Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

The Role of E-Commerce Platforms in Resolving Breach of Contract Disputes Related to the Delivery of Goods Not in Accordance with Consumer Orders by Business Actors Fikri, Muhammad; Sugiyono, Heru
Law Development Journal Vol 7, No 2 (2025): June 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.7.2.%p

Abstract

This research discusses the role of e-commerce platforms in resolving default disputes in e-commerce transactions with a focus on the case of delivery of goods not according to order as the object of research. The purpose of this research is to analyze the effectiveness of legal protection for consumers as well as the role of the platform in resolving such disputes. This research uses normative juridical method with statutory approach and case study. The results show that although there is a legal basis in the form of the Consumer Protection Law and its implementing regulations, implementation in the field is still not optimal. The obstacles faced include low consumer legal literacy, lack of transparency in the dispute resolution mechanism in the platform, and the lack of connection between the platform's internal system and the official dispute resolution institution. In addition, e-commerce platforms have not fully carried out their responsibilities as organizers of the digital transaction ecosystem. This research concludes that strategic steps are needed in the form of strengthening regulations, integrating dispute resolution systems with official institutions, and increasing legal education for consumers in order to create a fair, fast and sustainable dispute resolution mechanism.
Legal Protection and Enforcement of Securities Dilution by Issuers in the Technology Business Sector with Multiple Vot-ing Rights Stock Classification after Initial Public Offering (IPO) Raisha Cantika Mutiara; Aurora Jillena Meliala; Heru Sugiyono
International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): September : International Journal of Law, Crime and Justice
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijlcj.v2i3.687

Abstract

This study examines the legal protections and enforcement mechanisms against securities dilution in technology‐sector issuers adopting multiple voting rights stock classifications following an initial public offering (IPO) under Indonesia’s Financial Services Authority Regulation No. 22/POJK.04/2021. It addresses two core issues: the adequacy of minority shareholder safeguards embedded within the regulatory framework and the nature and extent of share dilution experienced by existing investors in dual‐class structures. Employing a normative legal research design with a doctrinal approach, the analysis draws on primary sources including UU No. 40/2007, UU No. 4/2023, POJK 22/POJK.04/2021, issuer prospectuses, and PT GoTo Gojek Tokopedia’s 2022–2024 annual reports complemented by secondary literature and tertiary legal references. Findings reveal that POJK 22/POJK.04/2021 integrates quantitative limits (a 90 percent cap on aggregate superior voting rights), procedural safeguards (minimum 5 percent ordinary‐shareholder quorum and independent renewal approval), temporal constraints (10‐year sunset clause), and one‐share‐one‐vote requirements for critical corporate actions, alongside a novel graduated voting ratio system. The GoTo case study underscores persistent misalignment between cash‐flow and voting rights, marked by significant share price volatility and reliance on share buybacks rather than dilutive issuances. While the regulatory framework is comprehensive, its efficacy is contingent on robust enforcement, transparency of indirect ownership, and institutional maturity. Empirical evaluation of post‐IPO dilution events, minority litigation outcomes, and enforcement actions is recommended to assess real‐world impacts.
Financial Management of Public Service Bodies in State Universities: Juridical Analysis of Fees for the Development of Independent Path New Student Institutions Arazid, Arazid; Sugiyono, Heru; Thohari, Ahmad Ahsin
Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies Том 3 № 02 (2025): Journal of Progressive Law and Legal Studies
Publisher : PT. Riset Press International

