Garuda - Garba Rujukan Digital

p-Index From 2020 - 2025

7.586

P-Index

This Author published in this journals

All Journal Kertha Semaya Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) al-Afkar, Journal For Islamic Studies Jurnal Pro Hukum : Jurnal Penelitian Bidang Hukum Universitas Gresik Jurnal Jatiswara Journal of Law Science Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum jurnal ilmiah hospitality JIIP (Jurnal Ilmiah Ilmu Pendidikan) JURNAL DE JURE MUHAMMADIYAH CIREBON LEGAL BRIEF Jurnal Muhakkamah Fakultas Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram Indonesia Berdaya Devotion: Journal of Research and Community Service PROFICIO: Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Empiricism Journal Jurnal Kolaboratif Sains JSIP: Jurnal Studi Ilmu Pemerintahan Journal Indonesia Law and Policy Review (JILPR) Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah Jurnal Pengabdian Ruang Hukum Commerce Law Jurnal Indonesia Sosial Sains Jurnal Ilmiah Pengabdian dan Inovasi Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Indonesia Journal of Community Empowerment Ulil Albab

Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara

Magister Hukum Universitas Muhammadiyah Mataram

Author-ID : 559505

Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Astronomy Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemistry Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Earth & Planetary Sciences Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Energy Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Materials Science & Nanotechnology Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 53 Documents Claim Missing Document

Claim Missing Document

Articles

1 2 3 4 5

THE EXECUTORIAL FORCE OF RULING OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURT AND THE IMPLICATIONS IN PRACTICE Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo, Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara &
Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Vol 2, No 4 (2014): UTOPIA HUKUM - KESEJAHTERAAN
Publisher : Jurnal IUS

This thesis entitled force executorial administrative court ruling and the implications in practice, discusses the mechanism of execution of the decision of the Administrative Court, the obstacles in the process of execution of the decision of the Administrative Court and the efforts that are made to the administrative court ruling that is not carried by the official / TUN Agency . This type of research is normative and assisted legal research / materials reinforced with empirical law in order to simplify and refine the analysis . The approach used is legislation approach , conceptual approach , approach cases , comparative approach . So that research results can be drawn that the mechanism of execution of court decisions TUN namely : Decision inkracht , after 60 working days the defendant did not perform its obligations , the decision has no legal force again and turns 90 working days of the obligation is not performed , the plaintiff filed a petition to the President of the Court order the court ordered defendant to implement the decision of the court , the defendant is not willing to implement the decision inkracht forceful measures imposed in the form of payment of a sum of money and forced or administrative sanctions and announced in local print media by him, since non-compliance of the court and the chairman shall submit to the President as the highest authority for TUN ordered officials to implement the courtâs decision . So there was a bottleneck in the execution of the ruling Justice TUN namely : Verdict Amar , execution barriers TUN official verdict is due to the position of Regional Chief Political Officer , execution barriers TUN official verdict caused the accused are officials who received the delegation of authority false , barriers of understanding TUN officials the State âs theory of law and AAUPB , technical barriers , barriers juridical ; Barriers related to legal principles , barriers in terms of the limited authority of judges , Barriers due to changes in the system of regional autonomy , Barriers due to noncompliance TUN officials and effort to do the administrative court ruling are not carried by the official / TUN Agency as criminal Attempts by the police to file a criminal report with the basic law 216 of the Criminal Code and civil efforts filed a lawsuit in state court using Article 1365 of the Civil Code as the basis for a lawsuit .Keywords : executorial power , Mechanisms , Barriers and Efforts .

HAK IMUNITAS ADVOKAT INDONESIA DALAM PERSPEKTIF PENEGAKKAN HUKUM DAN KEADILAN DI ERA REVOLUSI INDUSTRI 4.0â€ Jiwantara, Firzhal Arzhi
Jurnal Muhakkamah Vol 4 No 2 (2019): Jurnal Muhakkamah
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Nahdlatul Wathan Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

ince the birth of Law Number 18 Year 2003 Regarding Advocates on December 21, 2004, it is a form of appreciation for Advocates who are not only working but struggling to find noble justice and until finally being recognized as a Profession. Then from Law Number 18 Concerning Advocates contained the "Immunity Rights" contained in Article 16 which said Advocates could not be prosecuted both civil and criminal in carrying out their professional duties in good faith for the Client's defense in a court hearing ". Advocate is a profession honorable law (officium mobile) where the procedure of work is regulated in the Advocate Professional Ethics Code and Law Number 18 Year 2003 concerning Advocates. In the Act, Advocates have legal rights that make themselves immune from legal remedies on matters relating to the work of their Advocates. This immunity right is important related to its role in the process of law enforcement and the rights of its entity which are independently separated from the client. To maintain the right of immunity to advocates based on Law Number 18 of 2003 concerning Advocates and Constitutional Court Decree Number 26 / PUU-XI / 2013 so that they are free to carry out their profession as law enforcers in Indonesia for the benefit of clients in good faith in the Industrial Revolution Era 4.0.

