Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

The Responsibilities of Influencer Doctors Promoting Skincare Products on Social Media Amandha, Rendytha Khansa; Sugiyono, Heru
Jurnal Daulat Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2024): June 2024
Publisher : Magister of Law, Faculty of Law, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/jdh.v7i2.38581

Abstract

 Influencer doctors are prohibited from promoting skincare products on social media as regulated in MKEK Decree 029/2021. This has pros and cons, where influencer doctors are considered to help people pay more attention to a skincare product before buying and it is feared that there will be excessive claims on a product because they have expertise in the field of beauty. This research aims to analyze the responsibilities of influencer doctors who promote skincare products on social media and legal protection for consumers who experience losses from the promotion of skincare products carried out by influencer doctors on social media through normative juridical research methods which are supported by primary, secondary, and tertiary data. The study shows that the responsibility of influencer doctors needs to be looked at further regarding the fulfillment of mistakes made, if they are not at fault, then full responsibility falls on the business actor. Meanwhile, if guilty, the influencer doctor can be subject to sanctions as regulated in the 2018 MKEK Guidelines and the Consumer Protection Law. The embodiment of consumer protection is to provide rights and obligations for consumers, business actors and advertising business actors. Consumers often think impulsively when buying skincare products because of other people's reviews. Therefore, to avoid losses, consumers need to be more careful when purchasing skin care products. If they experience losses, consumers can apply for compensation or peace efforts, in court and outside of court.Keywords: Responsibility, Consumer Protection, Influencer Doctors, Skincare
Law Enforcement Against Business Enterprise That Import an Unofficial Mobile Phone (Study Comparasion in Indonesia, Malaysia and Japan) Ibrahim, Malik; Sugiyono, Heru
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023): Jurnal Suara Hukum
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v5n2.p226-251

Abstract

Imported goods sent to a country do not necessarily have a permit or official to be traded in that country. In this study, the question that will be answered is what are the implications for the import of unofficial cellular phones by business actors who are sold to consumers and how law enforcement and the difference between unofficial cellular phones by business actors are sold to consumers in Indonesia, Malaysia, and Japan. This research method uses normative juridical type. The results of the study show different legal products from each country and their enforcement. In Indonesia, the impact of this forgery can be detrimental to state tax revenues as well as economic instability. Thus, it is regulated by law from Article 45 and Article 46 of the Consumer Protection Law to sanction a prisoner of a maximum of 2 years with a fine of Rp. 500,000,000.00. Malaysia is also affected by this black market, namely the decline in the state deficit due to the non-disbursement of goods taxes. Law enforcement in Malaysia refers to the counterfeiting rules based on the CopyRight Act 1987 with a prison sentence of not more than 5 years and a fine of money. In addition, in Japan itself has the Consumer Protection Law of 2000 and its enforcement for people who carry counterfeit and counterfeit goods based on article 167 with a prison fine of not more than 3 years. The conclusion that can be drawn is that each country, such as Indonesia, Malaysia, and Japan, has its own way of enforcing the law against the sale of unauthorized cell phones, but the impact can be the same.
Pelindungan Hukum Bagi Konsumen Yang Menjadi Korban Perusahaan Investasi Ilegal Berbasis Multi Level Marketing Clarence, Jennifer; Sugiyono, Heru
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 7 No. 3 (2024): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v7i3.10860

