Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
9.314
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal LAW REFORM Yustisia Lentera Hukum JURNAL LITIGASI (e-Journal) Spektrum Hukum AL-Daulah Arena Hukum Veritas et Justitia Jurnal Hukum Novelty LAW REVIEW Jurnal IUS (Kajian Hukum dan Keadilan) Jurnal Hukum IUS QUIA IUSTUM PADJADJARAN Jurnal Ilmu Hukum (Journal of Law) Pembaharuan Hukum JURNAL MAHKAMAH Unram Law Review International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research Jurnal Selat Syntax Literate: Jurnal Ilmiah Indonesia Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Widya Yuridika Humani (Hukum dan Masyarakat Madani) Jurnal Hukum Bisnis Bonum Commune Substantive Justice International Journal of Law Lex Scientia Law Review Jambe Law Journal Syariah: Jurnal Hukum dan Pemikiran DE'RECHTSSTAAT International Journal of Supply Chain Management JURNAL ILMIAH LIVING LAW KERTHA WICAKSANA Unes Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Jurnal Ilmiah Penegakan Hukum DOKTRINA: JOURNAL OF LAW Jurnal Jatiswara Jurnal Hukum Volkgeist Negara Hukum: Membangun Hukum untuk Keadilan dan Kesejahteraan Jurnal Simbur Cahaya Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Supremasi Hukum: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Media Iuris University Of Bengkulu Law Journal Notaire International Journal of Economics, Business and Accounting Research (IJEBAR) Mulawarman Law Review JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW Jurnal Suara Hukum Majalah Hukum Nasional Budapest International Research and Critics Institute-Journal (BIRCI-Journal): Humanities and Social Sciences Jurnal Hukum Lex Generalis Journal of Judicial Review Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional Legislatif Jurnal Ketenagakerjaan Yuridika JIPRO : Journal Of Intellectual Property Volksgeist: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum dan Konstitusi Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) RechtIdee LamLaj Mizan: Journal of Islamic Law Jurnal Kajian Pembaruan Hukum Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum
Nugraha, Xavier
Faculty Of Law Of Airlangga University, Surabaya
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Physics Public Health Social Sciences Transportation Other

Published : 104 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 104 Documents
Search

 7   8   9   10   11 
Lien Rights: The Invisible Pillar Urgently Needed in Indonesia’s Construction Security System Regulation Adiwinata, Gianina Elizabeth; Simamora, Yohanes Sogar; Kurniawan, Faizal; Aristyawan, Patricia Anais; Nugraha, Xavier
Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 27 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v27i2.11939

Abstract

Indonesia’s construction sector faces acute payment risk, particularly for subcontractors and suppliers positioned downstream in multi-tier contractual chains. Unlike many common law jurisdictions that mitigate this risk through statutory construction lien rights, non-possessory security interests that attach to the improved aset, Indonesia lacks an equivalent construction-specific proprietary protection, leaving payment security largely dependent on contract remedies and general security devices. This article examines (i) how construction lien regimes function as project-specific security mechanisms in selected common law jurisdictions and (ii) the normative and functional gap created by their absence in Indonesia, along with feasible accommodation pathways. Employing doctrinal (normative) legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study analyzes representative lien frameworks in North Dakota, Texas, and Ontario. The analysis finds that, despite jurisdictional variations, lien regimes share a regulatory core: lien rights arise upon performance, are made transparent through notice/registration systems, operate under calibrated priority rules, and are enforceable against the project asset through structured procedures. By contrast, Indonesia’s principal security instruments, Mortgage Rights (Hak Tanggungan) and Fiduciary Security (Jaminan Fidusia), are structurally ill-suited to secure progressively embedded construction value and to protect parties lacking privity with owners. The article concludes that strengthening Indonesia’s construction security framework requires a construction-specific proprietary mechanism, preferably statutory recognition of construction lien rights with carefully designed registration, time limits, and priority rules to balance contributor protection with owner and financier certainty.
PENERAPAN ASAS-ASAS UMUM PEMERINTAHAN YANG BAIK DALAM PENYELENGGARAAN PELAYANAN PUBLIK DI LEMBAGA PERMASYARAKATAN Aris, Mohamad Syaiful; Tambunan, Ezra; Putri, Dita Elvia Kusuma; Nugraha, Xavier
LITIGASI Vol. 23 No. 2 (2022)
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Pasundan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.23969/litigasi.v23i2.5077

