Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.773
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Legalitas Lentera Hukum Brawijaya Law Journal : Journal of Legal Studies Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syariah dan Masyarakat Rechtsidee Jurnal Cakrawala Hukum MAHKAMAH: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Pancasila dan Kewarganegaraan Jurnal Akuntansi dan Pajak Jurnal Akta International Journal of Law Reconstruction Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Jambura Law Review JURNAL HUKUM dan KENOTARIATAN Media Iuris ADIL : Jurnal Hukum Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences International Journal of Environmental, Sustainability, and Social Science International Journal of Business, Law, and Education YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Journal of Law, Society, and Islamic Civilization International Journal of Educational Review, Law And Social Sciences (IJERLAS) Audito Comparative Law Journal (ACLJ) Administrative and Environmental Law Review Constitutionale East Asian Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (EAJMR) International Journal of Humanities Education and Social Sciences International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Yuridika Klausula: Jurnal Hukum Tata Negara, Hukum Adminitrasi, Pidana dan Perdata RechtIdee International Journal of Sustainability in Research (IJSR) Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal)
Tunggul Ansari Setia Negara
Universitas Brawijaya
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Neuroscience Social Sciences Other

Published : 58 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 58 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
The Effectiveness of Article 127b of Permen ATR/KPBN No. 16 of 2021 On The Implementation of The Registration of PPJB Deeds and Lease Agreements For Registered Land At The Land Office (A Study In Malang Raya) Sayoko, Wahyu Rekso; Negara, Tunggul Anshari Setia; Susilo, Hariyanto
International Journal of Business, Law, and Education Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): International Journal of Business, Law, and Education
Publisher : IJBLE Scientific Publications Community Inc.

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56442/ijble.v6i1.1122

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of Article 127b of Permen ATR/BPN Number 16 of 2021, which pertains to the registration of Deeds of Sale and Purchase Agreements (PPJB) and Deeds of Lease on registered land at the Land Office. The legal issue raised is the discrepancy between das sein (the reality on the ground) and das sollen (the legal provisions that should apply). In the Malang Raya region, these provisions are often overlooked or not implemented as they should be, resulting in numerous disputes over land and buildings based on PPJB and lease agreements. This study employs an empirical method grounded in theories of legal effectiveness, legal certainty, and legal utility. The results of the study indicate that the implementation of Article 127B has been ineffective because the three indicators of legal effectiveness—legal Substance, legal Structure, and legal culture—have not been met. The primary causes are the inadequate enforcement of regulations and a lack of understanding among relevant parties regarding the registration mechanism. Therefore, technical guidelines, as well as socialization and training, are necessary to enhance the effectiveness of implementing this article and prevent disputes in the future.
Legal Implications of The Regulation of Material Legal Norms in A Supreme Court Regulation (PERMA) Wahyu Iswantoro; Tunggul Anshari Setia Negara; Aan Eko Widiarto
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 20 No. 4 (2025): March
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v20i4.271

Abstract

Apart from being the authority of the DPR and the President, the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia also gives authority to judicial institutions such as the Supreme Court to make or form regulations. Whereas following Article 79 Paragraph (1) of the Supreme Court Law, the authority to regulate the Supreme Court is limited to supplementing procedural law, however, in its development, several PERMAs such as PERMA 2/2012 regulate the content of material legal norms and are externally binding, which should be regulated at the level law and becomes the authority of lawmakers (legislative act). The main issue that is important to research is what are the legal implications of regulating material legal norms in a PERMA. Under the problems raised, this research is doctrinal research also known as normative research. The approaches used are a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Based on the results of this research, there are 2 (two) legal implications of regulating material legal norms in a PERMA, namely: Overlapping Material Content of Legal Norms and the Unclear Position of PERMA in the Hierarchy of Legislative Regulations. As a result of these three legal implications, law enforcement officials as a legal structure will be unsure whether to follow PERMA as a statutory regulation that is aligned with the law or whether to ignore it.
The Authority of Judicial Orders of the Constitutional Court A Study of Legal Construction and Separation of Powers in Indonesia Ramdhani, Syafiq; Negara, Tunggul Anshari Setia; Susmayanti, Riana
YURISDIKSI : Jurnal Wacana Hukum dan Sains Vol. 21 No. 1 (2025): June
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Merdeka University Surabaya, Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55173/yurisdiksi.v21i1.289

