Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
7.827
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Al-Risalah : Jurnal Imu Syariah dan Hukum POROS TEKNIK Rechtsidee Jurisprudentie Jurnal Daulat Hukum Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan DE LEGA LATA: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Lex Librum: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Yuridis Abdimas Umtas : Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Veteran Law Review Jurnal Justitia : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora JUSTISI SABDAMAS JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Bakti Masyarakat Indonesia Jurnal Suara Hukum Al-Manhaj: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Law Development Journal International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics Indonesia Law Review (ILREV) Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies RechtIdee Jurnal KALANDRA Kanun: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum International Journal of Law and Society International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Heru Sugiyono
Fakultas Hukum Universitas Pembangunan Nasional Veteran Jakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 57 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 57 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Legal Status of the Object of the Fiduciary Determined as State Confiscated Goods that Have Been Auctioned Martin Batara Tambunan; Suherman Suherman; Heru Sugiyono
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i3.615

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal status of fiduciary collateral objects designated as state-confiscated assets that have been auctioned, and to examine the resolution of the state's rights in confiscating and auctioning fiduciary collateral objects in relation to the rights of financing companies as fiduciary creditors whose claims remain unsettled. This study employs a normative juridical research method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The results show that fiduciary collateral objects confiscated and auctioned by the state do not automatically nullify the creditor’s rights, as the principle of droit de suite entitles creditors to claim the object or the proceeds from its sale. Regulatory ambiguity creates legal uncertainty and discourages fiduciary-based financing practices. From a justice perspective, the state must not arbitrarily execute assets without considering the legitimate rights of creditors. Resolution of the conflict between the rights of the state and creditors must be carried out proportionally through criminal, civil, or non-litigation avenues, in order to establish a balance between law enforcement and creditor protection, thereby maintaining stability in the financing sector.
Justice in the Administration and Settlement of Bankruptcy Estate by Auction in Relation to the Recovery of Creditors’ Claims Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution; Iwan Erar Joesoef; Heru Sugiyono
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i3.616

Abstract

This study aims to examine the aspect of justice in the administration and settlement of bankrupt assets by the Curator, particularly concerning the repayment of receivables to creditors in the context of auction minutes issued by the KPKNL Samarinda. The research adopts a normative juridical method, legislation approach and conceptual approach, and is connected to a case study approach focusing on the auction process in the bankruptcy case of PT Karebet Mas Indonesia (in bankruptcy). The results of this study indicate that the Curator, in administering and settling unsold bankrupt assets, may proceed with a private sale (underhand sale) with the approval of the supervising judge, based on a limit value obtained from an independent appraiser’s valuation, provided that at least two public auctions have been conducted without success. The distribution of assets to creditors must observe the principle of pari passu pro rata, which ensures equal treatment according to their respective priorities.In the event that the settlement process of the bankrupt estate has been declared completed, yet the creditors have not received full repayment of their claims, the general provisions under Article 1131 of the Indonesian Civil Code shall apply, namely that all of the debtor’s assets constitute collateral for the fulfillment of their debts. This study recommends an amendment to Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, to regulate in a detailed, specific, and comprehensive manner the requirements for the underhand sale of bankrupt assets by the Curator. Such regulation is necessary to ensure justice and legal certainty for bankrupt debtors and creditors, particularly regarding the repayment of claims for concurrent creditors.
The Measuring Effectiveness of Centralization of Indonesian Coal Mineral Mining Licensing Suwarsit, Suwarsit; Sugiyono, Heru; Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Law Development Journal Vol 7, No 3 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.7.3.355-374

Abstract

Measuring the effectiveness of centralizing coal mineral mining licensing in Indonesia is important for conducting research to measure the success of business actors in obtaining business certainty. There are indications of failure to centralize Indonesian coal mineral mining licensing, which can hamper the business being operated and reduce the trust of business actors in the Indonesian Government. This type of research is normative juridical research using second party data such as articles and laws and regulations up to court decisions which are then presented in descriptive form. The novelty of this research that distinguishes it from previous research is the analysis of ministerial-level regulations and legal processes carried out by several business actors at the State Administrative Court Institution to obtain business certainty. The results showed that several business actors to obtain certainty of license implementation such as PT Perdana Maju Utama, PT Fajar Bahari, PT Mandiri Biofuels, PT Sri Mulya Agung, PT Garuda Agung Perkasa, and CV Siti Maju Sejahtera, did not go well which was marked by filing a lawsuit at the State Administrative Court Institution to the Government of Indonesia, so that the non-implementation of centralization of mineral and coal mining licenses was not only carried out by business actors but also by the State as the licensor.
Legal Certainty of Homologation in Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations on The Fulfillment of Consumer Rights as Concurrent Creditors (Study: Cikarang District Court Decision No. 87/Pdt.G/2021/Pn Ckr) Rizal, Sultan Ahmad; Sugiyono, Heru
Law Development Journal Vol 7, No 3 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.7.3.436-449

