Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
11.601
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Legalitas Jurnal Cita Hukum Unifikasi: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Logika : Jurnal Penelitian Universitas Kuningan Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Akta Empowerment : Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat JURNAL ILMIAH HUKUM DIRGANTARA KRTHA BHAYANGKARA Literatus FOCUS: Journal of Social Studies Journal Evidence Of Law Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi International Journal of Advanced Multidisciplinary JUDGE: Jurnal Hukum JPNM : Jurnal Pustaka Nusantara Multidisiplin Al-Zayn: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial & Hukum Journal of Governance and Public Administration LEX LAGUENS: Jurnal Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia LEX OMNIBUS : JURNAL HUKUM TATA NEGARA DAN ADMINISTRASI NEGARA MALA IN SE : JURNAL HUKUM PIDANA, KRIMINOLOGI DAN VIKTIMOLOGI Jurnal Bakti Dirgantara Jurnal Pustaka Cendekia Hukum dan Ilmu Sosial Uniku Law Review Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Greenation International Journal of Law and Social Sciences IPSSJ Jurnal Cendekia Ilmiah PESHUM Corpus Juris : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum
Diding Rahmat
Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadama
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Mathematics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 120 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 120 Documents
Search

 8   9   10   11   12 
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE PROVISIONS ON THE DEATH PENALTY IN THE CRIMINAL CODE Dedy Irawan; Diding Rahmat; Ardison Asri
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v7i3.641

Abstract

Capital punishment is the most severe form of punishment in the Indonesian criminal justice system and remains a controversial issue that sparks debate between the need to uphold justice and the protection of human rights, particularly the right to life. Under the old Criminal Code, capital punishment was included as a primary punishment that could be imposed on perpetrators of serious crimes such as premeditated murder, terrorism, treason, and drug trafficking. Meanwhile, the new Criminal Code, as specified in Law No. 1 of 2023, introduces significant changes in the regulation of the death penalty. The death penalty is no longer positioned as the primary punishment but rather as a conditional alternative punishment, which is only imposed if other penalties are deemed insufficient to achieve justice. This study aims to examine the differences in the regulation of the death penalty in the old and new Criminal Codes and to analyze the considerations of judges in imposing the death penalty based on a study of Decision No. 32/Pid.Sus/2025/PN Pts. The approach used is normative legal with a descriptive analysis method. The results of the study show a shift in the criminal law paradigm from a retributive approach to a more restorative and humanistic approach. In the new Criminal Code, the death penalty can be imposed with a probation period of 10 years, and if during that period the convict demonstrates good attitude and behavior, the sentence can be changed to life imprisonment or a fixed term of imprisonment. The regulation of the death penalty in the new Criminal Code reflects the state's efforts to maintain the deterrent effect on serious crimes while upholding the principles of humanity and balanced justice.
LEGAL ANALYSIS OF THE IMPLEMENTATION OF RESTORATIVE JUSTICE TOWARDS CORPORATE RESPONSIBILITY IN THE CONTEXT OF ENVIRONMENTAL RESTORATION Dadang Wahyudin; Diding Rahmat; Ardison Asri
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v7i3.643

Abstract

This study discusses the legal analysis of the application of restorative justice to corporate accountability in the context of environmental restoration. Environmental violations committed by corporations generally have a widespread and serious impact on ecosystems and the lives of surrounding communities. In national regulations, environmental law enforcement can be carried out through administrative, civil, and criminal channels. One key point is that corporations, as legal entities, can be held criminally liable if proven to have caused environmental pollution or damage. However, the imposition of sanctions on corporations still faces various challenges, such as weak enforcement, interference from vested interests, and a lack of concrete restoration for the environment and affected communities. In line with this, the restorative justice approach has begun to gain attention as an alternative in resolving environmental disputes. This approach emphasizes restoring environmental conditions and fulfilling the rights of affected communities, rather than merely punishing the perpetrators. In the context of Law no. 32 of 2009, restorative justice is reflected in out-of-court dispute resolution mechanisms, mediation, and ecological restoration. However, the lack of strong technical and institutional guidelines limits its implementation. Therefore, there is a need to strengthen regulations and the commitment of law enforcement officials to apply restorative justice more effectively in order to create environmental law enforcement that is not only repressive but also solution-oriented and sustainable.
APPLICATION OF THE PRINCIPLE OF EQUALITY BEFORE THE LAW IN THE CASE AMMAR ZONI'S NARCOTICS CRIME Elsa Efritha Wijaya; Diding Rahmat; Sudarto
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v7i3.644