Abstract

This study discusses the authority of judicial orders issued by the Constitutional Court in the context of legal construction and the principle of separation of powers in Indonesia. Judicial orders, as a concrete form of the expansion of the role of the judiciary, play an important role in filling legal gaps and ensuring the implementation of the Constitution, especially when the executive and legislative branches fail to fulfill their obligations. This study employs a normative legal approach with three analytical methods: a statutory approach, a case study of Constitutional Court decisions, and a conceptual approach to relevant legal theories. The findings indicate that judicial orders in Indonesia are not supported by a strong implementation framework, unlike practices in other countries such as India, Colombia, South Africa, Austria, and Germany, which are more progressive in regulating and supervising the implementation of judicial orders. The Indonesian Constitutional Court tends to issue declaratory or conditional rulings, but effective follow-up mechanisms do not accompany these. Therefore, this study recommends reformulating rulings to be more operational, establishing an implementation oversight unit, and adopting a continuing mandamus model for strategic issues as part of efforts to strengthen the role of the Constitutional Court in upholding constitutional supremacy and substantive justice in a constitutional democracy.
Justice Perspective on Land and Building Acquisition Duty Under Government Regulation No. 35/2023 Prayantama, Hamed; Anshari, Tunggul; Rachmat, Sigit Nur
International Journal of Islamic Education, Research and Multiculturalism (IJIERM) Vol 7 No 2 (2025)
Publisher : The Islamic Education and Multiculturalism Foundation

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47006/ijierm.v7i2.490

Abstract

Abstrak Penelitian ini mengkaji perspektif keadilan dalam penarikan Bea Perolehan Hak atas Tanah dan Bangunan (BPHTB) berdasarkan Peraturan Pemerintah Nomor 35 Tahun 2023 tentang Ketentuan Umum Pajak Daerah dan Retribusi Daerah. Penelitian ini dilatarbelakangi oleh adanya ketidakadilan dalam Pasal 18 ayat (2) huruf a, yang mewajibkan pembayaran BPHTB pada saat pembuatan Perjanjian Pengikatan Jual Beli (PPJB) yang bersifat notariil, berbeda dengan ketentuan sebelumnya yang mewajibkan pembayaran pada saat pembuatan Akta Jual Beli (AJB) oleh Pejabat Pembuat Akta Tanah (PPAT). Ketentuan tersebut menimbulkan permasalahan karena PPJB bukan merupakan alat bukti peralihan hak milik yang sah, serta bertentangan dengan asas “tunai dan terang” sebagaimana diatur dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria. Penelitian ini bertujuan menjawab dua rumusan masalah: (1) Apakah ketentuan pembayaran BPHTB saat pembuatan PPJB telah memenuhi prinsip keadilan? dan (2) Apa implikasi yuridis dari pelaksanaan Pasal 18 ayat (2) huruf a PP No. 35 Tahun 2023? Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan historis dan konseptual. Bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier dianalisis secara kualitatif yuridis melalui teknik interpretasi sistematis, gramatikal, dan teleologis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan adanya disharmonisasi norma antara PP No. 35 Tahun 2023 dan UUPA, khususnya dalam hal waktu dan dasar hukum penarikan BPHTB. Kewajiban pembayaran BPHTB pada tahap PPJB menimbulkan ketidakpastian hukum dan ketidakadilan, terutama bagi pihak yang belum melakukan peralihan hak secara sah. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa ketentuan tersebut belum mencerminkan prinsip keadilan dan merekomendasikan revisi regulasi agar sejalan dengan ketentuan hukum peralihan hak yang berlaku. Kata Kunci: Prinsip Keadilan; BPHTB; PPJB; Implikasi Hukum Abstract This study investigates the justice perspective in the imposition of the Acquisition Duty on Land and Building Rights (BPHTB) based on Government Regulation No. 35 of 2023 concerning General Provisions on Regional Taxes and Levies. The research is prompted by a perceived injustice in Article 18 paragraph (2)(a) of the regulation, which requires BPHTB to be paid at the time of executing a notarial binding sale and purchase agreement (PPJB), diverging from the previous practice where BPHTB was due upon the execution of the sale and purchase deed (AJB) by a land deed official (PPAT). This shift is problematic because a PPJB does not constitute legal transfer of ownership and contradicts the principle of cash and clear transaction enshrined in Law No. 5 of 1960 on Basic Agrarian Principles. The study seeks to answer two main questions: (1) Does the requirement to pay BPHTB at the time of PPJB fulfill the principle of justice? and (2) What are the legal implications of enforcing Article 18(2)(a) of Government Regulation No. 35 of 2023? Employing a normative juridical method with historical and conceptual approaches, the research analyzes primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials using qualitative juridical techniques. The study applies systematic, grammatical, and teleological interpretations to assess the normative consistency and fairness of the regulation. The findings reveal a normative disharmony between Government Regulation No. 35/2023 and the Basic Agrarian Law, particularly concerning the timing and legal basis of tax imposition. The obligation to pay BPHTB at the PPJB stage creates legal uncertainty and perceived injustice, especially for parties who have yet to finalize ownership transfer. The study concludes that the regulation in question does not adequately reflect the principle of justice and recommends legislative revision to align taxation obligations with valid legal transfer of ownership. Keywords: Justice Principle; BPHTB; PPJB; Legal Implications
The Concept of People's Sovereignty Towards The Appointment of The Ideal Acting Regional Head Hifdillah, Achmad Aldy; Negara, Tunggul Anshari Setia; Susmayanti, Riana
JURNAL AKTA Vol 12, No 1 (2025): March 2025
Publisher : Program Magister (S2) Kenotariatan, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/akta.v12i1.43859

