p-Index From 2021 - 2026
8.909
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Kertha Patrika LAW REFORM Yustisia Lentera Hukum JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Spektrum Hukum AL-Daulah Arena Hukum Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Hukum Novelty LAW REVIEW Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Pembaharuan Hukum JURNAL MAHKAMAH Unram Law Review International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Jurnal Selat Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Widya Yuridika Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Lex Scientia Law Review Jambe Law Journal Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran DE'RECHTSSTAAT International Journal of Supply Chain Management JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW KERTHA WICAKSANA Unes Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Jurnal Jatiswara Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan Jurnal Simbur Cahaya Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Media Iuris University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Notaire International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR) Mulawarman Law Review JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Suara Hukum Majalah Hukum Nasional Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Journal of Judicial Review Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Legislatif Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan Yuridika JIPRO : Journal Of Intellectual Property Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) RechtIdee LamLaj Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Analisa Daluarsa Gugatan Pembatalan Perjanjian Akibat Adanya Penyalahgunaan Keadaan (Misbruik Van Omstandigheiden) Xavier Nugraha; John Eno Prasito Putra; Krisna Darari Hamonangan Putra
Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Vol 8, No 1 (2020)
Publisher : Universitas Galuh

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (310.083 KB) | DOI: 10.25157/justisi.v8i1.3242

Abstract

Dalam perkembangannya, dapat dilihat bahwa gugatan pembatalan perjanjian akibat tidak adanya kesepakatan di dalam Syarat pertama Pasal 1320 BW, tidak terbatas hanya di dalam Pasal 1321 BW, seperti kekhilafan, paksaan, dan penipuan, namun dalam perkembangannya lahir alasan baru yaitu penyalahgunaan keadaan (misbruik van omstandigheiden). Namun, dalam praktiknya, menimbulkan pertanyaan terkait dengan dalurasa pengajuan gugatan pembatalan perjanjian akibat adanya penyalahgunaan keadaa. Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisa eksistensi dalurasa gugatan pembatalan perjanjian akibat adanya penyalahgunaan keadaan. Rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah, Pertama, penyalahgunaan keadaan sebagai alasan pembatalan perjanjian dan Kedua, dalurasa gugatan pembatalan perjanjian akibat adanya penyalahgunaan keadaan. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundnag-undangan dan konseptual. Berdasarkan penelitian ini, ditemukan bahwa Pertama, penyalahgunaan keadaan merupakan alasan baru dalam pembatalan perjanjian yang merupakan cacat kehendak modern, Kedua,  dalurasa gugatan pembatalan perjanjian akibat adanya penyalahgunaan keadaan berdasarkan analogi Pasal 1454 BW adalah lima tahun sejak diketahui adanya penyalahgunaan keadaan dalam membuat perjanjian tersebutKata kunci: Analogi, Daluarsa, Pembatalan Perjanjian, Penyalahgunaan Keadaan
Konstitusionalitas Perbuatan Tidak Menyenangkan Sebagai Tindak Pidana Ujaran Kebencian: Analisis Surat Edaran Kapolri Nomor: Se/6/X/2015 Peter Jeremiah Setiawan; Xavier Nugraha; Vincentius Sutanto; Marchethy Riwani Diaz
Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum Vol 8, No 1 (2021): JURNAL ILMIAH PENEGAKAN HUKUM JUNI
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/jiph.v8i1.4277