KOMPETENNSI ABSOLUT PERADILAN TATA USAHA NEGARA DALAM MENYELESAIKAN SENGKETA PENGADAAN TANAH BAGI PEMBANGUNAN UNTUK KEPENTINGAN UMUM Dani Elfah; Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara; Ikang Satrya Medyantara
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 6, No 3 (2018)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Perolehan tanah untuk kepentingan umum dapat ditempuh melalui pengadaan tanah.Pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan umum memerlukan persetujuan dari pihak yang berhak. Oleh karena pihak yang berhak tidak bersedia melepaskan hak atas tanah, maka timbul sengketa antara instansi yang memerlukan tanah dan pihak yang berhak. Sifat sengketa dalam pengadaan tanah adalah sengketa tata usaa negara dan sengketa keperdataan. Penyelesaian sengketa dalam pengadaan tanah untuk kepentingan ditempuh melalui musyawarah antara instansi yang memerlukan tanah dan pihak yang berhak, gugatan, atau keberatan kepada pengadilan.Sisten hukum tanah nasional yang berlaku di Indonesia sebagaimana tercermin di dalam Undang-Undang Nomor 5 Tahun 1960 Tentang Peraturan Dasar Pokok-Pokok Agraria mengakui dan menghormati hak masyarakat atas tanah dan benda yang berkaitan dengan tanah. Negara tidak hanya sebatas mengakui dan menghormati hak masyarakat atas tanah dan benda yang berkaitan dengan tanah, akan tetapi memberi perlindungan terhadap harta benda setiap orang yang berada dibawaha kekuasaannya dan Negara menjamin terhadap hak milik tidak boleh diambil alih secara sewenang-wenang oleh siapapun termasuk pemerintah.

THE EXECUTORIAL FORCE OF RULING OF ADMINISTRATIVE COURT AND THE IMPLICATIONS IN PRACTICE Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara & Gatot Dwi Hendro Wibowo
Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan Vol 2, No 1 (2014): UTOPIA HUKUM - KESEJAHTERAAN
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

This thesis entitled force executorial administrative court ruling and the implications in practice, discusses the mechanism of execution of the decision of the Administrative Court, the obstacles in the process of execution of the decision of the Administrative Court and the efforts that are made to the administrative court ruling that is not carried by the official / TUN Agency . This type of research is normative and assisted legal research / materials reinforced with empirical law in order to simplify and refine the analysis . The approach used is legislation approach , conceptual approach , approach cases , comparative approach . So that research results can be drawn that the mechanism of execution of court decisions TUN namely : Decision inkracht , after 60 working days the defendant did not perform its obligations , the decision has no legal force again and turns 90 working days of the obligation is not performed , the plaintiff filed a petition to the President of the Court order the court ordered defendant to implement the decision of the court , the defendant is not willing to implement the decision inkracht forceful measures imposed in the form of payment of a sum of money and forced or administrative sanctions and announced in local print media by him, since non-compliance of the court and the chairman shall submit to the President as the highest authority for TUN ordered officials to implement the court’s decision . So there was a bottleneck in the execution of the ruling Justice TUN namely : Verdict Amar , execution barriers TUN official verdict is due to the position of Regional Chief Political Officer , execution barriers TUN official verdict caused the accused are officials who received the delegation of authority false , barriers of understanding TUN officials the State ‘s theory of law and AAUPB , technical barriers , barriers juridical ; Barriers related to legal principles , barriers in terms of the limited authority of judges , Barriers due to changes in the system of regional autonomy , Barriers due to noncompliance TUN officials and effort to do the administrative court ruling are not carried by the official / TUN Agency as criminal Attempts by the police to file a criminal report with the basic law 216 of the Criminal Code and civil efforts filed a lawsuit in state court using Article 1365 of the Civil Code as the basis for a lawsuit .Keywords : executorial power , Mechanisms , Barriers and Efforts .

ANALISA BATAS KEWENANGAN BHABINKAMTIBMAS DALAM PENGAWASAN ANGGARAN DANA DESA M. Dawud Rizkyandi; Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman; Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara
Jurnal Ilmiah Hospitality Vol 11 No 1: Juni, 2022 (Sepcial Issue)
Publisher : Sekolah Tinggi Pariwisata Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47492/jih.v11i1.1828

The police is one of the functions of the state government in the field of maintaining security and public order, upholding the law, and providing protection, stability and community service in order to maintain domestic security, in the implementation of the task of implementing police partnerships with the community is very important in smoothly implementing police objectives in their duties, namely the maintenance of security and order in the community, methods that Used is a normative legal research method with a regulatory approach and conceptual approach, in this study willdescribe the form of authority and what can be done by the police, especially bhabinkamtibas in an effort to control the budget, supervision is carried out so as not to achieve abuse of authority so that the achievement of village welfare is far from the occurrence of corruption collusion and nepotism

