p-Index From 2020 - 2025
5.647
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Jurnal Infinity International Conference on Education and Language (ICEL) Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar MAGISTRA: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar dan Keislaman Delta-Pi : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Elemen HISTOGRAM: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika DWIJA CENDEKIA: Jurnal Riset Pedagogik Eklektik : Jurnal Pendidikan Ekonomi dan Kewirausahaan Journal of Economic, Bussines and Accounting (COSTING) JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) International Journal of Elementary Education Edumaspul: Jurnal Pendidikan Journal of Education, Humaniora and Social Sciences (JEHSS) Jurnal Ilmiah Administrasi Bisnis dan Inovasi Jurnal Pendidikan Syntax Idea Ecobisma (Jurnal Ekonomi, Bisnis dan Manajemen) JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan) Cakrawala Repositori Imwi Didaktika: Jurnal Kependidikan JagoMIPA: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan IPA Journal of Education Research Jurnal Impresi Indonesia INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF EDUCATION, INFORMATION TECHNOLOGY, AND OTHERS Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education MAGISTRA: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar dan Keislaman Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Terapan Universitas Jambi Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia (Japendi) Indonesian Journal of Advanced Research (IJAR) Journal of Business Management and Economic Development Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Indonesian Journal of Mathematics Education Jurnal Pendidikan IPA Indonesia Asian Journal of Management, Entrepreneurship and Social Science Jurnal Infinity
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Pengaruh Model Pembelajaran Think Pair Share dan Problem Based Learning Terhadap Kemampuan Berpikir Kritis dan Pemecahan Masalah Siswa Kelas XI di SMAN 2 Sijunjung Amelia, Mona; Fatimah, Fatia; Noviyanti, Mery
Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia Vol. 6 No. 11 (2025): Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia
Publisher : Publikasi Indonesia

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59141/japendi.v6i11.8744

Abstract

This study examines the effectiveness of the Think Pair Share (TPS) and Problem Based Learning (PBL) models in improving students’ critical thinking and mathematical problem-solving abilities in Grade XI at SMAN 2 Sijunjung. The research was motivated by the gap between students’ learning interest and higher-order cognitive performance in probability material. A quantitative quasi-experimental design with a 2×2 factorial structure was employed, involving two equivalent classes (XI F-4 = TPS; XI F-5 = PBL; total n = 64). Data were collected through four-item essay tests based on Facione’s indicators of critical thinking and Polya’s steps of problem solving. Instrument validity, reliability, difficulty, and discrimination indices were verified before administration. The findings revealed that TPS outperformed PBL in both critical thinking (mean = 85.06 vs 80.00; F = 18.240; p < 0.05) and problem-solving skills (mean = 82.46 vs 77.63; F = 15.689; p < 0.05). Within-model comparisons also showed higher critical-thinking scores than problem-solving ones in both groups. These results confirm that TPS effectively fosters reasoning, argumentation, and structured analytical processes within limited instructional time, while PBL is better suited for long-term contextual application. The study concludes that structured social interaction significantly contributes to the development of higher-order thinking skills, and future research should explore retention effects and the sequential integration of TPS → PBL models.
The Use of Eliciting Activities Model to Improve Mathematical Representation Ability and Self-Efficacy in Elementary Schools Rohim, Nur; Waluyo, St Budi; Noviyanti, Mery
MAGISTRA: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar dan Keislaman Vol. 16 No. 2 (2025): December | Magistra - Media Pengembangan Ilmu Pendidikan dan Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/mgs.v16i2.12746

Abstract

This study aims to determine improvements in mathematical representation ability and self-efficacy in ratio material among fifth-grade elementary school students using Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs). This research employs a mixed-method approach with a quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group design. The experimental group received treatment using Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs), while the control group was taught using conventional learning methods. Data collection techniques in this study included tests, questionnaires, documentation, observation, and interviews. Data analysis consisted of descriptive statistics, prerequisite tests, and final hypothesis testing (T-test, Z-test, mean difference test, and gain test). The results of this study indicate that Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) have a significant effect on the mathematical representation ability of fifth-grade students in the Sultan Agung cluster in the ratio material. This is demonstrated by the analysis results using the paired sample t-test, which produced a t-value (t_calculated) greater than the t-table value (13.047 > 2.145). Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) are effective in improving students’ mathematical representation ability, as shown by the independent sample t-test results, where t_calculated was greater than the t-table value (2.52 > 2.048). There is a significant difference in self-efficacy between students who received MEA-based learning and those who received conventional learning. The analysis using the independent samples t-test showed that the t-calculated values for self-efficacy were 2.935, 2.522, 2.699, and 2.871 for the magnitude, strength, and generality dimensions, respectively. Given that the t-table value was 2.048, it can be concluded that the t-calculated values for the self-efficacy questionnaire results in the experimental and control classes, across the dimensions of magnitude, strength, and generality, were greater than the t-table value.
The Use of Eliciting Activities Model to Improve Mathematical Representation Ability and Self-Efficacy in Elementary Schools Rohim, Nur; Waluyo, St Budi; Noviyanti, Mery
MAGISTRA: Media Pengembangan Ilmu Pendidikan Dasar dan Keislaman Vol. 16 No. 2 (2025): December | Magistra - Media Pengembangan Ilmu Pendidikan dan Keislaman
Publisher : Universitas Wahid Hasyim Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31942/mgs.v16i2.12746