Abstract

The legal instrument designed to shield financially distressed companies becomes a weapon that harms their consumers. This research illuminates this irony, demonstrating how a court-sanctioned debt restructuring agreement (homologation) under the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) process, while ostensibly promising legal certainty, in practice strips property buyers of their rights. The Meikarta case vividly illustrates how easily consumers, despite significant financial investment, are relegated to the status of unsecured creditors with virtually nonexistent bargaining power. Where, then, does justice lie for them? This study seeks to answer this question by examining the tangible impacts of the homologation process and arguing that corporate accountability should not cease merely with a court decree. Moving beyond a textual analysis of statutes, this research delves into a pivotal decision by the Cikarang District Court (No. 87/Pdt.G/2021/PN Ckr) that dared to break from tradition. The findings are illuminating: while a homologation agreement is legally binding on all parties, a judge need not be a rigid "mouthpiece of the law" (bouche de la loi). Through legal discovery (rechtsvinding), a judge can progressively interpret rules to protect the vulnerable. The court's decision in this case to proceed with the consumer's lawsuit, notwithstanding the pre-existing PKPU decree, marks a crucial paradigm shift. It serves as a testament to the feasibility of achieving substantive justice, and this study dissects how such judicial courage can offer new hope for consumers entangled in complex legal disputes.
Corporate Guarantee Legal Certainty Provided Without Shareholder Approval Dianrachma, Mitari; Sugiyono, Heru; Sakti, Muthia
International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/sj.v3i2.329

Abstract

The agreement providing a corporate guarantee does not provide a limit on the nominal amount that will be guaranteed by the corporate guaranteed provider because the corporate guarantee provider will guarantee the entire debt including interest, fines, fees and other amounts of money that must be paid. In Indonesian limited liability company law, directors are required to seek shareholder approval in the case of pledging more than fifty percent of the company's assets, but in practice, approval from shareholders is not always required to provide a corporate guarantee. Especially in the case of corporate guarantees known as limited corporate guarantees, where the guarantee value does not exceed fifty percent of the Company's total assets. The aim of this research is to analyze the legal certainty of providing corporate guarantees without shareholder approval for credit applications whose value is less than fifty percent of the Company's assets. This type of research is normative juridical, namely a type of research with a conceptual approach. This research has the result that a corporate guaranteed agreement to guarantee the value of a credit facility whose value is not more than 50% of the company's assets provided without shareholder approval does not provide legal certainty.
Misuse of Consumer Personal Data Through Illegal Fintech Peer To Peer Lending Syaiful, Rivasya Dinda; Sugiyono, Heru
JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v10i1.3003

Abstract

This research examines the misuse of consumer personal data through illegal Fintech Peer To Peer Lending. The aim of this research is to determine aspects related to Peer-to-peer lending Fintech Companies with a focus on the problem of misuse of consumer data. By providing an in-depth overview of forms of data misuse, as well as analyzing the legal responsibilities of illegal peer to peer lending fintech providers who are involved in misuse of consumer data. The research focus based on the background in this research is; 1) What are the forms of misuse of consumer data through illegal fintech peer to peer lending according to decision number; 438/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jkt.Utr. 2) What is the legal responsibility of individuals managing illegal peer to peer lending fintech who misuse consumer personal data according to Decision Number; 438/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jkt.Utr. This research uses a type of normative juridical research using qualitative methods and analytical descriptive approaches. So that the analysis can be carried out, the author first collects materials that are appropriate to the legal issue to be studied. The research results show that illegal fintech operators often misuse consumer data by involving third parties who do not have official certification, giving rise to intimidation, threats and defamation of consumers. In addition, the practice of requesting consumer consent to access personal data in violation of certain regulations was also exposed. The conclusion of this research confirms that this act can be subject to criminal sanctions as stated in the court decision. It is hoped that legal enforcement of this practice can be an effective step to protect consumer data and prevent abuse in the peer-to-peer lending fintech industry. Keywords: Misuse of personal data; illegal fintech peer-to-peer lending; positive law in Indonesia.
Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak-Hak Pekerja Outsourcing Atas Tindakan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Oleh Perusahaan Penyedia Jasa Pekerja Sugiyono, Heru; Pardede, Jeremy
Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan Vol. 19 No. 2 (2021): Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian, Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat dan Publikasi Ilmiah (LP3M) Institut Agama Islam (IAI) Al-Qodiri Jember, Jawa Timur Indonesia bekerjasama dengan Kopertais Wilayah 4 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53515/al qodiri.v19i2.4388

