Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
5.386
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata ADHAPER Jurnal Bina Mulia Hukum Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Justitia et Pax Widya Yuridika Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune Jurnal Sains Sosio Humaniora WAJAH HUKUM Awang Long Law Review Literasi Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum DE'JURE: Kajian Ilmiah Hukum Kumawula: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Media Iuris Jurnal Hukum Acara Perdata Era Hukum: Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Hukum JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Legal Spirit Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF SOCIAL, POLICY AND LAW (IJOSPL) Sawala : Jurnal pengabdian Masyarakat Pembangunan Sosial, Desa dan Masyarakat Indonesian Journal of International Law CITIZEN: Jurnal Ilmiah Mulitidisiplin Indonesia Journal of Social Research COMSERVA: Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Jurnal Hukum, Politik dan Ilmu Sosial (JHPIS) Concept: Journal of Social Humanities and Education Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal Midang Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Amandemen: Jurnal Ilmu Pertahanan, Politik dan Hukum Indonesia
Aam Suryamah
Universitas Padjadjaran
Religion Arts Humanities Astronomy Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 36 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 36 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
TINJAUAN YURIDIS PENDIRIAN PERSEROAN TERBATAS OLEH DOMPET DHUAFA DALAM PENGELOLAAN WAKAF PRODUKTIF Keshia Sashikirana Visco; Helza Nova Lita; Aam Suryamah
Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan Vol. 11 No. 1 (2025): Causa: Jurnal Hukum dan Kewarganegaraan
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.3783/causa.v11i1.11668

Abstract

Pendirian Perseroan Terbatas (selanjutnya PT) dalam pengelolaan wakaf merupakan langkah strategis dalam pengelolaan yang lebih terukur dan profesional. Dalam praktiknya, pengelolaan wakaf melalui PT tidak terlepas dari risiko bisnis yang dapat memengaruhi keberlanjutannya. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis praktik pendirian PT oleh Dompet Dhuafa dalam pengelolaan wakaf produktif dihubungkan dengan hukum positif di Indonesia, serta mengidentifikasi mitigasi risiko yang diterapkan untuk menjaga keutuhan harta wakaf dalam pengelolaannya melalui PT. Metodologi yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif, yaitu pendekatan yang berfokus pada pengkajian penerapan serta kaidah-kaidah dalam hukum positif. Informasi dikumpulkan melalui metode kepustakaan dan wawancara dengan Dompet Dhuafa. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan praktik pendirian PT oleh Dompet Dhuafa dalam pengelolaan wakaf tunduk pada tiga Undang-Undang, yaitu UU Wakaf, UU Yayasan, dan UU PT. Berdasarkan regulasi tersebut, Dompet Dhuafa selaku nazhir dapat mendirikan dua jenis PT, yaitu PT yang didirikan dengan harta yayasan dan PT yang didirikan dengan harta wakaf. Dalam hal PT yang didirikan dari harta wakaf, Dompet Dhuafa sebagai pemegang saham mendapatkan keuntungan sesuai dengan jumlah saham yang dimilikinya dan disalurkan sesuai ketentuan dalam UU Wakaf. Sebagai upaya mitigasi risiko, Dompet Dhuafa menjaminkan saldo nazhir dan mengasuransikan aset wakaf yang dimiliki. Laporan keuangan juga perlu disusun secara terpisah antara harta wakaf dan harta lainnya untuk memastikan kepatuhan terhadap UU Wakaf dan akan diawasi oleh oleh BWI. Meski BWI memiliki mekanisme pembinaan dan pelaporan, pengawasannya masih terbatas pada nazhir. The establishment of a Limited Liability Company (hereafter LLC) in waqf management is a strategic step in a more structured and professional management. In practice, waqf management through LLC is inseparable from business risks that may affect its sustainability. This study aims to analyze the practice of establishing LLC by Dompet Dhuafa in productive waqf management in relation to positive law in Indonesia, as well as to identify risk mitigation applied to maintain the integrity of waqf assets in their management through LLC. The methodology used is normative juridical, which is an approach that focuses on studying the application and rules in positive law. Information was collected through the literature method and interviews with Dompet Dhuafa. The results showed that the practice of establishing a LLC by Dompet Dhuafa in managing waqf is subject to three laws, namely the Waqf Law, the Foundation Law, and the LLC Law. Based on these regulations, Dompet Dhuafa as a nazir can establish two types of LLCs, namely LLC established with foundation assets and LLC established with waqf assets. In the case of a LLC established from waqf assets, Dompet Dhuafa as a shareholder gets profits according to the number of shares it owns and is distributed according to the provisions in the Waqf Law. As a risk mitigation effort, Dompet Dhuafa guarantees the nazir balance and insures the waqf assets owned. Financial reports also need to be prepared separately between waqf assets and other assets to ensure compliance with the Waqf Law and will be supervised by BWI. Although BWI has a coaching and reporting mechanism, its supervision is still limited to the nazir.
Kewenangan Jaksa Pengacara Negara Mewakili BUMN Sebagai Pihak Termohon Dalam Suatu Permohonan Kepailitan Dan PKPU Muhammad Akram Rafii Latuconsina; Elisatris Gultom; Aam Suryamah
JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): Juni: JURNAL HUKUM, POLITIK DAN ILMU SOSIAL
Publisher : Pusat Riset dan Inovasi Nasional

