Articles
<![CDATA[The Measuring Effectiveness of Centralization of Indonesian Coal Mineral Mining Licensing ]]>
<![CDATA[Suwarsit, Suwarsit]]>;
<![CDATA[Sugiyono, Heru]]>;
<![CDATA[Ramadhani, Dwi Aryanti]]>;
<![CDATA[Tarina, Dwi Desi Yayi]]>
<![CDATA[ Law Development Journal Vol 7, No 3 (2025): September 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/ldj.7.3.355-374
<![CDATA[Measuring the effectiveness of centralizing coal mineral mining licensing in Indonesia is important for conducting research to measure the success of business actors in obtaining business certainty. There are indications of failure to centralize Indonesian coal mineral mining licensing, which can hamper the business being operated and reduce the trust of business actors in the Indonesian Government. This type of research is normative juridical research using second party data such as articles and laws and regulations up to court decisions which are then presented in descriptive form. The novelty of this research that distinguishes it from previous research is the analysis of ministerial-level regulations and legal processes carried out by several business actors at the State Administrative Court Institution to obtain business certainty. The results showed that several business actors to obtain certainty of license implementation such as PT Perdana Maju Utama, PT Fajar Bahari, PT Mandiri Biofuels, PT Sri Mulya Agung, PT Garuda Agung Perkasa, and CV Siti Maju Sejahtera, did not go well which was marked by filing a lawsuit at the State Administrative Court Institution to the Government of Indonesia, so that the non-implementation of centralization of mineral and coal mining licenses was not only carried out by business actors but also by the State as the licensor.]]>
<![CDATA[Legal Certainty of Homologation in Postponement of Debt Payment Obligations on The Fulfillment of Consumer Rights as Concurrent Creditors (Study: Cikarang District Court Decision No. 87/Pdt.G/2021/Pn Ckr) ]]>
<![CDATA[Rizal, Sultan Ahmad]]>;
<![CDATA[Sugiyono, Heru]]>
<![CDATA[ Law Development Journal Vol 7, No 3 (2025): September 2025 ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Islam Sultan Agung ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.30659/ldj.7.3.436-449
<![CDATA[The legal instrument designed to shield financially distressed companies becomes a weapon that harms their consumers. This research illuminates this irony, demonstrating how a court-sanctioned debt restructuring agreement (homologation) under the Suspension of Debt Payment Obligations (PKPU) process, while ostensibly promising legal certainty, in practice strips property buyers of their rights. The Meikarta case vividly illustrates how easily consumers, despite significant financial investment, are relegated to the status of unsecured creditors with virtually nonexistent bargaining power. Where, then, does justice lie for them? This study seeks to answer this question by examining the tangible impacts of the homologation process and arguing that corporate accountability should not cease merely with a court decree. Moving beyond a textual analysis of statutes, this research delves into a pivotal decision by the Cikarang District Court (No. 87/Pdt.G/2021/PN Ckr) that dared to break from tradition. The findings are illuminating: while a homologation agreement is legally binding on all parties, a judge need not be a rigid "mouthpiece of the law" (bouche de la loi). Through legal discovery (rechtsvinding), a judge can progressively interpret rules to protect the vulnerable. The court's decision in this case to proceed with the consumer's lawsuit, notwithstanding the pre-existing PKPU decree, marks a crucial paradigm shift. It serves as a testament to the feasibility of achieving substantive justice, and this study dissects how such judicial courage can offer new hope for consumers entangled in complex legal disputes.]]>
<![CDATA[Corporate Guarantee Legal Certainty Provided Without Shareholder Approval ]]>
<![CDATA[Dianrachma, Mitari]]>;
<![CDATA[Sugiyono, Heru]]>;
<![CDATA[Sakti, Muthia]]>
<![CDATA[ International Journal of Social Science, Education, Communication and Economics Vol. 3 No. 2 (2024): June ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lafadz Jaya Publisher ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.54443/sj.v3i2.329