Abstract

Pelaksanaan outsourcing ini pada awalnya bertujuan untuk menciptakan efisiensi bagi perusahaan melalui fokus pada usaha inti, dan mengurangi biaya pekerja (cost labor). Namun dalam pelaksanaan, kedudukan bagi pekerja secara outsourcing tidak menentu dikarenakan hampir secara keseluruhan. pekerja outsourcing bekerja dengan dasar perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu(PKWT).Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pelaksanaan Outsourcing dalam pemenuhan hak-hak pekerja oleh perusahaan penyedia pekerja dan perlindungan hukum terhadap pekerja outsourcing atas tindakan pemutusan hubungan kerja oleh perusahaan penyedia pekerja menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang ketengakerjaan Dalam penelitian ini penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif yaitu metode Hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara mengkaji bahan pustaka, berkaitan dengan permasalahan yang sedang diteliti. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa Pelaksanaan sistem pemborongan pekerjaan (sistem outsourcing)di Indonesia belum dapat memberikan kesejahteraan pada pekerja upah lebih rendah,jaminan sosial yang minim,tidak ada jaminan job (job security) serta tidak adanya jaminan pengembangan karier. Disamping itu dalam Undang – Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang ketenagakerjaan tidak mengatur uang pesangon atau tunjangan lainnya sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap pekerja outsourcing. Kata kunci: Tenaga Kerja; Perlindungan Hukum; Outsourcing
Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Kerja Terhadap Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Dalam Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan Amiruddin, Alifiya Mafaza; Sugiyono, Heru
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 10 No. 1 (2023): Desember
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v10i1.244

Abstract

Abstract This study was conducted to determine the legal arrangements for termination of employment by employers who experienced the impact of Covid-19 on workers according to labor laws and legal protection of workers who experienced termination of employment by employers who were affected by Covid-19. This study uses normative juridical research methods. Legal protection for workers experiencing termination of employment during the Covid-19 pandemic until now there is still a lack of explicit efforts to heed workers' rights from employers to implement the provisions of the law. Since the issuance of Presidential Decree (Keppres) No.12 of 2020 concerning Determination of Non-Natural Disasters Spread of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) As National Disasters employers certainly have reason to terminate employment in the face of this pandemic in terms of the state of the company. Legal provisions for termination of employment are regulated in Act Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. The impact of employment due to this pandemic on employment relations that led to termination of employment due to the closure of the company, the Work From Home work system, causing unemployment. Keywords: Legal Protection, Work Termination, Employment, Covid-19
Tinjauan Yuridis Pemberian Hak Kepemilikan Atas Tanah Negara Rohman, Zahrah Farhataeni; Sugiyono, Heru
Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022): Desember
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v9i1.352

Abstract

Abstrak Tanah Negara merupakan tanah yang tidak dilekati suatu hak atas tanah dan bukan merupakan barang milik Negara/Daerah dan atau Badan Usaha Milik Negara / Daerah. Tanah yang berstatus tanah negara dapat dimintakan suatu hak untuk kepentingan tertentu dan prosedur tertentu. Kendatipun terhadap tanah negara dapat dimintakan suatu hak, namun dalam prakteknya baik perorangan maupun Badan Hukum masih kesulitan untuk mendapatkan hak atas tanah negara. Rumusan masalah yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini, bagaimana pengaturan pemberian hak kepemilikan atas tanah negara kepada perorangan atau Badan Hukum menurut sistem hukum di Indonesia dan kepastian hukum untuk mendapatkan hak atas tanah negara. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif yakni melalui studi pustaka dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan pemberian hak kepemilikan atas tanah negara belum dapat memberikan kepastian hukum atas diterimanya permohonan hak atas tanah negara yang diajukan oleh perorangan atau Badan Hukum. Tidak semua tanah negara bisa dimintakan mejadi hak milik, sehingga perlu ada sosialisasi mengenai jenis tanah negara yang dapat dimintakan menjadi hak milik, sehingga dapat memberikan kepastian hukum bagi perorangan ataupun badan hukum dalam mengajukan permohonan hak milik atas atas tanah negara. Kata kunci: Tanah Negara, Perorangan, Badan hukum Abstract State land is land that is not attached to a land right and is not property of the State/Regional and/or State/Regional-Owned Enterprises. Land with the status of state land may be asked for a right for certain interests and certain procedures. Even though a right to state land can be requested, in practice both individuals and legal entities are still having difficulty obtaining rights to state land. The formulation of the problem raised in this study, how to regulate the granting of ownership rights to state land to individuals or legal entities according to the legal system in Indonesia and legal certainty to obtain state land rights. The research method used is normative juridical, namely through library research using a statutory and case approach. The results of the study indicate that the arrangement for granting ownership rights to state land has not been able to provide legal certainty on the receipt of applications for state land rights submitted by individuals or legal entities. Not all state land can be requested as property rights, so there needs to be socialization regarding the types of state land that can be requested as property rights, so as to provide legal certainty for individuals or legal entities in applying for property rights on state land.
Sanctions Against Working Groups for the Selection of Goods/Services Providers in Cases of Tender Collusion (Study: Comparison between Indonesia and Malaysia) Bukit, Liametami Benedicta; Sugiyono, Heru
Rechtsidee Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December
Publisher : Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1093