Abstract

Public service is a series of actions carried out in order to meet the service needs of each citizen. In the department of corrections, public service arrangements also hold an essential element in creating a quality environment. It is on the reason that prisoners as god's creatures are also entitled to proper service as is guaranteed by article 34 verses (3) of Constitution 1945. On the other hand, in implementing abovementioned, service in correctional service is not actually implemented properly. This is due to many factors, such as shortage of prison officers, overcrowded prison, and other factors.  Based on abovementioned, the author formulated 2 (two) legal problems: a) the prisoner's right to good public service under the Correctional Service Act; and b) AUPB applications upon service arrangements in the penitentiary. The method of research is legal research. It is concluded that: a) eventhough a convict has committed an offense, the state has to ensure he gets proper service during his time; b) Public service officers in prison should always refer its conduct to the General Principles of Good Governance such as impartiality, good service, and principle to not commit abuse of power. Keywords: Penitentiary, Public Services, AUPB.
Legal immunity and liability in emergency assistance: Rethinking the Good Samaritan Doctrine in Indonesia through comparative and international perspectives Faizal Kurniawan; Xavier Nugraha; Angelica Milano; Bryan Owen Soeprapto; Lorenzo Nieuwenburg
Jurnal Hukum Novelty Vol. 17 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : Universitas Ahmad Dahlan

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.26555/jhn.v17i1.30232

Abstract

Introduction to the Problem: The problem explored in this study is that the Indonesian legal system does not provide any legal protection for ‘Good Samaritan’ acting to aid others’ in grave danger. This legal vacuum might cause a shift in humans' good nature. Purpose/Study Objectives: The purpose of this study is to examine how other jurisdictions regulate Good Samaritan immunity in civil disputes, addressing the research gap in Indonesia where no protection exists, and how such frameworks may be adapted. Design/Methodology/Approach: Normative juridical research combining statute, conceptual, comparative, and case approaches across Indonesia, Canada, and China to map immunity/liability rules in emergency civil disputes and extract transferable principles relevant to international law debates on protecting life and enabling bystander aid. Findings: The study finds that implementing a Good Samaritan Doctrine in Indonesia addresses the current legal vacuum by providing immunity to individuals who render aid in emergencies. Comparatively, Canada grants civil immunity for Good Samaritans acting in good faith, while China’s Civil Code provides similar protection with limitations. These models demonstrate that clear immunity provisions can encourage voluntary assistance without exposing helpers to liability. In the Indonesian context, the idea of having legal immunity and liability for ‘Good Samaritans’ could be achieved in the short term through advocation clarifying judicial interpretation of Article 1354 of the Indonesian Civil Code, and in the long term through dedicated legislation establishing Good Samaritan protection.  Paper Type: Research Article
Kedudukan Akun Media Sosial Sebagai Warisan Digital Dalam Perspektif Hukum Perdata di Indonesia Devi Yulida; Anak Agung Gede Ananta Wijaya Sahadewa; Xavier Nugraha
Kertha Wicaksana Vol 18 No 2 (2024)
Publisher : Fakultas Hukum, Universitas Warmadewa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.22225/kw.18.2.2024.52-61

