Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

INDUSTRIALISASI DI KASONGAN suyato, Suyato
Informasi Vol 29, No 1 (2003): INFORMASI
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3841.68 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/informasi.v1i1.7179

Abstract

Industrialisasi atau proses menuju masyarakat industri dapat dijelaskan dari dua sisi, yaitu struktural dan kultural. Secara struktural, semakin terdiferensiasi suatu masyarakat karena tingginya spesialisasi kerja, semakin modern masyarakat tersebut. Sedangkan secara kultural , semakin rasional tindakan sosial dalam masyarakat, semakin modern masyarakat tersebut. Pembahasan ini mencoba memadukan kedua perspektif tersebut dengan asumsi bahwa bila proses diferensiasi secara struktural tidak diikuti rasionalisasi tindakan . secara kultural maka proses industrialisasi akan terhenti pada masa transisi. Desa Kasongan sebagai salah satu sentra industri tengah mengalami proses tersebut. Namun demikian, proses diferensiasi secara struktural dan rasionalisasi tindakan secara kultural belum mampu menyebabkan tererosinya ikatan patron-klien yang ada dalam desa tersebut sehingga menyebabkan desa tersebut berhenti pada masa transisi. Dengan kata lain, proses transformasi menuju masyarakat industri baik dari aspek struktural maupun kultural . belum mampu menghasilkan tipe tindakan sosial yang bersifat elektif yang mempertimbangkan kesesuairU"! antnra tujuan dan cara mencapai Faktor-faktor yang menyebabkan desa Kasongan berada pada tahap transisi antara lain .' Kuatnya ikatan patron-klien, rigiditas ruang normatif, rasionalisasi tindakan tidak sebanding dengan laju diferensiasi struktural, dan tipe masyarakat industri yang diharapkan tidak jelas. Dengan demikian, banyak sekali kemungkinan yang bisa terjadi sebagaimana banyaknya kemungkinan araii perubahan sosiai.
PEl'lGEMBANGAN INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL DAN SOCIAL CAPITAL MELALUI PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN Suyato Suyato
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan Vol 2, No 2 (2008): Cakrawala Pendidikan, Juni 2008, Th. XXVII, No. 2
Publisher : LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (581.897 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/cp.v2i2.8507

Abstract

Developingintellectu,,1 and social capital in preparing student for their future'srole as constructiveand critical citizen is essential in a healthy de~ocratic state,School-based civiceducation ,as one of means in building such ones faces somechallenges, Developing intellectual and capital, may be, is the greatest one. Thispaper tries to propose the urgency of such effort by arguing that school"based civiceducationCan be utilized as a means of making well informed citizen, The mainconcepts, such as democracy, citizenship, and responsibilities of governmentshould be understood by citizen properly and comprehensively. Therefore, theparamount challenge of civic education teachers is how to implement a teachingstrategy for best instilling those values, because people are not born with theknowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to make democracy work; rather, theyacquire this knowledge and capacity for democratic citizenship .only Ihroughexperience,especially through 'School-based civic educa.tion, One of the beststrategies of civic education is portfolio-based teaching strategy. In this activity,studentshave an opportunity to practicing their values related to deIrtocracy,citizen,and responsibility of government. Besides its disadvantages, portfolio­based teaching strategy is a promising one in order to prepare the well informedcitizen veryneeded in a healthy democratic 'State. Accordingly, teachers of civiceducation should change their circumstances by implementing this strategy
PEl'lGEMBANGAN INTELLECTUAL CAPITAL DAN SOCIAL CAPITAL MELALUI PENDIDIKAN KEWARGANEGARAAN Suyato Suyato
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan Vol 3, No 3 (2007): Cakrawala Pendidikan, November 2007, Th. XXVI, No. 3
Publisher : LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (581.899 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/cp.v3i3.8573