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59653/jplls.v3i02.1569

Abstract

This study investigates the financial management of Public Service Agencies (BLU) within Indonesian state universities, focusing on the unauthorized imposition of institutional development fees (SPI/IPI) on independent pathway students at Udayana University, resulting in significant State financial losses. Employing a normative juridical methodology, the research analyzes regulatory frameworks, institutional accountability, and the legal implications of fee structures that contravene Ministry of Finance regulations (PMK No. 51/2015 and PMK No. 95/2020). Findings reveal systemic non-compliance in fee determination, where SPI/IPI charges were applied without legal authorization, bypassing mandated tariff protocols. The study identifies critical lapses in oversight, including the rector's failure to align fee policies with national financial regulations and the misuse of BLU flexibility, which enabled the diversion of funds into non-transparent banking practices. The case underscores the vulnerability of BLU's financial autonomy to mismanagement and corruption, particularly in the absence of robust accountability mechanisms. Recommendations emphasize the urgent need for legal reforms to enhance transparency, strengthen auditing processes, and clarify punitive measures for violations. This research contributes to the discourse on public financial governance in higher education, advocating for institutional reforms to prevent future fiscal mismanagement and uphold the integrity of State’s resources.
Legal Status of the Object of the Fiduciary Determined as State Confiscated Goods that Have Been Auctioned Martin Batara Tambunan; Suherman Suherman; Heru Sugiyono
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i3.615

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze the legal status of fiduciary collateral objects designated as state-confiscated assets that have been auctioned, and to examine the resolution of the state's rights in confiscating and auctioning fiduciary collateral objects in relation to the rights of financing companies as fiduciary creditors whose claims remain unsettled. This study employs a normative juridical research method using statutory, case, and conceptual approaches. The results show that fiduciary collateral objects confiscated and auctioned by the state do not automatically nullify the creditor’s rights, as the principle of droit de suite entitles creditors to claim the object or the proceeds from its sale. Regulatory ambiguity creates legal uncertainty and discourages fiduciary-based financing practices. From a justice perspective, the state must not arbitrarily execute assets without considering the legitimate rights of creditors. Resolution of the conflict between the rights of the state and creditors must be carried out proportionally through criminal, civil, or non-litigation avenues, in order to establish a balance between law enforcement and creditor protection, thereby maintaining stability in the financing sector.
Justice in the Administration and Settlement of Bankruptcy Estate by Auction in Relation to the Recovery of Creditors’ Claims Ricki Rahmad Aulia Nasution; Iwan Erar Joesoef; Heru Sugiyono
International Journal of Law and Society Vol. 2 No. 3 (2025): International Journal of Law and Society
Publisher : Asosiasi Penelitian dan Pengajar Ilmu Hukum Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.62951/ijls.v2i3.616

Abstract

This study aims to examine the aspect of justice in the administration and settlement of bankrupt assets by the Curator, particularly concerning the repayment of receivables to creditors in the context of auction minutes issued by the KPKNL Samarinda. The research adopts a normative juridical method, legislation approach and conceptual approach, and is connected to a case study approach focusing on the auction process in the bankruptcy case of PT Karebet Mas Indonesia (in bankruptcy). The results of this study indicate that the Curator, in administering and settling unsold bankrupt assets, may proceed with a private sale (underhand sale) with the approval of the supervising judge, based on a limit value obtained from an independent appraiser’s valuation, provided that at least two public auctions have been conducted without success. The distribution of assets to creditors must observe the principle of pari passu pro rata, which ensures equal treatment according to their respective priorities.In the event that the settlement process of the bankrupt estate has been declared completed, yet the creditors have not received full repayment of their claims, the general provisions under Article 1131 of the Indonesian Civil Code shall apply, namely that all of the debtor’s assets constitute collateral for the fulfillment of their debts. This study recommends an amendment to Law Number 37 of 2004 concerning Bankruptcy and Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations, to regulate in a detailed, specific, and comprehensive manner the requirements for the underhand sale of bankrupt assets by the Curator. Such regulation is necessary to ensure justice and legal certainty for bankrupt debtors and creditors, particularly regarding the repayment of claims for concurrent creditors.
Strategi Penanganan Pekerja Migran Indonesia Yang Bekerja Tidak Sesuai Dengan Kontrak Kerja Zakia Fitri, Anggi Rachma; Sugiyono, Heru
JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Vol. 6 No. 3 (2023): DECEMBER
Publisher : Universitas Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26623/julr.v6i3.7568

