Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Memahami Kaidah Ushuliyah Al-Am, Al-Khas, Al-Amru dan An-Nahyu Sebagai Metodologi Penetapan Hukum Islam Muh Alghifari; Nurul Safitri; Linda Oktaviana; Kurniati Kurniati
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v2i4.992

Abstract

There are at least three problems that will arise if the establishment of the Islamic law ignores the Ushuli theory; the ambiguity in the use of Ushuli theory, the misunderstanding of the Nash in the Qur'an and Hadith, and the broad interpretation because it does not focus on one or more of the Uushuri theories. The purpose of the study is to know the approach of the Ushuliyah al-am, al-khas, al-amru and al-nahyu as methodologies, procedures, and problems in the establishment of Islamic law. This research is a qualitative library research with a Ushul Fiqh approach. It is the same in the Qur'an as in the Quran. The procedure for the establishment of Islamic law is not much different from some of the views of scholars conducted, in general, namely by searching for the provisions of the law in Al-Qu’an and Hadith and analogous to the Islamic Shariah. The problem is that it lies at the core of the beginning of the law, on the different understanding and meaning that is presented or expressed by the scholars, the solution to overcome this problem by following the agreement of the scholar. Thus, in the understanding of the teachings of the Ushuri: Al-Am, Al-Khas, al-Amru and An-Nahyu, which is a small part of the studies of Ushuli, open a great opportunity for further research to discuss more fully about the teaching of Ussuri than Al-Amm, Al - Khas, Amru and Al – Nahyu.
Eksistensi Taqlid dalam Konteks Pengalaman Keagamaan di Era Kontemporer Mubarak Mubarak; Nur Resky Aulia; Kurniati Kurniati
ALADALAH: Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora Vol. 2 No. 4 (2024): Jurnal Politik, Sosial, Hukum dan Humaniora
Publisher : LP3M INSTITUT KH YAZID KARIMULLAH

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59246/aladalah.v2i4.1004

Abstract

The practice of taqlid is part of the Islamic legal tradition which has an important role in maintaining legal consistency and stability during the classical period. However, in the context of modern times, the practice of taqlid faces various problems, such as legal rigidity, madhhab fanaticism, and excessive dependence on ulama. The subject of this research focuses on the nature and law of taqlid as well as the existence of taqlid and Islamic law in the contemporary era. This research uses a type of normative research, a qualitative approach with a literature review method that involves searching, collecting and in-depth analysis of various references from books and scientific journals. This reference specifically discusses reflections on ushul fiqh in the context of taqlid, including related issues. The results of the research show that taqlid is divided into two according to the ulama, there are those that are forbidden or not allowed and there are also those that are permitted. Because basically taqlid is haram, but we see a phenomenon in society, that not all people can perform ijtihad on their own, so scholars divide two types of taqlid, namely those that are forbidden and those that are obligatory. It is haram for people who are capable of ijtihad but obligatory for ordinary people. Therefore, there needs to be an effort to improve religious education that emphasizes the ijtihad method, as well as encouraging the renewal of Islamic law that is relevant to current developments. In this way, taqlid can be carried out in a moderate and balanced manner, while still opening up space for dynamic and contextual ijtihad.
Rekonstruksi Maqasid Al-Syariah dalam Pemikiran Hukum Islam Kontemporer: (Upaya Mewujudkan Keadilan Bagi Perempuan di Era Modern) Nurwihda Ramadani; Sakina Sakina; Putri Abelia Z; Kurniati Kurniati
Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik Vol. 3 No. 4 (2025): November: Jurnal Hukum dan Sosial Politik
Publisher : International Forum of Researchers and Lecturers

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.59581/jhsp-widyakarya.v3i4.5767

Abstract

Injustice against women in contemporary Islamic law practice is still a serious problem, especially in cases of divorce, child custody, and the division of common property, which are often decided textually without considering the social, economic, and psychological aspects of women. This phenomenon shows that the application of Islamic law is still normative and does not fully reflect substantive justice as the purpose of maqāṣid al-syarī'ah. This research aims to analyze the nature of justice for women in the modern era, identify the steps needed to realize this justice, and formulate Islamic legal solutions based on maqāṣid al-syarī'ah that can be applied contextually in the religious justice system. The research method used is qualitative with a normative-empirical approach through literature analysis, case studies, and empirical data from religious court decisions and reports of official institutions such as Komnas Perempuan. The results of the study show that justice for women can only be achieved through a dynamic maqāṣid approach, by placing the interests of women and children above the legal-formalities of classical fiqh. The efforts needed include the integration of empirical data in judges' decisions, reform of religious justice policies, increasing the capacity of judges in understanding maqāṣid, and empowering women through legal literacy.
Penerapan Maqāṣid al-Syarī‘ah dalam Putusan Hakim: Analisis terhadap Keadilan Substantif di Pengadilan Agama Abd. Rahman; Kurniati Kurniati; Zulhasari Mustafa
AHKAM Vol 5 No 2 (2026): JUNI
Publisher : Lembaga Yasin AlSys