<![CDATA[The agreement providing a corporate guarantee does not provide a limit on the nominal amount that will be guaranteed by the corporate guaranteed provider because the corporate guarantee provider will guarantee the entire debt including interest, fines, fees and other amounts of money that must be paid. In Indonesian limited liability company law, directors are required to seek shareholder approval in the case of pledging more than fifty percent of the company's assets, but in practice, approval from shareholders is not always required to provide a corporate guarantee. Especially in the case of corporate guarantees known as limited corporate guarantees, where the guarantee value does not exceed fifty percent of the Company's total assets. The aim of this research is to analyze the legal certainty of providing corporate guarantees without shareholder approval for credit applications whose value is less than fifty percent of the Company's assets. This type of research is normative juridical, namely a type of research with a conceptual approach. This research has the result that a corporate guaranteed agreement to guarantee the value of a credit facility whose value is not more than 50% of the company's assets provided without shareholder approval does not provide legal certainty.]]>
<![CDATA[Misuse of Consumer Personal Data Through Illegal Fintech Peer To Peer Lending ]]>
<![CDATA[Syaiful, Rivasya Dinda]]>;
<![CDATA[Sugiyono, Heru]]>
<![CDATA[ JUSTISI Vol. 10 No. 1 (2024): JUSTISI ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.33506/js.v10i1.3003
<![CDATA[This research examines the misuse of consumer personal data through illegal Fintech Peer To Peer Lending. The aim of this research is to determine aspects related to Peer-to-peer lending Fintech Companies with a focus on the problem of misuse of consumer data. By providing an in-depth overview of forms of data misuse, as well as analyzing the legal responsibilities of illegal peer to peer lending fintech providers who are involved in misuse of consumer data. The research focus based on the background in this research is; 1) What are the forms of misuse of consumer data through illegal fintech peer to peer lending according to decision number; 438/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jkt.Utr. 2) What is the legal responsibility of individuals managing illegal peer to peer lending fintech who misuse consumer personal data according to Decision Number; 438/Pid.Sus/2020/PN Jkt.Utr. This research uses a type of normative juridical research using qualitative methods and analytical descriptive approaches. So that the analysis can be carried out, the author first collects materials that are appropriate to the legal issue to be studied. The research results show that illegal fintech operators often misuse consumer data by involving third parties who do not have official certification, giving rise to intimidation, threats and defamation of consumers. In addition, the practice of requesting consumer consent to access personal data in violation of certain regulations was also exposed. The conclusion of this research confirms that this act can be subject to criminal sanctions as stated in the court decision. It is hoped that legal enforcement of this practice can be an effective step to protect consumer data and prevent abuse in the peer-to-peer lending fintech industry. Keywords: Misuse of personal data; illegal fintech peer-to-peer lending; positive law in Indonesia.]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Hak-Hak Pekerja Outsourcing Atas Tindakan Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Oleh Perusahaan Penyedia Jasa Pekerja ]]>
<![CDATA[Sugiyono, Heru]]>;
<![CDATA[Pardede, Jeremy]]>
<![CDATA[ Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan Vol. 19 No. 2 (2021): Al Qodiri : Jurnal Pendidikan, Sosial dan Keagamaan ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Lembaga Penelitian, Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat dan Publikasi Ilmiah (LP3M) Institut Agama Islam (IAI) Al-Qodiri Jember, Jawa Timur Indonesia bekerjasama dengan Kopertais Wilayah 4 Surabaya ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.53515/al qodiri.v19i2.4388
