Articles
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN PERKARA KEKERASAN BERSAMA-SAMA TERHADAP ORANG
Ardinata, Dimey Cantika;
Santoso, Bambang
Verstek Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i3.96900
This article analyzes the judge's consideration in deciding the crime of joint violence against persons. The purpose of this article is to find out whether the judge's consideration in imposing a punishment decision is in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code, especially Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code. This research is a prescriptive and applied normative legal research with a case approach, namely examining one case of joint violence against persons with the Decision of the Surakarta District Court Number: 202/Pid.B/2023/PN.Skt. The collection of legal materials is carried out by means of literature studies in the form of primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The analysis technique is to use the deductive syllogism method. Based on this research, it is found that in the case of joint violence against persons, the judge in handing down the verdict is in accordance with the provisions of Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code so that the defendant can be convicted. Translated with DeepL.com (free version).
TELAAH URGENSI AMICUS CURIAE DALAM KERANGKA SISTEM PERADILAN PIDANA DI NEGARA INDONESIA
Rizal, Fachri Nur;
Santoso, Bambang
Verstek Vol 13, No 1 (2025): JANUARI-MARET
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i1.84832
Artikel ini menelaah urgensi Amicus Curiae dalam kerangka sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui urgensi Amicus Curiae dalam kerangka sistem peradilan pidana di Indonesia. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum doktrinal atau normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual. Penelitian hukum ini dilakukan dengan meneliti data berupa bahan-bahan hukum primer dan bahan-bahan hukum sekunder. Penelitian hukum ini bersifat preskriptif, atau penelitian ini bertujuan untuk dapat diterapkan dan harus koheren dengan gagasan dasar hukum yang berpangkal dari moral. Dalam penelitian ini, digunakan teknik analisis silogisme deduktif yang berpangkal dari pengajuan premis mayor dan premis minor. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa keberadaan Amicus Curiae tersebut dapat menjadi aksesibilitas bagi masyarakat yang ingin berkontribusi dalam proses berjalannya suatu perkara peradilan. Terobosan hukum dalam mencari bahan atau informasi tambahan bagi hakim dalam pertimbangan hukumnya. Namun perlu diketahui bahwa konsep Amicus Curiae perlu diberi batasan sejauh mana Amicus Curiae dapat menjadi bahan pertimbangan hakim, karena mengingat ada potensi konsep ini mempengaruhi independensi hakim dalam memutus perkara. Konsep ini harus diakui secara formal untuk memberi pengaturan secara rinci terkait konsep Amicus Curiae.
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM PENGADILAN NEGERI SURAKARTA DALAM MEMUTUS PERKARA PERSETUBUHAN OLEH ANAK
Al Rasyid, Afif Falady;
Santoso, Bambang
Verstek Vol 11, No 2 (2023): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i2.71500
This legal research aims to analyze the considerations of judges in imposing sentencing decisions against children in conflict with the law in cases of intercourse. The purpose of writing this law is to find out how the judge considers in deciding cases of sexual intercourse committed by children. This type of research uses normative legal research methods with a prescriptive or applied case approach. The method of collecting legal materials is by means of literature study and the legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. The results of the study show that the considerations in the decision handed down by the judge in cases of sexual intercourse committed by children are based on Decision No. 7/Pid.Sus-Anak/2021/PN Skt complies with the legal provisions of Article 183 of the Criminal Procedure Code, Article 81 paragraph (2) of Law No. 17 of 2016 concerning the Stipulation of Government Regulation in Lieu of Law Number 1 of 2016 concerning the Second Amendment to Law Number 23 of 2002 concerning Child Protection, and also Article 71 paragraph (3) of Law Number 11 of 2012 concerning the Juvenile Criminal Justice System, bearing in mind that minors may not receive imprisonment like adults so that they can continue their lives by becoming better individuals.Keywords: Child; sentencing; Intercourse; Judge's Consideration
PERUMUSAN KEBIJAKAN PIDANA TERHADAP TINDAK PIDANA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK DALAM PEMBAHARUAN HUKUM PIDANA DI INDONESIA
Sukma, Dara Pustika;
Hartiwiningsih, Hartiwiningsih;
Santoso, Bambang
Verstek Vol 12, No 4 (2024): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v12i4.105649
Perkembangan globalisasi saat ini mempengaruhi perkembangan ilmu pengetahuan dan teknologi, oleh karena itu sarana komunikasi dengan masyarakat juga mengalami perkembangan. Jaminan ketertiban dan keteraturan dalampenggunaan media sosial, pemerintah merespon dengan mengeluarkan Undang-Undang Nomor 19 Tahun 2016 Tentang Perubahan Atas Undang- Undang Nomor 11 Tahun 2008 tentang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik. Bahwa upaya perumusan peraturan di masa yang akan datang terkait tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik harus dilakukan. Pentingnya pengaturan penegasan batasan, kualifikasi yuridis serta mengenai apa yang dimaksud tindak pidana pencemaran baik dan perbuatan apa saja yang menjadi alasan pembenar suatu tindak pidana pencemaran nama baik,maka diperlukan batas-batas yang jelas terhadap konsep demi kepentingan umum. Ide formulasi pembaharuan tindak pidana pencemaran baik di masa yang akan datang, baik di RUU KUHP maupun Undang-Undang Khusus di luar KUHP diharapkan tidak lagi mencederai hak-hak masyarakat