Abstract

This article aims to analyze the position of unpleasant acts as a form of hate speech (haatzaai articlesen), which in fact the concept of unpleasant acts has been eliminated by the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-XI / 2013, The problem is focused on the constitutionality of wrongdoing. fun as a form of hate speech (haatzaai articlesen). In order to approach this problem, a theoretical reference from the element theory of crime and the theory of constitutionality of norms is used. This research is a normative legal research, so that the data is collected through literature studies, both on primary, secondary and tertiary legal materials. This research was analyzed qualitatively. This study concludes that: (1) With the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-XI / 2013 which is legally binding, then every legal norm in statutory regulations made after the Constitutional Court Decision must comply with the provisions with does not bring back the existence of the phrase "unpleasant actions". (2) Chief of Police Circular Number: SE / 6 / X / 2015 is not a statutory regulation (regeling), but a policy regulation (beleidsregel) which juridically results in the lack of authority to create new norms or restore the existence of norms that have been abolished by the Constitutional Court, so the concept of unpleasant acts in such a Chief of Police Circular is unconstitutional.
Analisis Terhadap Ketua Yayasan yang Rangkap Jabatan Di Indonesia: Sebuah Potensi Konflik Kepentingan Xavier Nugraha
DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Vol 3, No 2 (2020): Doktrina:Journal of Law Oktober 2020
Publisher : Universitas Medan Area

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.31289/doktrina.v3i2.4110

Abstract

The aim of this legal research is toto analyze the relationship between the head of the foundation who has concurrent positions so that there is the potential to create a conflict of interest. The formulation of the problem in this study is First, namely, how is the chairman of the foundation's arrangement in Indonesia? and Second, namely, how are provisions related to concurrent positions that can cause conflicts of interest to the chair of the foundation in Indonesia? This research is legal research using a statutory and conceptual approach. Based on this research, it was found that there are two models of concurrent positions that have the potential to cause conflicts of interest, namely concurrent positions with internal positions and concurrent positions with external positions. In Indonesia, related to the chairman of the foundation, what is banned is a dual position with an internal position, such as supervisors and supervisors. Associated with the chairman of a foundation who has concurrent positions with an external position, such as being an administrator in a different foundation is not prohibited, but if the concurrent positions cause the foundation's chairman, it harms the foundation, then the chairman of the foundation can be dismissed, and even has the potential to be held personally responsible.
Keadilan Proporsional Sebagai Landasan Filosofis Pengaturan Perizinan Pendirian Tempat Ibadah di Indonesia Xavier Nugraha; Pradnya Wicaksana
Jatiswara Vol 36 No 2 (2021): Jatiswara
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jatiswara.v36i2.300

Abstract

Pancasila sebagai dasar filsafat negara (philosopische grondslag) menjadikan Indonesia sebagai negara yang memandang kebebasan beragama dengan prinsip “netral-aktif”. Paradigma ini tertuang dalam Peraturan Bersama Menteri Agama dan Menteri Dalam Negeri No. 9 Tahun 2006 dan No. 8 Tahun 2006 (selanjutnya disingkat PBM No. 9/2006 dan No. 8/2006) yang mengatur terkait perizinan pendirian tempat ibadah. Namun dalam praktiknya, penggunaan syarat materiil dan formil yang sama terhadap seluruh jenis tempat ibadah yang didirikan justru menimbulkan berbagai celah diskriminasi yang pada akhirnya melanggar kebebasan beragama itu sendiri. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum dengan menggunakan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Hasil penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa, PBM No. 9/2006 dan No. 8/2006 yang menggunakan landasan filosofi keadilan egaliter karena memberikan kewajiban yang sama untuk memperoleh izin pendirian tempat ibadah pada akhirnya akan selalu menimbulkan celah diskriminasi terhadap umat agama minoritas. Sejatinya, landasan filosofi yang tepat untuk digunakan dalam mengatur perizinan pendirian tempat ibadah di Indonesia adalah keadilan proporsional karena perbedaan dinamika tiap agama hendaknya juga diberikan kewajiban yang berbeda pula.
An Analysis of The Offense of Unpleasant Action in Article 335 Paragraph (1) of The Indonesian Criminal Code Xavier Nugraha; Kusuma Wardani Raharjo; Ahmad Ardhiansyah; Alip Pamungkas Raharjo
Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Vol 5 No 2 (2021): JUNE
Publisher : Lembaga Penelitian dan Pengabdian Masyarakat