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the regulation and implementation of the principle of equality before the law within the Indonesian legal system, particularly in the enforcement of narcotics crime involving Ammar Zoni based on the Decision of the Central Jakarta District Court Number 632/Pid.Sus/2025/PN.Jkt.Pst. The principle of equality before the law is a fundamental concept in a rule of law state, which affirms that every individual has equal standing before the law without any form of discriminatory treatment. This research uses normative legal research methods with a statutory approach and a case approach. The data used in this study are secondary data consisting of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials obtained through library research. The data were analyzed qualitatively by interpreting and systematically examining relevant legal materials. The results of the study show that normatively the principle of equality before the law has been clearly regulated in the Indonesian legal system, particularly in Article 27 paragraph (1) and Article 28D paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia as well as various statutory regulations governing the criminal justice system, including Law Number 35 of 2009 concerning Narcotics. In its application to the case involving Ammar Zoni, the legal process was carried out through the general criminal justice mechanism without any special treatment toward the defendant as a public figure. The panel of judges based their decision on valid evidence presented in court and the applicable legal provisions. Thus, procedurally, the principle of equality before the law in this case has been implemented through an objective judicial process based on the facts revealed during the trial.
LEGAL REVIEW OF PROTECTION ORDERS FOR VICTIMS OF DOMESTIC VIOLENCE Berliana Putri Pramesti; Bambang Widarto; Diding Rahmat
JILPR Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review Vol. 7 No. 3 (2026): Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR), June 2026
Publisher : International Peneliti Ekonomi, Sosial dan Teknologi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56371/jirpl.v7i3.646

Abstract

Domestic violence is a form of human rights violation that causes physical, psychological, sexual, and economic suffering for victims. In order to provide protection for victims, the state enacted Law Number 23 of 2004 concerning the Elimination of Domestic Violence, which regulates the issuance of a Protection Order as one of its legal mechanisms. This legal instrument aims to provide preventive protection for victims from the risk of repeated violence and to ensure their safety during the law enforcement process. This study aims to analyze the regulation of protection orders for victims of domestic violence under Law Number 23 of 2004 and their implementation in law enforcement practices in Indonesia. This research employs a normative legal research method with a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The legal materials used consist of primary, secondary, and tertiary legal materials which are analyzed qualitatively through legal interpretation and juridical reasoning. The results of this study indicate that the regulation of protection orders in the Domestic Violence Law plays an important role as a preventive legal protection instrument for victims. Protection orders can be granted in the form of temporary protection provided by law enforcement officials as well as permanent protection determined by the court. However, in practice, the implementation of protection orders still faces several challenges, including the low level of public legal awareness, limited access of victims to protection services, and the lack of optimal coordination among law enforcement agencies. Therefore, it is necessary to enhance the capacity of law enforcement officials, strengthen coordination among relevant institutions, and increase legal awareness through public education so that the protection of domestic violence victims can be implemented effectively.
Kebijakan Tidak Menahan Tersangka Korupsi Yang Mengembalikan Uang Kerugian Negara Pada Tahap Penyidikan Gios Adhyaksa; Cucun Cundaya Fitria Sari; Anthon Fathanudien; Diding Rahmat
Jurnal Hukum Mimbar Justitia Vol. 12 No. 1 (2026): Published 30 Juni 2026
Publisher : Universitas Suryakancana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35194/jhmj.v12i1.6218

