Culture Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata JURNAL PEMBANGUNAN HUKUM INDONESIA Jurnal Analisis Hukum Batulis Civil Law Review Pancasila and Law Review POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES (POLRI) Ethics and Law Journal: Business and Notary Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Jurnal Media Akademik (JMA) Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Hukum & Pembangunan Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Kertha Desa: Journal Ilmu Hukum Kertha Semaya : Journal Ilmu Hukum Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan
Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
Faculty Of Law, Udayana University
Religion Arts Humanities Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 66 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 66 Documents
Search

 3   4   5   6   7 
The Rise of Centralistic Governance in Spatial Planning in Indonesia and Australia: A Comparative Study Widiatedja, I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit; Qadam Shah, Mohammad; Sudiarawan, Kadek Agus; Yogantara, Pande
BESTUUR Vol 11, No 1 (2023): Bestuur
Publisher : Administrative Law Departement Faculty of Law Universitas Sebelas Mare

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/bestuur.v11i1.70120

Abstract

Since the Reformation, spatial planning governance has moved away from authoritarianism toward a more democratic style of government. However, the current Job Creation Regulation has heralded the return of the centralistic governance in spatial planning. Surprisingly, Australia is also experiencing this trend. This study will look at how the centralistic phase of spatial planning was implemented in Indonesia and Australia. By using a normative method, the results reveal that the spirit of centralization is obvious in the Job Creation Regulation. The central government has a dominating role in the implementation of spatial planning. It also controls the issuing of detailed plan. Because of the need to produce a digital map, the central government now has a power over the granting of spatial planning permission. In Australia, the local government evaluates and decides on the vast majority of planning applications. A countervailing tendency, nevertheless, has seen state governments take on some of the planning and decision-making duties once exercised by local governments. The state minister and development assessment panels are now responsible for authorization of significant projects. This pattern appears to depoliticize and simplify the application process for development projects, especially when those projects have financial advantages.
LEGAL IMPLICATIONS ON THE ISSUANCE OF GOVERNMENT REGULATION NO. 36 OF 2021 ON THE WORKER WAGE SYSTEM IN INDONESIA Bryant Christoper; Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
POLICY, LAW, NOTARY AND REGULATORY ISSUES Vol. 2 No. 1 (2023): JANUARY
Publisher : Transpublika Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55047/polri.v2i1.525

Abstract

Wages are something that plays an important role in employment, because wages are a form of appreciation to workers/laborers given by employers for the work that has been done. The purpose of this study is to find out changes in the legal rules regarding the wage system in Indonesia so that workers know how the composition of the calculation used in calculating wages is based on the current legal rules. This research uses normative legal research methods and document study techniques for data collection, as well as legislation and descriptive approaches. The results of this study indicate that this new regulation is aimed at boosting the country's economy and increasing Indonesia's competitiveness in the world by changing the composition of the wage calculation variables and changing the type of wages.
The Urgency of Alternative Regulations Resolution of Disputes Regarding Termination of Employment in Cases of Force Majeure Kadek Agus Sudiarawan; Ni Made Gina Anggreni; Ni Putu Ayu Meylan Ardini
Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Vol 10, No 3 (2025): November 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.17977/um019v10i3p293-303

Abstract

This study aims to analyze termination of employment under force majeure circumstances, the dispute-resolution system based on statutory regulations, and alternative mechanisms that may be implemented to address disputes arising from such terminations. The research employs a normative legal research method with a statutory approach. The findings indicate that termination of employment by companies due to declining revenues leading to financial losses during periods of global crisis, which ultimately result in the temporary or permanent cessation of business operations, satisfies the characteristics of force majeure. The dispute resolution system for termination of employment under Law Number 2 of 2004 may be pursued through three mechanisms, namely bipartite negotiations conducted through deliberation to reach an agreement, tripartite procedures involving a third party through mediation, or adjudication before the Industrial Relations Court. Online dispute resolution, which enables dispute resolution without physical meetings by leveraging internet connectivity and video conferencing technology, represents an alternative model for resolving termination-of-employment disputes arising from force majeure that may be implemented in the future.
URGENSI PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP TENAGA HONORER INSTANSI PEMERINTAHAN YANG TIDAK LOLOS DALAM SELEKSI PPPK Ni Made Cindy Nadila Putri; Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 14 No. 4 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2026.v14.i04.p08