ANALISIS PERTIMBANGAN MAHKAMAH AGUNG DALAM MENGABULKAN KASASI TERDAKWA (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 2959/K/PID.SUS/2022)
Prabaswara, Yaying;
Santoso, Bambang
Verstek Vol 11, No 2 (2023): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v11i2.71539
This study analyzesthe criminal procedural law related to the consideration of the Supreme Court which granted Cassation guilty in the Narcotics case in accordance with Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and the consideration of the Supreme Court whichannulled theJudex Factie decision and tried himself according to Article 256 jo 255 of the Criminal Procedure Code. The Supreme Court set an acquittal in this case because there were legal clues and facts that showed the Defendant was innocent. The research method used is normative legal research which is both perscriptive and applied with case studies. The way to collect legal materials is by studying the literature and legal materials used, namely primary and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of research and discussion to answer the problem, it can be concluded that the reasons for cassation submitted by the Defendant were in accordancewith Article 253 paragraph (1) letter a of the Criminal Procedure Code because in the reasons for cassation, theJudex Factiedecision had misapplied the law, ignoring facts and instructions indicating that the Defendant not guilty. The Supreme Court's considerations in granting the Defendant's cassation were in accordance with Article 256 jo 255 of the Criminal Procedure Code granted the cassation and annulled the Judex Factiedecision and the trial itself declared the convict not legally and convincingly proven guilty of committing a crime of Narcotics. The Supreme Court has restored the Defendant's rights in terms of ability, position and dignity.Keywords: defendant's cassation; Narcotics; Consideration of the Supreme Court;
TELAAH PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN PERKARA PENGANIAYAAN BERAT DALAM PUTUSAN NOMOR 209/PID.B/2023/PN.SKT
Fitriyani, Fadhillah Nur;
Santoso, Bambang
Verstek Vol 13, No 3 (2025): JULI-SEPTEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i3.95908
This study analyzes the principles of restorative justice and finds out the judge's considerations in deciding cases of serious assault based on the study of verdict number 209/Pid. B/2023/PN Skt. The purpose of this legal research is to find out the basis for the judge's considerations in deciding cases by applying the principle of restorative justice based on the study of verdict number 209/Pid. B/2023/PN Skt. This legal writing is a normative legal research with a prescriptive and applied nature using primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials is using a literature study with a case approach. The analysis technique used is the deductive syllogism method. Based on the results of the study and discussion, the suitability of the Judge's considerations in issuing a light criminal sentence in the crime of serious assault, the author is in accordance with the principles of restorative justice. The judge's decision also reflects a sense of justice and benefit, because all parties involved, both the defendant, the victim, and the community, can feel a sense of peace, which is like the principle of restorative justice, namely prioritizing the recovery of the victim, the defendant, and the community.
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM MAHKAMAH AGUNG MEMUTUS KASASI TERDAKWA PERKARA KORUPSI PUTUSAN NOMOR 5190K/PID.SUS/2023
Triwardani, Mahaldika Nilan;
Santoso, Bambang
Verstek Vol 13, No 4 (2025): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i4.96305
This article analyzes the field of Criminal Procedure Law related to the considerations of the Justice in examining and deciding the cassation filed by the Defendant in a corruption case. The purpose of this article is to determine whether the justice's considerations in issuing a cassation decision in decision Number 5190K/Pid.Sus/2023 are in accordance with the provisions of the Criminal Procedure Code (KUHAP). The research method used is doctrinal or normative legal research. This research is prescriptive in nature which uses the collection of legal materials by means of literature study and the legal materials used are primary and secondary legal materials. Based on the results of the research, it can be concluded that the Supreme Court Judge (/justice?) has appropriately determined the cassation decision in the corruption case in decision Number 5190K/Pid.Sus/2023 because of the judge did not find any errors in the application of the law made by Judex Factie so that the Defendant is considered not to meet the requirements as stipulated in Article 253 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code and states that the Defendant's cassation is rejected with revisions.