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan menganalisis dasar yuridis kebijakan non-penahanan terhadap tersangka tindak pidana korupsi yang mengembalikan kerugian negara pada tahap penyidikan oleh kejaksaan serta implikasinya terhadap kepastian hukum, equality before the law, dan efektivitas pemberantasan korupsi. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual. Bahan hukum diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan dan dianalisis secara kualitatif menggunakan penafsiran gramatikal, sistematis, dan teleologis. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kebijakan non-penahanan tidak bertentangan dengan hukum acara pidana sepanjang memenuhi syarat objektif dan subjektif penahanan dalam KUHAP. Namun, pengembalian kerugian negara tidak dapat dijadikan dasar tunggal non-penahanan karena tidak menghapus pertanggungjawaban pidana. Kebaruan penelitian ini terletak pada analisis kebijakan non-penahanan sebagai pergeseran orientasi penegakan hukum dari pendekatan retributif menuju asset recovery. Penelitian ini merekomendasikan penyusunan pedoman internal Kejaksaan yang memuat parameter normatif guna menjamin kepastian hukum, kesetaraan di hadapan hukum, dan efektivitas pemberantasan korupsi.
Analisis Tindak Perundungan dalam Perspektif Hukum Pidana Muhammad Akmal Fahreza Balman; Diding Rahmat; Sudarto
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 08 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i08.2215

Abstract

Perundungan merupakan perilaku agresif yang semakin sering terjadi, terutama di lingkungan pendidikan, dan dapat menimbulkan dampak fisik maupun psikologis bagi korban. Dalam perspektif hukum pidana, perundungan berkaitan dengan perlindungan hak atas rasa aman, kehormatan, dan martabat manusia. Meskipun tidak diatur secara eksplisit dalam Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Pidana (KUHP), berbagai bentuk perundungan dapat dikualifikasikan sebagai tindak pidana melalui ketentuan mengenai kekerasan, penganiayaan, penghinaan, dan pengancaman. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan perundungan dalam hukum pidana Indonesia serta penerapan penegakan hukumnya di lingkungan pendidikan. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan, konseptual, dan kasus. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif telah tersedia instrumen hukum untuk menjerat pelaku perundungan, seperti KUHP dan Undang-Undang Perlindungan Anak. Namun, penegakan hukum masih menghadapi hambatan, antara lain minimnya pelaporan, kesulitan pembuktian, budaya permisif di lingkungan pendidikan, serta kurangnya koordinasi antar lembaga. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan penguatan penegakan hukum yang berorientasi pada perlindungan korban serta peningkatan peran institusi pendidikan dalam upaya pencegahan.
Tinjauan Yuridis atas Hak Korban Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga dalam Proses Pemulihan dan Rehabilitasi Vani Novitasari; Rizky Pratama Putra Karo Karo; Diding Rahmat
Judge : Jurnal Hukum Vol. 6 No. 08 (2026): Judge : Jurnal Hukum
Publisher : Cattleya Darmaya Fortuna