Abstract

Developingintellectu,,1 and social capital in preparing student for their future'srole as constructiveand critical citizen is essential in a healthy de~ocratic state,School-based civiceducation ,as one of means in building such ones faces somechallenges, Developing intellectual and capital, may be, is the greatest one. Thispaper tries to propose the urgency of such effort by arguing that school"based civiceducationCan be utilized as a means of making well informed citizen, The mainconcepts, such as democracy, citizenship, and responsibilities of governmentshould be understood by citizen properly and comprehensively. Therefore, theparamount challenge of civic education teachers is how to implement a teachingstrategy for best instilling those values, because people are not born with theknowledge, skills, and attitudes necessary to make democracy work; rather, theyacquire this knowledge and capacity for democratic citizenship .only Ihroughexperience,especially through 'School-based civic educa.tion, One of the beststrategies of civic education is portfolio-based teaching strategy. In this activity,studentshave an opportunity to practicing their values related to deIrtocracy,citizen,and responsibility of government. Besides its disadvantages, portfolio­based teaching strategy is a promising one in order to prepare the well informedcitizen veryneeded in a healthy democratic 'State. Accordingly, teachers of civiceducation should change their circumstances by implementing this strategy
Elections as a means of citizens political education: A comparative study between Indonesia and Malaysia Sunarso Sunarso; Suyato Suyato; Puji Wulandari Kuncorowati; Toba Sastrawan Manik; Ali Masykur Fathurrahman
Jurnal Cakrawala Pendidikan Vol 41, No 1 (2022): Cakrawala Pendidikan (February 2022)
Publisher : LPMPP Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/cp.v41i1.44305

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to compare Indonesian and Malaysian elections in terms of (1) legal basis, (2) organizing institution, (3) implementation, (4) political party function, and (5) public participation. It was a library study using a qualitative approach. Documentation was used to gather information. The data were analyzed descriptively using the Miles and Haberman model. The data were collected, grouped, reduced, interpreted, and concluded. The data were interpreted based on concepts, theories, and critical analysis. Cross-checking was used as the data validity technique. The results of this study are (1) Indonesia has hosted 12 elections, some of which have been influenced by political dynamics, including Law No. 12 of 2003 concerning Elections for the 2004 Election, Law No. 10 of 2008, and Law No. 7 of 2017 concerning Elections. Malaysian elections are governed by two laws: (a) the Malaysian Law on General Election Deed 1958 and (b) the Malaysian Law on General Election Error Act 1954. (c) P.U.(A) 293/2002 concerning the General Election (Voter Registration) Regulation last amended by P.U.(A) 106/2012; (d) P.U.(A) 185/2003 concerning Election Regulation (Post Elections) 2003; (e) P.U.(A) 386/1981 concerning General Election Regulations (Execution of Grand Elections) 1981, last amended by P.U. (A) 134/2013. (2) General Election Commission (KPU) is the name of the election organizers, whereas General Election Institute is the name of the election organizers in the New Order Era (LPU). Suruhanjaya Choice Raya is the Malaysian election organizer (SPR) (3) The election system in Malaysia is simpler and more efficient. Malaysia uses the District Election System which is based on the location of the election district, not the population. The election system in Indonesia uses the proportional election system. (4) Malaysia is a constitutional monarchy and adheres to a parliamentary democracy system. Both Indonesia and Malaysia adhere to a multi-party system. (5) The average voter turnout in Malaysian elections is 85 percent, while voter turnout in Indonesia is only 74 percent. In general, Malaysian elections are worse than those in Indonesia. In Malaysia, election organizers tend to favor government parties. Suruhanjaya Choice Raya Malaysia (SPR) barred Diaspora residents in other nations from using the post in 2018, claiming that the Diaspora favored opposition parties.
Perilaku menyimpang dalam perspektif sosiologis Suyato Suyato
Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan Vol 2, No 2 (2005): December 2005
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (191.968 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/civics.v2i2.4378

Abstract

Discourse of deviant behavior becomes difficult because of its complexity and relativity. Its complexity stems from the facts that there are many concepts should be considered, namely medical concepts, legal aspects, and morals issues. Its relativity comes from the facts that there are many perspectives, such as cross-cultural perspectives, subculture variations, ecological context, variation over time, and situational aspects. Sociologists have been made explanation on deviant behavior but not yet comprehensive. Sociological perspectives on deviant behavior can be categorized as structural functional theory, symbolic interaction theories, and conflict theory. Each of them tries to explain major question, basic assumption, and causes of deviance by using its own perspective. For example, control theory has been emphasis that because the lack of strong tied (legal or social) from others, individual tends to conduct defiantly. Sociologists also has been tried to comprehend ways people neutralize their misbehavior. Using economic perspective and control theory to eliminated corruption conducted by apparatus in district development program as an example, this article concluded that it is needed to make a comprehensive perspective in solving deviant behavior problems, such as corruption.
Teams Games Tournament (TGT): memadukan unsur competitive dan cooperative dalam rangka peningkatan kualitas pembelajaran PKn Suyato Suyato
Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan Vol 3, No 1 (2006): June 2006
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (3840.742 KB) | DOI: 10.21831/civics.v3i1.5740