<![CDATA[Pelaksanaan outsourcing ini pada awalnya bertujuan untuk menciptakan efisiensi bagi perusahaan melalui fokus pada usaha inti, dan mengurangi biaya pekerja (cost labor). Namun dalam pelaksanaan, kedudukan bagi pekerja secara outsourcing tidak menentu dikarenakan hampir secara keseluruhan. pekerja outsourcing bekerja dengan dasar perjanjian kerja waktu tertentu(PKWT).Tujuan penelitian ini adalah untuk mengetahui pelaksanaan Outsourcing dalam pemenuhan hak-hak pekerja oleh perusahaan penyedia pekerja dan perlindungan hukum terhadap pekerja outsourcing atas tindakan pemutusan hubungan kerja oleh perusahaan penyedia pekerja menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang ketengakerjaan Dalam penelitian ini penulis menggunakan metode penelitian yuridis normatif yaitu metode Hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara mengkaji bahan pustaka, berkaitan dengan permasalahan yang sedang diteliti. Berdasarkan hasil penelitian ditemukan bahwa Pelaksanaan sistem pemborongan pekerjaan (sistem outsourcing)di Indonesia belum dapat memberikan kesejahteraan pada pekerja upah lebih rendah,jaminan sosial yang minim,tidak ada jaminan job (job security) serta tidak adanya jaminan pengembangan karier. Disamping itu dalam Undang – Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 tentang ketenagakerjaan tidak mengatur uang pesangon atau tunjangan lainnya sebagai bentuk perlindungan hukum terhadap pekerja outsourcing. Kata kunci: Tenaga Kerja; Perlindungan Hukum; Outsourcing]]>
<![CDATA[Program UPNVJ Mengajar: Mewujudkan Akses Pendidikan Berkualitas Bagi Anak di Sekolah Masjid Terminal Indonesia ]]>
<![CDATA[Agustanti, Rosalia Dika]]>;
<![CDATA[Sugiyono, Heru]]>;
<![CDATA[Ridwan, Ridwan]]>;
<![CDATA[Adyuanas, Affan]]>;
<![CDATA[Syakur, Muhammad Zidan Asy]]>;
<![CDATA[Arofah, Muhammad Nouval]]>;
<![CDATA[Azzahra, Shalma]]>;
<![CDATA[Budiman, Jodhy Farrel]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Vol. 5 No. 6 (2025): November 2025 - Jurnal Altifani Penelitian dan Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Indonesian Scientific Journal ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.59395/altifani.v5i6.931
<![CDATA[Program UPNVJ Mengajar merupakan inisiatif Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat yang bertujuan untuk mewujudkan akses pendidikan berkualitas bagi anak-anak di Sekolah Masjid Terminal Indonesia. Melalui pendekatan pembelajaran yang interaktif dan kontekstual, program ini menghadirkan mahasiswa sebagai pengajar dan fasilitator dalam menyampaikan materi pendidikan dasar, pembentukan karakter, serta pengenalan nilai-nilai kebangsaan. Kegiatan ini dirancang untuk menjawab tantangan keterbatasan akses pendidikan formal yang dihadapi oleh anak-anak marginal di kawasan terminal. Antusiasme peserta didik serta keterlibatan aktif para relawan menjadi indikator keberhasilan awal program dalam menciptakan lingkungan belajar yang inklusif dan inspiratif. Program ini diharapkan dapat menjadi model kolaborasi antara perguruan tinggi dan masyarakat dalam mendukung tujuan pembangunan berkelanjutan di bidang pendidikan. Sebagai upaya untuk menjaga keberlanjutan dampak program UPNVJ Mengajar, penting untuk mengembangkan program pendampingan jangka panjang, seperti bimbingan belajar yang dilaksanakan secara mingguan atau bulanan. Kegiatan ini dapat menjadi wadah bagi peserta didik untuk terus mendapatkan akses pendidikan secara konsisten, sekaligus memperkuat pemahaman terhadap materi-materi dasar yang telah diajarkan. Selain itu, keberadaan program pendampingan ini juga berperan penting dalam membangun hubungan yang lebih erat antara mahasiswa relawan dan anak-anak, sehingga tercipta lingkungan belajar yang suportif, berkelanjutan, dan bermakna. Kegiatan ini telah berhasil dilaksanakan dengan melibatkan partisipasi aktif dari peserta didik, serta menunjukkan dampak positif dalam meningkatkan minat belajar dan interaksi yang lebih hangat antara relawan dan anak-anak. Upaya ini sejalan dengan komitmen terhadap Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs), khususnya SDG 4 tentang penyediaan pendidikan yang inklusif dan berkualitas bagi semua]]>