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.54209/judge.v6i08.2217

Abstract

Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga (KDRT) merupakan salah satu bentuk pelanggaran hak asasi manusia yang memerlukan perlindungan hukum serta mekanisme pemulihan yang komprehensif bagi korban. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan regulasi mengenai hak korban KDRT dalam proses pemulihan dan rehabilitasi berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia serta mengkaji peran lembaga terkait dalam pelaksanaannya. Penelitian ini menggunakan metode penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach). Data yang digunakan berupa data sekunder yang terdiri dari bahan hukum primer, sekunder, dan tersier yang diperoleh melalui studi kepustakaan, kemudian dianalisis secara kualitatif normatif. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa secara normatif negara telah menyediakan kerangka hukum yang cukup memadai dalam menjamin hak korban KDRT melalui berbagai regulasi, seperti Undang-Undang Nomor 23 Tahun 2004 tentang Penghapusan Kekerasan dalam Rumah Tangga, Undang-Undang Nomor 31 Tahun 2014 tentang Perlindungan Saksi dan Korban, serta regulasi terkait lainnya yang menekankan pentingnya pemulihan korban secara komprehensif. Pelaksanaan pemulihan korban melibatkan berbagai lembaga melalui pendekatan lintas sektor, seperti LPSK, UPTD PPA, kepolisian, layanan kesehatan, dan dinas sosial. Namun demikian, implementasi pemulihan korban masih menghadapi berbagai hambatan, antara lain keterbatasan sumber daya, ketimpangan kapasitas layanan antar daerah, serta faktor budaya yang memengaruhi keberanian korban dalam melaporkan kekerasan. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan harmonisasi regulasi, penguatan koordinasi antar lembaga, serta peningkatan kapasitas layanan untuk mewujudkan sistem pemulihan korban KDRT yang lebih efektif dan berkeadilan.
Tanggung Jawab Hukum Pihak Bank Atas Kerugian Nasabah Akibat Kejahatan Phising Roza Mulyadi; Diding Rahmat; Rizky Pratama K
Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Greenation Sosial dan Politik (Februari - April 2026)
Publisher : Greenation Publisher & Yayasan Global Resarch National

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jgsp.v4i1.607

Abstract

Perkembangan teknologi informasi dalam sistem perbankan digital meningkatkan efisiensi transaksi, namun juga memunculkan risiko kejahatan siber seperti phishing. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis pengaturan dan letak pertanggungjawaban hukum bank atas kerugian nasabah akibat kejahatan phishing dalam perspektif hukum positif Indonesia. Metode yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan analisis kualitatif deskriptif, menggunakan bahan hukum primer dan sekunder. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa pengaturan pertanggungjawaban bank tersebar dalam berbagai rezim hukum, antara lain Undang-Undang Informasi dan Transaksi Elektronik, Undang-Undang Perlindungan Data Pribadi, Undang-Undang Perlindungan Konsumen, Kitab Undang-Undang Hukum Perdata, serta regulasi Otoritas Jasa Keuangan dan Bank Indonesia. Secara normatif, tanggung jawab bank tidak hanya berbasis kesalahan (fault liability), tetapi juga mengarah pada tanggung jawab berbasis risiko (risk-based liability), mengingat bank sebagai penyelenggara sistem elektronik wajib menjamin keamanan dan keandalan sistemnya. Letak pertanggungjawaban bank ditentukan berdasarkan adanya kelalaian dalam penerapan prinsip kehati-hatian, kelemahan sistem keamanan, atau respons yang tidak optimal terhadap laporan nasabah. Dengan demikian, meskipun phishing dilakukan oleh pihak ketiga, bank tetap dapat dimintai pertanggungjawaban secara proporsional apabila terdapat hubungan kausal antara kelalaian bank dan kerugian nasabah.
Pelaksanaan Kegiatan Pengembangan Potensi Organisasi Mahasiswa Hukum (PPOMH) Sebagai Wahana Membentuk Jiwa Kepemimpinan Pada Mahasiswa Hukum Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma Ardison Asri; Diding Rahmat; Bambang Widarto; Ario Wendra; Aulia Gita
Jurnal Bakti Dirgantara Vol. 3 No. 1 (2026): Jurnal Bakti Dirgantara
Publisher : Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35968/hwn7pt28