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55606/jhpis.v3i2.3643

Abstract

State-Owned Enterprises (BUMN) are one of the actors in economic activities in the national economy which have an important role in realizing the welfare and prosperity of society. In the case of bankruptcy and postponement of debt payment obligations applications, the Prosecutor's Office has the authority to file a bankruptcy application against the debtor on the basis of public interest. On the other hand, the Prosecutor's Office can also act as a state attorney who has the authority to represent the state or state agency in a case. From the research results, it can be concluded that the authority of the State Attorney to represent the state/state agencies in commercial cases is different from civil cases in general as regulated by Law No. 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and postponement of debt payment obligations.
IMPLICATIONS OF IMPLEMENTING BEHAVIOR CHANGES IN ABUSE OF DOMINANT POSITION BASED ON BUSINESS COMPETITION LAW Hanif, Muhammad Fauzan; Sudaryat, Sudaryat; Suryamah, Aam
Awang Long Law Review Vol. 7 No. 2 (2025): Awang Long Law Review
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Awang Long

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56301/awl.v7i2.1524

Abstract

Abuse of a dominant position is one type of violation that can provide an opportunity to change behavior. The mechanism for providing behavioral change in the abuse of a dominant position has implications for the KPPU, the reported party, and competing business actors. In terms of providing an opportunity to change behavior, the Commission Council considers the type of violation, the time of the violation and the losses caused by the violation. There is no further explanation regarding the criteria for providing an opportunity to change behavior, so legal construction is needed. This research was carried out using a normative juridical approach. Specifications: This research is descriptive analytical in nature, namely the data obtained will be described in this research by providing an overview of legal problems, the legal system and reviewing or analyzing them according to the needs of the research. The results of the research show the implications that arise in providing behavioral changes for violations of abuse of a dominant position which are contrary to the principle of legal certainty. Changes in behavior in the abuse of a dominant position will open up opportunities for the reporter to design abuse strategies in the future with different strategies. Per se approach indicators are needed to perfect the legal construction of providing behavioral changes for abuse of a dominant position. The KPPU can apply an alternative approach by carrying out analysis if the perpetrator abuses a dominant position at the same time committing a violation that meets the elements in another article, behavior change can be rejected.
Implementation of Economic Rights Protection for Broadcast Right Holders of Football Matches Through the Consolidation of Compensation Claims in Criminal Cases Based on Law No. 28 of 2014 on Copyright and Article 98 of Law No. 8 of 1981 on Criminal Procedure Noverina Alicia Putri; Muhamad Amirulloh; Aam Suryamah
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 1 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i1.879

Abstract

The development of information technology has influenced various sectors, including cinematography, which is protected by copyright law, especially in the context of broadcasting football matches. Despite copyright protection, many parties engage in unauthorized rebroadcasting, causing a breach of economic rights for the relevant rights holders. This research analyzes the legislative regulations protecting football broadcasting rights in Indonesia and the financial rights protection related to rebroadcasting. This research aims to understand the legal rules about football broadcasting rights and the safety of economic rights for broadcasting rights holders. A mixed legal study method combines normative and empirical legal research. The research results indicate that the Copyright Law provides adequate protection for the economic rights of football broadcasting rights holders. These exclusive rights are acquired by legal entities authorized to broadcast audiovisual works through radio media. Although criminal judgments cannot fully restore economic losses, mainly because they are penal, further steps are necessary to ensure compliance with these exclusive rights
Tinjauan Hukum Positif atas Kedudukan Negara sebagai Pemegang PNBP dalam Proses Kepailitan di Indonesia: (Studi Kasus Putusan Nomor 18/Pdt.Sus-Renvoi/2023/PN Niaga Medan) Napitupulu, Nicholas; Sudaryat; Suryamah, Aam
Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Vol 6 No 8 (2025): Tema Hukum Pemerintahan
Publisher : CV Rewang Rencang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56370/jhlg.v6i4.703

