Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Development of Flashcard Media on Students' Learning Motivation Afifah Rizki, Nur; Paramitha, Ielda; Darmadi, I Wayan; Jarnawi, Muhammad
Al-Khazini Vol 6 No 1 (2026): APRIL
Publisher : UIN Alauddin Makassar

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar

Abstract

This study aims to develop and design flashcard-based learning media that can enhance students' motivation to learn. The research employs the Research and Development (R&D) method with the ADDIE development model, which includes the stages of Analyze, Design, Development, Implementation, and Evaluation. The flashcard media was designed using the Canva platform for visual design and Assembler Edu for AR content integration. Validation was conducted by subject matter experts and media experts. The trial involved 20 students and 3 science teachers, with data collected through learning motivation questionnaires, student and teacher response questionnaires, and pretest-posttest assessments. The validation results showed a media expert score of 4.59 (very feasible) and a subject matter expert score of 3.50 (feasible). The responses from teachers and students were categorized as very feasible, with scores of 4.41 and 4.37, respectively. Students' learning motivation increased, with a score of 4.02 (high category) and an N-Gain of 72.34% (high category). The media also proved effective in improving students' understanding, as seen in the increase in the average posttest score (77.95) compared to the pretest score (20.9). The study concludes that this AR-based flashcard media is feasible, practical, and effective as an innovative learning tool. Recommendations for further research include improving the quality of physical materials (lamination) and expanding the development to other physics topics.
Integrating Thinking Styles into Differentiated Instruction: Enhancing Learning Outcomes in Science Education Jarnawi, Muhammad; Haeruddin, Haeruddin; Werdhiana, I Komang; Syamsuriwal, Syamsuriwal; Mu’aziyah, Siti Eneng Sururiyatul
Integrated Science Education Journal Vol 6 No 1 (2025): January
Publisher : Cahaya Ilmu Cendekia Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37251/isej.v6i1.1328

Abstract

Purpose of the study: This research aims to advance science education by integrating Gregorc’s Thinking Style Model into differentiated instruction, thereby accommodating students’ diverse cognitive needs and improving their academic performance and learning outcomes in science education. Methodology: This study employed a quasi-experimental design conducted at MTs Al-Khairaat Bora, involving 70 students (36 male and 34 female). Thinking styles were identified using the Gregorc Thinking Style Inventory. Differentiated learning modules were developed and implemented, supported by pre-test and post-test assessments, classroom observations, and feedback surveys analyzed quantitatively and qualitatively. Main Findings: This study investigated the distribution of cognitive styles among 70 students, finding that Abstract Random (30.22%) and Concrete Random (28.30%) were the most predominant, followed by Abstract Sequential (16.48%) and Concrete Sequential (11.54%). Instruction tailored to these cognitive styles resulted in an increase in post-test scores for the experimental group (from 65 to 85), surpassing the control group (from 64 to 70). Novelty/Originality of this study: This study integrates Gregorc’s Thinking Style Model with differentiated instruction, offering a novel approach to adapting science education. By identifying students' thinking styles, it enhances engagement and understanding, aligning teaching methods with cognitive preferences. The study contributes to improving educational practices by fostering better learning outcomes for diverse student groups.
Metakognisi dan Gaya Berpikir: Membuka Potensi Pemecahan Masalah Fisika Haeruddin; I Komang Werdhina; Muhammad Jarnawi; Syamsuriwal; Zuhdan Kun Prasetyo; Supahar
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 9 No 12 (2023): December
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v9i12.6151

Abstract

Thinking styles and metacognition are related as they both have the same space in assessing one’s own abilities. Metacognition and thinking styles have an important role in unlocking the potential of physics problem solving. The objective of this study is to investigate the relationship between metacognition, thinking styles (particularly those proposed by Gregorc), and physics problem solving. The study involved a cohort of 364 students who were pursuing a physics degree at Tadulako University. The results indicated that metacognition behavior exhibited in the process of solving physics problems was classified as high category. The most dominant thinking style was abstract sequential, while the least was concrete random. The data analysis showed a significant difference in metacognition behavior between groups categorized by thinking style. Specifically, the concrete sequential (SK) group exhibited a significant difference with the abstract random (AA) group. These results provide further understanding of how metacognition and thinking styles play a role in physics problem solving. This study contributes significantly to comprehending the connection between metacognition, thinking styles, and the successful resolution of physics problems. The insights gained provide prospects for formulating more efficient physics learning methods that will ameliorate students' aptitude in tackling physics problems.
Assessing Student Performance Designing Props and Experiments Physics In Learning Team Base Project For Subject Instrumentation I Komang Werdhiana; Haeruddin; Muhammad Jarnawi; Syamsuriwal
Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan IPA Vol 11 No 2 (2025): February
Publisher : Postgraduate, University of Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jppipa.v11i2.10126

