Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
10.181
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Legalitas Diktum JURNAL IQTISAD: Reconstruction of Justice and Welfare for Indonesia Badamai Law Journal Jurisprudentie Unram Law Review Jurnal Akta Justitia et Pax Al-'Adl TANJUNGPURA LAW JOURNAL Jurnal Hukum tora: Hukum mengatur dan melindungi masyarakat DE'RECHTSSTAAT Jurnal Meta-Yuridis JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW Journal on Education TAHKIM Literasi Hukum Jurnal Yuridis DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Jurnal Restorative Justice Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Majalah Ilmiah Warta Dharmawangsa ADIL : Jurnal Hukum Al-Adl : Jurnal Hukum Res Nullius Law Journal Jurnal Christian Humaniora Paulus Law Journal Supremasi Hukum Jurnal Analisis Hukum Belom Bahadat : Jurnal Hukum Agama Hindu PAMPAS: Journal of Criminal Law Amsir Law Jurnal (ALJ) Justisi : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal Presumption of Law Widya Pranata Hukum : Jurnal Kajian dan Penelitian Hukum AL WASATH Jurnal Ilmu Hukum JURIDICA : Jurnal Fakultas Hukum Universitas Gunung Rinjani Journal of Law, Administration, and Social Science Research Fair Unisri Lontar Merah: Studi Keilmuan Hukum Formosa Journal of Multidisciplinary Research (FJMR) Jurnal Hukum Pelita Asian Journal of Community Services (AJCS) Journal of Legal and Cultural Analytics (JLCA) VIVA THEMIS- Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Humaniora Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Kajian Ilmu Hukum Riau Law Journal HUKMY : Jurnal Hukum JURNAL PANAH KEADILAN DIKTUM: JURNAL SYARIAH DAN HUKUM Jurnal Fakta Hukum (JFH) SOSIO YUSTISIA Jurnal Hukum dan Perubahan Sosial Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia Juris Humanity: Jurnal Riset dan Kajian Hukum Hak Asasi Manusia Journal of Contemporary Law Studies Journal of Humanities and Social Studies Indonesian Journal of Economic & Management Sciences (IJEMS) Adil Indonesia Journal Yuriska : Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Hartanto
Faculty Of Law Widya Mataram University, Yogyakarta, Indonesia
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 83 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 83 Documents
Search

 5   6   7   8   9 
PERBANDINGAN SANKSI PIDANA PASAL TERTENTU UNDANG-UNDANG INFORMASI DAN TRANSAKSI ELEKTRONIK (UU ITE No.11 tahun 2008 dengan No 19 tahun 2016): COMPARISON OF CRIMINAL SANCTIONS FOR CERTAIN ARTICLE OF THE INFORMATION AND ELECTRONIC TRANSACTIONS LAW (UU ITE No.11 tahun 2008 dengan No 19 tahun 2016) Hartanto; Alia Cahya Hakimi; Said Munawar
Journal Presumption of Law Vol 6 No 1 (2024): Volume 6 Nomor 1 Tahun 2024
Publisher : Universitas Majalengka

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31949/jpl.v6i1.4613

Abstract

Pengaruh perkembangan sosial dalam komunikasi masyarakat yang kemudian diatur secara hukum dan etika untuk mengantisipasi perkembangannya menjadi sebuah kejahatan, dan juga untuk memberikan kepastian hukum pada para pelaku yang benar-benar bertujuan jahat dalam penggunaan internet. Hukum pidana (KUHP) telah mengatur perbuatan hukum ancaman kekerasan dan pencemaran nama baik dalam konteks dunia nyata (konkrit), namun ketika hal tersebut digunakan menggunakan teknologi informasi dengan media elektronik (internet) maka merupakan tindak pidana relatif baru berikut dengan sanksinya. Pemerintah berusaha merespon berbagai perdebatan di masyarakat yang tampaknya belum memiliki filter dalam memilah penggunaan teknologi internet ini, dengan nenurunkan ancaman sanksi pidananya. Dua buah norma terkait delik (delict) diatas cukup menarik untuk dilakukan pembahasan, hal yang awalnya biasa terjadi dimasyarakat (interaksi sosial) seperti istilah ngerumpi, curhat, kritik dan sebagainya, saat ini menghadapi sanksi pidana khusus terkait elektronik. Perbandingan sanksi pidana dari UU ITE 2008 dan UU ITE 2016 telah tampak mewujudkan upaya pemerintah agar tidak terjadi over kriminalisasi, sekaligus tetap berupaya mengedukasi masyarakat. Beberapa pihak yang ingin agar pencemaran nama baik atau ancaman kekerasan ini dihapuskan menurut penulis adalah tidak linier dengan upaya untuk memajukan perdaban hukum dan masyarakat Indonesia
Problematika Perubahan Undang-Undang Tentang Mineral Dan Batu Bara: (Dikuasai Negara Tidak Sama Dengan Dimiliki Negara) Tampubolon, Steven Paulus Hamonangan; Hartanto, Hartanto
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 2 No. 3 (2024): Agustus: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v2i3.2991