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.35326/volkgeist.v5i2.678

Abstract

The Constitutional Court as the guardian of the constitution and the guardian of human rights has the duty to ensure that the Law does not contradict the constitution and does not violate human rights. One of the manifestations of this can be seen in the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013, where the Constitutional Court removed the element "Some other deeds or unpleasant treatment/act" in Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code. With the removal of the core elements of Article 335 paragraph (1) of the Criminal Code, raises questions related to the existence of the offense whether it still exists or not. Based on this, this study will examine 1) Application of Article 335 of the Criminal Code Before the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013 and 2.) Application of Article 335 of the Criminal Code After the Decision of the Constitutional Court Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013. This research is a normative legal research with a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. Based on this research, it was found that after the Constitutional Court Decision Number 1 / PUU-X / 2013 that offenses of unpleasant acts had been reconstructed into forced offenses.
Perwujudan Pemilu yang Luberjurdil melalui Validitas Daftar Pemilih Tetap Risdiana Izzaty; Xavier Nugraha
Jurnal Suara Hukum Vol. 1 No. 2 (2019)
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26740/jsh.v1n2.p155-171

Abstract

In Article 22E paragraph (1) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia, it is explained that General Elections (Elections) are held based on the principle of œluberjudil (direct, general, free, confidential, honest and fair). One of the manifestations of this principle is through the final voter list in the implementation of the election. This research is normative research with statute approach and conceptual approach. The issues discussed in this study are 1. Can the validity of the Permanent Voters List be seen as a manifestation of a direct, general, free, confidential, honest and fair election? 2. What are the problems that arise in determining the Permanent Voters List? 3. How is the guarantee of political rights for citizens due to problems that arise in the determination of the Permanent Voters List? Based on this research, it was found that the validity of the Permanent Voters List was part of the realization of the election system which was direct, general, free, confidential, honest and fair. This research also describes the problems in determining the Permanent Voters List and the mechanism for protecting the political rights of citizens in the event of problems in the final voter list 
Auction Winner as A New Criteria in The Concept of Good Faith Buyer in Indonesia Faizal Kurniawan; Xavier Nugraha; Ardhana Christian Noventri; Qona’aha Noor Maajid
Jambe Law Journal Vol 4 No 2 (2021)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Jambi University

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22437/jlj.4.2.171-190

Abstract

Good faith is a principle embodied under Article 1338 Paragraph (3) of the Indonesian Civil Code, which is required in every stage of a contract, including in a land sale and purchase contract. Under several decisions of the Supreme Court, good faith is considered to exist, for instance, when a buyer purchased a land through the auction of the State Receivables Affairs Committee (PUPN). Nevertheless, based on a conviction in the judicial practices, this article believes that purchases through official auctions are not necessarily the indicators for the existence of good faith principle in a land sale and purchase contract. Therefore, this study is focused on the concept of good faith buyer with a land object as well as the characteristic of auction winner as a good faith buyer protected by law. In conclusion, parties of a land sale and purchase contract through auction can be considered to have performed in good faith when they have fulfilled the criteria under Supreme Court Circular Letter and other criteria such as purchasing through state auction office in accordance with the applicable laws and regulations, purchasing in a reasonable price, and the auction winner is not the creditor himself who purchases at a price far below the collateral limit price.
ANALISIS UPAYA PEMERINTAH MEMINIMALISIR RISIKO GAGAL BAYAR DALAM PEMBERIAN PINJAMAN KEPADA BUMN Xavier Nugraha; Patricia Inge Felany; M Imron Rosyadi
Majalah Hukum Nasional Vol. 50 No. 1 (2020): Majalah Hukum Nasional Volume 50 Nomor 1 Tahun 2020
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (1455.592 KB) | DOI: 10.33331/mhn.v50i1.52