Abstract

This research aims to criticize the appointment of Acting Regional Heads as part of legal conflicts that are contrary to the constitution. The appointment of Acting Regional Heads who do not involve the people directly, causes a perception that people's sovereignty is sidelined for the sake of administrative efficiency. Article 18 paragraph (4) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia is above the Election Law and the regulations under it, so that the interpretation of this regulation is not harmonious can trigger a polemic. This study uses doctrinal/normative research with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. The results of this study describe the concept of the appointment of Acting Regional Heads as an irrational part and has the potential to weaken the sovereignty of the people as enshrined in the staatfundamental norm (1945 Constitution) or grundnorm (Pancasila), the content element in the provisions for the appointment of Acting Regional Heads is full of non-democratic conditions so that these provisions need to be reviewed by prioritizing the aspect of people's participation. Therefore, it is necessary to strengthen the representation, participation of the people, and democratic mechanisms to maintain the sustainability of an inclusive and equitable political system.
Sovereignty and Human Rights: Examining Sustainable Plantation Enterprises in Indonesia Hairan, Hairan; Negara, Tunggul Anshari Setia; Koeswahyono, Imam; Sugiri, Bambang
Administrative and Environtmental Law Review Vol 5 No 1 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Lampung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25041/aelr.v5i1.3415

Abstract

The Sovereignty Principle in the Plantations Law legalizes dynamics that disproportionately empower plantation companies while disenfranchising indigenous peoples. Under this principle, plantation permits are granted to companies, not indigenous communities, limiting the latter's involvement in mandatory deliberations set by the law. Consequently, indigenous peoples are coerced into relinquishing their lands in exchange for compensation, leading to the erosion of their collective land rights. This practice is at odds with the protections intended under Article 28D Paragraph (1) and Article 28H Paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of Indonesia, which safeguard collective rights to property. The lack of political will to recognize and protect these rights suggests a troubling disregard for the existence and sovereignty of indigenous peoples.
The Omnibus Method In Indonesia’s Legislation Formation System Usihen, Min; Anshari, Tunggul; Riyanto, R. Benny; Widiarto, Aan Eko
International Journal Of Humanities Education and Social Sciences (IJHESS) Vol 4 No 4 (2025): IJHESS FEBRUARY 2025
Publisher : CV. AFDIFAL MAJU BERKAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55227/ijhess.v4i4.1310

