Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.253
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Jurnal Teknik Sipil Lex Jurnalica (Ilmu Hukum) PRIVATE LAW SALAM: Jurnal Sosial dan Budaya Syar-i REPERTORIUM Gema Al-Ahwal: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Islam Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Daulat Hukum Jurnal Privat Law Jurnal Hukum dan Pembangunan Ekonomi Privat Law Jurnal Repertorium PROCEEDING ICTESS (Internasional Conference on Technology, Education and Social Sciences) Jurnal HAM Gema Keadilan DE'RECHTSSTAAT Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Indian Journal of Forensic Medicine & Toxicology Prophetic Law Review Indonesia Private Law Review International Journal of Educational Research and Social Sciences (IJERSC) Indonesian Journal of International Law Law Development Journal Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Jurnal Riset Rumpun Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Humaniora (JURRISH) International Journal of Law and Society Primagraha Law Review MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review International Journal of Sustainability in Research (IJSR) Seminar Nasional Teknologi dan Multidisiplin Ilmu Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Journal Of Law Sciences (Legisci) LAWPASS Jembatan Hukum: Kajian Ilmu Hukum, Sosial dan Administrasi Negara Jurnal Medika: Medika Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia Terang: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Scientific Development Journal Fundamental : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Jurisprudence
Adi Sulistiyono
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Dentistry Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 83 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 83 Documents
Search

 5   6   7   8   9 
The Validity of The Absence of An Indonesian Translation in International Business Contracts Septi Songgo Langit, Shyntaulloh; Sulistiyono, Adi; Torry Satriyo Kusumo, Ayub
International Journal of Educational Research & Social Sciences Vol. 6 No. 6 (2025): December 2025 ( Indonesia - Malaysia )
Publisher : CV. Inara in Colaboration with www.stie-sampit.ac.id

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.51601/ijersc.v6i6.1015

Abstract

An agreement is a legal act between two or more parties who bind themselves to one another. Indonesian law requires agreements to be drafted in the Indonesian language, as stipulated in Law Number 24 of 2009 and Law Number 2 of 2014. However, Supreme Court Circular Letter (SEMA) Number 3 of 2023 states that the absence of the Indonesian language in an agreement shall not automatically render the agreement null and void, creating a potential conflict with the contractual validity requirement of a lawful cause. This study aims to analyze the legal implications of agreements drafted without an Indonesian-language version in light of SEMA Number 3 of 2023. The research serves for the preparation of a Master of Notarial Law thesis at Sebelas Maret University, providing deeper insight and understanding of the legal issues involved. Using a normative legal research method with statutory and conceptual approaches, this study concludes that the absence of the Indonesian language in agreements may result in nullity by operation of law, violates Article 31 of Law Number 24 of 2009 and Article 43 of Law Number 2 of 2014, which explicitly mandate the use of Indonesian. Such violations affect the objective validity requirement of a lawful cause. This normative inconsistency has broader implications for Indonesia’s economic stability, as legal certainty supports economic growth. The obligation to use the Indonesian language is reinforced by Article 7 of Law Number 12 of 2011 concerning the hierarchy of laws, applying the principle of lex superior derogat legi inferiori.
Cryptoization and Shadow Currency: Legal Overview of the Importance of Digital Rupiah in Indonesia Sulistiyono, Adi; Kharisma, Dona Budi
Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Vol. 23 No. 2 (2024): Pena Justisia
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pekalongan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31941/pj.v23i2.4369

