Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.39
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal MATEMATIKA Statistika Prosiding Seminar Biologi Journal of Education and Learning (EduLearn) Jurnal Ilmiah Teknik Elektro Komputer dan Informatika (JITEKI) Prosiding Seminar Nasional Sains Dan Teknologi Fakultas Teknik Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Jurnal Teknologi Informasi dan Ilmu Komputer Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Jurnal Ekonomi & Studi Pembangunan Suska Journal of Mathematics Education Proceedings Education and Language International Conference Indonesian Journal of Applied Statistics Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika JTAM (Jurnal Teori dan Aplikasi Matematika) International Journal of Computing Science and Applied Mathematics Journal of Education Technology M A T H L I N E : Jurnal Matematika dan Pendidikan Matematika Vygotsky: Jurnal Pendidikan Matematika dan Matematika BISECER (Business Economic Entrepreneurship) Southeast Asian Mathematics Education Journal Jurnal Bumigora Information Technology (BITe) Jurnal TIKOMSIN (Teknologi Informasi dan Komunikasi Sinar Nusantara) Budapest International Research and Critics in Linguistics and Education Journal (Birle Journal) Journal of Applied Data Sciences Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Proceeding Biology Education Conference Prosiding Seminar Nasional Teknik Elektro, Sistem Informasi, dan Teknik Informatika (SNESTIK) Industrial Research Workshop and National Seminar Pancaran Pendidikan Prosiding Konferensi Nasional Penelitian Matematika dan Pembelajarannya Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Teknologi JRAMathEdu (Journal of Research and Advances in Mathematics Education) Jurnal Pendidikan MIPA Radiant : Journal of Applied, Social, and Education Studies
Sri Subanti
Program Studi Statistika, Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta 57126
Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Humanities Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Mechanical Engineering Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 194 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 194 Documents
Search

 6   7   8   9   10 
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING, GROUP INVESTIGATION DAN THINK PAIR SHARE DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI KEMAMPUAN PENALARAN SISWA Ardani, Anwar; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to find out the different effect of learning models using scientific approach on the students’ learning achievement viewed from the students’ reasoning ability. This study was a quasi-experimental research with a 3x3 factorial design. The population of research was all of the 8th graders of Junior High Schools throughout Tegal regency in the school year of 2014/2015. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling. The data analysis was conducted using a two-way anava with unbalanced cells at significance level of 5%. The results of research showed: (1) the learning achievement of students treated with PBL PS was equally good to that of those treated with GI PS, that of those treated with PBL PS and GI PS was better than that of those with TPS PS, (2) the learning achievement of students with high reasoning ability was equally good to that of those with medium one, the learning achievements of students with high and medium reasoning ability were better than that of those with low one, (3) in each reasoning ability, the learning achievement of students treated with PBL PS was equally good to that of those treated with GI PS, that of those treated with PBL PS and GI PS was better than that of those with TPS PS, and (4) in each learning model, the learning achievement of students with high reasoning ability was equally good to that of those with medium one, the learning achievements of students with high and medium reasoning ability were better than that of those with low one.Keywords: Scientific PBL (PBL PS), scientific GI (GI PS), scientific TPS (TPS PS) and reasoning ability.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN PROBLEM BASED LEARNING (PBL) DAN DISCOVERY LEARNING (DL) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI SEGIEMPAT DITINJAU DARI KECEMASAN BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA SMP NEGERI KELAS VII DI KABUPATEN BANYUMAS Fadlilah, Umi; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 8 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of the research were to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from anxiety mathematics learning. The learning models compared were direct, PBL with scientific approach, and DL with scientific approach. This was quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population were all students of Junior High School in Banyumas. The samples are the students of SMPN 1 Patikraja, SMPN 2 Patikraja, and SMPN 2 Kalibagor, taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and anxiety mathematics learning. The data analysis technique used unbalanced two ways anova. Based on the data analysis, it can be concluded as follows. (1) The students receiving PBL with scientific approach to DL with scientific approach achievement than those receiving direct learning model. The students receiving PBL with scientific approach and DL with scientific approach had the same learning outcome. (2) Students with lower levels of mathematics anxiety learning had better learning outcome than students with medium and high anxiety level. Students’ learning anxiety level on math was better in their learning outcome than students with high levels of learning anxiety mathematics. (3) In each group, the anxiety level of students learning mathematics, learning model PBL with scientific approach and learning model DL with scientific approach provides better performance than direct learning model, learning model PBL with scientific approach produces the same learning outcome with learning model DL with scientific approach. (4) In each of the learning model, students with lower levels of anxiety level of mathematics learning outcome had better math outcome than students with medium and high math anxiety level learning, students learn math anxiety levels were to have better learning outcome than students with high levels of anxiety learn mathematics.Keywords: Direct learning model, PBL learning model with scientific approach, DL learning model with scientific approach, Math Anxiety Learning