Abstract

This study aims to analyze legal protection and compensation mechanisms for consumers who are victims of illegal MLM-based investments, referring to Law Number 8 of 1999, and to assess the role and effectiveness of the OJK in supervision and enforcement. This illegal investment phenomenon is relevant to study because it often utilizes manipulative tactics, including the use of misleading information to encourage potential consumers to allocate their funds. Although legal regulations related to consumer protection are available, effective implementation and supervision are often challenges in ensuring that victims receive fair compensation. The study uses a normative legal method by reviewing theories, concepts, legal principles, and related laws and regulations. The research findings show that victims of illegal MLM-based investments in Indonesia have legal protection under the Consumer Protection Law, with supervision carried out by the Financial Services Authority (OJK). Victims have the right to file for a refund or compensation through a class action lawsuit mechanism. However, the limited assets of the perpetrator company are a major obstacle in implementing compensation. Therefore, a new, more effective approach is needed in supervision and law enforcement, including improving regulations to mitigate similar risks in the future. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis perlindungan hukum dan mekanisme ganti rugi bagi konsumen korban investasi ilegal berbasis MLM, mengacu pada Undang-Undang Nomor 8 Tahun 1999, serta menilai peran dan efektivitas OJK dalam pengawasan dan penindakan. Fenomena investasi ilegal ini relevan untuk dikaji karena kerap memanfaatkan taktik manipulatif, termasuk penggunaan informasi yang menyesatkan untuk mendorong calon konsumen mengalokasikan dana mereka. Meskipun aturan hukum terkait perlindungan konsumen telah tersedia, implementasi dan pengawasan yang efektif sering kali menjadi tantangan dalam memastikan korban memperoleh ganti rugi yang adil. Penelitian menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan meninjau teori, konsep, asas hukum, dan peraturan perundang-undangan terkait. Temuan penelitian menunjukkan bahwa korban investasi ilegal berbasis MLM di Indonesia memiliki perlindungan hukum di bawah Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen, dengan pengawasan yang dilakukan oleh Otoritas Jasa Keuangan (OJK). Korban berhak mengajukan pengembalian dana atau kompensasi melalui mekanisme gugatan class action. Namun, keterbatasan aset perusahaan pelaku menjadi hambatan utama dalam pelaksanaan ganti rugi. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pendekatan baru yang lebih efektif dalam pengawasan dan penegakan hukum, termasuk perbaikan regulasi untuk memitigasi risiko serupa di masa mendatang.
EDUKASI HUKUM MENGENAI PERLINDUNGAN HAK AKSES BANTUAN HUKUM BAGI WARGA BINAAN DI RUTAN KELAS I DEPOK Ridha Wahyuni; Dwi Desi Yayi Tarina; Dwi Aryanti Ramadhani; Heru Sugiyono; Sylvana Murni Deborah Hutabarat; Suwarsit, Suwarsit
J-ABDI: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol. 4 No. 7: Desember 2024
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jabdi.v4i7.8934

Abstract

Edukasi ini bertujuan untuk memberikan pengetahuan berupa informasi-informasi hukum dalam kerangka konsultasi hukum kepada para tahanan dan warga binaan yang berada di Rutan Kelas I Depok. Terkhusunya bagi perlindungan hak atas akses bantuan hukum yang dapat diperoleh secara cuma-cuma oleh masyarakat yang membutuhkan. Adapun metode yang digunakan dalam bentuk ceramah kemudian dilanjutkan dengan diskusi atau tanya jawab terkait masalah-masalah hukum yang sedang dihadapi oleh para warga binaan dan para tahanan di dalam proses hukum yang sedang berjalan. Dari kegiatan ini diharapkan dapat memberikan pencerahan hukum sebagai bentuk pelayanan bantuan hukum yang bisa diakses oleh semua lapisan masyarakat terutama bagi mereka yang memiliki keterbatasan ekonomi. Kegiatan ini, juga sebagai sarana guna mendukung program pemerintah dalam rangka memberikan jaminan perlindungan hak atas keadilan bagi setiap warga negara yang merupakan bagian dari kewajiban negara.
Mitigating the Risk of Exploitation and Violence Against Women Indonesian Migrant Workers in The Informal Sector Berliana Purwono Putri; Heru Sugiyono; Muthia Sakti
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 2: International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i2.349

Abstract

This research aims to analyze the mitigation of the risk of exploitation and violence against women Indonesian migrant workers in the informal sector as well as the responsibilities of the government and migrant employment agencies. Using the normative juridical method, this research examines relevant legal norms, such as the Indonesian Migrant Workers Protection Act, to evaluate the protection of women migrant workers' rights. Data is obtained from documentation of primary and secondary legal sources, analyzed using a feminist perspective to understand vulnerability factors and challenges in the feminization of migration. The results show that mitigating the risk of exploitation and violence against women Indonesian migrant workers in the informal sector includes preventive measures, such as pre-departure education, skills training, recruitment agency supervision, and legal empowerment. During the working period, protection is carried out through standardized work contracts, access to social protection, and bilateral cooperation, while post-work, economic and social reintegration is carried out through mentoring and entrepreneurship training. However, weak implementation of regulations, lack of oversight, and sectoral silos exacerbate the vulnerability of women Indonesian migrant workers in the informal sector to exploitation, discrimination, and rights violations. The responsibilities of the government and migrant employment agencies include legal protection at all stages of migration, from pre-departure recruitment, monitoring of working conditions, and post-employment reintegration programs to ensure that women migrant workers receive comprehensive protection through effective enforcement of employment contracts, legal aid, monitoring, and social reintegration. This research recommends improved regulation, pre-departure education, recruitment agency supervision, legal empowerment, and post-worker reintegration to reduce the risk of exploitation and violence against women migrant workers.
Merumahkan Sementara Pekerja di Masa Pandemi Covid-19: Abaikan Hak-Hak Pekerja Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti; Sugiyono, Heru; Agustanti, Rosalia Dika
Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Vol 20, No 4 (2023): Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia - Desember 2023
Publisher : Direktorat Jenderal Peraturan Perundang-undang, Kementerian Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54629/jli.v20i4.1061

