Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Reorienting the Economic Rights of Creators: A Constitutional Analysis of Copyright Licensing Post-Constitutional Court Decision No. 28/PUU-XXIII/2025 Rifqi Pratama Putra; Dwi Suryahartati; Zeni Sunarti
Rechtsvinding Vol. 3 No. 2 (2025)
Publisher : Civiliza Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59525/rechtsvinding.1346

Abstract

This research examines the implications of Constitutional Court Decision No. 28/PUU-XXIII/2025 on digital copyright licensing in Indonesia. The study addresses the anomaly where rapid creative industry growth fails to enhance creator welfare due to exploitative "direct licensing" mechanisms in Article 40 of Law No. 28 of 2014. This provision is deemed to violate constitutional property rights by allowing digital platforms to exploit works without explicit consent. Using normative legal research with statutory and conceptual approaches, the study analyzes primary and secondary legal materials. The results reveal that Decision No. 28/PUU-XXIII/2025 serves as a constitutional correction, prioritizing substantive justice over industrial efficiency. The ruling strengthens creators' bargaining positions, mandates transparency in royalty systems, and triggers a paradigm shift from efficiency-oriented to justice-oriented licensing. Practical implications include the mandatory renegotiation of licensing contracts, the integration of digital technologies like blockchain within the National Collective Management Organization (LMKN), and the realignment of global platform business models. Ultimately, this decision establishes a robust legal foundation to ensure equitable economic rights protection within Indonesia's digital ecosystem.
Perlindungan Hukum bagi Pemilik Hak atas Tanah dalam Penetapan Ganti Rugi Terkait dengan Pengadaan Tanah Pembangunan Jalan Tol Zihan Tasha Maharani Fauzi; Muskibah Muskibah; Dwi Suryahartati
SENTRI: Jurnal Riset Ilmiah Vol. 5 No. 2 (2026): SENTRI : Jurnal Riset Ilmiah, Februari 2026
Publisher : LPPM Institut Pendidikan Nusantara Global

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.55681/sentri.v5i2.5783

Abstract

Land acquisition for public interest often generates conflicts, particularly in determining compensation for land rights holders in toll road projects. Disputes commonly arise due to differences in land valuation, procedural inconsistencies, and perceptions of fairness. One notable example is Supreme Court Decision Number 1655 K/Pdt/2024, in which the cassation appeal concerning the amount of compensation was rejected. This study analyzes the determination of the form and amount of compensation, as well as the available legal protection mechanisms. Using a normative juridical method with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches, the research finds that compensation determination has not fully complied with Article 37 of Law Number 2 of 2012. Although deliberation is required, the appraisal results are considered final and binding, creating inconsistencies and potential legal uncertainty. In Decision Number 1655 K/Pdt/2024, the Supreme Court rejected the petition because the applicant failed to provide valid legal proof of ownership and lawful transfer of land rights, particularly an authentic deed issued by a Land Deed Official (PPAT). The compensation assessment conducted by the Public Appraisal Office (KJPP) was based on officially registered data, namely the Certificate of Ownership classified as agricultural land. The Court found no misapplication of law or procedural error. This ruling reinforces the importance of formal legal documentation in compensation disputes and strengthens the principles of legal certainty and orderly land administration in land acquisition for public interest.
Pengaruh Sejarah Hukum Terhadap Pembentukan Hukum dan Peraturan Perundang-Undangan di Indonesia Elza Oktavia S; Pricilia Meldi Putri; Arrie Budhiartie; Dwi Suryahartati; Fitria Fitria
QISTINA: Jurnal Multidisiplin Indonesia Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : CV. Rayyan Dwi Bharata