Abstract

Pengembangan Potensi Organisasi Mahasiswa Hukum (PPOMH) merupakan kegiatan yang dirancang untuk memperkuat kemampuan kepemimpinan mahasiswa Fakultas Hukum Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma (Unsurya). Kegiatan ini menjadi bagian dari program Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat (PKM) yang dikoordinasikan oleh Himpunan Mahasiswa Hukum (Himakum) dengan pendampingan fakultas dan rektorat. Tujuan PPOMH adalah membentuk karakter kepemimpinan yang kompeten, berintegritas, dan berorientasi pada tanggung jawab organisasi. Pelaksanaan kegiatan dilakukan melalui beberapa tahapan, yaitu persiapan dan koordinasi, pelaksanaan program, evaluasi serta feedback, dan pelaporan. Hasil kegiatan menunjukkan bahwa PPOMH berjalan efektif, yang ditunjukkan oleh tingginya partisipasi peserta, peningkatan keaktifan mereka dalam mengambil peran kepemimpinan, serta capaian indikator keberhasilan pada setiap sesi. Evaluasi pasca kegiatan mengonfirmasi adanya peningkatan soft skills kepemimpinan, termasuk sikap adil, jujur, tegas, terbuka, dan konsisten dalam menjalankan tugas. Kesimpulannya, PPOMH mampu menghasilkan mahasiswa yang unggul secara akademis sekaligus memiliki kompetensi kepemimpinan yang relevan dengan kebutuhan organisasi dan dunia kerja. Program ini perlu dilanjutkan secara berkelanjutan sebagai kontribusi nyata terhadap pelaksanaan Tri Dharma Perguruan Tinggi.   The Development of Legal Student Organizational Potential (PPOMH) is designed to strengthen leadership competencies among students of the Faculty of Law at Universitas Dirgantara Marsekal Suryadarma (Unsurya). This program forms part of a community service initiative coordinated by the Law Student Association (Himakum) under the supervision of the faculty and university leadership. The purpose of PPOMH is to shape student leaders who are competent, responsible, and possess strong integrity. The implementation consisted of several stages, including preparation and coordination, program execution, evaluation and feedback, and final reporting. The results indicate that PPOMH was carried out effectively, demonstrated by high participant engagement, increased willingness to assume leadership roles, and the achievement of targeted indicators in each session. Post-activity evaluation confirmed an improvement in leadership soft skills, including fairness, honesty, assertiveness, openness, and consistency in performing duties. In conclusion, PPOMH successfully fostered students who excel academically while developing leadership competencies relevant to organizational needs and the professional environment. This program should be continued sustainably as a tangible contribution to the implementation of the Tri Dharma of Higher Education.
Efektivitas Densus 88 dalam Pencegahan dan Penanganan Aksi Terorisme Fahrul Fachroni; Diding Rahmat
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Desember)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i3.1615