PELAKSANAAN PROSEDUR EKSEKUSI PUTUSAN PERADILAN ADMINISTRASI ANTARA INDONESIA DENGAN THAILAND Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara; Siti Hasanah
Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah Vol. 1 No. 4: Desember 2021
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Jenis penelitian yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif yaitu berdasarkan pertimbangan bahwa penelitian ini berangkat dari analisis membandingkan proses pelaksanaan prosedur eksekusi putusan peradilan administrasi antara Indonesia dengan thailand. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah Pendekatan komparatif, Pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan, Pendekatan konseptual, Pendekatan kasus, Pendekatan komparatif. Konsep yang dimaksud merupakan bentuk ketegasan untuk mewujudkan jaminan kepastian akses keadilan administratif bagi warga negaranya, diantaranya adalah :Pertama, mengenai kewenangan peradilan administrasi Thailand untuk melaksanakan eksekusi riil terhadap putusan peradilan administrasi yakni dengan menggunakan Hukum Acara Perdata secara mutatis mutandis terhadap harta kekayaan yang pejabat tata usaha negara yang mengabaikan putusan peradilan. Dalam konsep ini juga jelas bahwa ekseksui harta kekayaan tersebut adalah harta pribadi dari pejabat TUN yang melanggar bukan keuangan negara yang dimiliki lembaga publik tempat Pejabat TUN bekerja. Kedua, Thailand memiliki prosedur contempt of court bagi pejabat TUN yang tidak patuh terhadap perintah peradilan dapat dikenai sanksi serius yakni pengadilan dapat memberi paksaan atau menetapkan tindakan displiner terhadap pejabat TUN yang bersangkutan dengan -perkara, atautanpa pemeriksaan pengadilan menjatuhkan hukuman penjara dengan alasan contempt of court.

POLITIK HUKUM DALAM DEMOKRASI HUKUM DI BIDANG EKONOMI DI INDONESIA Nyiayu Arma Nurlailiy; Baiq Silvia Yustiari; Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara
Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah Vol. 1 No. 12: Agustus 2022
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jcijurnalcakrawalailmiah.v1i12.3199

Perkembangan Hukum dan Ekonomi sangat berkaitan dengan perkembangan dan usaha manusia untuk memenuhi kebutuhan hidupnya, usaha manusia tersebut ditunjang dengan perkembangan teknologi, besarnya interaksi, dan ketersediaan sumber daya alam dan manusia sehingga Peranan hukum dalam pembangunan ekonomi suatu bangsa merupakan sesuatu yang tidak dapat diabaikan keberadaannya. Sehingga sangat jelas, jika kondisi hukum suatu bangsa itu efektif, maka pembangunan ekonomi pun akan mudah untuk dilaksanakan. Metode penelitian yang digunakan adalah tipe penelitian hukum normatif, yaitu penelitian hukum yang dilakukan dengan cara meneliti bahan pustaka atau data sekunder. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan(statueaproah) yaitu pendekatan perundang-undangan yang berkaitan dengan materi yang dibahas dan pendekatan konseptual (conseptual approach) yakni pendekatan dengan cara memahami konsep-konsep hukum dan/atau pendapa tpara ahli hukum untuk memberikan gambaran dan informasi tentang Politik Hukum Dalam Demokrasi Hukum Di Bidangekonomi Di Indonesia. Hasil penelitian yaitu Demokratisasi politik hukum dibidang ekonomi di Indonesia merupakan pencerminan dari tujuan dari pembanguanan di Indonesia yaitu diupayakan untuk mengarahkan sepenuhnya untuk kemakmuran rakyat

KEWENANGAN PENGAWAS KETENAGAKERJAAN TERHADAP PEKERJA ANAK DI KABUPATEN LOMBOK TIMUR Sakaki Sakaki; Suyadi Suyadi; Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara
Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah Vol. 1 No. 12: Agustus 2022
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jcijurnalcakrawalailmiah.v1i12.3204

This research is a juridical-empirical legal research, the approach used is a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. The analytical method used is descriptive analytical method. Supervision by Supervision Labor inspection is an activity carried out by the government to ensure that the provisions of laws and regulations. concerning Manpower are implemented for the relationship between employers and workers and are adhered to by all parties. Supervision is carried out in an effort to oversee labor laws. Factors that support labor inspection of child labor in East Lombok Regency are, Willingness to Enter the Company, Conducting counseling, supporting facilities and facilities. Inhibiting factors are supervisory staff, supervisors cannot be investigated directly with company management, supervisory employees may not take direct action (not unchecked), PPNS Number of employees conducting investigations, insufficient time, limited labor inspectors