RASIO DECIDENDI DALAM PUTUSAN BEBAS PERKARA PENCEMARAN NAMA BAIK (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 203/PID.SUS/2023/PN JKT TIM)
Najwa, Tarisa Aulia;
Santoso, Bambang
Verstek Vol 13, No 2 (2025): APRIL-JUNI
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i2.87627
Artikel yang berjudul Rasio Decidendi Dalam Putusan Bebas Pencemaran Nama Baik (Tinjauan Putusan Nomor 203/Pid.Sus/2023/PN JKT.TIM) mengkaji dan mendeskripsikan permasalahan yang terjadi di Indonesia terkait dengan bagaimana pertimbangan hakim dalam memutus bebas perkara pencemaran nama baik khususnya dalam studi perkara Putusan Nomor 203/Pid.Sus/2023/PN JKT.TIM). Tujuan artikel ini adalah untuk mengetahui bagaimana pertimbangan hakim sekaligus menjadi preseden baru pertimbangan hakim dalam hal perkara tindak pencemaran nama baik. Penulis ingin mendalami pertimbangan Hakim dalam menjatuhkan putusan terhadap perkara pencemaran nama baik telah sesuai atau tidak dengan ketentuan peraturan perundang-undangan yang berlaku di Negara Indonesia.
TELAAH PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM PUTUSAN BEBAS TERDAKWA TINDAK PIDANA PENIPUAN (STUDI PUTUSAN NOMOR 799/PID.B/2021/PN JAMBI)
Dedy, Muhammad;
Santoso, Bambang
Verstek Vol 9, No 4 (2021): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v9i4.72440
This article aims to examine and find out the suitability of the considerations of the judge who handed down an acquittal in a fraud crime case with article 183 in conjunction with article 191 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This article uses normative or doctrinal legal methods that are prescriptive and applied. The approach used in this article is a case approach. The use of legal materials includes primary legal materials and secondary legal materials. The technique of collecting legal materials uses library research by collecting legal materials related to the problem to be studied. The law material analysis technique used is the syllogism method which uses a deductive mindset. Based on the results of the research and discussion, it shows that in Decision Number 799/Pid.B/2021/PN Jambi, the considerations of judges who handed down acquittals in cases of fraud were in accordance with Article 183 in conjunction with Article 191 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Procedure Code. This is because the Prosecutor's evidence is still very minimal through the evidence of witnesses and letters to find material truth in this case. In addition, based on the results of the examination at trial the Judge was of the opinion that the second and third elements of Article 378 of the Criminal Code in the Public Prosecutor's indictment were not legally fulfilled so that the Judge handed down an acquittal against the Defendant.Keyword: Judge's Consideration; Evidence; Acquittal Verdict; Fraud
PERTIMBANGAN HAKIM DALAM MENJATUHKAN PUTUSAN PEMIDANAAN DALAM PERKARA KORUPSI PADA PUTUSAN NOMOR 51/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN Jkt Pst
Agatha, Laurencia Dian Flaviana;
Santoso, Bambang
Verstek Vol 13, No 4 (2025): OKTOBER-DESEMBER
Publisher : Sebelas Maret University
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.20961/jv.v13i4.97865
This study aims to assess the appropriateness of using expert testimony as evidence in the proving corruption cases, specifically in verdict Number 51/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN Jkt. Pst. This research is normative legal research and it is prescriptive in nature, with legal sources obtained from primary and secondary legal resources. The technique of collecting legal in this research is by means of literature study and legal materials are obtained and processed using the deductive syllogism method. The author analyzes Articles 2 and 3 of the Law on the Against of Corruption Crime as the major premise, with Verdict Number 51/Pid.SusTPK/2024/PN Jkt. Pst. as the minor premise.The results showed that the judge's considerations in imposing a criminal sentence are consistent with Article 183 of KUHAP. In their legal reasoning, the panel of judges based their decision on the evidence and exhibits presented, which convinced them, coupled with the absence of any findings of the criminal irresponsibility.