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.58578/ahkam.v5i2.10027

Abstract

The development of the legal paradigm from a formalistic approach toward substantive justice requires the integration of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah into the practice of religious courts. However, the application of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah in judicial decisions still tends to be limited and unsystematic, creating a gap between legal rulings and the community’s sense of justice. This study aimed to analyze the application of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah in judicial decisions in religious courts and its contribution to the realization of substantive justice. This study used a qualitative approach with a literature study design focusing on document analysis of religious court decisions and scholarly journal articles. Data were collected through documentation and systematic searches of credible sources selected through purposive and snowball sampling, and were then analyzed using an interactive model with a thematic approach to identify major patterns and categories. The results showed that the application of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah in judicial decisions was not yet uniform and was divided into three main patterns, namely implicit, partial, and explicit but not yet systematic. These variations were influenced by judges’ internal factors, limitations of the legal system, and social dynamics. The research findings also showed that the integration of maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah contributed significantly to strengthening substantive justice, particularly in increasing the sensitivity of decisions to public benefit and the protection of vulnerable groups. The conclusion of this study emphasizes the importance of strengthening methodological frameworks and operational guidelines for systematically integrating maqāṣid al-syarī‘ah into legal discovery. The implications of this study include the development of a more substantive theory of Islamic law, the enhancement of judges’ capacity, and the reform of religious court policies oriented toward public benefit.
Co-Authors A. Adillah Zahiyah Djaka Abd. Rahman Abdul Rahman R Affandi Harlanda Baros Afi Rahmat Slamet Ahmad Faidillah Ahmad Faisal Ahsan Putra Hafiz Ali Zaenal Abidin Hasan Ambok Pangiuk Anak Agung Gede Sugianthara Andi Eril Andi Maharani Erwin Andi Muh Reza Caecar Arfan Andi Muhammad Aflah Andi Silva Quadsajul Andi Tenri Wale Anjas Saputra Annisa J Asiani Abu Aura Lika Cahyani Andi Sufarid Dela Aprilia Desi Lauran Tinni Deviana Cantika Dewi Sartika Syam Dian Amelia Sari Ernawati Ernawati Erwin Permana Esha Kurnia Roustantia Faathir Janwar Fahrial S Fanti Rahmania Ramli Fauzan Montanah Ferdiansa Putra Fiantika Armanda Halisatul Muslimah Hayyul H Husairi Husairi Inul Katika Putri izzah, lathifatul Khusnul Khatimah Kiki Amaliah Linda Oktaviana Lira Sopi Ema M. Rayhan Idil Fitrah A M. Yulianto Listiawan Mahaputra Dwi S MIFTAHUL JANNAH Misyrah Ahmadi Moh Alvin Kamal Mubarak Mubarak Muh Alfaridzi Ramli Muh Alghifari Muh Fadhil Amir Muh Fadly Multazam Muh Rizky Alamsyah Muh. Aqsho Che Athoriq. R Muh. Irham Muh. Mulyadi Muhaemina Muhaemina Muhammad Ali Afsar Muhammad Imam Sejati Muhammad Mulyadi Muhammad Naufal Marifat Muhammad Naufal Ma’rifat Musyfikah Ilyas Nadya Quwwatun Rabbaniah Najwa Fakhira Hisbuddin Nirmalasari Nirmalasari Nur Ahmad Al Fai’q Nur Aisyah Nur Azizah NUR FADILLAH Nur Padila Nur Ramadhani Nur Resky Aulia Nur syamsi Nurfadillah Nurfadillah Nurul Al-fatihah Rahman Nurul Azisah Syahrani Haris Nurul Hanifa Azzahra Nurul Rezkyani S Nurul Safitri Nurwihda Ramadani Octa Vera Putri Abelia Z Raisya Aurora A Rangga Mahesa Rihan Dwi Putri Rini Nur Amaliah Riska Amalia Ramadani Riska Amalia Ramadhani Rogayah Rogayah Rosalinda Rosalinda Safitri Aulia Zalsalnabila Sakina Sakina Salsa Luthfiah Rezki Salwa Selly Pitia Selpiani Selpiani Serlika Aprita Shadiqah Tirza Tsamarah Siti Rahmaayu Dwi Permatasari Soeparmono soeparmono Suatang Suatang Syafdillah Sastri Syam Syamsinar Bahar Syekh Alfath Syukri Syukri Tiara Tiara Vyna Mar’atul Muflichah Widarko, Agus Wiwin Alawiyah Yulia Febrianti Yusriansyah Yusriansyah Zahira Gefira Zulhasari Mustafa