Abstract

The general background of this study is the persistent dominance of tender collusion in Indonesia’s procurement sector, which undermines fair competition and public welfare. The specific background focuses on KPPU Decision No. 15/KPPU-L/2023, where the Working Group (POKJA) was proven negligent but exempted from sanctions due to its unclear legal status under Law No. 5/1999. The knowledge gap lies in the absence of explicit regulatory authority to sanction POKJA, creating ambiguity in defining “other parties” within tender collusion provisions. The aim of this research is to compare Indonesia’s regulatory framework with Malaysia’s system, which empowers MYCC to impose administrative sanctions directly on public officials involved in bid rigging. The results show that Malaysia’s Competition Act 2010 provides broader investigative and enforcement powers, enabling more effective deterrence, while Indonesia relies on fragmented administrative mechanisms that weaken accountability. The novelty of this study is its comparative legal analysis demonstrating how dual-authority competition bodies enhance integrity in public procurement. The implications highlight the urgency to revise Law No. 5/1999, clarify POKJA’s legal standing, and establish expert data-analysis bodies to strengthen preventive measures against future tender collusion. Highlights: Indonesia’s weak sanctioning framework leaves POKJA’s accountability unclear in tender collusion cases. Malaysia’s MYCC demonstrates stronger enforcement through integrated administrative and public powers. Reform of Law No. 5/1999 is essential to strengthen oversight and prevent future bid-rigging practices. Keywords: Tender Collusion, POKJA, Competition Law, MYCC , Procurement Governance
Co-Authors Affan Adyuanas Agus Setiyo Budi Nugroho Agustanti, Rosalia Dika Aji Lukman Ibrahim Ali, Jovansyah Amandha, Rendytha Khansa Amiruddin, Alifiya Mafaza Anggi Rachma Zakia Fitri Arazid, Arazid Aulia, Fara Aurellia Zerikha Syah Aurora Jillena Meliala Berliana Purwono Putri Bukit, Liametami Benedicta Chrys Auditya Dewi Dianrachma, Mitari Dinanti, Dinda Dwi Desi Yayi Tarina Dylan Rajasa Chandra Faidurrahman Faidurrahman Fajar, Rahula Fuad Sholihin Gladys Nun Aulia Ermansyah Handoyo Prasetyo Haryanto, Imam Hendra Parulian Herbawani, Chahya Kharin Heru Suyanto Heru Suyanto Heru Suyanto Ibnu Sholeh Herdidenanto Ilvana Oktalia Irwan Erar Josoef Iswanti Rachmanisa Iwan Erar Joesoef Jennifer Clarence Jodhy Farrel Budiman Laksana, Ajie Agung Liansah, Irene Lina Husnul Khairiyyah Lutfi, Khoirur Rizal Malik Ibrahim Martin Batara Tambunan Michael Giovanni Joseph Mouna Suez Sianturi Muhamad Shafwan Afif Muhammad Arafah Sinjar Muhammad Farhan Gayo Muhammad Fazli Rabbani Ramadhan Muhammad Fikri Muhammad Nouval Arofah Muhammad Rahadian Hasbi Muhammad Zidan Asy Syakur Muthia Sakti Pardede, Jeremy Raisha Cantika Mutiara Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti Ramadhanti Achlina Tri Putri Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution Ridha Wahyuni Ridwan Ridwan Rizal, Sultan Ahmad Rizkianti, Wardani Rochela Amalia Narindra Rohman, Zahrah Farhataeni Salwa Noviana Putri Samodro, Dewanto Shalma Azzahra Suci Amalia Tirachim Suherman Suherman Suprima Suwarsit Suwarsit Suyanto, Heru Syaiful, Rivasya Dinda Sylvana Murni Deborah Hutabarat Thohari, Ahmad Ahsin Zahra Athirah Zahra Awaliany Safitri