Abstract

State Receivables is one type of state revenue that must be paid to the Central Government. One form of State Receivables is Non-Tax State Revenue (PNBP). In the bankruptcy process, the State represented by the Ministry / Institution can become a Creditor. Creditors in bankruptcy itself are divided into 3 (three) levels. The problem is how the position of the state as the holder of PNBP itself in the bankruptcy process and how it is implied in one of the Commercial Court decisions, namely Decision Number 18/Pdt.Sus-Renvoi/2023/PN Niaga Medan. The results of the study show that, based on positive law in Indonesia, the position of the State as a holder of non-tax revenues in the bankruptcy process is as a Preferred Creditor. Furthermore, the consideration of the panel of judges in Decision Number 18/Pdt.Sus-Renvoi/2023/PN Niaga Medan can be said to be less precise in accommodating the position of the State itself.
Kepastian Hukum Pelaksanaan Voting Online Rencana Perdamaian Dalam Penundaan Kewajiban Pembayaran Utang Cindarbumi, Berlian Pramesthi; Suryamah, Aam
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 5 No. 2 (2022): NOVEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v5i2.5235

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal certainty  of  implementation  voting  online for reconcilliation agreement in the suspension of payment  scheme.  During the Covid-19Pandemic, the government issued various policies regarding social activities that would be carried out in court which were carried out  online, now they can be carried out  online, including the agenda for voting  for  reconcilliation agreement in PKPU.  However, there is no legal basis for voting online for  reconcilliation agreement in PKPU, so there is legal uncertainty regarding this implementation.  The research method used in this research is normative juridical. The results of the research obtained are that there is certainty from the implementation of voting  online for reconciliation agreement in the suspension of payment  scheme by referring to SEMA No. 1 of 2020 as legitimacy which states that judges can carry out activities in court boldly in order to reduce the spread of Covid-19. The implementation of the online voting  online for reconciliation agreement  as a whole still refers to the  UU KPKPU  and  thats  derivative regulations. The novelty of this research is to examine the validity or legal certainty of the implementation of the voting online for  reconcilliation agreement in PKPU  scheme.Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kepastian hukum dari pelaksanaan voting online rencana perdamaian dalam skema penundaan kewajiban pembayaran utang (PKPU). Pada masa pandemi Covid-19, pemerintah mengeluarkan berbagai kebijakan mengenai pembatasan sosial yang mengakibatkan kegiatan di pengadilan yang semula dilaksanakan secara langsung, kini dapat dilakukan secara daring, termasuk agenda voting rencana perdamaian dalam PKPU. Akan tetapi, tidak ditemukan landasan hukum dari voting online rencana perdamaian dalam PKPU, sehingga terdapat ketidakpastian hukum terhadap pelaksanaannya. Metode penelitian yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif. Hasil penelitian yang didapat ialah bahwa terdapat kepastian hukum dari pelaksanaan voting online rencana perdamaian dalam skema PKPU dengan merujuk kepada SEMA No. 1 Tahun 2020 sebagai legitimasi yang menyebutkan bahwa hakim dapat menyelenggarakan kegiatan-kegiatan di pengadilan secara daring demi menekan angka penyebaran Covid-19. Adapun pelaksanaan dari voting online rencana perdamaian secara keseluruhan masih merujuk kepada UU KPKPU dan peraturan turunannya. Kebaruan dari penelitian ini ialah mengkaji keabsahan atau kepastian hukum terhadap pelaksanaan voting rencana perdamaian secara online dalam skema PKPU.  
Co-Authors Adrasitta Khaliddya Fithrianni Agus Suwandono Agus Suwandono Ahmad M Ramli Ahmad M. Ramli Angela, Irene Maria Aqila Alhaq Santoso Bagas Nurcahya Ifieliano Bagas Nurcahya Ifieliano Bernadetta Lakshita Pradipta Utomo Bianca Latanya Cindarbumi, Berlian Pramesthi Dadang Epi Sukarsa Darodjat, Rafan Delvis Patrik Deviana Yuanitasari Dianda Dyassaputri Diva Yohana Margaretha Marbun Elisatris Gultom Ema Rahmawati Etty Mulyati Hakim, Jefferson Hanif, Muhammad Fauzan Helitha Novianty Muchtar Helza Nova Lita Helza Nova Lita Helza Nova Lita Holyness N Singadimedja Holyness Nurdin Singadimedja Intan Zahirah Jeremia Lumban Tobing Katarina Zein Angelica Janwarin Keshia Sashikirana Visco Laina Rafianti Marwandy, Irsyad Maulana, Mursal Miranda Risang Ayu Palar Mirza Alvina Maharani Muhamad Amirulloh Muhamad Amirulloh Muhammad Akram Rafii Latuconsina Mursal Maulana Nabilah Gunawan Napitupulu, Nicholas Nitta Amalia Noverina Alicia Putri Nyulistiowati Suryanti Putra, Afrizal Musdah Eka Putra, Afrizal Musdah Eka RAFAN DARODJAT Rafianti , Laina Ramli, Ahmad M Ranti Fauza Mayana Rika Ratna Permata Sinta Dewi Sudaryat Sudaryat Sudaryat Sudaryat Sudaryat Sudaryat, Sudaryat Tasya safiranita Tobing, Jeremia Lumban U. Sudjana, Sudjana Valencia Gustin Yonathan Aji Pamungkas Zidna Taqiya