Abstract

Globalization, accompanied by advancements in science and technology, has increased the usage of social media in Indonesia. Currently, social media accounts serve not only as platforms for interaction but also as potential sources of significant economic value. Moreover, regulations concerning the inheritance of social media accounts remain unclear and vary across platforms. The research methodology employed utilizes the normative juridical method, incorporating conceptual and case approaches. This study involves analysis of laws, court decisions, and social media platform policies. The research findings indicate that an extensive interpretation of inheritance in civil law, by considering their economic value, encompasses social media accounts. However, the implementation of social media account inheritance encounters various obstacles, including inconsistent platform policies. Some platforms have facilitated account preservation as memorials, but clarity regarding access to content or account management is lacking. Concerns persist regarding legal protection for heirs concerning social media accounts as inheritance. In the context of Civil Law, clear legal protection is necessary to ensure that heirs' rights are fulfilled, especially in acquiring economic benefits from inherited social media accounts. Furthermore, this paper underscores the necessity for clearer regulations within Civil Law concerning the inheritance of social media accounts. Strong legal protection is required to ensure justice for heirs and facilitate the effective and efficient resolution of digital legacy.
The Francovich Principle as the Basis of State Responsibility for Laborer Loss Due to Company Bankruptcy Widyantoro, Agus; Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa; Nugraha, Xavier
Yustisia Vol 12, No 3: December 2023
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas Sebelas Maret

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.20961/yustisia.v12i3.79345

Abstract

The absence of legal certainty in the application of the pari passu pro rata parte principle in the distribution of bankrupt accounts in Indonesia has given rise to uncertainty regarding the protection of the rights of laborers whose employers or companies have faced bankruptcy. This article considers that Indonesia requires a set of formulations enabling the state to provide legal protection for the rights of laborers affected by employer or company bankruptcy. The article explores the feasibility of adopting the Francovich Principle in Indonesia, defining it as a principle holding the state accountable for the losses incurred by laborers due to company bankruptcies.  The  article  concludes  that  several  conditions must be met to apply the Francovich Principle, including the establishment of a guarantee institution, the obligation for financial contributions from companies, and the implementation of specific measures to prevent abuse. The state’s effort to adopt the Francovich Principle involves establishing a priority scale in drafting laws related to the Francovich Principle into the Priority National Legislation Program. Furthermore, the government needs to revitalize institutions related to the Francovich Principle within the national legal and regulatory system
Analisis Skuter Listrik Sebagai Kendaraan di Indonesia: Sebuah Tinjauan Hukum Normatif Xavier Nugraha; Luisa Srihandayani; Kexia Goutama
Simbur Cahaya VOLUME 27 NOMOR 2, DESEMBER 2020
Publisher : Universitas Sriwijaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.28946/sc.v27i2.1041

Abstract

Perkembangan kendaraan saat ini tidak hanya fokus pada pengembangan kendaraan yang efisien, namun juga fokus menciptakan kendaraan yang ramah lingkungan yang kemudian dikenal sebagai green vehicle. Salah satu contoh green vehicle adalah electronic scooter atau skuter listrik yang mulai bermunculan di Indonesia. Bersamaan dengan kemunculannya, posisi skuter listrik sebagai kendaraan menimbulkan pertanyaan di benak berbagai pihak yakni apakah skuter listrik termasuk dalam kategori kendaraan bermotor atau kendaraan tidak bermotor, sebab hal ini akan berimplikasi pada penentuan hak dan kewajiban bagi penggunanya. Tulisan ini akan membahas lebih lanjut kedudukan serta hak dan kewajiban skuter dengan menggunakan metode hukum normatif serta pendekatan perundang-undangan (statute approach) dan pendekatan konseptual (conceptual approach). Hasil analisis menunjukan bahwa berdasarkan penafsiran ekstensif dan sosiologis kedudukan dari skuter listrik adalah sebagai kendaraan tidak bermotor. Hal ini dengan melihat fakta bahwa meski tenaga listrik lebih sering digunakan, namun dalam keadaan tertentu seperti habisnya baterai dan kondisi jalan atau cuaca tak memungkinkan, skuter listrik membutuhkan tenaga manusia. Terkait dengan hak dan kewajiban bagi pengguna skuter listrik, saat ini ketentuan yuridis hanya mewajibkan penggunaan jalur khusus sehingga pengguna skuter listrik berhak mendapat jalur khusus tersebut untuk digunakan, meski di masa mendatang mungkin dibutuhkan beberapa hak dan kewajiban lainnya bagi pengguna skuter listrik agar lebih memenuhi standar keamanan bagi pengguna.
PENAL MEDIATION BY POLICE INSTITUTION IN HANDLING HATE SPEECH THROUGH ELECTRONIC MEDIA: A LEGAL EFFORTS TO RESOLVE WITH A RESTORATIVE JUSTICE APPROACH Toni Harmanto; Bagus Oktafian Abrianto; Xavier Nugraha
International Journal of Artificial Intelligence Research Vol 6, No 1.2 (2022)
Publisher : Universitas Dharma Wacana

