Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.216
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal IPTEK Journal of Proceedings Series DiH : Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Jurnal Cita Hukum Mimbar Keadilan Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum LEGALITY Jurnal Wawasan Yuridika Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Pena Justisia: Media Komunikasi dan Kajian Hukum Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL Jurnal Inovasi Penelitian Jurnal Rechts Vinding : Media Pembinaan Hukum Nasional COURT REVIEW: Jurnal Penelitian Hukum Voice Justisia : Jurnal Hukum dan Keadilan Bureaucracy Journal : Indonesia Journal of Law and Social-Political Governance Al-Khidmah Jurnal Pengabdian Masyarakat Journal Evidence Of Law Ius Positum: Journal of Journal Of Law Theory And Law Enforcement SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Journal of Artificial Intelligence and Digital Business Innovative: Journal Of Social Science Research Madani: Multidisciplinary Scientific Journal Baileo: Jurnal Sosial Humaniora SEIKAT: Jurnal Ilmu Sosial, Politik dan Hukum Journal of Law and Legal Reform Lex Scientia Law Review
Syofyan Hadi
Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Civil Engineering, Building, Construction & Architecture Computer Science & IT Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Environmental Science Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Medicine & Pharmacology Physics Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 54 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 54 Documents
Search

 2   3   4   5   6 
Theory Analysis of Justice Against Good-faith Buyers in Freedom of Contract Miarsa, Fajar Rachmad Dwi; Nasution, Krisnadi; Prasetyawati, Endang; Hadi, Syofyan
IUS POSITUM: Journal of Law Theory and Law Enforcement Vol. 1 Issue 4 (2022)
Publisher : jfpublisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56943/jlte.v1i4.197

Abstract

The Abuse of circumstances can occur when one of the parties has advantages in economic, psychological, and physical fields. The cases regarding the abuse of circumstances in Indonesia is often occur, but the law in Indonesia has not regulated this matter and is only based on jurisprudence. The case that often occurs is one of the parties who has weak economy in dependence/need position, then they forced to voluntary accept the clauses or promises made by monopolized party (bargaining power) in order to get the things needed (achievements), although the agreement can be detrimental to them. This research uses normative legal research which is also called doctrinal legal research. Normative legal research is legal research conducted by examining library materials or secondary legal data. Normative legal research is also called literature law research. The results of this research are good faith buyers who prioritize the main principle, no harm others and based on the principle of propriety as stated by Aristotle and Adam Smith.
Upholding the Rights of Persons with Disabilities Through the Difference Principle Shodikin, Miftakhul; Hadi, Syofyan
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 18 No. 1 (2025): Februari 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v18i1.12135

Abstract

The right to work is a right for every citizen to earn a decent living for humanity. However, injustice is still often felt by people with disabilities who often face challenges in accessing this right. The difference principle asserts that inequality is only acceptable if it provides the greatest benefit to the most disadvantaged. This principle is an appropriate analytical tool to evaluate how employment policies in Indonesia have succeeded in minimizing the inequalities faced by persons with disabilities. Therefore, this research aims to explain the difference principle prioritizes the well-being of those who are most disadvantaged or marginalized. This study aims to analyze the legal issues through a normative legal lens, incorporating both statutory and conceptual analysis. Through normative analysis and deductive reasoning, the result of this research is that the regulation of the right to work for persons with disabilities is not yet optimal in accordance with the difference principle. Such as special quota policies that are not accompanied by strict sanctions, training, and job fairs that are still general and have yet to fully meet the unique requirements of individuals with disabilities. The inclusive recruitment process, which should be a must, is a phrase in the article that regulates the possibility (optional) instead of an obligation (mandatory). Meanwhile, the limited authority of the Disability Service Unit (ULD) in the employment sector and the weak institutional structure of the National Commission on Disability (KND), which is far from independent, include the barriers that individuals with disabilities encounter in accessing their right to employment.
The Authority of Regency/City Governments in Control of Alcoholic Beverage Sales Hadi, Syofyan
DiH: Jurnal Ilmu Hukum Volume 21 Nomor 1 Februari 2025
Publisher : Doctor of Law Study Program Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/dih.v0i0.11508