Abstract

Studi ini bertujuan menganalisis kedudukan hukum tenaga honorer yang tidak lolos seleksi Pegawai Pemerintah dengan Perjanjian Kerja (PPPK) serta merumuskan bentuk perlindungan hukum yang layak pascapenataan non-ASN menurut UU 20/2023. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (UU 20/2023, PP 49/2018, UU 24/2011), pendekatan konseptual (doktrin perlindungan hukum Satjipto Rahardjo; Philipus M. Hadjon), dan telaah putusan (MK No. 119/PUU-XXII/2024), dilengkapi kebijakan administratif (Keputusan MenPANRB No. 15 dan 16 Tahun 2025). Temuan menunjukkan: (1) honorer yang tidak lolos tetap berada dalam kerangka penataan ASN; peluang keterserapan terbuka melalui skema PPPK, termasuk PPPK Paruh Waktu—dan/atau pola outsourcing di bawah rezim ketenagakerjaan; (2) perlindungan preventif mencakup pendataan berbasis BKN, larangan rekrutmen honorer baru, pengakuan administratif, standar pengupahan minimum, serta jaminan sosial; (3) perlindungan represif tersedia melalui jalur PTUN/PHI terhadap tindakan sewenang-wenang; (4) namun dasar hukum PPPK Paruh Waktu yang bertumpu pada keputusan menteri menimbulkan celah kepastian dan kesetaraan, sehingga efektivitas perlindungan, khususnya represif belum kokoh. Studi merekomendasikan penguatan landasan normatif setingkat UU/PP dan harmonisasi standar perlindungan agar sejalan dengan asas kepastian, keadilan, dan meritokrasi. ABSTRACT This study examines the legal status of honorary personnel (non-ASN) who fail the PPPK selection and formulates appropriate legal protections after the restructuring mandated by Law 20/2023. It employs a normative legal method using a statute approach (Law 20/2023, Gov. Reg. 49/2018, Law 24/2011), a conceptual approach (legal-protection doctrines of Satjipto Rahardjo and Philipus M. Hadjon), and case analysis (Constitutional Court Decision No. 119/PUU-XXII/2024), complemented by administrative policies (Ministry of PANRB Decrees No. 15 and 16 of 2025). Findings indicate: (1) unsuccessful honorary workers remain within the ASN restructuring track, with absorption channels via PPPK, including part-time PPPK and/or outsourcing under labor law; (2) preventive protection includes BKN, based registration, a ban on new honorary hiring, administrative recognition, minimum wage standards, and social security; (3) repressive protection is available through administrative and industrial-relations courts against arbitrary acts; (4) however, the part-time PPPK scheme relies on ministerial decrees, creating gaps in legal certainty and equality, which weakens enforcement, especially the repressive track. The study recommends elevating the legal basis to statute/regulation level and harmonizing protection standards to align with certainty, justice, and meritocratic governance.
URGENSI PENGUATAN PENGATURAN KEDUDUKAN PEKERJA PADA PENYELESAIAN PERSELISIHAN HUBUNGAN INDUSTRIAL SECARA NON-LITIGASI Kadek Agus Sudiarawan; Nyoman Satyayudha Dananjaya; I Kadek Rey Aditya Putra; Ni Made Ari Harta Sari
Kertha Semaya: Journal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 14 No. 8 (2026)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/KS.2026.v14.i08.p07