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (196.696 KB) | DOI: 10.29099/ijair.v6i1.388

Abstract

In the era of the industrial revolution 4.0 which caused the information to be easily spread, it turned out to have a bad impact, which led to the birth of the post-truth era. The post-truth era is an era in which objective facts become blurred because of broad public opinion. This makes it easy to spread hooks and expressions of hatred in society. The high perpetrators of hoax distribution and expressions of hatred make a legal solution needed that not only focuses on the deterrent effect for the perpetrators but the recovery of the community in its original condition. To restore the community's condition to its original condition, a restorative justice approach is used, one of which is through mediation by the police. This article will discuss, firstly related to the concept of mediation of penalties by the police in Indonesia and secondly it will discuss the approach of mediation of penalties by the Indonesian police in the handling of criminal acts of hate speech in electronicmedia. This article is a legal article that uses a statute approach, conceptual approach, and case approach. Based on the analysis in this article, it was found first the police nowdasy have an authority to solve the problem with restorative justice secondly that the first approach that pollice need to use in handling hate speech is by mediating in order to realize restorative justice by police agencies in Indonesia.
A Chance to Defend Regional Heads in The Procedure of Regional Head Dismissal as A Manifestation of The Proportionality Principle Mohammad Syaiful Aris; Iqbal Fauzurrahman; Bagus Oktafian Abrianto; Xavier Nugraha; Stefania Arshanty Felicia
Jurnal Hukum dan Peradilan Vol 12 No 2 (2023)
Publisher : Pusat Strategi Kebijakan Hukum dan Peradilan Mahkamah Agung RI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.25216/jhp.12.2.2023.241-266

Abstract

The existence of regional autonomy in Indonesia is implemented through regional leaders who have the authority to run local government. When carrying out their duties, regional leaders are supervised by other state institutions as a form of checks and balances in government power. Hence, the procedure to dismiss regional leaders regulates to involve the Regional People's Representative Assembly, the Supreme Court, and the President through the Minister of Home Affairs as a form of right to dismiss. However, the existence of the proportionality principle in the procedure to dismiss regional leaders, through the right given to regional leaders to defend themselves, has yet to be regulated in the law. This article talks about two things: first, the procedure to dismiss regional leaders, and second, the legal consequences and the position of a chance to summon regional leaders to explain and defend themselves in the procedure to dismiss regional leaders. This article aims to find the importance of proportionality principles in the procedure to dismiss regional leaders. The method used in this article is legal research, with statutes, conceptual, and case approaches. The results of this research show that although the procedure to dismiss regional leaders has been regulated in law, applying the proportionality principle only exists in jurisprudences. Hence, an ius constituendum is needed to determine legal consequences and certainty regarding the procedure to dismiss regional leaders.
Lien Rights: The Invisible Pillar Urgently Needed in Indonesia’s Construction Security System Regulation Gianina Elizabeth Adiwinata; Yohanes Sogar Simamora; Faizal Kurniawan; Patricia Anais Aristyawan; Xavier Nugraha
Journal of Judicial Review Vol. 27 No. 2 (2025): December 2025
Publisher : Universitas Internasional Batam

