Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Effectiveness of Implementation of the Regulation of the Supreme Court of the Republic of Indonesia Concerning Electronic Administration of Cases and Trials in Court Deasy, Deasy Yuni Pratiwi; Razak, Askari; Ramadani, Rizki
Qawanin Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): September 2024 - February 2025
Publisher : Program Studi Ilmu Hukum, Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/qawaninjih.v5i2.560

Abstract

This study aims to determine and analyze the Effectiveness of Electronic Trial Implementation at the Makassar State Administrative Court and to determine and analyze the Factors that Influence the Effectiveness of Electronic Trial Implementation at the Makassar State Administrative Court. In this study, legal regulations and the reality in the field will be analyzed to provide answers to the questions raised. This study uses an empirical legal research method, with the research location in Makassar City and its location at the Makassar State Administrative Court. Data were collected through interview techniques and literature studies, which were then analyzed descriptively analytically. The results of the study indicate that the Effectiveness of the Implementation of Supreme Court Regulation Number 1 of 2019 Concerning Electronic Case Administration and Trials in Court (Case Study at the Makassar State Administrative Court) has not been fully effective because there are still many obstacles that hinder the implementation of electronic trials. Coupled with the settlement of cases from year to year experiencing fluctuating data. This is due to one of the factors that greatly influences, among others, the infrastructure factor, namely the network which still often experiences disruptions. As a recommendation, In order to improve the effectiveness of the implementation of electronic trials at the Makassar State Administrative Court in accordance with the Supreme Court Regulation with the intent and purpose of the government, it is necessary to add and update facilities and infrastructure, especially those related to the network. The government also needs to hold special training for judges and advocates so that law enforcers become more professional and the government needs to conduct socialization to the public about the importance of technology at this time. Abstrak: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Persidangan Secara Elektronik di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Makasaar dan untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis Faktor-faktor yang memengaruhi Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Persidangan Secara Elektronik di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Makassar. Di dalam penelitian ini peraturan hukum dan kenyataan di lapangan akan dianalisis untuk memberikan jawaban atas persoalan yang diajukan. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum empiris, dengan lokasi penelitian di Kota Makassar dan tempatnya di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Makassar. Data dikumpulkan melalui teknik wawancara dan studi Pustaka, yang kemudian dianalisis secara deskriptif analitis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa Efektivitas Pelaksanaan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung Nomor 1 Tahun 2019 Tentang Administrasi Perkara Dan Persidangan Di Pengadilan Secara Elektronik (Studi Kasus Pada Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Makassar) belum sepenuhnya efektif di karenakan masih banyak kendala yang menghambat jalannya persidangan elektronik. Ditambah dengan penyelesaiaan perkara dari tahun ke tahun mengalami data yang fluktuatif. Hal ini disebabkan salah satu faktor yang sangat mempengaruhi antara lain faktor sarana prasarana yaitu jaringan yang masih sering mengalami gangguan. Sebagai rekomendasi, Dalam rangka meningkatkan efektivitas pelaksanaan persidangan elektronik di Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara Makassar agar sesuai dengan Peraturan Mahkamah Agung dengan maksud dan tujuan pemerintah perlu menambah dan memperbaharui sarana dan prasarana tertutama yang berkaitan dengan jaringan. Pemerintah juga perlu mengadakan pelatihan khusus kepada hakim dan advokat agar penegak hukum menjadi lebih professional serta pemerintah perlu melakukan sosialisasi kepada masyarakat akan pentingnya teknologi pada saat ini.
Efektivitas Penegakan Hukum Terhadap Pelaku Penambangan Pasir Tanpa Izin (Studi Pada Kepolisian Resor Pangkep) Badaru, Baharuddin; Razak, Askari; Umam, Wildan Syauqil; TL, A. Darmawansya
AL-MANHAJ: Jurnal Hukum dan Pranata Sosial Islam Vol. 5 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Fakultas Syariah INSURI Ponorogo

