Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.551
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Semaya POROS TEKNIK Rechtsidee Jurisprudentie Jurnal Daulat Hukum Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Yuridis Abdimas Umtas : Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Veteran Law Review Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora JUSTISI SABDAMAS JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Bakti Masyarakat Indonesia Jurnal Suara Hukum Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Law Development Journal Jurnal Interpretasi Hukum International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies Jurnal KALANDRA Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum International Journal of Law and Society International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Heru Sugiyono
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 53 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 53 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Sanctions Against Working Groups for the Selection of Goods/Services Providers in Cases of Tender Collusion (Study: Comparison between Indonesia and Malaysia) Bukit, Liametami Benedicta; Sugiyono, Heru
Rechtsidee Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1093

Abstract

The general background of this study is the persistent dominance of tender collusion in Indonesia’s procurement sector, which undermines fair competition and public welfare. The specific background focuses on KPPU Decision No. 15/KPPU-L/2023, where the Working Group (POKJA) was proven negligent but exempted from sanctions due to its unclear legal status under Law No. 5/1999. The knowledge gap lies in the absence of explicit regulatory authority to sanction POKJA, creating ambiguity in defining “other parties” within tender collusion provisions. The aim of this research is to compare Indonesia’s regulatory framework with Malaysia’s system, which empowers MYCC to impose administrative sanctions directly on public officials involved in bid rigging. The results show that Malaysia’s Competition Act 2010 provides broader investigative and enforcement powers, enabling more effective deterrence, while Indonesia relies on fragmented administrative mechanisms that weaken accountability. The novelty of this study is its comparative legal analysis demonstrating how dual-authority competition bodies enhance integrity in public procurement. The implications highlight the urgency to revise Law No. 5/1999, clarify POKJA’s legal standing, and establish expert data-analysis bodies to strengthen preventive measures against future tender collusion. Highlights: Indonesia’s weak sanctioning framework leaves POKJA’s accountability unclear in tender collusion cases. Malaysia’s MYCC demonstrates stronger enforcement through integrated administrative and public powers. Reform of Law No. 5/1999 is essential to strengthen oversight and prevent future bid-rigging practices. Keywords: Tender Collusion, POKJA, Competition Law, MYCC , Procurement Governance
The Law Enforcement Against The Abuse Of Dominant Position By The E-Commerce Platform Shopee Rochela Amalia Narindra; Heru Sugiyono
Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 12 No 2 (2025): Volume 12 Nomor 2 Desember 2025 (In Press)
Publisher : Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v12i2.62281

Abstract

This study examines the enforcement of competition law against the alleged abuse of dominant position by Shopee in the delivery service sector, as reflected in Case Number 04/KPPU-I/2024. Shopee is suspected of prioritizing its affiliated service, Shopee Express, leading to discriminatory practices that disadvantage independent delivery service providers. Using a normative juridical method with a statutory and case approach, the study finds that such practices potentially violate Article 19(d) and Article 25(1) of Law Number 5 of 1999. Legal protection for independent businesses can be provided preventively through regulations prohibiting discriminatory practices and repressively through law enforcement mechanisms by KPPU or civil lawsuits. The findings highlight the importance of strengthening regulations, consistent law enforcement, and legal education to ensure fair competition and safeguard consumer interests
Kepastian Hukum Business Judgment Rule Dalam Memberikan Perlindungan Hukum Bagi Direksi Perseroan Lina Husnul Khairiyyah; Heru Sugiyono
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 8 No. 3 (2025): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v8i3.12930