Abstract

Persoalan terkait ketidakseimbangan kedudukan para pihak merupakan salah satu isu utama yang masih menjadi tantangan dalam penguatan sistem penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial yang saat ini berlaku di Indonesia. Persoalan ketidakseimbangan kedudukan para pihak ditemukan pada setiap tahapan penyelesaian perselisihan melalui skema PPHI yaitu baik pada tahapan non- litigasi melalui perundingan bipartit dan tripartit, hingga pada tahapan litigasi melalui Pengadilan Khusus Hubungan Industrial. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan mengidentifikasi bagaimana kedudukan pekerja pada pengaturan penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial secara non-litigasi yang saat ini berlaku di Indonesia, mengidentifikasi dan menganalisis urgensi dari penguatan pengaturan kedudukan pekerja dalam penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial secara non-litigasi, dan berusaha menemukan bentuk penguatan pengaturan kedudukan pekerja dalam mewujudkan penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial secara non-litigasi yang berkeadilan dimasa depan. Penelitian ini merupakan Penelitian Hukum Normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, pendekatan konseptual, pendekatan fakta dan pendekatan perbandingan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan kondisi ketidakseimbangan kedudukan antara pekerja dengan pengusaha terjadi pada setiap pilihan penyelesaian secara non litigasi, yaitu baik pada tahapan perundingan bipartit maupun tahapan penyelesaian melalui mekanisme tripartit. Adapun penguatan pengaturan kedudukan pekerja pada sistem penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial sangat dibutuhkan guna mewujudkan nilai perlakuan yang adil dan layak dalam bingkai hubungan industrial sebagai amanat dari UUD NRI 1945. Atas kondisi terrsebut maka diperlukan langkah-langkah penguatkan baik secara kelembagaan maupun prosedur penyelesaian guna memastikan tersedianya akses yang adil dan setara ketika para pihak menempuh jalur non-litigasi sebagai pilihan penyelesaian perselisihan hubungan industrial. ABSTRACT The issue related to the imbalance of the positions of the parties is one of the main issues that is still a challenge in strengthening the industrial relations dispute settlement system that is currently in force in Indonesia. The problem of imbalance in the position of the parties is found at every stage of dispute resolution through the PPHI scheme, namely both at the non-litigation stage through bipartite and tripartite negotiations, to the litigation stage through the Special Court of Industrial Relations. This study aims to find out and identify how the position of workers in the non-litigation industrial relations dispute settlement arrangement that is currently prevailing in Indonesia, identify and analyze the urgency of strengthening the position of workers in non-litigation industrial relations dispute resolution, and try to find a form of strengthening the position of workers in realizing the settlement of industrial relations disputes in a fair non-litigation manner in the future. This research is a Normative Legal Research with a legislative approach, conceptual approach, factual approach and comparative approach. The results of the study indicate that the imbalance in bargaining positions between employees and employers persists throughout all non-litigation dispute resolution mechanisms, encompassing both the bipartite negotiation stage and the tripartite dispute settlement process. Strengthening the legal framework governing the position of employees within the industrial relations dispute settlement system is therefore essential to ensure fair and equitable treatment in industrial relations, as mandated by the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. In light of these circumstances, institutional as well as procedural reforms are necessary to reinforce the dispute resolution system, thereby ensuring that both parties have fair and equal access when pursuing non-litigation mechanisms as an alternative means of resolving industrial relations disputes.
Kewajiban Menghadirkan Penerjemah Resmi dalam Pembuatan Akta Notaris dan Implikasinya Terhadap Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Notaris Alda Amalia; Kadek Agus Sudiarawan
Acta Comitas : Jurnal Hukum Kenotariatan Vol 11 No 02 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Udayana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24843/AC.2026.v11.i02.p03