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.37253/jjr.v27i2.11939

Abstract

Indonesia’s construction sector faces acute payment risk, particularly for subcontractors and suppliers positioned downstream in multi-tier contractual chains. Unlike many common law jurisdictions that mitigate this risk through statutory construction lien rights, non-possessory security interests that attach to the improved aset, Indonesia lacks an equivalent construction-specific proprietary protection, leaving payment security largely dependent on contract remedies and general security devices. This article examines (i) how construction lien regimes function as project-specific security mechanisms in selected common law jurisdictions and (ii) the normative and functional gap created by their absence in Indonesia, along with feasible accommodation pathways. Employing doctrinal (normative) legal research using statutory, conceptual, and comparative approaches, the study analyzes representative lien frameworks in North Dakota, Texas, and Ontario. The analysis finds that, despite jurisdictional variations, lien regimes share a regulatory core: lien rights arise upon performance, are made transparent through notice/registration systems, operate under calibrated priority rules, and are enforceable against the project asset through structured procedures. By contrast, Indonesia’s principal security instruments, Mortgage Rights (Hak Tanggungan) and Fiduciary Security (Jaminan Fidusia), are structurally ill-suited to secure progressively embedded construction value and to protect parties lacking privity with owners. The article concludes that strengthening Indonesia’s construction security framework requires a construction-specific proprietary mechanism, preferably statutory recognition of construction lien rights with carefully designed registration, time limits, and priority rules to balance contributor protection with owner and financier certainty.
Legal Protection of Trade Secrets over the Potential Disposal of Trade Secrets Under the Re-Engineering Precautions Faizal Kurniawan; Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman; Xavier Nugraha
Jurnal Ilmiah Kebijakan Hukum Vol 16 No 2 (2022): Edisi Juli
Publisher : Badan Strategi Kebijakan Hukum

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30641/kebijakan.2022.V16.267-282