Abstract

This study seeks to analyze and evaluate the implementation of the omnibus method within Indonesia's legislative framework. The primary focus of the research is to examine how this method streamlines the regulatory structure by merging multiple laws into a single, unified regulation. A qualitative methodology is employed, involving the analysis of relevant legal documents, existing laws, regulations, and academic literature. The sample population includes various Indonesian laws and regulations impacted by the omnibus method. The findings indicate that while the omnibus method significantly reduces legal complexity, it also introduces concerns regarding potential overlaps and conflicts within the legal system.
The Challenges and Opportunities of the Constitutional Court Decision Implementation on Recognition of the Indigenous Religions in Indonesia Sihombing, Uli Parulian; Safa'at, Muchamamd Ali; Anshari, Tunggul; Widiarto, Eko; Salman, Radian
Yuridika Vol. 36 No. 2 (2021): Volume 36 No 2 May 2021
Publisher : Universitas Airlangga

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (337.3 KB) | DOI: 10.20473/ydk.v36i2.24927

Abstract

The Constitutional Court of Indonesia has held the followers of the indigenous religion (the Penghayat) can have their own religious identity on their identity card (ID) in 2016. The 1945 Constitution of Indonesia mentions a non-discriminatory principle which has been applied by the Constitutional Court to this case. However, the implementation of the Constitutional Court decision will face challenges and opportunities on the field. The author has used of both normative and empirical methodology by providing related legal information and the result of the interview with the local leader of the indigenous religion as sources of analysing the issues. As the result of the research shows the following challenges for the implementation of the Constitutional Court decision ; a. unification of the laws, b. lack of affirmative action for the followers of the indigenous religions, c. Lack of the updated and integrated administrative data base of the citizens with the Constitutional Court decision, d. religiously and ethnically based politics effecting the decision of public officials to accommodate public services for the followers of the indigenous religions while the following opportunities of the implementation of the Constitution Court decision are the constitutional recognition and protection of the indigenous community, the existence of the National Ombudsman Commission, the rule law principle in the 1945 Constitution, final and legally binding status of the Constitutional Court decision.
Triadism Perspective on Payment of Debt Taxes in Complete Systematic Hold Registration Program: What and How? Adytia, Nur Amalina Putri; Anshari SN, Tunggul; Jauharoh, Arini
Rechtsidee Vol. 10 No. 2 (2022): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v11i0.789

Abstract

The Complete Systematic Land Registration Program (PTSL) actually has an orientation to provide guarantees of legal certainty. However, the formulation of rules in Ministerial Regulation No. 6/2018 regarding PTSL provides space for not fulfilling three values that must be met by law. This study aims to analyze PTSL Regulations in the perspective of Gustav Radbruch's triadism. This research is a juridical-normative research by prioritizing conceptual and statutory approaches. The results of the study confirmed that from the aspects of fairness, benefit, and legal certainty, the regulation of the payment of taxes payable for the transfer of rights to certified land from the PTSL program as stated in the PTSL Ministerial Regulation has the potential to prevent the three basic legal values from being realized. The non-realization of the three basic legal values above in the formulation of arrangements for payment of taxes payable for the transfer of land rights certified from the PTSL program has the potential to cause injustice in society while minimizing the beneficial aspects of the PTSL program as well as creating legal uncertainty in society regarding the implementation of the PTSL program which has the potential to harm human rights. community as PTSL participants. Revisions to the PTSL Ministerial Regulation, specifically Article 33 paragraph (1) of the PTSL Ministerial Regulation in conjunction with Article 40 paragraph (1) of the PTSL Ministerial Regulation actually aim to fulfill the three basic legal values put forward by Gustav Radbruch, for ensuring justice, expediency, and legal certainty.
Model of Supervision of Unregistered Community Organisations in Order to Realise Legal Certainty in Indonesia Dyanata, Nandu; Budiono, Abdul Rachmad; Anshari, Tunggul; Djatmika, Prija
Pandecta Research Law Journal Vol. 19 No. 1 (2024): June, 2024
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/pandecta.vol19i1.4179