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37680/almanhaj.v5i2.3654

Abstract

This study aims to identify and analyze the effectiveness of law enforcement against unlicensed sand miners by the Pangkep Resort Police, and to identify and analyze the factors that impede the effectiveness of law enforcement against illegal sand miners by the Pangkep Resort Police. This type of research is empirical juridical. The research results show that the effectiveness of law enforcement against the perpetrators of sand mining without a permit by the Pangkep Resort Police is not running effectively. This is due to the understanding of the Satreskrim investigators of the Pangkep Resort Police in determining and finding the elements of crime from the perpetrator's actions, so that the investigation requires and/or presents expert witnesses to clarify the actions of the perpetrators. Factors hindering the effectiveness of law enforcement against illegal sand mining by the Pangkep Resort Police, namely; substance, structure, and legal culture. The three factors that most influence the criminal act of sand mining without a permit is the legal substance.
Affirmative Action Untuk Penyandang Disabilitas: Memenuhi Hak Pilih dalam Pemilu Yang Adil Razak, Askari
Wajah Hukum Vol 7, No 2 (2023): Oktober
Publisher : Universitas Batanghari Jambi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33087/wjh.v7i2.1271

Abstract

This research analyzes the fulfillment of voting rights for people with disabilities in elections and the efforts of affirmative action to achieve justice. People with disabilities have equal opportunities in elections according to the Constitutional Court's decision and the Election Law. Although the number of people with disabilities is approximately 1% of the population, it is important for the General Election Commission (KPU) to accurately register them. The fulfillment of voting rights for people with disabilities is in accordance with the 1945 Constitution and the Human Rights Law. People with disabilities are vulnerable groups with special rights guaranteed by the Disability Law. However, their political rights are often neglected due to stigma and discrimination. Through normative legal research, affirmative action becomes important as a temporary policy to provide equal opportunities. Active participation of people with disabilities is key in elections. The government categorizes voters as normal and those with mental disorders, but the difference between mental disabilities and insanity must be understood. Mental disorders and memory impairment are not the only requirements for elections. This research emphasizes the importance of fulfilling the voting rights of people with disabilities and the efforts of affirmative action for justice. Improvements in registration systems, elimination of stigma, and better understanding of political rights are expected to increase participation in the political process.
Konstitusionalitas Perlindungan Hukum Terhadap Kebebasan Beragama dan Beribadah di Indonesia Razak, Askari; A. Sakti R.S. Rakia; A. Darmawansya
JUSTISI Vol. 8 No. 3 (2022): JUSTISI
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Sorong

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33506/jurnaljustisi.v8i3.1925

Abstract

In the explanation of Law no. 1/PNPS/1965 stated that the recognized religions in Indonesia are Islam, Christianity, Catholicism, Hindu Buddhism, and Confucianism. As a result, other beliefs loses its legal standing and legal protection by the state. The issue of religious freedom is also influenced by the different interpretations of the terms "religion" and "belief" by the public and law enforcer. First, the terms "religion" and "belief" have different meanings. "Religion" refers to the religions adopted by Indonesian citizens, in accordance with the explanation in Law no. 1/PNPS/1965. While the term "belief" has no legal basis. Second, the terms "religion" and "belief" have identical meanings. If this opinion is recognized, then there will be generalization between "agama wahyu", and "agama budaya”. On the other hand, Article 29 paragraph (2) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia does not yet have an adequate constitutional interpretation in resolving this issue.
Konstitusionalitas Peradilan Adat dalam Penyelesaian Sengketa Masyarakat Adat di Kabupaten Tana Toraja Marham, Usman; Husen, La Ode; Razak, Askari
Al-Ishlah: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Vol 26 No 1: Desember 2022 - Mei 2023
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56087/aijih.v26i1.453

Abstract

This research encapsulates an attempt to thoroughly investigate and analyze the constitutionality of customary justice in the context of dispute resolution among indigenous peoples, with particular emphasis on the ways in which disputes are resolved through customary justice institutions in Tana Toraja Regency. The research method applied was a combination of a normative (doctrinal) legal research approach relating to legal theory and doctrine, and an empirical (non-doctrinal) legal research approach focusing on practical experience and field observations. The findings of this study underscore the importance of considering the political context of law in evaluating the constitutionality of customary justice, given that the system is faced with a range of complex challenges. In practice, the dispute resolution process through customary justice in Tana Toraja Regency is organized by a reconciliatory judge, who is tasked with facilitating the process of deliberation between the disputing parties with the aim of reaching a mutually acceptable agreement or decision. Recommendations from this study highlight the need for legislative efforts to formulate clearer laws and regulations regarding the role and procedures of customary justice in resolving disputes in indigenous communities. There is also a need for local policies that support the role of conciliatory judges in the customary justice system in Tana Toraja. This research not only provides a deeper understanding of customary justice practices, but also provides a foundation for improved policies and better legal practices in the future, which can strengthen the protection of indigenous peoples’ rights and support sustainable and inclusive development.
Efektivitas Restoratif Justice Dalam Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Penganiayaan Wardany, Prawira; Razak, Askari; Sutiawati, Sutiawati
Journal of Lex Theory (JLT) Vol. 5 No. 2 (2024): Journal of Lex Theory (JLT)
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52103/jlt.v5i2.1865