Abstract

The purpose of this research is to analyze the authority of the Regency/City Government in controlling the sale of alcoholic beverages. This research is a normative legal research using a statutory approach and a conceptual approach. Primary legal materials were collected by inventorying and categorizing laws and regulations, while secondary legal materials were collected through literature studies. Legal materials were analyzed using normative analysis. The results of the study found that the Regency/City Government is given attribution authority to control the sale of alcoholic beverages in the form of (1) Authority to provide SIUP-MB class B and C for retailers and direct sellers of drinks on the spot and (2) Authority to determine certain places that are permitted or restricted or prohibited from selling and distributing alcoholic beverages in accordance with regional characteristics in accordance with the provisions of Article 12 paragraph (3) of Law No. 23 of 2024 and its Attachments, Article 7 of Presidential Regulation No. 74 of 2013, and Article 28 of Minister of Trade Regulation No. 20 of 2014. To implement this authority, the Regency/City Government needs to form Regional Regulations and Regional Head Regulations to provide legal certainty for the implementation of alcoholic beverage sales businesses and legal protection for the community in the region
Kekuatan Hukum Putusan Dewan Kehormatan Penyelenggara Pemilu terhadap Penetapan Calon Presiden dan Wakil Presiden Dananjaya, Adhitya Arum; Hadi, Syofyan
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 1 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (April)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i1.1052

Abstract

This research discusses the legal strength of the decision of the Election Organizer Honorary Council (DKPP) regarding the determination of presidential and vice presidential candidates by the General Election Commission (KPU). DKPP is an institution tasked with enforcing the code of ethics for election organizers by issuing final and binding decisions. However, this "final and binding" nature is often questioned in the context of whether DKPP decisions are equivalent to decisions of formal judicial institutions. This research highlights the legal strength of DKPP decisions in the context of determining presidential and vice presidential candidates, especially in cases of violations of the code of ethics by the KPU. Through normative research methods that examine statutory regulations and juridical analysis, this research finds that although DKPP decisions are binding for election management institutions such as the KPU and Bawaslu, these decisions do not have permanent legal force like formal judicial decisions and can become the object of a lawsuit in court. State Administration (PTUN). The research results show that although the DKPP decision is final and binding on the relevant agencies, it is limited in nature as part of internal supervision and can become the object of a lawsuit in the state administrative court. This confirms that the DKPP does not have the same legal power as formal justice, even though its decisions must be implemented by the parties involved in holding elections.
USE OF THE E-VOTING SYSTEM TO MAKE IT HAPPEN DEMOCRATIC ELECTIONS Fawwaz Iqbal Rahmanto; Syofyan Hadi
SOSIOEDUKASI Vol 13 No 2 (2024): SOSIOEDUKASI : JURNAL ILMIAH ILMU PENDIDIKAN DAN SOSIAL
Publisher : Fakultas Keguruan Dan Ilmu Pendidikan Universaitas PGRI Banyuwangi

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.36526/sosioedukasi.v13i2.4370

Abstract

Democratic elections are an essential element in a sovereign government system, where the voting rights of every individual are valued, and the selection process is conducted in a fair, transparent, and efficient manner. To enhance the quality and efficiency of elections, e-voting technology has been introduced as an alternative to traditional voting methods. This study discusses the use of e-voting systems to achieve more democratic elections, focusing on aspects of security, transparency, accessibility, and efficiency. The results of the study show that e-voting has significant potential to increase voter participation, reduce operational costs, and expedite the vote-counting process. However, challenges related to data security, system integrity, and resistance to technological change must be addressed to ensure successful implementation. Overcoming these challenges requires robust cybersecurity measures, rigorous testing, and comprehensive voter education. With proper oversight and careful adoption of technology, e-voting can become an effective solution to support a more democratic process. Additionally, collaboration between government bodies, technology providers, and civil society is crucial to build trust and ensure the system's credibility. This study concludes that while e-voting offers numerous advantages, it is imperative to implement comprehensive measures to mitigate risks and maintain the integrity of the electoral process, ultimately fostering a more inclusive and participatory democracy.
KEWAJIBAN NEGARA DALAM MEMBERIKAN PERLINDUNGAN HUKUM TERHADAP PEKERJA MIGRAN INDONESIA NON PROSEDURAL DALAM PERSPEKTIF HAM Sutra, Heni; Hadi, Syofyan
Jurnal Sosial Humaniora Sigli Vol 6, No 2 (2023): Desember 2023
Publisher : Universitas Jabal Ghafur