Abstract

Cryptoization in Indonesia can be seen in the number of investors and crypto asset transactions. As of January 2024, the total number of crypto asset investors reached 18.83 million investors. Meanwhile, the total accumulated value of crypto asset transactions throughout 2024 was recorded at IDR 48.82 trillion. Various types and developments in crypto assets trigger shadow currency risks. Shadow currency is a currency function that can be replaced by another form. In this regard, research is needed regarding the relationship between crypto assets as shadow currency in financial stability and the importance of regulating digital rupiah in Indonesia. The approach used is the statute approach. This research will examine various laws and regulations relating to crypto assets, fintech, financial systems and currencies. The research results show that the crypto asset transaction process occurs outside the official monetary system and can develop into a digital currency area outside certain jurisdictions. The materialization of this risk can threaten a country's monetary sovereignty, thus triggering the risk of shadow currency. Therefore, it is recommended that the Digital Rupiah be a Central Bank Digital Currency (CDBC) which is officially implemented in Indonesia. However, there needs to be regulatory and policy support needed so that CBDC can be implemented in Indonesia, one of which is through a revision of the Indonesian Act on Currency.
TANGGUNG JAWAB NOTARIS TERHADAP PENOLAKAN UNTUK MENJADI PEMEGANG PROTOKOL NOTARIS Deselta, Azalia; Sulistiyono, Adi; Ginting, Rehnalemken
Repertorium: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Kenotariatan Vol. 12 No. 2 (2023): Repertorium
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/rpt.v12i2.3191