Abstract

This study aims to examine legal certainty and the accountability of directors in making business decisions through the application of the Business Judgment Rule (BJR) doctrine. The background of this research stems from the high risk of criminalization against directors who act in a business capacity, even though they have acted in good faith. The urgency of this research lies in the need for legal certainty that can provide protection for directors so that they remain bold in making strategic decisions without fear of legal threats. This study uses a normative juridical method with a case approach, namely Decision No. 12/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN Jkt.Pst related to LNG procurement by Pertamina. The results of the analysis show that the BJR doctrine has the potential to provide legal protection for directors, as long as business decisions are made in good faith, with due care, and without conflicts of interest. However, this protection is conditional because it can still be set aside in the event of a violation of the principles of GCG and fiduciary duty. In Decision No. 12/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN Jkt.Pst, BJR's defense was rejected due to procedural violations, such as the absence of approval from the Board of Commissioners and the General Meeting of Shareholders, as well as the absence of adequate risk assessment and technical analysis. The novelty of this study lies in its normative analysis of the application of BJR in criminal cases involving state-owned enterprises, which has not been widely studied in Indonesian legal literature. The consistent application of GCG and fiduciary duty principles is key to achieving legal certainty and protecting directors from future legal risks.   Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menelaah kepastian hukum dan pertanggungjawaban direksi dalam mengambil keputusan bisnis melalui penerapan doktrin Business Judgment Rule (BJR). Latar belakang penelitian ini berangkat dari tingginya risiko kriminalisasi terhadap direksi yang bertindak dalam kapasitas bisnis meskipun telah beritikad baik. Urgensi penulisan terletak pada kebutuhan akan kepastian hukum yang mampu memberikan perlindungan bagi direksi agar tetap berani mengambil keputusan strategis tanpa rasa takut terhadap ancaman hukum. Dalam penelitian ini metode yang digunakan yaitu yuridis normatif dengan fokus pada pendekatan kasus, khususnya melalui Putusan No. 12/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN Jkt.Pst terkait pengadaan LNG oleh Pertamina. Dari analisis yang dilakukan, terlihat bahwa doktrin BJR berpotensi memberikan perlindungan hukum bagi direksi, sepanjang keputusan bisnis dilakukan dengan itikad baik, kehati-hatian, dan tanpa konflik kepentingan. Namun, perlindungan tersebut bersifat kondisional karena tetap dapat dikesampingkan apabila terjadi pelanggaran terhadap prinsip GCG dan fiduciary duty. Dalam Putusan No. 12/Pid.Sus-TPK/2024/PN Jkt.Pst, pembelaan BJR ditolak karena terdapat pelanggaran prosedural, seperti ketiadaan persetujuan Dewan Komisaris dan RUPS, serta absennya kajian risiko dan analisis teknis yang memadai. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis normatif terhadap penerapan BJR dalam perkara pidana korporasi BUMN, yang sebelumnya belum banyak dikaji dalam literatur hukum Indonesia. Penerapan prinsip GCG dan fiduciary duty secara konsisten menjadi kunci terwujudnya kepastian hukum dan perlindungan direksi dari risiko hukum di masa mendatang.      
Co-Authors Adyuanas, Affan Agus Setiyo Budi Nugroho Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Aji Lukman Ibrahim Ali, Jovansyah Alisya Rahma Saebani Amandha, Rendytha Khansa Amiruddin, Alifiya Mafaza Arazid, Arazid Arofah, Muhammad Nouval Aurora Jillena Meliala Azzahra, Shalma Berliana Purwono Putri Budiman, Jodhy Farrel Bukit, Liametami Benedicta Chrys Auditya Dewi Clarence, Jennifer Dianrachma, Mitari Dinanti, Dinda Dwi Desi Yayi Tarina Dylan Rajasa Chandra Faidurrahman Faidurrahman Fajar, Rahula Fuad Sholihin Handoyo Prasetyo Haryanto, Imam Herbawani, Chahya Kharin Heru Suyanto Heru Suyanto Heru Suyanto Ibnu Sholeh Herdidenanto Iwan Erar Joesoef Liansah, Irene Lina Husnul Khairiyyah Lutfi, Khoirur Rizal Malik Ibrahim Martin Batara Tambunan Michael Giovanni Joseph Muhamad Shafwan Afif Muhammad Arafah Sinjar Muhammad Farhan Gayo Muhammad Fikri Muhammad Rahadian Hasbi Muthia Sakti Oktalia, Ilvana Pardede, Jeremy Raisha Cantika Mutiara Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti Ramadhanti Achlina Tri Putri Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution Ridha Wahyuni Ridwan, Ridwan Rizal, Sultan Ahmad Rizkianti, Wardani Rochela Amalia Narindra Rohman, Zahrah Farhataeni Salwa Noviana Putri Samodro, Dewanto Suci Amalia Tirachim Suherman Suherman Suprima Suyanto, Heru Syaiful, Rivasya Dinda Syakur, Muhammad Zidan Asy Sylvana Murni Deborah Hutabarat Thohari, Ahmad Ahsin Zahra Athirah Zakia Fitri, Anggi Rachma