Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.741
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Masalah-Masalah Hukum Lentera Hukum Pembaharuan Hukum Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies Integritas: Jurnal Antikorupsi Morality :Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Legal Standing : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jambura Law Review Jurnal Ilmiah Galuh Justisi Jurnal Yudisial Jurisprudensi: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah, Perundang-undangan, Ekonomi Islam JURNAL ILMIAH ADVOKASI JUSTISI Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam JPIn : Jurnal Pendidik Indonesia RIO LAW JURNAL International Journal of Law Society Services Reformasi Hukum Journal of Scientific Research, Education, and Technology Protection: Journal Of Land And Environmental Law Jurnal Hukum Caraka Justitia Journal of Constitutional Law Society (JCLS) Socius: Social Sciences Research Journal SASI Pandecta : Jurnal Penelitian Ilmu Hukum (Research Law Journal) Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security PUSKAPSI Law Review
Saragih, Geofani Milthree
Unknown Affiliation
Religion Arts Humanities Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Social Sciences Other

Published : 34 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 34 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4 
Peran Hukum Progresif dalam Menyelesaikan Konflik Pidana Masyarakat: Tantangan dan Solusi Hukum Berkeadilan Yusuf DM, Mohd.; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Mustika, Dodi; Hidayat, Fadler; Wirawan L., R. Dicky; Anggraini, Rita
Legalite : Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam Vol 10 No 2 (2025): Legalite: Jurnal Perundang Undangan dan Hukum Pidana Islam
Publisher : IAIN Langsa

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32505/legalite.v10i2.10681

Abstract

This condition gives rise to various problems, particularly in resolving criminal conflicts involving vulnerable groups and local communities. This study aims to analyze the role of progressive law in resolving community criminal conflicts, as well as to identify the challenges and equitable legal solutions offered through this approach. The research employs a qualitative library-based methodology by analyzing scholarly literature, statutory regulations, and academic works relevant to progressive law and criminal conflict resolution. The findings indicate that progressive law is capable of providing more humane and contextual solutions through the application of restorative justice, penal mediation, and community-based approaches. Nevertheless, its implementation still faces structural, cultural, and institutional obstacles. Therefore, a paradigm shift in law enforcement and strengthened commitment from all stakeholders are required so that progressive law can function optimally in realizing sustainable justice.
DINAMIKA KONFLIK AGRARIA DALAM PENYELESAIAN SENGKETA LAHAN: ANALISIS SOSIOLOGI HUKUM TERHADAP RELASI NEGARA, KORPORASI, DAN MASYARAKAT Yusuf DM, Mohd.; Fadhli, M.; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Santoso, Budi; Mulyono, Joko Dwi; Putra, Ari Armanda; Warianti, Khairunisak; Arifa, Atika Putri
Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi Vol 13, No 4 (2025): Jurnal Ilmiah Advokasi
Publisher : Universitas Labuhanbatu

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36987/jiad.v13i4.6719

Abstract

This study aims to analyze the dynamics of agrarian conflicts in Indonesia using a sociological perspective on law, particularly in the context of land dispute resolution. This study uses a socio-legal approach by combining normative analysis of agrarian legislation and conceptual studies of legal sociology to understand the interaction between law, social structures, and power relations in the practice of land dispute resolution. The results show that the existence of agrarian regulations has not been fully able to realize substantive justice because their implementation is often influenced by social inequality, the dominance of economic interests, and the weak bargaining position of the community, especially farmers and marginalized groups. In practice, the law not only functions as a normative instrument but also reflects the configuration of power at work in society. Therefore, the resolution of agrarian conflicts requires an approach that is not merely legal-formal, but also sensitive to the social context, distributive justice, and the protection of land rights in a sustainable manner. Keywords: Agrarian Conflict; Sociology of Law; Land Disputes; Social Justice
Dynamics of Anti-Terrorism Regulation: A Comparative Study Between Indonesia, Malaysia and the United States: Dinamika Regulasi Anti-Terorisme: Studi Perbandingan Antara Indonesia, Malaysia, dan Amerika Serikat Anang Hendri Prayogo; Saragih, Geofani Milthree; Erdianto Effendi; Andi Hakim Lubis; Yuliana Yuliana
Indonesian Journal of Counter Terrorism and National Security Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): July-December, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/ijctns.v4i2.25125