Abstract

Article 33 (3) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, is clear that the welfare of the people must be prioritized, however, the problem of mineral and coal mining, at the conceptual level, has not shown an impact on the welfare of the Indonesian people; The author appreciates this change in law. Currently, corruption related to mining has emerged again, namely a loss of IDR 271 trillion, which according to Bambang Hero S. is still an environmental loss or a loss to the country's economy. When compared to BLBI of 138 trillion and Asabri of around 22 trillion, this means that the trading system of tin as one of the mining commodities is the biggest corruption, which was unexpected by the public, but suddenly emerged after the election. Departing from the 1945 Constitution which uses the principle of managing oil and gas resources for the benefit of society and the state. So the problem formulation is how problematic occurs in changes to the regulations of Law no. 4 of 2009 until now it has become Law no. 3 of 2020. At the norm level, changes to the law have accommodated the principles of sustainability and legal certainty, even though implementing regulations do not yet exist. Returning to legal problems in Indonesia, problems often arise in the application of the law, not at the normative level.
Penegakan Hukum Pidana dalam Perspektif Sosiologi Hukum: Analisis Kesenjangan antara Norma dan Realitas Sosial Suratman Suratman; Lestari Anggraini; Hartanto Hartanto; Aida Dewi
JURNAL HUKUM PELITA Vol. 7 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Hukum Pelita Mei 2026
Publisher : Direktorat Penelitian dan Pengabdian (DPPM) Universitas Pelita Bangsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37366/jhp.v7i1.7057

Abstract

Criminal law is often positioned as a state instrument to maintain social order and control deviant behavior. However, its effectiveness cannot be understood solely through normative legal analysis. This study examines criminal law from a sociology of law perspective to analyze the relationship between normative legal construction and social reality, as well as the gap between the objectives of criminal law and its enforcement practices. Using normative legal research with a qualitative approach, this study analyzes legislation, legal doctrines, and relevant literature through conceptual and sociological perspectives. The findings show that criminal law operates within complex social structures influenced by power relations, cultural values, and institutional practices. A legalistic and repressive enforcement approach often leads to social injustice, stigmatization, and declining public trust in the criminal justice system. The study argues that integrating a sociology of law perspective is essential to develop a more responsive, contextual, and humane criminal law system. Criminal law reform should shift from a purely punitive orientation toward a balanced approach that emphasizes proportionality, restorative justice, and social protection. Strengthening legal awareness through civic education is also crucial to enhance the legitimacy and effectiveness of criminal law in a pluralistic society
Co-Authors Ababil, Muhamad Afghan Adiana, Maria Eliza Agus Santoso Aida Dewi Aida Dewi Aidilla, Latifatul Alia Cahya Hakimi Alifah Herawati Alimpeev, Daniil Anwar Hidayatulloh, Bagus Arrafi, Muhammad Richo Arvita Hastarini Bagus Anwar Hidayatulloh Bagus Anwar Hidayatulloh Bambang Tri Bawono Biramasi, Arifin Budiarto, Djoko Cahyono Cahyono Chrisjanto, Edy Cunduk Wasiati Daryoko, Daryoko Dianawati Lega Diantono, Amabelle Fellyta Dista Amelia Sontana Djoko Budiarto Dwi Astuti Dwi Astuti Edginio, Carolus Evan Putra Edy Chrisjanto Edy Chrisjanto Elza Qorina Pangestika Elza Qorina Pangestika Erna Tri Rusmala Ratnawati Faizah Nada Mutiara, Faizah Nada Mutiara Fifink Praiseda Alviolit Fifink Praiseda Alviolita Fifink Praiseda Alviolita Fithrian Luthfan, Gusti Fadhil Geronsius Arinto Guru Giferi, Luisa Griselda Hartanto Hyronimus Rhiti Jatmiko, sigit Kadir, Syukron Abdul Kelik Endro Suryono Kurniyati, Nany Noor Kusumawiranti, Retno Lega, Dianawati Lestari Anggraini Linda Dewi Rahayu Malkhi, Yusuf Meliana S, Mitzi Diva Muhamad Rusdi Muhamad Rusdi Muhammad Dendy Alfariski Muhammad Rusdi Murdoko, Murdoko Murdomo Murdomo Murdomo Murdomo Nany Boor Kurniyati Nany Noor Kurniyati Nidya Tajsgoani Noferani, Rudad Nurahman, Adiansyah Praiseda , Fifink Alviolita Putri, Nur Anita Owiwanti Putri, Wulan Julianti Qorina Pangestika, Elza Ramadhani, Milenia Rhiti, Hyronimus Rininta Rininta Rininta Rininta Roni Sulistyanto Luhukay, Roni Sulistyanto Said Munawar Said Munawar Said Munawar Samsul Bahri Saputri, Devita Sri Buwono, Sapto Wahyu Sudiyana Sulistya, Mikael Inzaghi Suratman Suratman Susanto Susanto Suyatno Suyatno Syafiqurrohman Syafiqurrohman Syakdiah Syakdiah, Syakdiah Tampubolon, Steven Paulus Hamonangan Triatmojo, Puguh Vicki Dwi Purnomo Vicki Dwi Purnomo Wahyandono, Matheas Prihargo Wahyuningtyas , Emy Wahyuningtyas, Emy Wantara Wantara Wilda Meutia Syafiina, Cut Yosa Pratikta, Fairus Yosua Richard Y