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.47647/jsh.v6i2.1672

Abstract

Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk menganalisis mengenai kewajiban Negara dalam memberikan perlindungan hukum kepada Pekerja Migran Indonesia Non Prosedural. Penelitian ini adalah penelitian hukum normatif, Pendekatan yang digunakan dalam penelitian ini terdiri dari Pendekatan Undang – Undang dan Pendekatan konseptual. Jenis dan Sumber Bahan Hukum yang digunakan ialah bahan hukum primer, bahan hukum sekuder dan bahan nonhukum. Hasil penelitian ini adalah bahwa Negara berkewajiban untuk memberikan perlindungan hukum terhadap pekerja migran Indonesia non prosedural didasarkan pada prinsip-prinsip universal HAM yang mengakui dan melindungi hak-hak dasar setiap individu, tanpa memandang status migrasi mereka. Selain itu, ada hak-hak asasi yang melekat pada diri pekerja migran Indonesia non prosedural tersebut yang juga diatur dalam instrument hukum HAM Nasional dan Internasional.Kata Kunci :     Perlindungan hukum, PMI Non Prosedural, HAM
Legal Reform of the Division of Authority for Mining Affairs: Balance between Regional Autonomy and National Interests Hadi, Syofyan; Fikri, Sultoni; Riqiey, Baharuddin; Rustambekov, Islambek
Journal of Law and Legal Reform Vol. 6 No. 3 (2025): July, 2025
Publisher : Universitas Negeri Semarang

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.15294/jllr.v6i3.20947

Abstract

This study aims to analyze and find the legal reform of the division of authority for mineral and coal mining affairs between the Central Government and Regional Governments, so that a regulatory model can balance the principle of regional autonomy and national interests. This research is a normative legal research with a statute, conceptual, and case approach. This study found that after Law No. 3 of 2020 and Law No. 6 of 2023, there was a centralization of mineral and coal mining affairs, which led to the creation of injustice and legal uncertainty for autonomous regions. These regulations, from the perspective of balancing the principle of regional autonomy and the principle of national interests, need to be reformed trough the division of mineral and mining affairs between the Central Government and the autonomous regions based on the principle of justice by using the principles of externality, accountability, and efficiency. Meanwhile, the Central Government can use the principle of national strategic interests for several mineral and coal mining sub-affairs. In Addition, the delegation authority model should be removed and Article 18 paragraph (5) of the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia needs to be amended, so that the division of government affairs provides justice and legal certainty for autonomous regions.
Reformulasi Konsep Pengampuan Melalui Penguatan Pengawasan oleh Pengampu Pengawas Fouziah, Resti; Hadi, Syofyan
Journal Evidence Of Law Vol. 4 No. 2 (2025): Journal Evidence Of Law (Agustus)
Publisher : CV. Era Digital Nusantara

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59066/jel.v4i2.1301

Abstract

The concept of guardianship in the Civil Code (KUH Perdata) has so far contained a discriminatory approach towards people with mental and/or intellectual disabilities. This is reflected in the use of terms such as "stupid", "brain disease", and "dark eyes", as well as the provisions of Article 433 of the Civil Code which require the determination of guardianship without considering individual capacity. Constitutional Court Decision Number 93/PUU-XX/2022 is present as a constitutional correction that encourages a change in approach, from a generalized guardianship model to an assessment based on personal capacity. This study aims to analyze the urgency of reformulating the concept of guardianship so that it is in line with the principles of non-discrimination and respect for the rights of people with disabilities as regulated in Law Number 8 of 2016 and the Convention on the Rights of Persons with Disabilities (CRPD). Through a normative legal approach, this article recommends strengthening the role of supervisory guardians in guardianship institutions consisting of various professional elements to realize protection for people under guardianship/ curandus. The results of this study indicate that the concept of guardianship, as regulated by the laws and regulations in Indonesia, still has weaknesses in terms of oversight of the actions and policies taken by guardians toward the individuals under their care. The absence of a strong supervisory mechanism opens opportunities for abuse of authority, both administratively and financially, which can harm the interests of the protected individuals.
Open Legal Policy: Testing Practices and Limitations by the Constitutional Court Riqiey, Baharuddin; Hadi, Syofyan; Sukardi, Sukardi; Hikam, Reza Maulana
Jurnal Hukum Magnum Opus Vol. 8 No. 2 (2025): Agustus 2025
Publisher : Magister Ilmu Hukum Fakultas Hukum Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/jhmo.v8i2.131863