Abstract

Krisis ekonomi yang diakibatkan oleh COVID-19 telah berimbas pada kebijakan merumahkan para pekerja/buruh. Tidak kurang dari 1,1 juta pekerja/buruh dirumahkan sejalan dengan pemberlakuan kebijakan lockdown. Kebijakan merumahkan ini bertentangan dengan Undang-undang Ketenagakerjaan, khususnya mengabaikan hak-hak pekerja/buruh. Tujuan tulisan ini melengkapi kekurangan dari studi terdahulu dengan mengkaji secara seksama bagaimana tindakan merumahkan bertentangan dengan nilai-nilai dasar hukum yang mengatur ketenagakerjaan. Metode yang digunakan bersifat kualitatif yang didasarkan pada pemetaan berita-berita online yang dipilih secara random berdasarkan tema berita yang memenuhi kriteria focus penelitian serta data statistic tentang banyaknya perusahaan yang merumahkan pekerja/buruh pada masa pandemic COVID-19. Kemudian diklasifikasikan secara sistematis untuk membuktikan adanya pelanggaran hukum dalam praktik merumahkan pekerja/buruh mengakibatkan pekerja/buruh mengalami tidak dapat menuntut hak-haknya dan disisi lain pengusaha tidak melaksanakan kewajiban hukumnya, berakhirnya kontrak kerja sebelum masanya, dan menghalangi hak pekerja/buruh untuk menyampaikan aspirasinya. Hasil penelitian memperlihatkan bahwa kebijakan pada masa pandemic perlu dievaluasi, karena pengalaman masyarakat menjalani masa pandemic tidak menjadi perhatian dalam membuat kebijakan. Kesimpulan penting dari kajian ini adalah perlunya suatu pemahaman subjektif tentang pekerja/buruh yang mengalami kebijakan dirumahkan, sebagai alternatif pada pemahaman umum dan bersifat top down.The economic crisis caused by COVID-19 has an impact on the policy of laying off workers/laborers. No less than 1.1 million workers/laborers were laid-off in line with the implementation of the lockdown policy. This housing policy is contrary to the Manpower Act, particularly ignoring the rights of workers/laborers. The purpose of this paper is to fill in the deficiencies of previous studies by examining carefully how the act of housing is contrary to the basic legal values governing manpower. The method used is qualitative which is based on mapping online news that is randomly selected based on news themes that meet the research focus criteria as well as statistical data about the number of companies laying off workers/laborers during the COVID-19 pandemic. Then it is classified systematically to prove there is a violation of law in the practice of laying off workers/laborers causing workers/laborers to experience being unable to claim their rights and on the other hand employers not carrying out their legal obligations, ending work contracts prematurely, and hindering workers/laborers' rights to express their aspirations. The results of the study show that policies during a pandemic need to be evaluated because the experience of the community during a pandemic is not a concern in making policies. An important conclusion from this study is the need for a subjective understanding of workers/laborers who have experienced the laid-off policy, as an alternative to general understanding and is top-down.
Nominee Agreements as Instruments of Fraud in Educational Foundations : Criminal Responsibility of Foundation Organs for Misappropriating Land Assets Ownership Michael Giovanni Joseph; Handoyo Prasetyo; Heru Sugiyono
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v2i2.629

Abstract

This study examines the use of nominee agreements as instruments of fraud within Indonesian foundations that operate private educations.  This research focuses on how foundation organs use the foundations to buy land assets for themselves and evade liability. The problem addressed is the gap between civil‐law façade and underlying criminal intent, whereby Patrons, Management, and Supervisors transfer land ownership out of the foundation’s name through a simulated agreement called nominee contracts. The research aims to analyze how these contracts facilitate systemic fraud and to propose a legal framework for holding both individuals and the foundation itself criminally accountable. A doctrinal‐normative method is employed, involving analyses of statutory provisions (Foundation Law, the old and the new Criminal Code), internal regulations, and key court decisions (e.g., Gunung Muria University, Al‐Hilaal Ambon, Morning Star). Findings reveal that nominee agreements consistently conceal intent to defraud, that existing legal provisions are underutilized or applied piecemeal, and that criminal courts have been reluctant to dissolve offending foundations despite clear evidence of strafbaarfeit (criminal act) by the foundation. The main synthesis highlights the necessity of a consistent approach by the law enforcement and the court to interpret nominee‐based transfers as criminal acts to prevent further asset diversion. The study concludes that integrating civil and criminal frameworks, along with strengthening oversight and enabling immediate dissolution of fraudulent foundations, is essential to safeguard public interest and restore trust in the nonprofit sector.
Tiktokshop’s Acquisition of Tokopedia in Providing Justice for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises (Study: Tiktokshop E-Commerce Services in Indonesia) Dylan Rajasa Chandra; Sugiyono, Heru
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 4 No. 5 (2024): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities (July-August 2024)
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v4i5.532