Abstract

Salah satu bentuk kegiatan yang dilakukan pemerintah untuk mengelola uang negara adalah dengan melakukan pinjaman kepada BUMN. Hal ini dilakukan untuk melaksanakan kegiatan pembangunan nasional terutama percepatan pembangunan infrastruktur. Meskipun pinjaman tersebut untuk kegiatan BUMN, namun tetap harus sesuai dengan prinsip good governance. Perlu ada upaya pemerintah untuk meminimalisir risiko gagal bayar yang muncul dalam pemberian pinjaman kepada BUMN. Berdasarkan latar belakang tersebut, rumusan masalah dalam penelitian ini adalah 1) Apa upaya preventif terhadap risiko gagal bayar dalam pemberian pinjaman kepada BUMN? 2) Apa upaya represif terhadap risiko gagal bayar dalam pemberian pinjaman kepada BUMN? Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum. Pendekatan yang digunakan adalah pendekatan perundang-undangan dan pendekatan konseptual. Berdasarkan penelitian ini, ditemukan bahwa 1) Upaya preventif yang dapat dilakukan oleh pemerintah berupa penerapan sikap kehati-hatian dalam setiap tahap pelaksanaan pemberian pinjaman serta adanya penilaian, pengawasan, serta evaluasi terhadap pelaksanaan pemberian pinjaman kepada BUMN dan 2) Upaya represif yang dapat dilakukan berupa pengenaan denda administrasi serta penerapan sanksi pidana.
NON-CONVICTION BASED ASSET FORFEITURE SEBAGAI FORMULASI BARU UPAYA STOLEN ASSET RECOVERY TINDAK PIDANA KORUPSI INDONESIA Xavier Nugraha; Ave Maria Frisa Katherina; Windy Agustin; Alip Pamungkas
Majalah Hukum Nasional Vol. 49 No. 1 (2019): Majalah Hukum Nasional Nomor 1 Tahun 2019
Publisher : Badan Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Kementerian Hukum dan HAM RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (355.991 KB) | DOI: 10.33331/mhn.v49i1.92

Abstract

Korupsi yang merupakan masalah global telah menyebabkan tingginya kerugian keuangan dan perekonomian negara di Indonesia. United Nation Convention Against Corruption telah mencanangkan rekomendasi kepada negara-negara untuk membuat pengaturan mengenai Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture sebagai upaya untuk mengembalikan kerugian negara secara maksimal. Kerugian negara yang telah kembali saat ini masih tidak sebanding dengan kerugian negara yang secara nyata ada akibat korupsi. Urgensi ini lah yang menghadirkan konsep perlunya pengaturan mengenai Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture di Indonesia. Penelitian yang digunakan bersifat yuridis normatif dengan pendekatan peraturan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Peraturan perundang-undangan di Indonesia sejatinya telah mengadopsi konsep Non-Conviction Based Asset Forfeiture, namun tidak memenuhi secara maksimal dasar filosofis adanya konsep tersebut, yaitu mengembalikan kerugian negara akibat korupsi secara maksimal dan cepat dengan mekanisme peradilan perdata. Sehingga, undang-undang yang mengatur mengenai perampasan aset perlu dibuat tersendiri dan diundangkan untuk mengakomodasi upaya pengembalian kerugian negara akibat korupsi secara maksimal.
Perkembangan Gugatan Perbuatan Melanggar Hukum oleh Pemerintah Pasca-Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 (Development of Lawsuit for Law Violation by the Government Post Statute/Law Number 30 of 2014) Bagus Oktafian Abrianto; Xavier Nugraha; Nathanael Grady
Jurnal Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum Untuk Keadilan Vol 11, No 1 (2020): JNH Vol 11 No 1 Juni 2020
Publisher : Pusat Penelitian Badan Keahlian Setjen DPR RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (865.715 KB) | DOI: 10.22212/jnh.v11i1.1574