<![CDATA[Perlindungan Hukum Tenaga Kerja Terhadap Pemutusan Hubungan Kerja Dalam Masa Pandemi Covid-19 Menurut Undang-Undang Nomor 13 Tahun 2003 Tentang Ketenagakerjaan ]]>
<![CDATA[Amiruddin, Alifiya Mafaza]]>;
<![CDATA[Sugiyono, Heru]]>
<![CDATA[ Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 10 No. 1 (2023): Desember ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v10i1.244
<![CDATA[Abstract This study was conducted to determine the legal arrangements for termination of employment by employers who experienced the impact of Covid-19 on workers according to labor laws and legal protection of workers who experienced termination of employment by employers who were affected by Covid-19. This study uses normative juridical research methods. Legal protection for workers experiencing termination of employment during the Covid-19 pandemic until now there is still a lack of explicit efforts to heed workers' rights from employers to implement the provisions of the law. Since the issuance of Presidential Decree (Keppres) No.12 of 2020 concerning Determination of Non-Natural Disasters Spread of Corona Virus Disease 2019 (Covid-19) As National Disasters employers certainly have reason to terminate employment in the face of this pandemic in terms of the state of the company. Legal provisions for termination of employment are regulated in Act Number 13 of 2003 concerning Manpower. The impact of employment due to this pandemic on employment relations that led to termination of employment due to the closure of the company, the Work From Home work system, causing unemployment. Keywords: Legal Protection, Work Termination, Employment, Covid-19]]>
<![CDATA[Tinjauan Yuridis Pemberian Hak Kepemilikan Atas Tanah Negara ]]>
<![CDATA[Rohman, Zahrah Farhataeni]]>;
<![CDATA[Sugiyono, Heru]]>
<![CDATA[ Lex Librum : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 9 No. 1 (2022): Desember ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Sekolah Tinggi Ilmu Hukum Sumpah Pemuda ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.46839/lljih.v9i1.352
<![CDATA[Abstrak Tanah Negara merupakan tanah yang tidak dilekati suatu hak atas tanah dan bukan merupakan barang milik Negara/Daerah dan atau Badan Usaha Milik Negara / Daerah. Tanah yang berstatus tanah negara dapat dimintakan suatu hak untuk kepentingan tertentu dan prosedur tertentu. Kendatipun terhadap tanah negara dapat dimintakan suatu hak, namun dalam prakteknya baik perorangan maupun Badan Hukum masih kesulitan untuk mendapatkan hak atas tanah negara. Rumusan masalah yang diangkat dalam penelitian ini, bagaimana pengaturan pemberian hak kepemilikan atas tanah negara kepada perorangan atau Badan Hukum menurut sistem hukum di Indonesia dan kepastian hukum untuk mendapatkan hak atas tanah negara. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah yuridis normatif yakni melalui studi pustaka dengan menggunakan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan pemberian hak kepemilikan atas tanah negara belum dapat memberikan kepastian hukum atas diterimanya permohonan hak atas tanah negara yang diajukan oleh perorangan atau Badan Hukum. Tidak semua tanah negara bisa dimintakan mejadi hak milik, sehingga perlu ada sosialisasi mengenai jenis tanah negara yang dapat dimintakan menjadi hak milik, sehingga dapat memberikan kepastian hukum bagi perorangan ataupun badan hukum dalam mengajukan permohonan hak milik atas atas tanah negara. Kata kunci: Tanah Negara, Perorangan, Badan hukum Abstract State land is land that is not attached to a land right and is not property of the State/Regional and/or State/Regional-Owned Enterprises. Land with the status of state land may be asked for a right for certain interests and certain procedures. Even though a right to state land can be requested, in practice both individuals and legal entities are still having difficulty obtaining rights to state land. The formulation of the problem raised in this study, how to regulate the granting of ownership rights to state land to individuals or legal entities according to the legal system in Indonesia and legal certainty to obtain state land rights. The research method used is normative juridical, namely through library research using a statutory and case approach. The results of the study indicate that the arrangement for granting ownership rights to state land has not been able to provide legal certainty on the receipt of applications for state land rights submitted by individuals or legal entities. Not all state land can be requested as property rights, so there needs to be socialization regarding the types of state land that can be requested as property rights, so as to provide legal certainty for individuals or legal entities in applying for property rights on state land.]]>