Abstract

This study aims to determine improvements in mathematical representation ability and self-efficacy in ratio material among fifth-grade elementary school students using Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs). This research employs a mixed-method approach with a quasi-experimental nonequivalent control group design. The experimental group received treatment using Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs), while the control group was taught using conventional learning methods. Data collection techniques in this study included tests, questionnaires, documentation, observation, and interviews. Data analysis consisted of descriptive statistics, prerequisite tests, and final hypothesis testing (T-test, Z-test, mean difference test, and gain test). The results of this study indicate that Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) have a significant effect on the mathematical representation ability of fifth-grade students in the Sultan Agung cluster in the ratio material. This is demonstrated by the analysis results using the paired sample t-test, which produced a t-value (t_calculated) greater than the t-table value (13.047 > 2.145). Model-Eliciting Activities (MEAs) are effective in improving students’ mathematical representation ability, as shown by the independent sample t-test results, where t_calculated was greater than the t-table value (2.52 > 2.048). There is a significant difference in self-efficacy between students who received MEA-based learning and those who received conventional learning. The analysis using the independent samples t-test showed that the t-calculated values for self-efficacy were 2.935, 2.522, 2.699, and 2.871 for the magnitude, strength, and generality dimensions, respectively. Given that the t-table value was 2.048, it can be concluded that the t-calculated values for the self-efficacy questionnaire results in the experimental and control classes, across the dimensions of magnitude, strength, and generality, were greater than the t-table value.
PENGARUH PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM-BASED LEARNING BERBANTUAN LEMBAR KERJA PESERTA DIDIK DAN ALAT PERAGA TERHADAP PEMAHAMAN MATEMATIS DITINJAU DARI GENDER SISWA Sintya Permata Ayu; Moh. Uzer Usman; Mery Noviyanti
Primary: Jurnal Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar Vol. 11 No. 3 (2022): June
Publisher : Laboratorium Program Studi Pendidikan Guru Sekolah Dasar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.33578/jpfkip.v11i3.8882

Abstract

This article describes the effect of problem-based learning assisted by students’ worksheets and teaching aids on students’ mathematical understanding based on their gender. The research method used in this article was quasi-experimental, with a factorial research design. The research subjects involved the fourth-grade students at elementary school. Based on the data result, there was a difference in students’ mathematical understanding between the students who received the problem-based learning assisted by students’ worksheets and students who received the problem-based learning assisted by teaching aid. There was no difference between male and female students in students’ mathematical understanding. The mathematical understanding of male students who received problem-based learning assisted by students’ worksheets was lower than male students who received problem-based learning assisted by teaching aids. The mathematical understanding of female students who received problem-based learning assisted by students’ worksheets was higher than female students who received problem-based learning assisted by teaching aids. And the test result showed that there was an interaction effect between problem-based learning and gender on students’ mathematical understanding
Praxology in advanced geometry textbooks for distance education: A hermeneutic review of structure and knowledge representation Noviyanti, Mery; Sudirman, Sudirman; Kandaga, Thesa; Ramdhani, Sendi; Isnawan, Muhamad Galang
Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Journal of Advanced Sciences and Mathematics Education
Publisher : CV. FOUNDAE

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58524/jasme.v5i2.840

Abstract

Background: Geometry plays a fundamental role in mathematics education by developing logical reasoning and spatial understanding. Despite its importance, geometry remains a difficult subject for university students, particularly in distance learning contexts. While several studies have analyzed geometry textbooks, few have examined their knowledge structures through a praxeological perspective. Aim: This study aims to analyze a university-level Euclidean geometry textbook by identifying how the components of praxeology, namely task (T), technique (τ), technology (θ), and theory (Θ), are organized and interconnected to support meaningful learning. Method: The research applied a hermeneutic phenomenological design. The textbook, used in a master’s geometry course at an Indonesian university, was analyzed through repeated readings and qualitative interpretation. Data were coded and categorized according to the praxeological framework and validated through researcher discussions. Result: The findings show that the textbook demonstrates a coherent praxeological structure with accurate theoretical explanations and effective technological representations. However, the analysis revealed weaknesses such as limited rationale for applying specific techniques, insufficient connection between theoretical concepts and exercises, and few examples of proofs. Conclusion: The study concludes that while the textbook reflects strong praxeological principles, improvements are needed in clarifying technique rationales, linking theory and practice, and structuring technological components. The results provide pedagogical insights for developing university geometry textbooks that enhance conceptual understanding, reflective reasoning, and learning effectiveness in both traditional and distance education settings.