Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.565
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Pendidikan Geografi Undiksha Saintifika FKIP e-PROCEEDING Jurnal Pendidikan dan Ilmu Geografi Majalah Pembelajaran Geografi Jurnal Geografi AT-TA`DIB Awang Long Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Wahana Pendidikan Khidmatuna : Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat JPIG Jurnal Akuntansi dan Ekonomi Bisnis Jurnal Pembelajaran Fisika Journal of Innovation Research and Knowledge Natural Science Education Research (NSER) SAINTIFIKA JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research JURNAL MULTIDISIPLIN ILMU AKADEMIK Politika Progresif : Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Humaniora International Journal of Law and Society Desentralisasi: Jurnal Hukum, Kebijakan Publik, Dan Pemerintahan Konsensus: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Hukum dan Ilmu Komunikasi Journal of Nursing Science Research Jurnal Pendidikan Anak Usia Dini dan Kewarganegaraan
Sri Astutik
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 56 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research

 1 
Implementation of Labor Law in the Era of Industrial Revolution 4.0 - Challenges and Solutions Bachrul Amiq; Wahyu Prawesthi; Noenik Soekorini; Hartoyo Hartoyo; Sri Astutik
Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 2 No. 10 (2024): Oktober 2024
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jimr912

Abstract

The Industrial Revolution 4.0 has drastically transformed global industries, introducing advanced technologies such as automation, artificial intelligence, and digitalization into the workplace. This rapid technological shift has presented significant challenges for labor laws, which are often designed for traditional work environments. This study explores the implementation of labor law in the context of the Industrial Revolution 4.0, analyzing the challenges faced by both employers and employees in adapting to these new technological advancements. Using a qualitative methodology, this research employs a juridical review of existing labor laws, supported by an in-depth case study examining how these laws are applied in technology-driven industries. The findings indicate that labor laws often lag behind the technological advances, leading to gaps in legal protections for workers and ambiguities in employer obligations. The case study highlights specific instances where current labor regulations fail to address issues related to remote work, job displacement due to automation, and workers' rights in the gig economy. Solutions are proposed to modernize labor laws, ensuring they are adaptable to future technological developments while safeguarding workers' rights. The study concludes that there is an urgent need for legal reforms to balance innovation with fair labor practices in the era of Industry 4.0.
Legal Review of Local Government Institutions in Papua under Government Regulation No. 106/2021 Billy Muskitta Bastian Erlando; Vieta Imelda Cornelis; Noenik Soekorini; Sri Astutik; Hartoyo Hartoyo
Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 3 No. 9 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jimr1368

Abstract

The Province of Papua holds a special constitutional status under Law No. 2 of 2021, implemented through Government Regulation (PP) No. 106 of 2021, which assigns 23 governmental functions to regional authorities. The regulation embodies asymmetric decentralization intended to protect the rights of Indigenous Papuans (OAP) and address local needs. However, it raises legal concerns regarding ambiguous authority distribution between central, provincial, and municipal levels, as well as the unclear operational role of the Papuan People’s Assembly (MRP). The main research problem is whether PP No. 106/2021 provides a coherent and constitutionally consistent governance framework. This study applies doctrinal legal research using normative-analytical methods, including statutory interpretation, constitutional tests, and comparative perspectives. The findings indicate weak accountability mechanisms in managing Special Autonomy Funds, limited integration of customary law, and institutional fragility in newly established bodies such as BP-DOP and UPAP. The study concludes that PP No. 106/2021 does not fully align with the constitutional principles of legal certainty and decentralization. It recommends substantial revisions, strengthening MRP’s legal status, formal recognition of customary law through Perdasus, and an institutional blueprint with clear performance indicators to ensure effective, inclusive, and adaptive governance in Papua
Legal Safeguards for Justice Collaborators in Murder Cases: The Richard Eliezer Verdict Analysis Charles Ardani; Sri Astutik; Vieta Imelda Cornelis; Siti Marwiyah; Bachrul Amiq
Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 3 No. 12 (2025): Desember 2025
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jimr1405

Abstract

Justice collaborators, or "crown witnesses," have become essential in modern criminal justice systems, particularly in dismantling organized crime and uncovering complex murder cases. This study explores the legal protections afforded to justice collaborators in Indonesia through a doctrinal analysis of the Supreme Court Decision No. 1704 K/PID.SUS/2022, commonly known as the Richard Eliezer verdict. The objective is to critically examine the adequacy and application of legal safeguards provided to individuals who cooperate with law enforcement while implicated in serious crimes. Employing normative legal research methods and a statutory and case approach, the paper reveals discrepancies in the implementation of protections for justice collaborators. While the Indonesian Witness and Victim Protection Agency (LPSK) offers procedural protections, this analysis identifies significant gaps in enforcement, judicial interpretation, and institutional coordination. The findings underscore a need for stronger legislative frameworks and consistent judicial standards to uphold the rights and safety of justice collaborators. The implications extend to criminal law reform and the balancing of retributive justice with restorative mechanisms. This study contributes to the legal discourse on human rights protections in criminal procedure, particularly concerning vulnerable individuals assisting the justice system under duress or threat.
Constitutionality Testing of Presidential Candidacy Thresholds in Elections Based on the Principle of Popular Sovereignty Munir; Noenik Soekorini; Sri Astutik; Vieta Imelda Cornelis; Bachrul Amiq
Journal of International Multidisciplinary Research Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Januari 2026
Publisher : PT. Banjarese Pacific Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62504/jimr1421