Abstract

This paper examines the dynamics of anti-terrorism regulations in Indonesia, Malaysia and the United States by comparing the legal frameworks and law enforcement mechanisms in each country. legal frameworks and law enforcement mechanisms that apply in each country. The purpose of this research is to analyse how each country shapes its anti-terrorism law as a response to national threats, while at the same time maintaining a balance of as a response to national threats, while at the same time maintaining the balance between state security and human rights protection. The main issues discussed include differences in legal approach, scope of state authority in counter-terrorism operations, as well as monitoring mechanism to prevent authority in counter-terrorism operations, as well as monitoring mechanism to prevent abuse of authority. abuse of authority. The method used is juridical method used is normative-comparative juridical by analysing statutory instruments, government policies, and institutional practices in the three countries. The results The results show that Indonesia emphasises procedural guarantees in its anti-terrorism law, Malaysia maintains a preventive detention model rooted in historical security doctrine. rooted in historical security doctrine, while the United States applies a layered a layered approach backed by extensive intelligence powers and judicial oversight. judicial oversight. In conclusion, although all three countries prioritise national security, their approaches reflect different security, their approaches reflect different legal traditions and political contexts. political context. Therefore, a balanced regulatory model should take into account effectiveness, constitutional accountability and protection of fundamental rights.
Overcriminalization dalam Sistem Hukum Pidana Indonesia: Tantangan terhadap Prinsip Konstitusionalitas dan Ideologi Pancasila Saragih, Geofani Milthree; M.O.Saut Hamonangan Turnip; Ariska Cesar Divian Candra Kusuma; Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara
PUSKAPSI Law Review Vol. 5 No. 2 (2025): PUSKAPSI Law Review
Publisher : PUSKAPSI

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.19184/puskapsi.v5i2.60001

Abstract

Fenomena overcriminalization dalam sistem hukum pidana Indonesia semakin menonjol seiring dengan berkembangnya regulasi yang cenderung menempatkan hukum pidana sebagai instrumen utama penyelesaian masalah sosial. Kondisi ini menimbulkan problematika serius karena melahirkan inflasi kriminalisasi, mempersempit ruang kebebasan individu, serta berpotensi bertentangan dengan prinsip-prinsip konstitusional yang dijamin dalam UUD 1945, terutama mengenai hak asasi manusia dan asas legalitas. Selain itu, penggunaan hukum pidana yang berlebihan kerap mengabaikan nilai-nilai dasar Pancasila sebagai ideologi bangsa yang menekankan keseimbangan antara keadilan, kemanusiaan, dan kemaslahatan sosial. Kajian ini bertujuan untuk mengkaji secara kritis implikasi overcriminalization terhadap prinsip konstitusionalitas dan Pancasila, serta menawarkan alternatif pendekatan dalam perumusan kebijakan pidana yang lebih proporsional. Metodologi yang digunakan adalah penelitian hukum normatif dengan pendekatan konseptual, perundang-undangan, dan komparatif, melalui analisis literatur, doktrin hukum, serta putusan pengadilan relevan. Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa overcriminalization berpotensi mengikis jaminan konstitusional warga negara, melemahkan legitimasi hukum, dan bertentangan dengan semangat keadilan sosial yang menjadi pilar utama Pancasila. Oleh karena itu, diperlukan pembatasan yang tegas dalam penggunaan instrumen pidana dengan mengedepankan prinsip ultimum remedium, rasionalisasi peraturan perundang-undangan, serta penguatan nilai-nilai Pancasila dalam kebijakan kriminal agar hukum pidana tetap selaras dengan cita hukum Indonesia.
Co-Authors Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara Afrijon, Emi Amelia, Risky Anang Hendri Prayogo Andi Hakim Lubis Arifa, Atika Putri Ariska Cesar Divian Candra Kusuma Aritonang, William Suryadi Ganda Tuah Berson, Hendri Dessy Artina Dewi, Elya Kusuma DM, Mohd. Yusuf Dwi Budi Santoso Edy Setyawan Eka N.A.M Sihombing, Eka N.A.M Erdianto Effendi Fadhli, M. Fahrizal S.Siagian Fatmawati, Fatmawati Fauzan Ghafur Firman Firman Firouzfar, Saied Gaol, Selamat Lumban Ginting, Nabila Marsiadetama Gurning, Rijen Handoko, Tito Hasgar A.S., A. Muhammad Hidayat, Fadler Hidayat, Freddy Hilman, Anton Indana Zulfah Ishwara , Ade Sathya Sanathana Ishwara, Ade Sathya Sanathana Ismandianto Ivory, Jared Junesti, Nadia L., Rainly Ledy Diana M.O.Saut Hamonangan Turnip Mexsasai Indra Mochammad Imron Awalludin Mohamad Hidayat Muhtar Mohd. Yusuf DM Mulyono, Joko Dwi Mustika, Dodi Muthia, Arini Azka Nasution, Junisyah Nasution, Mirza NIM. A1011141008, YULIANA Nugroho, Aziz Widhi Pangaribuan, Roland Latarsa Pasaribu, Davin Hansel Putra Utama, Andi Wahyu Putra, Ari Armanda Putra, Rengga Kusuma Razak, Askari Rita Anggraini Rivera, Kevin M. Salahuddin Salahuddin Sanathana Ishwara, Ade Sathya Setiawan, Feri Sikumbang, Yudhia Perdana Silaban, Helen Mutiara Sitompul, Hasran Irawadi Suaka, Mardhatillah Sugianto Sugianto Suherman, Jajang Sukrizal, Sukrizal Sulastri Sulastri Supriyadi A Arief Tanto Lailam Tarmudi Tarmudi, Tarmudi Tiraputri, Adi Wardioso, Abdau Warianti, Khairunisak Wasiska, Asti Widagdo, Gatot Subroto Wirawan L., R. Dicky Yati Sharfina Desiandri Yusuf DM, Mohd. Zean Via Aulia Hakim ZULFAH, INDANA