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian menganalisis efektivitas restoratif justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana penganiayaan di Kepolisian Resor Pangkep, dan 2). Untuk mengetahui dan menganalisis faktor yang menghambat restoratif justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana penganiayaan di Kepolisian Resor Pangkep. Tipe penelitian ini adalah yuridis empiris. Hasil Penelitian penulis mendapatkan bahwa: 1). Efektivitas restoratif justice dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana penganiayaan di Kepolisian Resor Pangkep, belum berjalan secara efektif dalam penyelesaian tindak pidana penganiayaan. Hal ini dikarenakan kunci dari proses penyelesaian secara mediasi adalah harus didasari adanya kesepakatan oleh para pihak. 2). Pada ketiga faktor tersebut yang paling menghambat adalah pihak pelaku dan korban dikarenakan belum tercapainya syarat materil yang harus dipenuhi untuk dapat mencapai penyelesaian tindak pidana penganiayaan melalui restoratif justice. The research objective is to analyze the efforts to resolve the crime of land grabbing in ParePare City. This type of research is empirical, the results of the author's research found that: 1) Law enforcement efforts against land grabbing in the city of ParePare are less effective, as for efforts that can be made by law enforcers in the city of ParePare through Pre-Emtive Efforts (prevention with understanding the law), Efforts Preventive (Prevention through socialization and counselling) and Repressive Efforts (social control efforts carried out after a violation occurs to restore harmony that was disturbed due to conflict or deviation). As with disputes in other fields, land disputes can be resolved in various ways, including through arbitration, alternative dispute resolution, and judicial bodies. The inhibiting factors in law enforcement against criminal acts of land grabbing are; Economic conditions, lack of legal awareness in society, community habits, and historical factors.
Fungsi Kepolisian Dalam Efektivitas Penegakkan Hukum Terhadap Penyalahgunaan Narkotika Pratama, Muh. Alwi; Razak, Askari; Badaru, Baharuddin
Journal of Lex Theory (JLT) Vol. 6 No. 1 (2025): Journal of Lex Theory (JLT)
Publisher : Program Pascasarjana Universitas Muslim Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Tujuan penelitian menganalisis efektivitas fungsi kepolisian dalam penegakan hukum terhadap penyalahgunaan narkotika di Kota Makassar. Permasalahan penyalahgunaan narkotika telah menjadi isu serius yang mengancam stabilitas sosial, kesehatan publik, dan generasi muda. Dalam konteks ini, peran Polrestabes Makassar sebagai ujung tombak penegakan hukum sangatlah krusial. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis empiris dengan pendekatan kualitatif. Data diperoleh melalui wawancara dengan aparat kepolisian, tokoh masyarakat, dan pengamatan langsung di lapangan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun Polrestabes Makassar telah menjalankan tugasnya sesuai peraturan perundang-undangan, masih terdapat berbagai hambatan seperti keterbatasan anggaran, kurangnya personel terlatih, lemahnya koordinasi antarinstansi, serta pengaruh jaringan narkotika yang melibatkan oknum internal maupun eksternal. Selain itu, pendekatan represif yang dominan belum dibarengi dengan strategi preventif dan rehabilitatif yang memadai. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan peningkatan kapasitas kelembagaan, pembentukan sinergi multipihak, serta penguatan peran masyarakat dan teknologi dalam pencegahan narkotika. Dengan upaya yang komprehensif, diharapkan penegakan hukum terhadap penyalahgunaan narkotika di Kota Makassar dapat berjalan lebih efektif dan berkelanjutan.. The research objective is to analyse the effectiveness of police functions in law enforcement against drug abuse in Makassar City. Drug abuse has become a serious issue that threatens social stability, public health, and the younger generation. In this context, the role of Makassar City Police (Polrestabes Makassar) as the forefront of law enforcement is crucial. This study employs an empirical juridical method with a qualitative approach. Data were collected through interviews with police officers, community leaders, and direct field observations. The findings indicate that although the police have carried out their duties according to the prevailing laws and regulations, several obstacles remain, including budget limitations, lack of trained personnel, weak interagency coordination, and the influence of drug networks involving both internal and external actors. Moreover, the predominant repressive approach has not been adequately complemented by preventive and rehabilitative strategies. This research recommends institutional capacity building, enhanced multi-stakeholder synergy, and the strengthening of community roles and technology in drug prevention. Through a comprehensive approach, it is expected that law enforcement against drug abuse in Makassar City will become more effective and sustainable..
General Principles of Good Government on the Competence of Government Apparatus in Making State Administration Decisions Razak, Askari
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 1 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i1.1139