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze how the impact of the placement of Indonesian migrant workers who work not in accordance with the work contract, as well as how the handling strategy of Indonesian migrant workers who work not in accordance with the work contract. This research is important to do, because in practice there are still many cases of Indonesian migrant workers who still do not fulfill their rights and obligations when they are placed in their destination country. The novelty in this research is to examine the impact of the placement of Indonesian migrant workers who work not in accordance with the employment contract, as well as the handling strategy of Indonesian migrant workers who work not in accordance with the employment contract which have been agreed upon, accompanied by case examples as a study for this research. The method used in this research is normative juridical which is carried out by examining library materials or secondary data. The results of this research show that Indonesian migrant workers who work not in accordance with their work contracts have an impact on migrant workers' rights not being fulfilled. The PMI Law regulates dispute resolution strategies for handling PMI cases as contained in Article 77.  Tujuan dari penelitian ini adalah untuk menganalisis bagaimana dampak penempatan pekerja migran Indonesia yang bekerja tidak sesuai dengan kontrak kerja, serta bagaimana strategi penanganan pekerja migran Indonesia yang bekerja tidak sesuai dengan kontrak kerja. Penelitian ini penting dilakukan, karena dalam praktiknya masih banyak terjadi kasus pekerja migran Indonesia yang masih tidak dipenuhi hak dan kewajibannya saat ditempatkan di negara tujuan mereka. Adapun kebaharuan dalam penelitian ini yakni meneliti mengenai dampak penempatan pekerja migran Indonesia yang bekerja tidak sesuai dengan kontrak kerja, serta strategi penanganan pekerja migran Indonesia yang bekerja tidak sesuai dengan kontrak kerja yang sudah disepakati, disertai dengan contoh kasus sebagai studi penelitian ini. Metode yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini adalah yuridis normatif yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa pekerja migran Indonesia yang bekerja tidak sesuai dengan kontrak kerja berdampak pada tidak terpenuhinya hak dari pekerja migran. Pada UU PMI diatur mengenai strategi penyelesaian perselisihan untuk penanganan kasus PMI yang terdapat pada Pasal 77.    
The Measuring Effectiveness of Centralization of Indonesian Coal Mineral Mining Licensing Suwarsit, Suwarsit; Sugiyono, Heru; Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti; Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi
Law Development Journal Vol 7, No 3 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.7.3.355-374

Abstract

Measuring the effectiveness of centralizing coal mineral mining licensing in Indonesia is important for conducting research to measure the success of business actors in obtaining business certainty. There are indications of failure to centralize Indonesian coal mineral mining licensing, which can hamper the business being operated and reduce the trust of business actors in the Indonesian Government. This type of research is normative juridical research using second party data such as articles and laws and regulations up to court decisions which are then presented in descriptive form. The novelty of this research that distinguishes it from previous research is the analysis of ministerial-level regulations and legal processes carried out by several business actors at the State Administrative Court Institution to obtain business certainty. The results showed that several business actors to obtain certainty of license implementation such as PT Perdana Maju Utama, PT Fajar Bahari, PT Mandiri Biofuels, PT Sri Mulya Agung, PT Garuda Agung Perkasa, and CV Siti Maju Sejahtera, did not go well which was marked by filing a lawsuit at the State Administrative Court Institution to the Government of Indonesia, so that the non-implementation of centralization of mineral and coal mining licenses was not only carried out by business actors but also by the State as the licensor.
Legal Certainty of Homologation in Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations on The Fulfillment of Consumer Rights as Concurrent Creditors (Study: Cikarang District Court Decision No. 87/Pdt.G/2021/Pn Ckr) Rizal, Sultan Ahmad; Sugiyono, Heru
Law Development Journal Vol 7, No 3 (2025): September 2025
Publisher : Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/ldj.7.3.436-449