Abstract

The existence of a lawsuit for unlawful acts by the authorities (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad) is one of the means of providing legal protection for the citizens from actions (handling) carried out by the government. Over time, the concept of onrechtmatige overheidsdaad has develops dynamically. The change in the concept of the State Administrative Decree in Article 87 of Law Number 30 of 2014 concerning Government Administration has caused an onrechtmatige overheidsdaad lawsuit which was once the absolute competence of the District Court, and now became the absolute competence of the State Administrative Court. This research attempts to explain the changes in the regulation and changes in the concept of onrechtmatige overheidsdaad after the enactment of Law Number 30 of 2014. The transfer of authority to examine onrechtmatige overheidsdaad lawsuit from the general court to the state administrative court has various juridical consequences, ranging from changes in procedural law, petitum and posita. One of the important consequences is a change related to the implementation or execution of the judicial decision, where in the past, when an onrechtmatige overheidsdaad lawsuit was an absolute competence of a district court, the implementation of the decision depended on the good will of the government. However, after becoming absolute competence of the Administrative Court, there is a mechanism of forced efforts so that the decision can be carried out by the relevant government agencies (defendants).AbstrakKeberadaan gugatan perbuatan melanggar hukum oleh penguasa (onrechtmatige overheidsdaad) merupakan salah satu sarana pelindungan hukum masyarakat atas tindakan (handeling) yang dilakukan oleh pemerintah. Adapun konsep mengenai onrechtmatige overheidsdaad berkembang secara dinamis dari waktu ke waktu. Perubahan konsep Keputusan Tata Usaha Negara (KTUN) di dalam Pasal 87 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, menyebabkan gugatan onrechtmatige overheidsdaad yang dahulu merupakan kompetensi absolut Pengadilan Negeri, berubah menjadi kompetensi absolut Pengadilan Tata Usaha Negara. Penelitian ini berusaha memaparkan mengenai perubahan pengaturan dan perubahan konsep onrechtmatige overheidsdaad pasca berlakunya Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014. Beralihnya kewenangan untuk memeriksa gugatan onrechtmatige overheidsdaad dari lingkungan peradilan umum ke peradilan tata usaha negara memiliki berbagai konsekuensi yuridis, mulai dari perubahan hukum acara, petitum, dan posita. Salah satu konsekuensi yang cukup penting adalah perubahan terkait dengan pelaksanaan putusan atau eksekusi. Dahulu, gugatan onrechtmatige overheidsdaad merupakan kompetensi absolut pengadilan negeri, sehingga pelaksanaan putusan tergantung dari itikad baik (good will) dari pemerintah. Pasca-beralih ke kompetensi absolut PTUN, terdapat mekanisme upaya paksa agar putusan tersebut dapat dijalankan oleh instransi pemerintah terkait (tergugat).