Abstract

The purpose of this study is a study of the protection of law and justice that exists in Indonesia related to the occurrence of actions by a number of Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises actors on the decision to acquire Tokopedia made by Bytedance as the parent of Tiktokshop. This research was conducted using the normative juridical method because it is based on legal norms in legislation and legal principles. The results of this study indicate that the partnership between Tiktokshop and Tokopedia provides problems of justice for business actors where one party benefits from Tiktokshop's innovation and the other party feels disadvantaged because of gaps in business competition. With the existence of laws that regulate legal protection for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises, especially with the enactment of Regulation of the Minister of Trade Number 31 of 2023 concerning Business Licensing, Advertising, Guidance and Supervision of Business Actors in Trading through Electronic Systems, it can be said that existing regulations if implemented can provide benefits to business actors in providing justice and legal protection for Micro, Small and Medium Enterprises.
Legal Certainy in Resolving Trademark Disputes Involving Subtantial Similarities to Registered Trademarks of Other Parties Liansah, Irene; Sugiyono, Heru
Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities Vol. 5 No. 5 (2025): (JLPH) Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities
Publisher : Dinasti Research

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jlph.v5i5.1958

Abstract

The increasing number of trademark registrations in Indonesia reflects a growing awareness among business actors regarding the importance of legal protection for product or service identity. However, this trend also triggers legal disputes, particularly when a newly registered trademark bears substantial similarity to an existing registered trademark. This study aims to analyze the resolution of trademark disputes involving substantial similarities to registered trademarks of other parties, and to examine the legal certainty surrounding such dispute resolution through trademark cancellation lawsuits in the Commercial Court and arbitration proceedings. The research used a normative juridical method by examining written legal norms such as legislation, court decisions, and analyzing relevant concrete cases. The results indicate that resolution through cancellation lawsuits in the Commercial Court is transparent and offers legal protection through judicial processes. However, it faces challenges such as lengthy procedures and limited judicial understanding of intellectual property. In contrast, arbitration offers a faster and more efficient alternative, yet remains underutilized due to weak contractual awareness. In terms of legal certainty, court litigation provides binding legal force through decisions that may serve as jurisprudence, while arbitration ensures certainty through final and binding awards, although enforcement remains limited. In conclusion, optimizing both avenues requires robust regulatory support and legal education for business actors
Legal Ownership of Images Generated by Generative Artificial Intelligence : (A Study of Buying and Selling Transactions on Adobe Stock in Indonesia) Alisya Rahma Saebani; Heru Sugiyono; Muthia Sakti
Green Social: International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs Vol. 2 No. 2 (2025): June : International Journal of Law and Civil Affairs
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.70062/greensocial.v2i2.185

Abstract

The development of Artificial Intelligence (AI) technology has led to the creation of various works, including images generated without direct human involvement. One of the platforms that facilitates the buying and selling of AI-generated images is Adobe Stock. However, this raises legal issues regarding ownership status and copyright protection of such images, considering that Indonesia's positive law has not explicitly regulated ownership of works produced by non-human entities. This research aims to examine the legality of ownership over images generated by Generative AI in transactions through Adobe Stock and to analyze its compatibility with the Indonesian legal system. This study uses a normative juridical method with statutory, case, comparative, and conceptual approaches, as well as a literature study relevant to the issues discussed. The results show that under the Indonesian legal system, a work must have a creator who is a legal subject. Therefore, images generated by AI cannot automatically be granted copyright status unless there is significant human intervention in the creation process. In transactions through Adobe Stock, the platform's policy serves as the main reference in determining ownership and legal responsibility over AI-generated images. The legality of AI-generated image ownership in Indonesia remains a gray area and requires regulatory updates to accommodate technological developments. Legal clarity is needed to protect parties involved in AI-based digital transactions and to ensure legal certainty in the protection of creative works.