Abstract

Abstrak: Notaris adalah pejabat umum yang memiliki kewenangan untuk membuat akta otentik. Setiap akta otentik tersebut memiliki kekuatan hukum yang sempurna, yang mana tidak diperlukannya alat bukti lain dalam pembuktian untuk memutuskan suatu perkara. Sehingga isinya sangat dirahasikan dan tidak semua orang dapat melihat isinya, kecuali para pihak dan yang pihak lain yang sudah ditentukan dalam peraturan perundang-undangan. Selain membuat akta otentik, notaris juga memiliki kewajiban untuk menyimpan akta-akta yang dibuatnya berupa minuta akta dan dokumen-dokumen lainnya dalam protokol notaris yang menjadi bagian dari pengadministrasian kantor. Protokol Notaris tersebut wajib dijaga dan dirawat karena sifatnya yang termasuk dalam arsip negara. Maka dari itu, sangat diperlukan penyerahan protokol notaris kepada pihak lain yang telah ditunjuk sebagai pemegang atau penerima protokol jika notaris pembuat akta tersebut bermasalah atau yang termasuk dalam kategori di Pasal 62 Undang-Undang Jabatan Notaris. Namun, dalam praktiknya sangat dimungkinkan jika pemegang atau penerima protokol menolak untuk menjadi pemegang protokol atas alasan apapun, seperti sedang sakit, kantor pemegang protokol yang sempit sehingga tidak ada tempat lagi untuk menyimpan protokol, dan sebagainya. Hal tersebut tidak diperbolehkan karena notaris wajib untuk menerima protokol meskipun tidak adanya dasar hukum yang jelas. Kewajiban tersebut tersirat dalam Pasal 2 ayat (3) huruf c Peraturan Menteri Hukum dan Hak Asasi manusia Nomor 19 Tahun 2019 dan putusan pengadilan yang diteliti dalam penelitian ini. Maka dari itu, dalam putusan yang diteliti dalam penelitian ini menjadi dasar bahwa seorang notaris diwajibkan untuk menerima protokol notaris. Tanggung jawab yang diambil oleh pemegang protokol yang telah menolak untuk menjadi pemegang protokol notaris namun ingin membatalkannya adalah dengan membuat Pernyataan Pencabutan atas Surat Penolakan Menjadi Protokol meskipun penerima protokol dalam keadaan tidak memungkinkan.Kata Kunci: Protokol Notaris; Tanggung Jawab; Tolak Abstract: Notary is a public official who has the authority to make authentic deeds. Each authentic deed has perfect legal force, which does not require other evidence in proof to decide a case. So that the contents are very confidential and not everyone can see the contents, except for the parties and other parties specified in the laws and regulations. In addition to making authentic deeds, notaries also have an obligation to keep the deeds they make in the form of deed minutes and other documents in the notary protocol which is part of the office administration. The Notary Protocol must be maintained and cared for because of its nature which is included in the state archives. Therefore, it is very necessary to hand over the notary protocol to another party who has been appointed as the holder or recipient of the protocol if the notary making the deed has a problem or is included in the category in Article 62 of the Notary Law. However, in practice it is very possible if the holder or recipient of the protocol refuses to become the protocol holder for any reason, such as being sick, the protocol holder's office is so small that there is no more space to store the protocol, and so on. This is not allowed because the notary is obliged to accept the protocol even though there is no clear legal basis. This obligation is implied in Article 2 paragraph (3) letter c of the Regulation of the Minister of Law and Human Rights Number 19 of 2019 and the court decisions examined in this study. Therefore, the decisions examined in this study serve as the basis that a notary is required to accept the notary protocol. The responsibility taken by a protocol holder who has refused to become a notary protocol holder but wants to cancel it is to make a Statement of Revocation of the Letter of Refusal to Become a Protocol even though the protocol recipient is in an impossible situation.Keywords: Notarial Protocol; Responsibility; Refusal
Co-Authors Abdul Wahid Ahya Mofidi Lahida AL Hakim, Dimas Al Sentot Sudarwanto Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto Albertus Sentot Sudarwanto, Albertus Sentot Anggraeni, Sindi Ayu Annastasya Saputri, Nindya Arief Suryono Ariyanti, Dwi Oktafia Arsyad Aldyan Aziz, Sannia Beryl Alfarez Hertanto Beta Wulansari Brigita Natalia Rose Santi Budi Prasetyo Burhanudin Burhanudin Burhanudin Harahap Caska - Deselta, Azalia Dhikma Heradika Diana Tantri Cahyaningsih Dona Budi Kharisma, Dona Budi Eddy Ramon Torong Emmy Latifah Endang Pandamdari Fadilla Mariska Putri Faisal Luqman Hakim, Faisal Luqman Fitri Fatmawati, Vera Fitriyah, Sarah Fitriyah, Sarah Grahani Wahyu Widhyastuti Hari Purwadi,, Hari Hariati, Sri Hartiwiningsih Hatimah, Khusnul Hazdan, M Fahmi Heradika, Dhikma Heri Azwansyah Hermawan, Sapto I Gusti Ayu Ketut Rachmi Handayani Idris Assaf, Muhammad Iksan Isharyanto ,, Isharyanto Isharyanto Isharyanto Ivan Renaldi Kartika Cahyaningtyas Krista Yitawati Kukuh Tejomurti, Kukuh Kusumo, Ayub Torry Satrio Lunaraisah, Lunaraisah M Syamsudin M. Hawin M. Syamsudin Melati Adventine Christi Silitonga Moh. Jamin Monaya, Nova Muhammad Ramadhan Musataklima Musataklima Musataklima, Musataklima Nadhifah Thifal Kurnia Wibowo Nanda Bagus Trihatmojo Novianti, Dinda Nurwati Nur Padma Widyantari Perwitasari, RR. Intan Ratih Prameswari, RA Alilah Fathyarani Pranoto , Prasetyo Hadi Purwandoko PUJIONO Pujiyono Pujiyono , Purnama Adi , Fadhil Putri, Fadilla Mariska Raden Mohamad Herdian Bhakti Rahmaidha, Dewandira Darruning Sripradnya Rahman, Reza Fazlur Rahman, Reza Fazlur Rahmawati, Nur Ainiyah Rehnalemken Ginting Ridwan Rochim, Bayu Nur Roestamy, Martin Said Said, Said Salsabila, Elora Salsabila, Sekar Salma Saptanti, Noor Saputra, Toni Tri Septi Songgo Langit, Shyntaulloh Setiaji, Sigit Sihotang, Sudiman Sindi Ayu Anggraeni Sri Dwi Retno Ningsih Sri Utami suwadi, pujiyono Syamsuddin Talitha Danti Elvina Tesalonika Marta Ayuning Tyas Tifani Rizki Dianisa Torong, Eddy Ramon Torry Satriyo Kusumo, Ayub Trihatmojo, Nanda Bagus Tuhana Tuhana Umi Handayani Wardhani, Rachmalia Rosa Wardhani, Rachmalia Rosa Wicaksono, Bagas Wahyu Widyantari, Padma Winuratri Gita Prawardhani Yitawati, Krista Yudho Taruno Muryanto Zuhrah