Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Written Essay Assessment of Philosophical Reasoning in Game-Based Science Teacher Education: Ontological, Epistemological, and Axiological Profiles of Pre-Service Teachers Rifda Nur Hikmahwati Arif; Banu Kisworo; Yulianti Yusal
BIOCHEPHY: Journal of Science Education Vol. 6 No. 1 (2026)
Publisher : MO.RI Publishing

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.52562/biochephy.v6i1.1985

Abstract

Philosophy of Science is a key component of science teacher education because it helps prospective teachers understand the nature of scientific knowledge, its justification, and its educational value. This descriptive qualitative study analyzed essay responses from 78 pre-service science teachers at Makassar State University who participated in a multiplatform game-based Philosophy of Science course. Four essay questions assessed understanding of ontology, epistemology, axiology, and the integration of these three dimensions within junior secondary science education. Data were examined through qualitative content analysis supported by codebook development, repeated reading, peer review, negative-case analysis, and descriptive quantification. Results indicated strong understanding of ontological concepts (95.0% valid responses) and axiological reasoning (96.3%), while epistemological understanding was less developed (59.6%). Integrating the three philosophical dimensions proved most challenging, with only 53.8% valid responses and 40.5% demonstrating complete synthesis. Students primarily recommended debate-based games (31.3%), reflecting an emphasis on critical thinking. These findings provide a framework for assessing philosophical reasoning through essays in game-based science teacher education.
Analisis Persepsi Mahasiswa Calon Guru IPA Terhadap Metode Praktikum Sederhana pada Perkuliahan Zat dan Energi Syarful Annam; Rifda Nur Hikmahwati Arif; Ahmad Zuhudy Bahtiar; Amalia Rahmadani; Nur Rahmah Sangkala
Journal of Classroom Action Research Vol. 8 No. 2 (2026): May 2026
Publisher : Program Studi Magister Pendidikan IPA, Universitas Mataram

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.29303/jcar.v8i2.14857

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis persepsi mahasiswa terhadap penerapan metode praktikum sederhana pada perkuliahan zat dan energi. Penelitian menggunakan pendekatan kuantitatif dengan metode survei deskriptif. Subjek penelitian adalah mahasiswa program studi pendidikan IPA yang telah mengikuti kegiatan praktikum sederhana, dengan jumlah responden sebanyak 93 orang. Instrumen penelitian berupa angket skala Likert yang terdiri dari 20 pernyataan yang mencakup aspek pemahaman konsep, ketertarikan & motivasi belajar, keterampilan proses sains, efektivitas metode praktikum, dan aspek evaluasi pembelajaran. Data dianalisis menggunakan statistik deskriptif berupa nilai rata-rata dan persentase. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa persepsi mahasiswa terhadap metode praktikum sederhana berada pada kategori positif dengan nilai rata-rata sebesar 4,03 dengan indikator pemahaman konsep tertinggi, keterampilan proses sains terendah. Praktikum sederhana terbukti efektif dalam meningkatkan pemahaman konsep dan keterlibatan mahasiswa dalam pembelajaran. Namun demikian, pengembangan keterampilan proses sains belum optimal, serta terdapat kendala pada aspek waktu dan frekuensi pelaksanaan praktikum. Kesimpulan penelitian ini menunjukkan bahwa metode praktikum sederhana memiliki potensi sebagai alternatif pembelajaran yang efektif, khususnya dalam kondisi keterbatasan fasilitas laboratorium. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pengembangan desain praktikum yang lebih sistematis dan berbasis inquiry untuk meningkatkan kualitas pembelajaran sains.
Literature Review: Penerapan Project-Based Learning terhadap Pembelajaran Inovatif IPA Nurfitra Yanto; Rifda Nur Hikmahwati Arif; Sakinah Zubair
Lambda: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA dan Aplikasinya Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): Lambda : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan MIPA dan Aplikasinya
Publisher : Lembaga Bale Literasi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58218/lambda.v5i2.1486

Abstract

Twenty-first century science education demands instructional approaches that simultaneously develop conceptual understanding and applied skills. This study aims to analyze the implementation of Project-Based Learning (PjBL) in science education through a systematic literature review. The research method involved rigorous analysis of 20 peer-reviewed articles published between 2017 and 2024, selected through strict inclusion and exclusion criteria. The analysis revealed three key findings: (1) PjBL effectively enhances student engagement and conceptual understanding in science learning; (2) the model significantly contributes to the development of 21st-century skills, particularly critical thinking, collaboration, and scientific literacy; (3) PjBL demonstrates high compatibility with the investigative and contextual nature of science education. The study concludes that PjBL represents an innovative and effective approach for improving science education quality across various educational levels. These findings recommend the development of more operational PjBL implementation guidelines to better support educators in optimally applying this model.
Analysis of Students’ Ability to Develop Critical Thinking Skills Assessment Instruments Using Discussion and Lecture-Based Learning Methods Rifda Nur Hikmahwati Arif; Ramlawati; Nur Indah Sari; Andi Tri Riski Ramadani
International Journal of Educational Practice and Policy Vol. 4 No. 1 (2026): March-April 2026
Publisher : PT. Global Research Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66314/ijepp.v4i1.354

Abstract

Critical thinking skills are essential competencies in 21st-century education because they support students in analyzing information, evaluating arguments, and making reasoned decisions. In science education, these skills are important not only for understanding scientific concepts but also for solving complex problems and interpreting evidence. However, developing valid and reliable assessment instruments for measuring critical thinking remains a challenge, especially for pre-service teachers. This study aims to analyze the ability of Science Education students to develop critical thinking assessment instruments and to compare the effectiveness of three frameworks: Facione, Watson–Glaser Critical Thinking Appraisal (WGCTA), and Ennis. The research employed a quantitative approach using a descriptive–comparative design involving 27 students enrolled in an assessment instrument development course. Data were collected through the evaluation of instruments developed by students using a validated rubric and analyzed using descriptive and inferential statistical techniques. The results indicate that students demonstrated good ability in developing critical thinking assessment instruments. The average scores were 70.45 for Facione, 82 for WGCTA, and 78.18 for Ennis. The analysis showed no significant difference among the three frameworks, indicating comparable effectiveness in supporting students’ ability to develop critical thinking assessment instruments.