Abstract

This study critically examines the constitutionality of Indonesia’s presidential candidacy threshold under Article 222 of Law No. 7 of 2017 in relation to the principle of popular sovereignty in Article 1(2) of the 1945 Constitution. The threshold requiring a party or coalition to hold 20% of DPR seats or 25% of the popular vote has been controversial for limiting voter choice and reinforcing oligarchic dominance. Using a normative legal research method, the study applies doctrinal interpretation through grammatical, systematic, historical, and teleological approaches to evaluate whether the threshold is consistent with constitutional democracy. The analysis identifies a disconnect between the legislative rule and the constitutional concept of sovereignty residing with the people, informed by theories of democracy, sovereignty, and progressive legal thought. While procedurally legitimate, the threshold lacks substantive constitutional validity because of its exclusionary impact on political participation. The study proposes four reform options: repeal, proportional adjustment, judicial reinterpretation, and constitutional amendment. These reforms would realign electoral rules with democratic principles and restore voters’ political agency. A doctrinal reinterpretation model is offered, framing the threshold as a regulatory instrument rather than a rigid barrier, advocating a legal structure that promotes inclusivity and reflects the people’s general will.
Co-Authors Abd Muhith Abdillah Satar Aditya Mahardika Aditya Rakhmawan Afida Silmi Nahdliyah Agum Taufan Agus Abdul Ghani Ahliyani Ahliyani Ajeng Lestyarindi Albertus Djoko Lesmono Alief Akbar Albasir Amar Ma’ruf Al Bawani Ana Susiati Anika Firdiansari Anindya Vania Permatasari Anna Partina Ari Dwi Handrian Arif Rahman Fadli Asyroful Mujib Ayub Fatahillah Ayuk Witria Ningsih Bachrul Amiq Bejo Apriyanto Berliana Oni Imaniar Billy Muskitta Bastian Erlando Brian Aziz Suryadana Charles Ardani Cindy Ineke Ferdanti Dede Wildan Kurniawan Dian Pratiwi dian putri ayu rahmawati Dony Adhitama Kurniawan Elan Artono Nurdin Emelyana Yuliana sugianto EF Endang Yulianingsih Era Iswara Pangastuti Ernu Widodo Fahmi Arif Kurnianto Febrian Eko Priandono Firda Afiana Maghfiroh Fitri Hariani Gilang Candra Setiawan Giofani Ginolla Ardiyanto Hartoyo Hartoyo Hildatul Zannah Hovi Abdillah HUSNUL KHOTIMAH I Ketut Mahardika Ida Purwati Iinamy Nurul Fuad Ilzam, Moch Immanuel Obed Anaru Indrawati Indrawati Intan Dwi Handayani Irawan Soerodjo Irene Berlinda Fajarrani Kiki Dwi Trisnani Kurnianto, Fahmi Arif Lailatul Nuraini Lisa Listyo Wati Lu’luul Maknuniyah M. Alvan Nur Rosyid M. Syahrul Borman M. Yustino Aribawa Maryani Maryani Maulana Ahmadi Maygi Angga Siswantoro Mohammad farid Hidayatulloh Muhammad Asyroful Mujib Munir Naelal Ngiza Nita Dwi Handayani Nita herlina ekasaputri Noenik Soekorimi Noenik Soekorini Nur Handayati Nur Wandiyah Kamilasari Nuriman Nuriman Nurma Yuwita Nurul Faradilla NURUL HIDAYAT Oktavian Brian Firmansyah Pangastuti, Era Iswara Prasasti Nur Indahsari Putri Anjani Rakhmawati Oktasenta Syafira ratna amalia Ratna Yuliastanti Regena Yuni Maulida Rengga Fatma Jaya Ria Intandari Rifati Dina Handayani Rif’ati Dina Handayani Rike Dwi Wulandari Risalatul Lutfiyah Shoum Rizka Nugraha Praktikna rofiqoh rofiqoh Rohmatul Husna Rohmi Khoirun N Rr. Laksmi Wulandari Safina Aulia Sani Saihan Salfa Zahroh Ahadah Shely, Shely Silvia Ainur Rohma Singgih Bektiarso Sinthia Lolita Lorensi Siti Badriyatul Siti Iklimatul Fatimah Siti Marwiyah Somaryati St SRI RAHAYU Sri Wahyuni Subekti Subekti Subekti Subekti Subekti Subiki Subiki Sudarti . Suhdi Suhdi Supeno Supeno Suriyo, Suriyo Sutarto Sutarto Syabdha Alamsyah Tini Wulandari Tjiptaning Suprihati Trapsilo Prihandono Tri Mardiyanti Rahayu Uswatun Hasanah Uswatun Hasanah Verawati Eka Ratna Sari Vieta Imelda Cornelis Wahyu Prawesthi Wicaksono, Iwan Yuni Dyah Pratiwi Yushardi Yushardi Zevi Hofifah Zhahrotun Nurroniah Zhulfi Prasetyadi