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE THINK PAIR SHARE (TPS) DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER (NHT) DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK PADA MATERI BILANGAN DITINJAU DARI ADVERSITY QUOTIENT (AQ) SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN BOYOLALI Adiningsih, Sri; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 2 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of the research was to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from student’s AQ. The learning models compared were TPS with scientific approach, NHT with scientific approach, and classical with scientific approach. The type of the research was a quasi-experimental research. The population were all students of Junior High School in Boyolali. The samples are the students of SMPN 1 Boyolali, SMPN 1 Sawit and SMPN 3 Sawit, which taken by using stratified cluster random sampling technique. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and AQ questionnaire. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-ways Anova. The conclusions were as follows. (1) TPS with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than NHT with scientific approach, and both gives better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. (2) Climbers students have better mathematics achievement than campers and quitters students,  campers students have better mathematics achievement than quitters students. (3) For TPS with scientific approach, climbers students have better mathematics achievement than campers and quitters students. Campers and quitters students have the same mathematics achievement. For NHT and classical with scientific approach, climbers students have better mathematics achievement than quitters students. Climbers and campers students have the same mathematics achievement. Campers and quitters students have the same mathematics achievement. (4) For climbers students, TPS with scientific approach and NHT with scientific approach give the same mathematics achievement. NHT with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach give the same mathematics achievement. TPS with scientific approach gives the better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. For campers and quitters students, all learning models give the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: TGT, NHT, Classical, Scientific Approach, AQ.
ANALISIS PROSES PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH (PROBLEM BASED LEARNING) MATEMATIKA DENGAN PENDEKATAN ILMIAH (SCIENTIFIC APPROACH ) DI SMA NEGERI 1 JOGOROGO KELAS X KABUPATEN NGAWI Rahmawati, Arum Dwi; Riyadi, Riyadi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 10 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to describe the planning, implementation process of learning undertaken by teachers of mathematics and constraints experienced during the process of mathematical problem-based learning with a scientific approach in class X SMAN 1 Jogorogo. This research was a qualitative study. These subject are taken using purposive sampling. The subjects of this study were the teacher math in class X. Data collection techniques in this study were documentation, interviews and observations. Techniques to validate that the data source triangulation and triangulation time. The data analysis technique used was the concept of Miles and Huberman consists of data reduction, data display, and conclusion. The results showed that the planning process of mathematical problem-based learning with a scientific approach was not maximal yet, seen in the preparation of lesson plans which teachers only see examples of other schools and only see a reference to the syllabus. Implementation of the learning process is done the math teacher in class X SMAN 1 Jogorogo was not maximal yet. Visible in the indicator 5M on core activities are observing, asking, gather information, and communicate their associates have not done all. In observing the activities of students had no difficulty, however, go into the next phase indicator and students are still difficulties in doing so. In the event of  problem making students ask questions, lack of motivation and imagination. Collect information on the activities of students also have difficulty in learning resources are used only for math books grade students associate X. At this stage also looks still difficulty in processing information, although sometimes the teacher has given direction that the students tried to process the information that has been obtained. At that last stage  quite well in communicating the results, good enough student responses revealed the results even though the teacher had to call one of the students without first. Overcoming the problems found in the process of mathematical problem-based learning with a scientific approach to teacher always gives motivation at any stage of learning and trying to develop a problem-based learning with a scientific approach.Keywords: PBL, Scientific Approach 
ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI POKOK LINGKARAN DITINJAU DARI KESIAPAN BELAJAR DAN GAYA BERPIKIR SISWA KELAS XI IPA SMA N 3 SURAKARTA TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014 Wardani, Endang Purwati; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 3 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were: (1) knowing the characteristics of the misconception, and (2) knowing the causes of the misconception of the XI grade students in the academic year of 2013/2014 in  equation of circle and equation of tangent line of a circle viewed from the student’s readiness and style of learning. Qualitative research was applied in this research. The subject of the research are students of the eleven grade of SMA Negeri 3 Surakarta. The source of data was taken from informants (students), documentation (questionnaire), and test. Data collection was taken by using interview, diagnostic test, and questionnaire. Data validity used the source of triangulation. Data analysis used Miles and Huberman’s concept that are data collection, data reduction, presenting the data, and drawing the conclusion. The result of the research showed as follows: (1) students who are ready to learn and have the synthetic thinking style in understanding the locus of a point on the circle and determining the equation of tangent line of  a circle,  experience a misconception of theoretical concept. Meanwhile, in determining the circle equation, the students who are ready to learn with synthetic thinking style, don’t have any misconception.  (2) Students who are ready to study and have analytic thinking style in determining the equation of circle (determining the center point and the radius) experience a misconception in co relational concept. In understanding the locus of a point on the circle and determining the equation of tangent of line, students who are ready to study with analytical thinking style, experience a misconception in theoretical concept. (3) Students who are not ready to learn with synthetic thinking style experience a misconception in determining the equation of a circle (determining the center point and the radius), the misconception is in co relational and theoretical concept. In determining the equation of tangent line of a circle, students who are not ready with synthetic thinking style experience misconception of theoretical concept. While in understanding the locus of a point on the circle, generally   students who not ready to learn with synthetic thinking style do not experience misconception. (4) Students who are not ready to learn with analytical thinking style experience misconception in determining the equation of circle (determining the center point and radius), namely the misconception of co relational and theoretical concepts. In determining the locus of a point on the circle, students who are not ready to learn with the analytical thinking style experience misconception of theoretical concept. (5) In general the cause of misconception for the students is the difficulty of the students to classify the form of the equation of the circle and the equation of tangent line of a circle.Keywords: misconception, readiness to learn, thinking style
PROSES BERPIKIR REFLEKTIF SISWA KELAS VII SMP NEGERI 3 POLANHARJO KLATEN DALAM PEMECAHAN MASALAH PECAHAN Wahyuni, Fina Tri; Sujadi, Imam; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research was to describe the characteristics of reflective thinking process of the students in Grade VII of State Junior Secondary School 3 of  Polanharjo Klaten who have the high, moderate, and low abilities in solving fractional problems. This research used qualitative case study approach. The data of research were gathered through task-based in-depth interview. The results of research were the characteristics of reflective thinking process of the students as follows: 1) The students with the high initial ability in Mathematics: (a) in the problem understanding phase, they were able to mention information of the problems and to explain what has been done; (b) in the problem-solving planning phase, they were able to identify the concept of the problems and to explain what has been done; (c) in the implementation of problem-solving plan phase, they were able to realize the mistakes and to fix them, to examine the truth of an argument, to employ the internal knowledge, to relate the information that they have known, and to communicate ideas with symbols instead of pictures or direct objects; and (d) in the reexamination phase, they were able to draw conclusions to return the answers back into the contexts and to explain what has been done. 2) The students with the moderate initial ability in Mathematics: (a) in the problem understanding phase, they were able to mention information of the problems and to explain what has been done; (b) in the problem-solving planning phase, they were able to identify the concept of the problems, to employ the internal knowledge, to relate the information that they have known, and to explain what has been done; (c) in the implementation of problem-solving plan phase, they were unable to do reflective thinking; (d) in the reexamination phase, they were able to draw conclusions to return the answers back into the contexts and to explain what has been done. 3) The students with the low initial ability in Mathematics were able to do reflective thinking merely on the problem understanding phase, with the following characteristics: they were able to mention information of the problems and to explain what has been done.Keywords: Characteristics of reflective thinking process, problem solving, and initial ability in Mathematics.