Abstract

As social creatures, humans have a tendency to live in society and organise their lives, which is guaranteed by the constitution, which provides guarantees for association and organisation. This freedom has implications where currently there are many community organisations that exist with various objectives, the existence of community organisations themselves in the country has been far more advanced in its work to empower the community. The problem is that CSOs currently have two forms, namely registered and unregistered, so there are problems in supervision. The variety of mass organisations gave birth to various groups, one of which was based on religious ideology, such as Hizbut Tahrir Indonesia (HTI) which was dissolved on 19 July 2017. The Law on Mass Organisations affirms the principles that must be used in the establishment of mass organisations, one of the prohibitions is that mass organisations must not conflict with Pancasila and the 1945 Constitution. However, there is no definite formulation regarding the indicators of being contrary to Pancasila or Anti- Pancasila. Various restrictions are displayed in the form of prohibitions that show the existence of the existence of a mass organisation law. However, the application of the law should have a balance of inherent matters, namely between rights and obligations.
Co-Authors Aan Eko Widiarto Abdul Majid Abdul Rachmad Budiono Achmad Safiudin R Adji Kuntadewi Adytia, Nur Amalina Putri Afifulloh Afifulloh, Afifulloh Agustina, Enno Sellya Alkanu, David Pandu Amanda Puteri Rachmatullah Anastasia Rosita Retno Mayangsari Andriana, Desmilia Eka Anisa Pasha Rahmawati Antari, Putu Eva Ditayani Arif Zainudin Ariska Cesar Divian Candra KUSUMA Bagus Rio Biantoro Benny Riyanto David Boy Sumurung Silaban Dhia Al Uyun Diah Aju Wisnuwardhani Dyah Widhiawati Dyah Widhiawati Dyanata, Nandu Eko Widiarto Eko Widiarto, Eko Endang Sri Kawuryan Ervin Munandar Fadli, Moh. Fahmi Kamuli Fahmi, Herzie Riza Faqih Sunni S. Fery Rochmad Ramadhan Firmansyah R, Adithya Tri Fredy Alpin Gunawan Hadiyanti, Anisa Rahma Hairan, Hairan Hendarto Hadisuryo Henry, Tirza Tania Hermawan Dwi Putra Hifdillah, Achmad Aldy Hussein Ahmad Imam Koeswahyono Indah Dwi Qurbani Istislam Istislam, Istislam Istislam, - Iwan Permadi Jauharoh, Arini Jazim Hamidi kawuryan, endang sri Kawuryan, Endang Sri Laksono Trisnantoro Lovita Gamelia Kimbal Luth, Thohir Muchamad Ali Safaat Muchamad Ali Safa’at Muchamamd Ali Safa’at Muhammad Lukman Hakim Muhammad Lutfi Muhammad Lutfi Muzdalifah Lutfi Ngesti Dwi Prasetyo Ni Nyoman Intan Pratiwi Rahmawati Nur Chanifah Prayantama, Hamed Prija Djatmika Prija Djatmika, Prija Purba, Iman Pasu Putra, Hermawan Dwi Putri Darmawan Charles Putri, Luh Putu Yeyen Karista R. Imam Rahmat Sjafi’i Rachmat, Sigit Nur Radian Salman Ramdhani, Syafiq Reni Margiyanti Riana Susmayanti Riana SUSMAYANTI Safa'at, Muchamamd Ali Safa’at, Muchamad Ali Safa’at, Rachmad Salsabila, Amira Choirunnisa Salsha Zuhriyah Sandi Permana Nugraha Sandi Permana Nugraha Sayoko, Wahyu Rekso Setyo Widagdo Shinta Hadiyantina Shinta Hadiyantina Sihombing, Uli Parulian Sinda Eria Ayuni Sudarsono Sudarsono Sugiri, Bambang Supriyadi Supriyadi Susilo, Hariyanto Titik Soeryati Soekasi Uli Parulian Sihombing Usihen, Min Wahyu Iswantoro Widhiawati, Dyah Yulianti, Elina Dyah