Abstract

The Indonesian Trade Secrets Law Number 30/2000 (ITS Law) postulates exemptions for acts that are not considered infringements to protect trade secrets. One of them is the reverse engineering of other people's trade secrets. The problem is that the ITS Law does not limit the extent to which reverse engineering can be justified. The absence of these limitations also allows attempts to disclose trade secrets under the pretext of reverse engineering. This problem ultimately results in the absence of legal certainty for the protection against trade secret disclosure, which is the sole responsibility of the trade secret owner. This article aims to re-analyze the protection provided by the ITS Law and examine the extent to which the limitations on reverse engineering can be justified in the ITS Law. This article used normative juridical research methods combined with statutory, conceptual, and case approaches. It revealed a paradox in the protection of trade secrets against the possibility of trade secret disclosure. This article concluded that changes are necessary to the ITS Law, specifically by adjusting to the basic principles of IPR protection, limiting the extent to which the reverse engineering of other people's trade secrets can be justified, and adding a "Good Faith" clause in performing reverse engineering actions.
Co-Authors Adelina, Alya Adiwinata, Gianina Elizabeth Agus Widyantoro Ahmad Ardhiansyah Ahmad Ardhiansyah Ahmad Muzakki Alam Subuh Fernando Aldi, Jihan Anjania Alfredo, Juan Maulana Alip Pamungkas Alip Pamungkas Raharjo Alya Adelina Alya Anira Amilah Fadhlina Angelia, Alissa Angelica Milano Angelica Novia Walasondakh Ani Munirah Mohamad Answendy, Putri Riska Ardhana Christian Noventri Ardhana Christian Noventri Arinni Dewi Ambarningrum Aris, Mohamad Syaiful Aristyawan, Patricia Anais Arjuna, Gio Atiqoh Farhan Maulani Ave Maria Frisa K Ave Maria Frisa Katherina Bagus Oktafian Abrianto Bryan Owen Soeprapto Budi, Kukuh Pramono Budianto, Anneta Cornelia Christina Ella Yonatan Citi Rahmati Serfiyani Dania Shofi Maziyah Daniel Julian Tangkau Danmadiyah, Shevierra Darmawan, Monica Caecilia Desak Ayu Gangga Sitha Dewi Dinda Ajeng Puspanita Dinda Silviana Putri Dinda, Giovanni Dita Elvia Kusuma Putri Dwiana Martanto Eka Widi Astuti Eko Budisusanto Elma Putri Tanbun Emely Laurentius, Melva Enrick, Michael Ezra Tambunan Faizal Kurniawan Farid Ibrahim Fariz Rachman Iqbal Febrian Dirgantara Felany, Patricia Inge Felicia, Stefania Arshanty Fernando, Alam Subuh Firmansyah, Ridho Fuady, Muhammad Ikram Nur Ghansham Anand Gianina Elizabeth Adiwinata Gio Arjuna Putra Gio Arjuna Putra Giovanni Dinda Cahyawati Grace Sharon Gwyneth Eugenia Keisya Howard Hadiwidjayanti, Rizky Haidar Adam Hartono, Julienna Heru Irianto Heru Irianto Insiyah, Sayyidatul Iqbal Fauzurrahman Iqbal, Fariz Rachman Izzah Khalif Raihan Abidin Izzaty, Risdiana Izzaty, Risdiana Jeniffer Avrillya Wibisono Jeniffer Avrillya Wibisono Jennifer Moniq Sutanto John Eno Prasito Putra Joni Eko Waluyo Juan Maulana Alfedo Julienna Hartono Julienna Hartono Kadek Anda Gangga Putri Kartika Widya Utama Kexia Goutama Kosuma, Indah Permatasari Krisna Angela Krisna Darari Hamonangan Putra Krisna Murti Kusuma Wardani Raharjo Kusuma Wardani Raharjo Lorenzo Nieuwenburg Luisa Srihandayani Luisa Srihandayani M Imron Rosyadi M. Adib Akmal Hamdi M. Syaiful Aris Marchethy Riwani Diaz Marzul Afiyanto Mas Rahmah, Mas Maulia Madina Melati Ayu Pusparani Melva Emely Laurentius Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman Moch. Marsa Taufiqurrohman Mohamad, Ani Munirah Mohammad Syaiful Aris Muhammad Mashuri Muhammad Rizky Febrianto Nasri Nadya Eka Amalia Al’Azza Natasha Caecilia Lisanggraeni Rositaputri Nathanael Grady Nina Amelia Novita Sari Nina Amelia Novita Sari Patricia Anais Aristyawan Patricia Inge Felany Patricia Inge Felany Peter Jeremiah Setiawan Peter Jeremiah Setiawan Pradnya Wicaksana Prawitra Thalib Prihandono, Yoga Purnamawadita, Baiq Elma Putri Saraswati Putri, Annida Aqiila Putri, Annida Aqiila Putri, Dita Elvia Kusuma Putri, Dita Elvia Kusuma Qona’aha Noor Maajid Rahmat , Nur Ezan Rahmat, Nur Ezan Ramadhan, Febriansyah Ramadhanti, Syifa Regita Nathalia, Angeline Ridho Firmansyah Risdiana Izzaty Risdiana Izzaty Risdiana Izzaty Rizki Firmansyah Rizki Istighfariana Achmadi Rosa Ristawati Rosyadi, Julianda Rr. Herini Siti Aisyah S., Bryan Owen Sabdo Adiguno Safira Noor Ramadhanty Sapta Aprilianto Sayyidatul Insiyah Sayyidatul Insiyah Septiningrum, Shintya Yulfa Serfiyani, Citi Rahmati Shevierra Danmadiyah Shevierra Danmadiyah Shintya Yulfa Shintya Yulfa Septiningrum Sigmawati Widyaningrum Simamora, Yohanes Sogar Siti Latifah Sri Winarsi Stefania Arshanty Felicia Stefania Arshanty Felicia Sudirman Sudirman Sumardji Suparto Wijoyo Syifa Ramadhanti Syifa Ramadhanti Tambunan, Ezra Tanbun, Elma Putri Taufiqurrohman, Moch. Marsa Thoriq Mulahela Toni Harmanto Tonic Tangkau Trisadini Prasastinah Usanti Ulfa Septian Dika Vincentius Sutanto Wahyu Purnomo Wibisono, Angelica Milano Aryani Wibisono, Angelica Milano Aryani Wibisono, Berardus Bilyarto Wibisono, Jeniffer Avrillya Wibowo, Widyanti Wicaksana, Pradnya Widyanti Wibowo Wijaya Sahadewa, Anak Agung Gede Ananta Windy Agustin Windy Agustin Yoga Prihandono Yohana Apriliani Christianta Silaen Yohanes Sogar Simamora Yulida, Devi Yuni Lathifah Yunia Utami Indah Haloho