ANALISIS MISKONSEPSI SISWA PADA MATERI PECAHAN DALAM BENTUK ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI GAYA KOGNITIF SISWA KELAS VIII DI SMP NEGERI 2 ADIMULYO KABUPATEN KEBUMEN TAHUN AJARAN 2013/2014 Savitri, Maria Endah; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 4 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were to: (1) identify the occurrence of misconceptions in the eighth grade junior high school students in the material form of algebraic fractions, for students which are classified to cognitive style field independence and field dependence, and (2) describe the occurrence of misconceptions eighth grade junior high school students in the material form of algebraic fractions, for students which are classified to cognitive style field independence and field dependence. This research used a descriptive qualitative  method with a case study. Subjects of this research are eighth grade students of SMP Negeri 2 Adimulyo academic year 2013/2014. The sample of the research was taken by using the snowball sampling technique. The identification of the existence of misconceptions was done by using misconception diagnostic test. While the identification of the students' cognitive styles was conducted by using student cognitive style questionnaire instrument. Data validity used the source of triangulation method. Analysis of data use the model of Miles and Huberman. The results of this research indicate that: (1) misconceptions that occur in the FD students more likely to misconceptions on the concept of understanding the elements of the algebra and the terms of a fraction is called fractional form algebra, the concept of canceling, the concept of operating powers, and understand the properties the concept of distributive, (2) the highest misconceptions experienced by the FI students in understanding the concept of distributive properties, as well as understanding the elements of the algebra the condition is referred to as a fraction in the form of algebraic fractions, (3) causes of the misconceptions students FD is dominated by reasoning is not complete and students who lack of ability to process and memorize course, (4) factors causing of misconceptions students FI dominated by reasoning is not complete.Keywords: Misconceptions, algebraic fractions, cognitive style.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN BERBASIS MASALAH DAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STAD DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI KEMANDIRAN BELAJAR Brilliyanti, Fanny; Usodo, Budi; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to know: (1) which one gives better mathematics achievement, cooperative learning model Student Teams Achievement Division (STAD), model Problem Based Learning (PBL), or model classical with scientific approach;  (2) which one has better mathematics achievement, students who have high, medium, or low of self regulated learning; (3) for each learning model, which one has better  mathematics achievement, students who have high, medium, or lowof self regulated learning; (4) For each category of self regulated learning, which one gives better mathematics achievement, STAD, PBL, or classical with scientific approach. The populations were all students of Junior High School in Surakarta City. Sampling was done by stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were students of SMP N 2 Surakarta, SMP N 15 Surakarta and SMP N 24 Surakarta. The instruments used were mathematics achievement tests and self regulated learning questionnaire. The data was analyzed using unbalanced two-ways anova. The conclusion were as follows. (1) PBL with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than STAD with scientific approach, and STAD with scientific approach and classical with scientific approach have the same mathematics achievement. (2) Mathematics achievement of students who have high self regulated learning was better than students who have medium and low self regulated learning and students who have medium self regulated learning was better than students who have low self regulated learning (3) For STAD and PBL with scientific approach, students who have high and medium self regulated learning have the same mathematics achievement. Mathematics achievement of students who have high self regulated learning was better than students who have low self regulated learning. Students who have medium and low self regulated learning have the same mathematics achievement. For classical with scientific approach, students who have high, medium, and low self regulated learning have the same mathematics achievement. (4) For students who have high self regulated learning, STAD with scientific approach gives the same mathematics achievement with PBL and classical with scientific approach but PBL with scientific approach gives better mathematics achievement than classical with scientific approach. For students who have medium and low self regulated learning, all learning models give the same mathematics achievement.Keywords: Student Team Achievment Division (STAD), Problem Based Learning (PBL), classical, scientific approach, self regulated learning (SRL)