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pihak yang berkewajiban menghadirkan penerjemah resmi dalam pembuatan akta notaris berdasarkan Pasal 43 Ayat (5) Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2004 tentang Jabatan Notaris sebagaimana telah diubah dengan Undang-Undang Nomor 2 Tahun 2014, serta implikasinya terhadap perlindungan hukum bagi notaris. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, melalui penelusuran bahan hukum primer dan sekunder yang dianalisis secara kualitatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kewajiban menghadirkan penerjemah resmi secara proporsional berada pada para penghadap sebagai pihak yang berkepentingan langsung terhadap pemahaman isi akta, sedangkan notaris berkewajiban memastikan kehadiran penerjemah secara formal, memverifikasi legalitasnya, serta mencantumkan identitas penerjemah dalam akta. Penegasan norma mengenai pembagian kewajiban tersebut diperlukan untuk menjamin kepastian hukum dan perlindungan hukum bagi notaris.  
Co-Authors Adam Jose Sihombing Adisti, Putu Cantika Alda Amalia Alia Yofira Karunian Alvyn Chaisar Perwira Nanggala Pratama Anak Agung Ayu Wulan Prami Lestari Anak Agung Gede Duwira Hadi Santosa Ari Mahartha Bereklau, Brigitta Maria Bryant Christoper Dananjaya, I Komang Delvi Delvi Desak Putu Dewi Kasih Dewa Nyoman Rai Asmara Putra Dita Deviyanti Dwijayanthi, Putri Triari Fatchul Aziz Gede Agus Angga Saputra Gede Ardi Pradipa Jagi Wirata Gede Sugi Wardhana Gusti Ayu Diyan Vanessa Cristina Hermanto, Bagus I Gede Khrisna Dharma Putra I Gede Pasek Pramana I Gede Satya Putra Wibawa I Gust i Ngurah Wairocana I Gusti Ayu Nadya Candra Pramitha I Gusti Lanang Ngurah Adhi Widyarta Putra I Gusti Ngurah Parikesit Widiatedja I Kadek Rey Aditya Putra I Kadek Wira Dwipayana I Kadek Wira Dwipayana I Ketut Sudiarta I Ketut Sudiarta I Ketut Tjukup I Ketut Widyantara Putra I Komang Ferdyan Julyatmikha I Made Marta Wijaya I Made Sila Arta Putra I Putu Bimbisara Wimuna Raksita I Putu Rasmadi Arsha Putra I Putu Reinaldy Putrawan I Wayan Bela Siki Layang I Wayan Dedi Putra I Wayan Griya Putra Indah Pradnyani Putri, Ni Luh Gede Jayantara, I Putu Agus Krisna Karisma Nalayanti, Ni Nyoman Karunian, Alia Yofira Kasandra Dyah Hapsari Komang Calisto Yugi Adnyana Komang Yuni Sintia Dewi Kusuma, Ida Bagus Indra Kusuma, Kadek Pegy Sontia Layang, I Wayan Bela Siki Leony Ghuusbertha Marpaung Lokahita, Kadek Indira Longtan SHI Luh Putu Budiarti Made Agus Mas Dika Satryaningrat Made Dwita Martha Made Shannon Tjung Made Suksma Prijandhini Devi Salain Made Wiswani Wacika Marlina, Winda Martana, Putu Ade Hariestha Martha, Made Dwita Muchamad Izaaz Farhan Ramadhan Murti, Putu Ayu Mas Candra Dewi Ngakan Made Laksamana Wiwacitra Ni Desak Made Eri Susanti Ni Kadek Ayu Sri Undari Ni Kadek Eny Wulandari Putri Ni Ketut Supasti Dharmawan Ni Made Ari Harta Sari Ni Made Cindy Nadila Putri Ni Made Gina Anggreni Ni Nengah Adiyaryani Ni Putu Ayu Meylan Ardini Ni Putu Ayu Meylan Ardini Ni Putu Ayu Meylan Ardini Ni Putu Maharani Ni Putu Nanda Kebayan Sari Nyoman A Martana Nyoman Satyayuda Dananjaya Nyoman Satyayudha Dananjaya Pardosi, Mona Nita Pradnyani Putri, Ni Luh Gede Indah Pratama, Alvyn Chaisar Perwira Nanggala Putu Ade Hariestha Martana Putu Ade Harriesta Martana Putu Ade Harriestha Martana Putu Ade Harriestha Martana Putu Ade Harriestha Martana Putu Devi Yustisia Utami Putu Edgar Tanaya Putu Edgar Tanaya Putu Gede Arya Sumerta Yasa Putu Tsuyoshi Reksa Kurniawan Qadam Shah, Mohammad Raksita, I Putu Bimbisara Wimuna Ronald Saija Ruwisanyoto, Raden Fauzan Athallah Putra Salwa Putri Hardiyan Saputra, Komang Agus Yoga Satyayuda Dananjaya, Nyoman Sawitri, Dewa Ayu Dian Shara, Made Cinthya Puspita Shezil Alifiana Dista Aisyah Tjokorda Istri Diah Widyantari Pradnya Dewi Wita Setyaningrum Yogantara, Pande