Abstract

This research will focus on specific aspects in PTUN decisions that can act as a guide for government officials in improving the quality of administrative decision making. Investigating the impact of PTUN decisions on changes or improvements to administrative policies within government officials is also the aim of this research. This research will identify potential gaps between PTUN decisions and administrative decision-making practices by government officials, as well as analyze the implications of these gaps for their competence. Furthermore, this research will examine how participation and coordination between government officials and legal institutions such as PTUN, can contribute to enriching the process of making better administrative decisions. The research method used is the normative juridical method. It is hoped that the results of this research will provide new insight into the importance of collaboration between government officials and legal institutions in improving the quality of administrative decision making in Indonesia.
Penunjukan Gubernur oleh Presiden dalam Wacana RUU Daerah Khusus Jakarta: Kontroversi dan Orientasi Razak, Askari
UNES Law Review Vol. 6 No. 2 (2023)
Publisher : Universitas Ekasakti

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31933/unesrev.v6i2.1455

Abstract

The Special Capital Region of Jakarta Bill has generated controversy regarding the proposal to grant the President the authority to appoint the Governor. Despite concerns about conflicting with regional autonomy, this provision is considered crucial for maintaining the stability of the capital. This research aims to analyze the controversy surrounding the mechanism of the President's appointment of the Governor in the bill and formulate an ideal policy orientation to bridge the interests of the central and local governments. A normative method, utilizing legislative and case law approaches, is employed to examine primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials, qualitatively analyzing the controversy and policy orientation. The study identifies the controversy arising from Article 10, paragraph (1), allowing the President's direct appointment, potentially undermining citizen participation and democratic principles. To balance central and local government interests, policy orientation can refer to Law No. 23 of 2014, involving direct election of the Governor by the people, with additional conditions and recommendations from the central government. Aligning the Governor of Jakarta's term with the President's and establishing a Jakarta Consideration Council involving both central and local government elements ensures checks and balances. Detailed tasks for the Governor regarding the coordination of national development programs in Jakarta, along with incentives and affirmative policies from the central government, support the region's development as the capital.
The Effectiveness of Law Enforcement on Cybercrime: A Case Study of Online Fraud in South Sulawesi Syahfallah, Zulfan Akbar; Razak, Askari; Salle, Salle
SIGn Jurnal Hukum Vol 7 No 2: Oktober 2025 - Maret 2026
Publisher : CV. Social Politic Genius (SIGn)

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37276/sjh.v7i2.557

Abstract

The escalation of cyber fraud offenses within the South Sulawesi Regional Police’s jurisdiction poses serious challenges for law enforcement authorities, particularly given the limitations of conventional regulatory instruments that fail to address the characteristics of digital crime. This research aims to conduct an in-depth analysis of law enforcement disparity triggered by the normative gap between the application of Article 378 of Law Number 1 of 1946 and Law Number 11 of 2008 and its amendments, evaluate structural and cultural obstacles distorting investigation effectiveness, and project a systemic solution through the transition to Law Number 1 of 2023. Employing a socio-legal research method with a qualitative approach, this study integrates doctrinal analysis with empirical data obtained through in-depth interviews with investigators, judges, and victims. The results reveal crucial facts regarding regulatory disharmony, where law enforcement officials experience inertia in exercising their authority to cut off digital access due to unprepared forensic infrastructure at the regional level and low public legal literacy. This phenomenon creates a paradox of blunt law enforcement and perpetuates disparities in court verdicts. In conclusion, this study asserts that partial reform is no longer adequate to address the complexity of cybercrime. The study’s implications include concrete steps, such as formulating standard operating procedures aligned with Article 493 of Law Number 1 of 2023, forensic laboratory decentralization, and adopting internet access rights revocation sanctions as a futuristic sentencing strategy that guarantees legal certainty and restorative justice.