Abstract

Many researches has been done in searching the advantages and disadvantages, both Cooperative and Competitive model of teaching, each of them has marry advantages. Accordingly, the rest task of teachers is to take the advantages and eliminate its disadvantages. This article tries to propose Team Game Tournament as a means in integrating cooperative and competitive aspects of instructional activity. With its distinctive feature, TGT can combines both cooperative and competitive spirits of student as a result, hopefully, student' achievement will increase. Implementation of TGT in some right occasion is one of means in increasing instructional effectiveness.
Revitalisasi Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Abad 21: Analisis Keterampilan Abad 21 Suyato Suyato; Yayuk Hidayah; Iqbal Arpannudin; Lutfia Septiningrum
SOCIA: Jurnal Ilmu-Ilmu Sosial Vol 19, No 2 (2022): Socia: Jurnal Ilmu-ilmu Sosial
Publisher : Yogyakarta State University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/socia.v19i2.60152

Abstract

Revitalisasi Pendidikan Kewarganegaraan Abad 21 menjadi isu penting dalam menghadapi tantangan abad 21 yang semakin kompleks dan dinamis. Ketrampilan abad 21 menjadi fokus utama dalam upaya meningkatkan kualitas pendidikan kewarganegaraan, yang bertujuan untuk menghasilkan generasi yang siap menghadapi tantangan global dan menjadi warga negara yang aktif dan berkontribusi pada masyarakat. Penelitian kualitatif ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis data ketrampilan abad 21 yang terkait dengan pendidikan kewarganegaraan di abad 21. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah studi kasus dengan melibatkan partisipan dari guru dan siswa pada sebuah sekolah menengah atas di Indonesia. Data dikumpulkan melalui observasi kelas, wawancara, dan analisis dokumen terkait kurikulum dan materi pembelajaran. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa ketrampilan abad 21 yang diajarkan dalam pendidikan kewarganegaraan meliputi kemampuan berpikir kritis, kreatif, komunikasi, kolaborasi, dan kemampuan beradaptasi dengan perubahan. Namun, implementasi pembelajaran ketrampilan abad 21 masih menghadapi beberapa kendala seperti kurangnya pemahaman konsep dan peran ketrampilan abad 21 dalam pendidikan kewarganegaraan serta kurangnya dukungan dari pihak sekolah dan pemerintah. Oleh karena itu, revitalisasi pendidikan kewarganegaraan di abad 21 perlu dilakukan dengan melibatkan semua pihak terkait, baik guru, siswa, maupun pihak sekolah dan pemerintah, agar ketrampilan abad 21 dapat diajarkan dan diterapkan secara efektif dalam pendidikan kewarganegaraan di abad 21.
Persepsi tentang Kebinekaan Global Warga Negara: Penelitian pada Mahasiswa di Universitas Ahmad Dahlan Siti Aulia, Syifa; Marzuki; Suyato
Jurnal Moral Kemasyarakatan Vol 9 No 1 (2024): Volume 9, Nomor 1 - Juni 2024
Publisher : Universitas PGRI Kanjuruhan Malang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21067/jmk.v9i1.10255

Abstract

Dalam era globalisasi, kebinekaan menjadi isu yang mendesak di berbagai belahan dunia. Kebinekaan, mencakup keragaman etnis, budaya, agama, dan bahasa, memperkaya kehidupan sosial namun juga menimbulkan tantangan dalam menciptakan harmoni sosial. Pendidikan tinggi memainkan peran penting dalam membentuk pandangan dan sikap mahasiswa terhadap kebinekaan global. Di Indonesia, negara dengan kekayaan budaya yang kaya, kebinekaan global menjadi aspek yang unik, menyoroti tantangan masyarakat multikultural. Studi ini fokus pada persepsi mahasiswa Universitas Ahmad Dahlan terhadap kebinekaan global, mengidentifikasi faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi pandangan mereka. Metode survei digunakan untuk mengumpulkan data, dengan hasil menunjukkan bahwa mahasiswa mengakui pentingnya keberagaman global dan melihatnya dalam konteks kewarganegaraan. Mereka melihat penghormatan budaya dan musyawarah sebagai solusi untuk tantangan kebinekaan. Pengajaran yang tanggap budaya diperlukan dalam menanggapi keragaman etnis dan budaya di tingkat pendidikan tinggi, yang dapat meningkatkan prestasi siswa dan memperkuat keterhubungan global. Namun, tantangan dalam mengimplementasikan pendidikan kewarganegaraan global di Indonesia termasuk kurangnya keahlian guru, keterbatasan waktu dan anggaran, serta kurikulum yang padat. Penelitian ini memberikan wawasan tentang persepsi mahasiswa terhadap kebinekaan global dan menyarankan strategi pendidikan yang lebih responsif terhadap kebutuhan masyarakat yang semakin beragam.
Engineering the development of democratic citizenship education curriculum in the global era: A few perspectives from theoretical frameworks Suyato, Suyato
Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan Vol 20, No 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jc.v20i1.59915