Abstract

Performance assessment is an important part of learning that applies the team-based project method. This study aims to describe student performance in designing physics teaching aids and experiments in terms of active participation, understanding of the material, presentation skills and products. This study uses a descriptive method. Data were obtained through observation sheets and rubrics and assessment sheets. Data analysis for active participation, understanding of the material, and presentation skills was carried out by determining the number of students who obtained scores according to each category (very good, good, quite good, and less good) then expressed as a percentage. Data analysis for product assessment was carried out by determining the average score of each product and converting it to a score of 100. There were 29 students who were the sample of the study. The results of the study showed that students who participated actively were predominantly in the sufficient and less active categories. The percentage of students who understood the material was predominantly in the understand and understand enough categories. Students' presentation skills were predominantly in the good category. All the results of the teaching aid designs were in the very good category. There were three experimental design results in the very good category and three others in the good category. Based on the research results, it can be concluded that students are able to design physics demonstration tools and experiments in terms of active participation, understanding of the material, presentation and product skills, through team-based project learning.
Mapping the Intellectual Structure of Item Response Theory and Rasch Model Applications in Physics Education Assessment: A Scopus-Based Bibliometric Analysis Haeruddin Haeruddin; Delthawati Isti Ratnaningtyas; Muhammad Jarnawi; Syamsuriwal Syamsuriwal; Rudi Santoso
Journal of Mathematics Science and Computer Education Vol 6, No 1 (2026): MAY 2026
Publisher : Universitas Lambung Mangkurat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20527/jmscedu.v6i1.18491

Abstract

Assessment in physics education requires valid and reliable measurement instruments capable of accurately representing students’ cognitive abilities, including conceptual understanding, scientific reasoning, and problem-solving skills. Over the past decades, instrument validation has shifted from Classical Test Theory to modern probabilistic measurement models, particularly Item Response Theory (IRT) and the Rasch model. Despite the growing application of these models in physics education research, the expanding literature remains thematically and methodologically fragmented, limiting a comprehensive understanding of the field’s intellectual development. Therefore, this study aims to map the intellectual structure and research trends of IRT and Rasch model applications in physics education assessment. This study employed a bibliometric research design using 243 Scopus-indexed publications published between 2001 and 2026. Bibliographic metadata were retrieved using Publish or Perish and analyzed using the Bibliometrix package in RStudio and VOSviewer to examine publication trends, influential sources, collaboration networks, and keyword co-occurrence patterns. The results reveal substantial growth in publications, increasing by more than 1,150% over the past two decades. Five major thematic clusters were identified: measurement frameworks, psychometric modeling, validity and fairness, instrument development and technology, and learning progression. Emerging themes such as computational thinking, digital instrument development, and multidimensional assessment indicate a shift toward competency-based and technology-supported assessment practices. Overall, the findings reveal the intellectual structure and research trends of IRT and Rasch model applications in physics education assessment, demonstrating their growing role as central methodological frameworks in contemporary assessment research. These findings also provide directions for future research, particularly in developing multidimensional Rasch-based instruments and technology-enhanced assessment systems in physics education
Co-Authors Abd. Syukur, Muh. Syarif S. Adisti, Maria Firmina Afifah Rizki, Nur Afriani, Nurul Alma Alma Amelia, Nurafni Amiruddin Hatibe Amiruddin Kade Andi Sumadi Aprilia Ningsih, Andi Arfianingsih, Devy Aryani A Wahab Bete, Suci Novita Sari Darsikin Darsikin Daud, Susmawati Dayana, Nur Faiqah Delthawati Isti Ratnaningtyas Edwi Agusstiawan Fadlina Farawansyah, Fifi Indar Fifi Indar Farawansyah Fifi Indar Farawansyah, Fihrin Fihrin Firda, Nyoman Gusmawan Gustina Gustina Hadu, Yuniarti Haeruddin Haeruddin Haeruddin Haeruddin Haeruddin I Komang Werdhiana I Komang Werdhina I Wayan Darmadi Ielda Paramita Ika Nurul Fitriani Ikbal Isti Ratnaningtyas, Delthawati Kamaluddin Kamaluddin Ketut Alit Adi Untara Khuzaimah, Andi Ulfah Koriston, Meyling puspitasari Lisman, Lisman Madani, Rara Adillah Magfira, Nurfia Marungkil Pasaribu Miftah Miftah Miftah, Miftah Mu'aziyah, Siti Eneng Sururiyatul Muh. Syarif Muhammad Ali MUHAMMAD ALI Muhammad Zaky Muslimin Muslimin MUTMAINAH Mu’aziyah, Siti Eneng Sururiyatul N. Laratu, Wahyuni Naposia, Naposia Ni Komang Sulitrayanti Nike Silvia Nurasyah Dewi Napitupulu Nurfachri, Dhimas Arif Nurgan Tadeko Nurjannah Nurjannah Nurjannah, Nurjannah Nurul Azmi, Nurul Pahriadi Paramitha, Ielda Rasdin, Waode Tirta Murlina Ratna, Adi Ratnaningtyas, Delthawati Isti Riska Safitri, Riska Rizki Ilmianih Rudi Santoso Rudi Santoso, Rudi Sahrul Saehana Sani, Nurul Kami Sari, Komang Ayu Setiawan, Rio Suardin, Dina Sucitra, Fani Sulitrayanti, Ni Komang Supahar Supriyatman, Supriyatman Syahril, Asmaul Syamsu Syamsu Syamsuriwal Syamsuriwal, Syamsuriwal Syarif, Muh. Syuhudi, Moh. Astiar Unggul Wahyono Wahab, Aryani A Yuliana Sumbung, Dewi Yusuf Kendek Zuhdan Kun Prasetyo