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.57235/qistina.v4i2.7386

Abstract

Tujuan dari penulisan jurnal ini tentang Pengaruh Sejarah Hukum terhadap pembentukan hukum dan peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia. Secara historis, Indonesia mengambil sistem hukum dari Eropa Kontinental yang berasal dari Belanda, dan ini menjadi dasar hukum di negara ini. Namun, seiring waktu, hukum di Indonesia juga dipengaruhi oleh prinsip-prinsip hukum umum, nilai-nilai hukum Islam, dan norma-norma hukum adat yang kuat dalam budaya masyarakat. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis bagaimana pengaruh dari sejarah hukum terhadap berbagai sistem hukum ini berpengaruh terhadap pembentukan kerangka hukum nasional yang unik dan rumit. Dengan menggunakan metode analisis normatif, penelitian ini mencari tahu bagaimana berbagai elemen dari sistem hukum dunia turut membantu diversifikasi hukum di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa meskipun keberagaman ini membuat sistem hukum nasional semakin bertambah, hal itu juga membawa tantangan dalam menyelaraskan dan merapikan peraturan yang ada. Studi ini memberikan kontribusi penting untuk memahami bagaimana pengaruh dari berbagai sistem hukum berjalan dalam konteks Indonesia, serta hubungannya dengan pembaruan hukum di negara.
Trademark Protection in Metaverse: Evaluating Indonesia's Legal Framework for Well- Known Marks on Roblox Maudy Prima Azairin; Dwi Suryahartati; Firya Oktaviarni
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 19 No 2 (2025): Edisi Juli
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2025.V19.145-164

Abstract

The rise of the Roblox gaming platform within the Metaverse presents new challenges for trademark protection in Indonesia. Users frequently create, trade, and sell virtual goods incorporating well-known marks without authorization, raising concerns about the adequacy of Trademark Act No. 20 of 2016 in addressing digital trademark violations. This study aims to evaluate Indonesia's legal framework for protecting well-known marks in virtual spaces and assess its effectiveness in preventing unauthorized use on platforms like Roblox. Using a normative juridical approach, the research analyzes the current legal provisions, particularly the scope and interpretation of Articles 1, 21, and 83 of Law No. 20 of 2016, and also identifies normative gaps in addressing violations involving virtual goods and digital environments. The findings reveal that while the Trademark Act provides a foundation for brand protection, it lacks explicit regulations for virtual goods and digital environments, leaving well-known marks vulnerable to misuse. To address these challenges, the study recommends broadening key legal definitions within the Trademark Act and enhancing preventive measures on Roblox, such as stricter verification and enforcement systems. Strengthening Indonesia's trademark regulations in response to technological advancements is essential to ensure comprehensive intellectual property protection. Theoretically, the study contributes to the discourse on adapting IP law to digital realities. Practically, it offers policy insights for legislators and platforms to prevent misuse of well-known marks in virtual spaces.
Co-Authors Aceng Haetami Ade Dia Andriyani Ade Octavia Agus Syarif Agus Syarif Ahmad Nur Budi Utama Amir, Diana Andi Najemi, Andi Arfa'i Arfa'i Armando Armando Armando, Y. G. Arrie Budhiartie Arsyad Arsyad Arsyad Arsyad Asrika Fazlia, Shelly Azairin, Maudy Prima Bima Pratama Chairul Anwar Dawam Suprayogi Diana Amir Diana Amir Dicky Azwan Didi Syaputra Donny Yusra Pebrianto Dori Efendi Eko Nuriyatman Elza Oktavia S Ertananda, Annisa Evalina Alissa dan Arrie Budhiartie Firya Oktaviarni Fitria Fitria Herlina Manik Hestianah, Hestianah Ilhami, Mohammad Indra Muchlis Adnan Isran Idris Isran Idris Isran Idris Jefri Mahardika Jodion Siburian Johni Najwan Kadir, Nor Aida binti Ab Lenny Husna Lestari Lili Naili Hidayah M Masrum M. Yusuf Maisyarah, Nyimas Dian Maudy Prima Azairin Meliona, Vevi Meri Yarni Muhammad Yusuf Muskibah Muskibah Mutia Adlian Nelli Herlina Nely Herlina Netty Netty Nickyta Sidabutar, Emi Nys. Arfa Oktaviarni, Firya Pahlefi, Pahlefi Pricilia Meldi Putri Raffles Raffles Raffles Raffles Rahmat Ramadani Ratih Novitasari Rifqi Pratama Putra Riki Dwi Putra Rita Susanti Riza Amina Harkaz Ritonga Ruth Alnila Sinaga Sinaga, Ruth Alnila Subhan Suhermi Suhermi Suhermi, Suhermi Sukamto Satoto Sulistiyo, Urip Taufik Yahya Taufik Yahya Taufiq Yahya Upik Yelianti Utomo, Pradita Eko Prasetyo Wahyu Rohayati Wannike Manalu Windarto Windarto Windarto Windarto, Windarto Y. G. Armando Yenny Septiana Yenny Yetniwati Yetniwati Yetniwati Yetniwati Yogha Octhanio Pratama Yusra, Dony Zeni Sunarti Zihan Tasha Maharani Fauzi