Abstract

There are weaknesses both from the perspective and effectiveness of Citizenship Education (CE) which are too oriented towards domestic problems in the context of facing global challenges and problems. Today it is necessary to change the orientation of the Civics curriculum which is globally oriented. In other words, it is necessary to engineer the Civics curriculum development. This paper attempts to present theoretical frameworks for engineering the development of a democratic and globally oriented Civics curriculum. There are at least six theoretical frameworks, namely the Birdcage Theory, Crystal Theory, Tree Theory, DNA Theory, Mushroom Theory, and Amoeba Theory. The six theories have different views, implications, and recommendations in curriculum engineering, including the Civics curriculum. This paper ends with the author's recommendations after considering both the strengths and weaknesses of the six theoretical frameworks.
Sensitivitas antarbudaya mahasiswa di Yogyakarta Suyato, Suyato
Jurnal Civics: Media Kajian Kewarganegaraan Vol 17, No 2 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Yogyakarta

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21831/jc.v17i2.35314

Abstract

Di dalam masyarakat majemuk atau multikultural seperti Indonesia ini, sensitivitas antarbudaya yang dimiliki warga masyarakat menjadi elemen penting untuk terciptanya kehidupan bermasyarakat, berbangsa dan bernegara yang damai. Namun demikian, penelitian yang memfokuskan pada sensitivitas antarbudaya belum banyak dilakukan. Oleh karena itu, peneliti tertarik untuk meneliti masalah sensitivitas antarbudaya, khususnya di kalangan mahasiswa. Secara khusus, penelitian ini dimaksudkan untuk membandingkan tingkat sensitivitas antarbudaya mahasiswa di tiga program studi yang ada di UNY, UPNV, dan UNRIYO. Penelitian yang menghasilkan luaran berupa tulisan ini merupakan penelitian komparatif, berusaha membandingkan tingkat sensitivitas antarbudaya mahasiswa tiga program studi (Keperawatan, PKn, dan Teknik Perminyakan). Responden penelitian ini sebanyak 90 mahasiswa yang dipilih secara acak dari tiga program studi tersebut (Keperawatan: 30; PKn: 30; dan Teknik Perminyakan: 30). Metode pengumpulan data adalah dengan penyebaran angket. Data dianalisis secara statistik baik secara deskriptif maupun komparatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa tidak ada perbedaan yang signifikan tingkat sensitivitas antarbudaya di antara tiga program studi tersebut. Dengan demikian dapat disimpulkan bahwa mahasiswa dari ketiga program studi tersebut memiliki tingkat sensitivitas antarbudaya yang tinggi, karena berada pada kategori pendukung cultural relativism, bukan cultural egocentrism. ABSTRACTIn a pluralistic or multicultural society like Indonesia, intercultural sensitivity possessed by citizens is an important element for the creation of a peaceful society, nation, and state. However, there has not been much research focusing on intercultural sensitivity. Therefore, researchers are interested in examining the issue of intercultural sensitivity, especially among students. Specifically, this research was intended to compare the level of intercultural sensitivity among students in the three study programs at UNY, UPNV, and UNRIYO. The research report written in this paper is a comparative study, trying to compare the level of sensitivity among students of three study programs (Nursing, Civics, and Petroleum Engineering). The research respondents were 90 students who were randomly selected from the three study programs (Nursing: 30; Civics: 30; and Petroleum Engineering: 30). The method of collecting data is by distributing questionnaires. Data were analyzed statistically both descriptively and comparatively. The results showed that there was no significant difference in the level of intercultural sensitivity among the three study programs. Thus, it can be concluded that students from the three study programs have a high level of intercultural sensitivity, because it is in the category of supporting cultural relativism, not cultural egocentrism.