Abstract

The Constitutional Court in its various decisions has not granted a petition on the grounds of open legal policy. Open legal policy is always identical to numbers, for example, term of office, parliamentary threshold, etc. Therefore, the purpose of this study is to examine and analyze the practice of testing legal norms that are open legal policy by the Constitutional Court and to examine and analyze the limitations of testing legal norms that are open legal policy by the Constitutional Court. The research method used in this study is legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The results of this study indicate that the practice of testing legal norms that are open legal policy has been going on since the Constitutional Court was established. The provisions of legal norms that are open legal policy are essentially the absolute domain of the legislators so that other state institutions cannot change these provisions. However, under certain conditions the Constitutional Court can change these provisions as long as the norms clearly violate morality, rationality, and intolerable injustice; exceed the authority of the legislators; are part of the abuse of authority; cause institutional problems and lead to legal deadlock; are contrary to political rights; and are contrary to the principle of people's sovereignty.
Justice in the Internet Context: The Protection of Freedom of Expression Online Post Constitutional Court Decision Number 105/PUU-XXII/2024 Hadi, Syofyan
Mimbar Keadilan Vol. 18 No. 2 (2025): Agustus 2025
Publisher : Faculty of Law, Universitas 17 Agustus 1945 Surabaya

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30996/mk.v18i2.131947

Abstract

The purpose of this study is to analyze justice on the Internet post Constitutional Court Decision Number 105/PUU-XII/2024 which provide strengthening of protection of freedom of expression on the Internet. This research is a normative legal research with a statutory, conceptual, and case approach. The results of the study found that restrictions on freedom of expression on the Internet in the Law on Electronic Information and Transaction are problematic because they are irrational, unfair, disproportionate, and tend to conflict with the 1945 Constitution of the Republic of Indonesia. Through Decision Number 105/PUU-XII/2024, the Constitutional Court has realized justice on the Internet by providing proportional protection of freedom of expression on the Internet. The decision provides freedom for everyone to express themselves on the Internet, such as conveying criticism, provided that their expression does not degrade the dignity or good name of others. Government institutions, professions, or positions are excluded from subjects that can be victims of defamation. The government can no longer prosecute citizens who criticize the policies it has taken. The decision provides guidelines for enforcing the law against violations of freedom of expression on the Internet.
Co-Authors Abdul Aziz Alpian, M. Amelia, Mays Anang Pratama Widiarsa Anjaly Rosdiansyah Dewi Anugrah, Narendra Putra Arie Mangesti, Yovita Baharuddin Riqiey Bastian, Jimmy Bayu Kurnia Nazarrudin Qolyubby Bernada, Yaffed Septian Bernada Bravestha, Rio Chairul Farid, Achmad Dahlan, Rudiyanto Dananjaya, Adhitya Arum Demar Bunga Kinanti Djinarto, Bambang Fajar Sugianto Farisi, Salman Fawwaz Iqbal Rahmanto Fikri, Sultoni Fouziah, Resti Frans Simangunsong Ghozali, Moudy Raul Guntur, Sundaru Herry Febriadi Hikam, Reza Maulana Hufron Hufron Hufron Hufron Hufron Hufron Hufron Hufron, Hufron Imron, Muhamad Karmal Maksudi Krisnadi Nasution Krisnadi Nasution Lovitya Trisnanti, Ines Mangesti, Yovita Arie Miarsa, Fajar Rachmad Dwi MOH. SALEH Mohammad Mohammad Muhammad Afif Murtadlo, Aly Nandini, Nova Mawar Lailatul Adawiyah Nickalus, Juan Noviekayati, IGAA. Priyambodo, Bagus Adam Puji Utomo, Sutrisno Putra Samudra, Kaharudin Qolyubby, Bayu Kurnia Nazarrudin Rimbawani Sushanty, Vera Riqiey, Baharuddin Ronny Ronny Rustambekov, Islambek S Endang Prasetyawati Sesung, Rusdianto Sesung, Rusdianto Setyadji, Sri Shodikin, Miftakhul Shulga, Ievgenii Sibarani, Tagor Slamet Suhartono Sukardi Sukardi Sultoni Fikri Sultoni Fikri Sutra, Heni Syahroni, Muh. Arief Tomy Michael Tomy Michael Tri Budiman, Nanang Walujo Tjahjono, Agus Wati, Tan Hana Darma Mangruwa Wibowo, Agung Satryo Wiwik Afifah Yunita, Asti