Co-Authors Abidin, Izzah Khalif Raihan Adelina, Alya Adiwinata, Gianina Elizabeth Agus Widyantoro Ahmad Ardhiansyah Ahmad Muzakki Alam Subuh Fernando Aldi, Jihan Anjania Alfredo, Juan Maulana Alip Pamungkas Alip Pamungkas Raharjo Alya Adelina Alya Anira Al’Azza, Nadya Eka Amalia Amilah Fadhlina Anak Agung Gede Ananta Wijaya Sahadewa Angelia, Alissa Angelica Milano Angelica Novia Walasondakh Answendy, Putri Riska Ardhana Christian Noventri Ardhana Christian Noventri Arinni Dewi Ambarningrum Aris, Mohamad Syaiful Aristyawan, Patricia Anais Arjuna, Gio Atiqoh Farhan Maulani Ave Maria Frisa K Ave Maria Frisa Katherina Bagus Oktafian Abrianto Bryan Owen Soeprapto Budi, Kukuh Pramono Budianto, Anneta Cornelia Budisusanto, Eko Christina Ella Yonatan Citi Rahmati Serfiyani Dania Shofi Maziyah Daniel Julian Tangkau Danmadiyah, Shevierra Darmawan, Monica Caecilia Desak Ayu Gangga Sitha Dewi Devi Yulida Dinda Ajeng Puspanita Dinda Silviana Putri Dinda, Giovanni Dita Elvia Kusuma Putri Dwiana Martanto Eka Widi Astuti Elma Putri Tanbun Emely Laurentius, Melva Enrick, Michael Ezra Tambunan Faizal Kurniawan Farid Ibrahim Fariz Rachman Iqbal Fauzurrahman, Iqbal Febrian Dirgantara Felany, Patricia Inge Felicia, Stefania Arshanty Fernando, Alam Subuh Firmansyah, Ridho Fuady, Muhammad Ikram Nur Ghansham Anand Gio Arjuna Putra Gio Arjuna Putra Giovanni Dinda Cahyawati Grace Sharon Gwyneth Eugenia Keisya Howard Hadiwidjayanti, Rizky Haidar Adam Harmanto, Toni Hartono, Julienna Heru Irianto Heru Irianto Insiyah, Sayyidatul Iqbal Fauzurrahman Iqbal, Fariz Rachman Izzaty, Risdiana Izzaty, Risdiana Jeniffer Avrillya Wibisono Jennifer Moniq Sutanto John Eno Prasito Putra Joni Eko Waluyo Juan Maulana Alfedo Julienna Hartono Kadek Anda Gangga Putri Kartika Widya Utama Kexia Goutama Kosuma, Indah Permatasari Krisna Angela Krisna Darari Hamonangan Putra Krisna Murti Kusuma Wardani Raharjo Lorenzo Nieuwenburg Luisa Srihandayani Luisa Srihandayani M Imron Rosyadi M. Adib Akmal Hamdi M. Syaiful Aris Marchethy Riwani Diaz Marzul Afiyanto Mas Rahmah, Mas Maulia Madina Melati Ayu Pusparani Melva Emely Laurentius Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman Mohamad, Ani Munirah Mohammad Syaiful Aris Muhammad Mashuri Muhammad Rizky Febrianto Nasri Natasha Caecilia Lisanggraeni Rositaputri Nathanael Grady Nina Amelia Novita Sari Nina Amelia Novita Sari Patricia Inge Felany Patricia Inge Felany Peter Jeremiah Setiawan Peter Jeremiah Setiawan Pradnya Wicaksana Prawitra Thalib Prihandono, Yoga Purnamawadita, Baiq Elma Putri Saraswati Putri, Annida Aqiila Putri, Annida Aqiila Putri, Dita Elvia Kusuma Putri, Dita Elvia Kusuma Qona’aha Noor Maajid Rahmat , Nur Ezan Rahmat, Nur Ezan Ramadhan, Febriansyah Ramadhanti, Syifa Regita Nathalia, Angeline Ridho Firmansyah Risdiana Izzaty Risdiana Izzaty Risdiana Izzaty Rizki Firmansyah Rizki Istighfariana Achmadi Rosa Ristawati Rosyadi, Julianda Rr. Herini Siti Aisyah S., Bryan Owen Sabdo Adiguno Safira Noor Ramadhanty Sahadewa, Anak Agung Gede Ananta Wijaya Sapta Aprilianto Sayyidatul Insiyah Sayyidatul Insiyah Septiningrum, Shintya Yulfa Serfiyani, Citi Rahmati Shevierra Danmadiyah Shevierra Danmadiyah Shintya Yulfa Shintya Yulfa Septiningrum Simamora, Yohanes Sogar Siti Latifah Sri Winarsi Stefania Arshanty Felicia Stefania Arshanty Felicia Sudirman Sudirman Sumardji Suparto Wijoyo Syifa Ramadhanti Syifa Ramadhanti Tambunan, Ezra Tanbun, Elma Putri Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa Thoriq Mulahela Tonic Tangkau Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti Ulfa Septian Dika Vincentius Sutanto Wahyu Purnomo Wibisono, Angelica Milano Aryani Wibisono, Angelica Milano Aryani Wibisono, Berardus Bilyarto Wibisono, Jeniffer Avrillya Wibowo, Widyanti Wicaksana, Pradnya Widyaningrum, Sigmawati Widyanti Wibowo Windy Agustin Windy Agustin Yohana Apriliani Christianta Silaen Yulida, Devi Yuni Lathifah Yunia Utami Indah Haloho