Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 4 Documents
Search
Journal : Cakrawala Pendidikan

PEl'lGEMBANGAN INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL DAN SOCIAL CAPITAL MELALUI PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN Suyato Suyato
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan Vol 2, No 2 (2008): Cakrawala Pendidikan, Juni 2008, Th. XXVII, No. 2
Publisher : LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (581.897 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/cp.v2i2.8507

Abstract

Developingintellectu,,1 and social capital in preparing student for their future'srole as constructiveand critical citizen is essential in a healthy de~ocratic state,School-based civiceducation ,as one of means in building such ones faces somechallenges, Developing intellectual and capital, may be, is the greatest one. Thispaper tries to propose the urgency of such effort by arguing that school"based civiceducationCan be utilized as a means of making well informed citizen, The mainconcepts, such as democracy, citizenship, and responsibilities of governmentshould be understood by citizen properly and comprehensively. Therefore, theparamount challenge of civic education teachers is how to implement a teachingstrategy for best instilling those values, because people are not born with theknowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to make democracy work; rather, theyacquire this knowledge and capacity for democratic citizenship .only Ihroughexperience,especially through 'School-based civic educa.tion, One of the beststrategies of civic education is portfolio-based teaching strategy. In this activity,studentshave an opportunity to practicing their values related to deIrtocracy,citizen,and responsibility of government. Besides its disadvantages, portfolio­based teaching strategy is a promising one in order to prepare the well informedcitizen veryneeded in a healthy democratic 'State. Accordingly, teachers of civiceducation should change their circumstances by implementing this strategy
PEl'lGEMBANGAN INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL DAN SOCIAL CAPITAL MELALUI PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN Suyato Suyato
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan Vol 3, No 3 (2007): Cakrawala Pendidikan, November 2007, Th. XXVI, No. 3
Publisher : LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (581.899 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/cp.v3i3.8573

Abstract

Developingintellectu,,1 and social capital in preparing student for their future'srole as constructiveand critical citizen is essential in a healthy de~ocratic state,School-based civiceducation ,as one of means in building such ones faces somechallenges, Developing intellectual and capital, may be, is the greatest one. Thispaper tries to propose the urgency of such effort by arguing that school"based civiceducationCan be utilized as a means of making well informed citizen, The mainconcepts, such as democracy, citizenship, and responsibilities of governmentshould be understood by citizen properly and comprehensively. Therefore, theparamount challenge of civic education teachers is how to implement a teachingstrategy for best instilling those values, because people are not born with theknowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to make democracy work; rather, theyacquire this knowledge and capacity for democratic citizenship .only Ihroughexperience,especially through 'School-based civic educa.tion, One of the beststrategies of civic education is portfolio-based teaching strategy. In this activity,studentshave an opportunity to practicing their values related to deIrtocracy,citizen,and responsibility of government. Besides its disadvantages, portfolio­based teaching strategy is a promising one in order to prepare the well informedcitizen veryneeded in a healthy democratic 'State. Accordingly, teachers of civiceducation should change their circumstances by implementing this strategy
Elections as a means of citizens political education: A comparative study between Indonesia and Malaysia Sunarso Sunarso; Suyato Suyato; Puji Wulandari Kuncorowati; Toba Sastrawan Manik; Ali Masykur Fathurrahman
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan Vol 41, No 1 (2022): Cakrawala Pendidikan (February 2022)
Publisher : LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/cp.v41i1.44305

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare Indonesian and Malaysian elections in terms of (1) legal basis, (2) organizing institution, (3) implementation, (4) political party function, and (5) public participation. It was a library study using a qualitative approach. Documentation was used to gather information. The data were analyzed descriptively using the Miles and Haberman model. The data were collected, grouped, reduced, interpreted, and concluded. The data were interpreted based on concepts, theories, and critical analysis. Cross-checking was used as the data validity technique. The results of this study are (1) Indonesia has hosted 12 elections, some of which have been influenced by political dynamics, including Law No. 12 of 2003 concerning Elections for the 2004 Election, Law No. 10 of 2008, and Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections. Malaysian elections are governed by two laws: (a) the Malaysian Law on General Election Deed 1958 and (b) the Malaysian Law on General Election Error Act 1954. (c) P.U.(A) 293/2002 concerning the General Election (Voter Registration) Regulation last amended by P.U.(A) 106/2012; (d) P.U.(A) 185/2003 concerning Election Regulation (Post Elections) 2003; (e) P.U.(A) 386/1981 concerning General Election Regulations (Execution of Grand Elections) 1981, last amended by P.U. (A) 134/2013. (2) General Election Commission (KPU) is the name of the election organizers, whereas General Election Institute is the name of the election organizers in the New Order Era (LPU). Suruhanjaya Choice Raya is the Malaysian election organizer (SPR) (3) The election system in Malaysia is simpler and more efficient. Malaysia uses the District Election System which is based on the location of the election district, not the population. The election system in Indonesia uses the proportional election system. (4) Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy and adheres to a parliamentary democracy system. Both Indonesia and Malaysia adhere to a multi-party system. (5) The average voter turnout in Malaysian elections is 85 percent, while voter turnout in Indonesia is only 74 percent. In general, Malaysian elections are worse than those in Indonesia. In Malaysia, election organizers tend to favor government parties. Suruhanjaya Choice Raya Malaysia (SPR) barred Diaspora residents in other nations from using the post in 2018, claiming that the Diaspora favored opposition parties.
Increasing Social Care Through Civic Education in Higher Education Suyato, Suyato; Hidayah, Yayuk
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan Vol. 43 No. 1 (2024): Cakrawala Pendidikan (February 2024)
Publisher : LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/cp.v43i1.67136

Abstract

This study aims to build social care through an engagement-based Civic Education curriculum at Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta/UNY whose students have diverse backgrounds. This study was developed based on the qualitative approach through 1) a focus group discussion to examine the engagement learning model in the Civic Education curriculum, 2) a workshop on the development of engagement learning models, 3) expert validation using the engagement learning model instrument, 4) implementation of engagement learning model, and 5) reflections on the engagement learning model implementation. The results of this study show that the Engagement Learning Model can improve social care shown from mutual respect for diversity, social cohesion, sympathy for others, and volunteerism. The researcher used the social value theory to analyze students' social care. This engagement learning model can develop a social collaboration that promotes the unique characteristics of each student. Students are trained to be critical and socially sensitive through an engagement project consisting of social activities in the community in Civic Education learning. Increasing students' care from Civic Education may positively influence students' knowledge, attitudes, and social relations in their groups and outside their groups, respect and acceptance of diversity, social cohesion that forms cooperation, sympathy for others that form social solidarity, as well as a sense of volunteerism that makes students provide solutions to social problems.