Abstract

The legal instrument designed to shield financially distressed companies becomes a weapon that harms their consumers. This research illuminates this irony, demonstrating how a court-sanctioned debt restructuring agreement (homologation) under the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) process, while ostensibly promising legal certainty, in practice strips property buyers of their rights. The Meikarta case vividly illustrates how easily consumers, despite significant financial investment, are relegated to the status of unsecured creditors with virtually nonexistent bargaining power. Where, then, does justice lie for them? This study seeks to answer this question by examining the tangible impacts of the homologation process and arguing that corporate accountability should not cease merely with a court decree. Moving beyond a textual analysis of statutes, this research delves into a pivotal decision by the Cikarang District Court (No. 87/Pdt.G/2021/PN Ckr) that dared to break from tradition. The findings are illuminating: while a homologation agreement is legally binding on all parties, a judge need not be a rigid "mouthpiece of the law" (bouche de la loi). Through legal discovery (rechtsvinding), a judge can progressively interpret rules to protect the vulnerable. The court's decision in this case to proceed with the consumer's lawsuit, notwithstanding the pre-existing PKPU decree, marks a crucial paradigm shift. It serves as a testament to the feasibility of achieving substantive justice, and this study dissects how such judicial courage can offer new hope for consumers entangled in complex legal disputes.
Corporate Guarantee Legal Certainty Provided Without Shareholder Approval Dianrachma, Mitari; Sugiyono, Heru; Sakti, Muthia
International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): June
Publisher : Lafadz Jaya Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54443/sj.v3i2.329

Abstract

The agreement providing a corporate guarantee does not provide a limit on the nominal amount that will be guaranteed by the corporate guaranteed provider because the corporate guarantee provider will guarantee the entire debt including interest, fines, fees and other amounts of money that must be paid. In Indonesian limited liability company law, directors are required to seek shareholder approval in the case of pledging more than fifty percent of the company's assets, but in practice, approval from shareholders is not always required to provide a corporate guarantee. Especially in the case of corporate guarantees known as limited corporate guarantees, where the guarantee value does not exceed fifty percent of the Company's total assets. The aim of this research is to analyze the legal certainty of providing corporate guarantees without shareholder approval for credit applications whose value is less than fifty percent of the Company's assets. This type of research is normative juridical, namely a type of research with a conceptual approach. This research has the result that a corporate guaranteed agreement to guarantee the value of a credit facility whose value is not more than 50% of the company's assets provided without shareholder approval does not provide legal certainty.
Misuse of Consumer Personal Data Through Illegal Fintech Peer To Peer Lending Syaiful, Rivasya Dinda; Sugiyono, Heru
JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/js.v10i1.3003

Abstract

This research examines the misuse of consumer personal data through illegal Fintech Peer To Peer Lending. The aim of this research is to determine aspects related to Peer-to-peer lending Fintech Companies with a focus on the problem of misuse of consumer data. By providing an in-depth overview of forms of data misuse, as well as analyzing the legal responsibilities of illegal peer to peer lending fintech providers who are involved in misuse of consumer data. The research focus based on the background in this research is; 1) What are the forms of misuse of consumer data through illegal fintech peer to peer lending according to decision number; 438/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jkt.Utr. 2) What is the legal responsibility of individuals managing illegal peer to peer lending fintech who misuse consumer personal data according to Decision Number; 438/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jkt.Utr. This research uses a type of normative juridical research using qualitative methods and analytical descriptive approaches. So that the analysis can be carried out, the author first collects materials that are appropriate to the legal issue to be studied. The research results show that illegal fintech operators often misuse consumer data by involving third parties who do not have official certification, giving rise to intimidation, threats and defamation of consumers. In addition, the practice of requesting consumer consent to access personal data in violation of certain regulations was also exposed. The conclusion of this research confirms that this act can be subject to criminal sanctions as stated in the court decision. It is hoped that legal enforcement of this practice can be an effective step to protect consumer data and prevent abuse in the peer-to-peer lending fintech industry. Keywords: Misuse of personal data; illegal fintech peer-to-peer lending; positive law in Indonesia.