<![CDATA[Sanctions Against Working Groups for the Selection of Goods/Services Providers in Cases of Tender Collusion (Study: Comparison between Indonesia and Malaysia) ]]>
<![CDATA[Bukit, Liametami Benedicta]]>;
<![CDATA[Sugiyono, Heru]]>
<![CDATA[ Rechtsidee Vol. 13 No. 2 (2025): December ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Universitas Muhammadiyah Sidoarjo ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.21070/jihr.v13i2.1093
<![CDATA[The general background of this study is the persistent dominance of tender collusion in Indonesia’s procurement sector, which undermines fair competition and public welfare. The specific background focuses on KPPU Decision No. 15/KPPU-L/2023, where the Working Group (POKJA) was proven negligent but exempted from sanctions due to its unclear legal status under Law No. 5/1999. The knowledge gap lies in the absence of explicit regulatory authority to sanction POKJA, creating ambiguity in defining “other parties” within tender collusion provisions. The aim of this research is to compare Indonesia’s regulatory framework with Malaysia’s system, which empowers MYCC to impose administrative sanctions directly on public officials involved in bid rigging. The results show that Malaysia’s Competition Act 2010 provides broader investigative and enforcement powers, enabling more effective deterrence, while Indonesia relies on fragmented administrative mechanisms that weaken accountability. The novelty of this study is its comparative legal analysis demonstrating how dual-authority competition bodies enhance integrity in public procurement. The implications highlight the urgency to revise Law No. 5/1999, clarify POKJA’s legal standing, and establish expert data-analysis bodies to strengthen preventive measures against future tender collusion. Highlights: Indonesia’s weak sanctioning framework leaves POKJA’s accountability unclear in tender collusion cases. Malaysia’s MYCC demonstrates stronger enforcement through integrated administrative and public powers. Reform of Law No. 5/1999 is essential to strengthen oversight and prevent future bid-rigging practices. Keywords: Tender Collusion, POKJA, Competition Law, MYCC , Procurement Governance]]>
<![CDATA[The Law Enforcement Against The Abuse Of Dominant Position By The E-Commerce Platform Shopee ]]>
<![CDATA[Rochela Amalia Narindra]]>;
<![CDATA[Heru Sugiyono]]>
<![CDATA[ Jurisprudentie: Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum Vol 12 No 2 (2025): Volume 12 Nomor 2 Desember 2025 (In Press) ]]>
Publisher : <![CDATA[Jurusan Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Syariah dan Hukum uin alauddin ]]>
Show Abstract
|
Download Original
|
Original Source
|
Check in Google Scholar
|
DOI: 10.24252/jurisprudentie.v12i2.62281
<![CDATA[This study examines the enforcement of competition law against the alleged abuse of dominant position by Shopee in the delivery service sector, as reflected in Case Number 04/KPPU-I/2024. Shopee is suspected of prioritizing its affiliated service, Shopee Express, leading to discriminatory practices that disadvantage independent delivery service providers. Using a normative juridical method with a statutory and case approach, the study finds that such practices potentially violate Article 19(d) and Article 25(1) of Law Number 5 of 1999. Legal protection for independent businesses can be provided preventively through regulations prohibiting discriminatory practices and repressively through law enforcement mechanisms by KPPU or civil lawsuits. The findings highlight the importance of strengthening regulations, consistent law enforcement, and legal education to ensure fair competition and safeguard consumer interests]]>