KEWENANGAN PERATUN DALAM PERKARA PENGHAPUSAN MEREK TERDAFTAR OLEH PEMERINTAH (REGULATORY AUTHORITY IN CASE OF REMOVAL OF REGISTERED MARKS BY THE GOVERNMENT) Abi Harun Arroisi; Guntur Ilman Putra; Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara
Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah Vol. 1 No. 12: Agustus 2022
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jcijurnalcakrawalailmiah.v1i12.3207

Dengan berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 tentang Merek dan Indikasi Geografis, maka penyelesaian sengketa Merek dilaksanakan oleh dua lembaga peradilan, yaitu Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara dan Pengadilan Niaga. Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara berwenang menyelesaikan sengketa penghapusan Merek terdaftar atas prakarsa Menteri, sedangkan Pengadilan Niaga berwenang menyelesaikan sengketa Pendaftaran Merek, sengketa Penghapusan Merek oleh Pihak Ketiga, Sengketa Pembatalan Merek, dan sengketa Pelanggaran Merek. Sengketa Pendaftaran Merek pada hakikatnya adalah sengketa atas Keputusan Menteri, sehingga apabila garis batas kompetensinya tidak dipertegas dapat menimbulkan tumpang tindih penyelesaian di antara kedua badan peradilan tersebut. Untuk itu dilakukanlah penelitian hukum ini, dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasilnya adalah perlu diterbitkan Surat Edaran Mahkamah Agung tentang penentuan garis batas kewenangan antara kedua lembaga peradilan tersebut, yaitu bahwa kompetensi Pengadilan Niaga adalah semua sengketa yang telah ditentukan UU Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 untuk diselesaikan oleh Pengadilan Niaga dan sengketa keperdataan yang terkait dengan Merek, sedangkan kompetensi Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara adalah sengketa Penghapusan Merek atas prakarsa Menteri dan semua Keputusan dan/atau Tindakan Menteri yang berkaitan dengan Merek yang tidak ditentukan UU Nomor 20 Tahun 2016 untuk diselesaikan Pengadilan Niaga.

POLITIK HUKUM DALAM DEMOKRASI HUKUM DI BIDANG EKONOMI DI INDONESIA Nyiayu Arma Nurlailiy; Baiq Silvia Yustiari; Firzhal Arzhi Jiwantara
Jurnal Cakrawala Ilmiah Vol. 2 No. 1: September 2022
Publisher : Bajang Institute

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.53625/jcijurnalcakrawalailmiah.v2i1.3500

Co-Authors Abdul Hafid Abi Harun Arroisi Ady Supryadi Afrihadi, Faisal Agustinus F. Paskalino Dadi Arief Fahmi Lubis Asmuni Asmuni Baiq Silvia Yustiari Baiq Silvia Yustiari Burhanuddin Burhanuddin Dani Elfah Dewanti, Yuvana Dewi Komalasari Dewi, Anies Prima Edy Sony Efendi Kusnandar Ernesta Arita Ari Fadil, Lalu Muhammad Fikri, Zainul Gede Harimbawa Guntur Ilman Putra Guntur Ilman Putra Guntur Ilman Putra Hani Usmandani Haq, Hilman Syarial Harun, Rina Rohayu Hasyim, Hafid Heri Budianto Idhar Idhar Idhar, Idhar Ikang Satrya Medyantara Imalah Imran Imran IRMAN PUTRA Johny Koynja Jumawal, Jumawal Kaspul Hadi Khaerul Ihsan Khaerul Ihsan Kusnandar, Efendi Lukman Lukman Lukman M. Dawud Rizkyandi Made Wardika Muhaemin Muhaemin Muhammad Padil Akbar Mukhlishin, Mukhlishin Nasaruddin Nasaruddin Nasaruddin Nasution Nasution Nasution Nasution Nurjannah S Nyiayu Arma Nurlailiy Nyiayu Arma Nurlailiy Pratama, Inka Nusamuda Primasari, Shinta Ridwan, Ridwan Rina Rohayu Harun Rizan, Lalu Samsu Sahlan Sahlan Sahrul, Sahrul Sakaki Sakaki Salahudin Salahudin Salahudin Salahudin Santi Mandasari Santi Mandasari Sarip, Sarip Shinta Primasari Siti Hasanah Siti Hasanah Siti Hasanah Siti Hasanah Siti HasanahSiti Hasanah Sri Solehah Suhartono Suhartono Suyadi Suyadi Syafruddin Syafruddin Syamsuddin Syamsuddin Syamsuddin Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman Taufiqurrahman Tauhid, Tauhid Ufran Ufran, Ufran Usman Munir Wijatono, Setia Yogi Hadi Ismanto Yulias Erwin

Title

Found 53 Documents
Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title Search

Found 53 Documents Search

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Abstract

Title

Found 53 Documents
Search