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis kewenangan Detasemen Khusus 88 Anti Teror (Densus 88) dalam pencegahan dan penindakan tindak pidana terorisme berdasarkan peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia, serta menilai efektivitas pelaksanaannya dalam menjaga keamanan nasional dengan tetap menjunjung prinsip hak asasi manusia. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan perundang-undangan dan konseptual, melalui kajian terhadap peraturan hukum, doktrin, dan literatur yang relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa kewenangan Densus 88 diatur secara tegas dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 2018 yang mencakup upaya preventif dan represif, seperti deteksi dini, kontra-radikalisasi, penangkapan, penggeledahan, dan penyitaan. Secara empiris, Densus 88 dinilai cukup efektif dalam mencegah dan menangani aksi terorisme, ditunjukkan dengan keberhasilan menggagalkan berbagai rencana serangan dan menekan eskalasi terorisme di Indonesia. Namun demikian, dalam pelaksanaannya masih terdapat dinamika dan kritik terkait dugaan pelanggaran hak asasi manusia, khususnya dalam tindakan penindakan di lapangan. Penelitian ini menyimpulkan bahwa Densus 88 memiliki peran strategis dalam penanggulangan terorisme di Indonesia, namun diperlukan penguatan kerangka regulasi, peningkatan profesionalisme aparat, koordinasi antar lembaga, serta penegakan hukum yang berkeadilan dan berorientasi pada perlindungan hak asasi manusia guna meningkatkan efektivitas penanganan terorisme secara berkelanjutan.
Co-Authors Adi Surya, Ridho Adzkari, Feby Agus Prasatya Agus Riwanto, Agus Aldy Arveransyah Altansa, Fadlil Amellia Nugraheni Puspita Sari Andi Abdullah Mutakaliman Andreas Sinaga, Stiven Andryan Aprynaldi Anggraini, Inah Anthon Fathanudien Anthon Fathanudien Anugrah , Sandy Kelvin Ardison Asri Aria Cesar Kusuma Atmaja Aridi, Ali Ario Wendra Aris Budiatno Arya Budi Pratama Athari Farhani Aturkian Laia Aulia Gita Aungrah, Sandy Kelvin Bambang Widarto Bambang Widarto Bambang Widarto Baruna, Muhammad Mirza Berliana Putri Pramesti Bias Lintang Dialog Boy Chris Pranata Silaban Christanti Natalia Cipto Pasaribu, Candra Cucun Cundaya Fitria Sari Cynthia Rahmawati Dadang Wahyudin Dani Rahmat Daniel Hendrawan Darwis, Nurlely Dedy Irawan Dhazeng Murwiyandono Dicky Darmawi Diding Suryadi Dikha Anugrah Dipranto Tobok Pakpahan Dipranto Tobok Pakpahan Diyanto Diyanto Ela Nurlaela Eliana, Yosefa Elsa Efritha Wijaya Enggartiasto Adipradana Fahrul Fachroni Fathanudien, Anthon Fera Kusumawati Fitri Purnamasari Fonny Olga Winerungan Fransiskus, Dedy Frida Ramadhani Gatot Afandi Gio Zaky Asadul Haq Gios Adhyaksa Gios Adhyaksa Guruh Tirta Lunggana Halim, Basten Roberto Hamdi Iska Harini, Mediana Haris Budiman Hidayatullah Hidayatullah Indah Sari Istianingsih Istianingsih Istianingsih, Istianingsih Jasman Jenri Ranteallo Junaedi Junaedi Kahpiana Komar Hidayat Lasmauli Niverita Laura Abbas Jackson Lenny Nadriana Lindri Purbowati Lovtasya, Fadilla Mahmud, Izmi Izdiharuddin B Che Jamaludin Malik, Ibra Maniur sinaga Muhammad Akmal Fahreza Balman Muhammad Edra Alamsyah Muhammad Faiz Aziz, Muhammad Faiz Mumuh Muhyiddin Niru Anita Sinaga Nou’im Hayat Nurhadi, Syarif Pasaribu, Candra Cipto Prasetyo, Teguh Raden Mohamad Herdian Bhakti Riano Purwonegoro Ahmad Ristio Rizky Pratama Rizky Pratama K Rizky Pratama Putra Karo Karo Roza Mulyadi Rr. Dijan Widijowati Rusmantara, I Wayan Sandhi Permana Sarip Hidayat Sarip Sarip Satrio, Bagus Selamat Lumban Gaol Sesilia Eleanor Sarkawi Shabarudin Shabarudin Shilvyana Aprilliani Sibarani, Irvan Simarmata, Lasmauli Noverita Siregar, Zeta Claudia Sandra Sri Endah Wahyuningsih Subhan Zein Sgn Sudarto Sudarto Sudarto Sudarto Sudarto Sujono Sujono Sujono Sujono Sujono Sujono, Sujono Sukadi Supri Abu Suwari Akhmaddhian Taufik Hidayat Taupik Hidayat, Taupik Teten Tendiyanto Timothius Richard Yudha Saputra Tri Astuti Handayani TRI PRASETYO, YOGI Trianto Umam Ma'arif, Mirojul Vani Novitasari Waldi, Wedri Wilsa, Wilsa Zein Sgn, Subhan