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE STRUCTURED NUMBERED HEADS, THINK TALK WRITE, DAN LEARNING TOGETHER DENGAN PENDEKATAN SAINTIFIK DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIKA MATEMATIKA SISWA Utami, Desi Tri; Budiyono, Budiyono; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 3, No 9 (2015): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract: The purpose of this research was to find out the effect of the cooperative learning models on the learning achievement in mathematics viewed from the students’ logical mathematical intelligence. The learning models compared were the cooperative learning models of Structured Numbered Heads (SNH), Think Talk Write (TTW), and Learning Together (LT) with scientific approach. This research used quasi experimental research method with the factorial design of 3x3. The population of the research was all of the students in grade VII of Junior High School in Sukoharjo Regency. The data was analyzed using two-ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cell. The conclusions of the research were as follows. (1) SNH and TTW with scientific approach had the same learning achievement. SNH and TTW with scientific approach had better learning achievement than LT with scientific approach. (2) Students with high logical mathematical intelligence had better learning achievement than the students with middle and low logical mathematical intelligence, also students who had middle logical mathematical intelligence had better learning achievement than students who had low logical mathematical intelligence. (3) In SNH with scientific approach, the students who had high logical mathematical intelligence had learning achievement as good as students with middle and low logical mathematical intelligence. In TTW and LT with scientific approach, the students who had high logical mathematical intelligence had learning achievement as good as students with middle logical mathematical intelligence, and the students who had high and middle logical mathematical intelligence had better learning achievement than the students with low logical mathematical intelligence. (4) For all level of students’ logical mathematical intelligence, the students who were given by SNH, TTW, and LT with scientific approach had the same learning achievement.Keywords: Structured Numbered Heads, Think Talk Write, Learning Together, Scientific Approach, Logical Mathematical Intelligence
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN THREE STEPS INTERVIEW (TSI) PADA MATERI FUNGSI DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN LOGIS MATEMATIS Riyanto, Nandyar Fisthi; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Subanti, Sri
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 4, No 5 (2016): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

Abstract:The purpose of this study was to determine the effect of the learning models TAI, TSI, and direct learning model on mathematics learning achievement viewed from the students logical mathematical intelligence. The type of this study was quasi experimental study with 3x3 factorial design. The population were the eighth-grade students of junior high schools in Boyolali Regency in the academic year of 2015/2016. Instruments used for data collection were mathematics achievement test and logical mathematical intelligence test. The data analysis technique used was the two-way ANAVA with unequal cell. Based on the hipothesis test, they were concluded that: (1) The mathematics learning achievement of TAI was better than TSI and direct learning model, the mathematics learning achievement of TSI was better than direct learning model. (2) The mathematics learning achievement of students with high logical mathematical intelligence were better than average and low logical mathematical intelligences. Students with average logical mathematical intelligence were better than low logical mathematical intelligences. (3) Students with high logical mathematical intelligence who were treated by TAI, TSI, and direct learning models had same mathematics learning  achievement; students with average logical mathematical intelligence who were treated by TAI was same of TSI and was better than direct learning model, TSI was better than direct learning model; students with low logical mathematical intelligence who were treated by TAI had better mathematics learning achievement than TSI and direct learning model, TSI students were better than direct learning model model. (4) In TAI learning model, the mathematics learning  achievement of high logical mathematical intelligence were better than the average and lower logical mathematical intelligence, the mathematics learning achievementof average has equal with low logical mathematical intelligence; in TSI learning model, students with high logical mathematical intelligence has equal of average logical mathematical intelligence, the mathematics learning achievements of high and average logical mathematical intelligence were better than the low logical mathematical intelligence; in direct learning model, students with high logical mathematical intelligence has better mathematics learning achievement than high and average of logical mathematical intelligence,  students with average logical mathematical intelligence has better mathematics learning achievement than low of logical mathematical intelligence.Keywords:Team Assisted Individualization, Three Steps Interview, Direct Learning Model, Logical Mathematical Intelligence, Achievement.
Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Abdul Aziz Abdul Aziz Abdul Aziz Hidayat Achmad Nurrofiq Achmad Nurrofiq Adi Wicaksono, Nanda Adigama Tri Nugraha Aflich Yusnita Fitrianna Aflich Yusnita Fitrianna Agus Supriyanto Ahmad Abdul Mutholib Aji Susanto Amalia Zulvia Widyaningrum Amanda, Nabila Tri Ambarawati, Mika Amiratih Siti Aisyah Andhika, Niken Dwi Anggraira, Attilah Suci Annisa Swastika Annur, M. Firman Anwar Ardani Aprilia, Nabila Churin Arianto, Febri Arif Rahman Hakim Arif Rahman Hakim Arif Rahman Hakim Arif Rahman Hakim Arifa Apriliana Arifa Apriliana, Arifa Ariska Yuliana Putri Ariska Yuliana Putri Arsita Anggraeni Pramesti Arum Dwi Rahmawati Dwi Rahmawati, Arum Dwi Rahmawati Dwi Assyifa Lala Pratiwi Hamid Astuti, Arinda Tri Astuti, Indra Puji Atika Amalia Attilah Suci Anggraira Aulia Rizki Destarani Ayu Rahmawati Bastian Al Ravisi Brilliyanti, Fanny Brilliyanti, Fanny Budi Santosa Budi Santosa Budi Santosa Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budi Usodo Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Budiyono, Budiyono Danar Supriadi Desi Tri Utami, Desi Tri Diana Tri Purnamasari Dini Yuniarti Dwi Ambarwati, Dwi Dwi Retnowati Dwi Retnowati Dyah Auliya Agustina Endang Widiyastuti Era Hervilia Etika, Erdyna Dwi Exacta, Annisa Prima Fajar Suryatama Farida Nurhasanah Fhadilla, Nahdatul Fitri Apriyani Pratiwi, Fitri Apriyani Fitri Era Sugesti Fitria, Camelina Fitriana Anggar Kusuma Fitriana, Laila Getut Pramesti Giant Aprisetyani Giant Aprisetyani H Hartatik, H Hendriyanto, Agus Hervilia, Era Husna Afanyn Khoirunissa Iffah, Rona Dhiya Layli Ikrar Pramudya Ikrar Pramudya, Ikrar Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Imam Sujadi Indra Raditya , Dionisius Intan Novia Sari Intan Novia Sari Irwan Susanto Irwan Susanto Isnaini, Bayutama Isnandar Slamet Isnandar Slamet Isnandar Slamet Isnandar Slamet, Isnandar Iwan Kurnianto Kadar, Jimmy Abdel Karina Pramitasari Karina Pramitasari, Karina Kartikaningtyas, Nafiqoh Elsa Katherine Her Pratiwi Khafittulloh Viqriah Khafittulloh Viqriah, Khafittulloh Khoiriyah, Nor Kumarahadi, Brigitta Melati Kurniasih, Rini Kurniati, Edy Dwi Lestari, Fajar Lina Muawanah, Lina Mahmudah Titi Muanifah Mahmudah Titi Muanifah Mahmudati, Rina Maratu Shalikhah Maratu Shalikhah, Maratu Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Mardiyana, Mardiyana Marfuah, Ismiyati Mida Nurani Mika Ambarawati Mohamad Nur Fauzi Muhammad Bayu Nirwana Muhammad Wildan Fadilah Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyadi Mulyadi Nais Qonita Salsabila Ningsih, Maya Kristina Nirwana, Muhammad Bayu Nopiana, Medi Nor Khoiriyah Novi Dya Meylasari Nugraha, Titis Jati Nugroho, Purwo Setiyo Nuraini, Latifah Nurudin, M. Pardede, Hilman Ferdinandus Permatasari, Dinda Agnes Prabowo, Haniftia Haqqiendini Pramesti, Arsita Anggraeni Prasasti, Berlyana Ayu Pratiwi, Fitri Apriyani pratiwi, hasih Proborini, Ellen Purna Bayu Nugroho Purnamasari, Anita Pusaka, Semerdanta Putra Adi Wibowo Putra Adi Wibowo Rachmawati, Intan Rahmita Ika Sari Raodatul Jannah Raodatul Jannah Rara Sugiarti Ratih Kusumaningrum Ratih Kusumaningrum Reka Pramukti Reka Pramukti, Reka Respati wulan Retno Anggraheni Ria Wahyu Wijayanti Rina Mahmudati Riyadi Riyadi Riyadi Riyadi Riyanto, Nandyar Fisthi Riyanto, Nandyar Fisthi Rizky Wahyudi Sandhy Prasetyo Tito Kurniawan Sandhy Prasetyo Tito Kurniawan, Sandhy Prasetyo Satrio Wicaksono Sudarman Savitri, Maria Endah Savitri, Maria Endah Septiana Wijayanti Setiaputra, Felix Indra Sri Adiningsih Sri Sulistijowati Handajani Sugesti, Fitri Era Sugianto Sugianto Sugiyanto - Sugiyanto Sugiyanto Sugiyanto Sugiyanto Sugiyanto, Sugiyanto Sujadi, Imam Sujadi, Imam Sujadi, Imam Sulandari, Winita Sumantri, Astri Wiliastri Susilotomoa, Dhestahendra Citra Titik Yuniarti Triyazulfa, Azkiya Umi Fadlilah, Umi Umi Supraptinah Umi Supraptinah, Umi Veronica Sri Wigiyanti Veronica Sri Wigiyanti Very Hendra Saputra Virlina Zuhanisani Wahyuni, Fina Tri Wahyuni, Fina Tri Wahyuningtyas, Widyana Wardani, Endang Purwati Wardani, Endang Purwati Widyana Wahyuningtyas Wihasti Imas Priyandani Wihasti Imas Priyandani, Wihasti Imas Winita Sulandari Winita Sulandari Winita Sulandari Winita Sulandari Wulandari, Lina Yadi Ardiawan Yadi Ardiawan Yudho Yudhanto Yudho Yudhanto Yudho Yudhanto, Yudho Yuliana Susanti Yuliana Susanti, Yuliana Yuniarti, Titik Yusnita Rahmawati Yusnita Rahmawati Zainal Arifin Zuhanisani, Virlina Zuhdha Basofi Nugroho Zuhdha Basofi Nugroho, Zuhdha Basofi Zukhronah, Etik