Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
5.878
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal E-Jurnal Medika Udayana e-GIGI ODONTO Dental Journal Jurnal Kesehatan Gigi Dental Journal (Majalah Kedokteran Gigi) The Indonesian Biomedical Journal Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Universitas Padjadjaran Padjadjaran Journal of Dentistry Dinamisia: Jurnal Pengabdian Kepada Masyarakat Journal of Indonesian Dental Association Jurnal Kreativitas PKM E-Prodenta Journal of Dentistry Jurnal Material Kedokteran Gigi Jurnal Kedokteran Gigi Terpadu JURNAL ABDI MASYARAKAT INDONESIA (JAMIN) Jurnal Abdimas Kesehatan Terpadu Odonto dental journal
Deviyanti Pratiwi
Department Of Dental Materials, Faculty Of Dentistry, Universitas Trisakti, Jakarta
Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Dentistry Earth & Planetary Sciences Education Energy Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Materials Science & Nanotechnology Medicine & Pharmacology Nursing Public Health Social Sciences Other

Published : 45 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 45 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
The Impact of Different Types of Polishing Bur on the Nanofiller Composite's Surface Roughness Dwi Harini Endah Meidianti; Deviyanti Pratiwi; Rosalina Tjandrawinata
Odonto : Dental Journal Vol 11, No 2 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/odj.11.2.181-187

Abstract

Background: Composite resin is a filling material that is similar in color to tooth enamel and can be used widely for various cases, especially for the restoration of anterior teeth. Composite resins have been modified and improved to obtain maximum restoration results, one of which is nanofiller. Nanofiller composite is known to have a high level of smoothness, but polishing remains the key to success in the final filling process. There are many types of polishing on the market, this indicates that not all dentists use the same type of tools. This study aimed to determine the effect of various types of polishing bur on the surface roughness of nanofiller.Method: The type of research conducted was an experimental laboratory. Cylindrical samples with a total of 40 samples measuring 10 mm x 2 mm were divided into 4 groups. Samples were soaked in distilled water and stored in an incubator for 24 hours at 37oC. The samples were polished using different types of bur except for the control group. Samples were tested for surface roughness using a surface roughness tester and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Result: This study shows differences in the surface roughness of the nanofiller composite after being polished using different types of polishing burs. The results of the one-way ANOVA test indicated that there was a significant difference from the average of the four sample groups.Conclusion: Polishing burs can produce different surface roughness of nanofiller composite.
The Impact of Different Types of Polishing Bur on the Nanofiller Composite's Surface Roughness Dwi Harini Endah Meidianti; Deviyanti Pratiwi; Rosalina Tjandrawinata
Odonto : Dental Journal Vol 11, No 2 (2024): December 2024
Publisher : Faculty of Dentistry, Universitas Islam Sultan Agung

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.30659/odj.11.2.181-187

Abstract

Background: Composite resin is a filling material that is similar in color to tooth enamel and can be used widely for various cases, especially for the restoration of anterior teeth. Composite resins have been modified and improved to obtain maximum restoration results, one of which is nanofiller. Nanofiller composite is known to have a high level of smoothness, but polishing remains the key to success in the final filling process. There are many types of polishing on the market, this indicates that not all dentists use the same type of tools. This study aimed to determine the effect of various types of polishing bur on the surface roughness of nanofiller.Method: The type of research conducted was an experimental laboratory. Cylindrical samples with a total of 40 samples measuring 10 mm x 2 mm were divided into 4 groups. Samples were soaked in distilled water and stored in an incubator for 24 hours at 37oC. The samples were polished using different types of bur except for the control group. Samples were tested for surface roughness using a surface roughness tester and scanning electron microscopy (SEM). Result: This study shows differences in the surface roughness of the nanofiller composite after being polished using different types of polishing burs. The results of the one-way ANOVA test indicated that there was a significant difference from the average of the four sample groups.Conclusion: Polishing burs can produce different surface roughness of nanofiller composite.
Water Temperature’s Effects towards Setting Time of Normal Type Alginate Impression Material Deviyanti Pratiwi; Juanita Andriani Sutrisno
Journal of Indonesian Dental Association Vol. 3 No. 2 (2020): October
Publisher : Indonesian Dental Association

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32793/jida.v3i2.566

Abstract

Introduction: Alginate impression material is widely used in dentistry. There are two types of alginate impression based on the setting time: fast setting (type I) and normal setting (type II). Setting time of alginate impression is affected by the ratio of powder and water, water temperature, also types of the alginate impression. In some dental treatments, dentists need to make modifications of alginate impression materials in the normal setting type to speed up the setting time and prevent maintenance delays. Objective: The objective of this study is to determine the effect of water temperature on the setting time of normal type alginate impression material. Methods: This laboratory experimental study were carried out on alginate impression materials of normal type which were tested in three temperature groups (±15°C, ±24°C, and ±40°C). The setting time is measured using a penetrometer in accordance with ANSI/ADA No. 18 equipped with a glass plate and a metal ring mold with a diameter of 30 mm and a height of 16 mm. Results: The results of statistical tests indicate the influence of water temperature on the setting time of the normal type of impression material carried out in all three temperature groups (p<0.05). Mann Whitney Test Results with p<0.05 showed a difference in the average setting time of each temperature group, in which the three groups are ±24°C to ±15°C, ±24°C to ±40°C, and ±15°C to ±40°C. The fastest setting time occurs in the test group with a temperature of ±40°C and the longest occurring in the testing group is ±15°C. Conclusion: There is an increase in the setting time of alginate impression materials in the normal setting type due to the influence of water temperature. Increased setting time by 23,2% faster at the temperature of ±40°C than the normal water temperature.
The Effect of Rhinoceros Beetle Nanochitosan on Compressive Strength of Glass Ionomer Cement Deviyanti Pratiwi; Richentya Feiby Salim; Komariah Komariah
Journal of Indonesian Dental Association Vol. 4 No. 2 (2021): October
Publisher : Indonesian Dental Association

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32793/jida.v4i2.635

Abstract

Introduction: : Glass Ionomer Cement (GIC) is a dental restorative material that is widely modified to improve mechanical properties, such as compressive strength. Biomaterial that can be used to modify GIC is nanochitosan, a material that has been studied to improve the mechanical properties of GIC. Nanochitosan from Xylotrupes gideon can increase enamel hardness on home bleaching application. Objective: To investigate the effect of nanochitosan from Xylotrupes gideon on compressive strength of GIC. Methods: The research type conducted was an experimental laboratory. Samples of 6 mm (height) × 4 mm (diameter) GIC divided into 10 groups (n=5) that was modified with 10% v/v nanochitosan solution, 5% v/v nanochitosan solution, 10% w/w nanochitosan powder, and with 5% w/w nanochitosan powder. Samples were stored in an incubator at 37°C for 1 hour and 24 hours before testing. Compressive strength was tested using Universal Testing Machine. Result: Nanochitosan modified GIC decreased in compressive strength. The result of Two-Way ANOVA statistical analysis showed that there was no significant difference (p >0.05) between all test groups, while there was a significant difference between the 1 hour and 24 hours test groups (p <0.05). Conclusion: Nanochitosan from Xylotrupes gideon has no significant effect on the compressive strength of GIC.
The Effect of Horn Beetle Nanochitosan (Xylotrupes gideon) Addition on The Hardness of Glass-ionomer Cement Florencia Livia Kurniawan; Rosalina Tjandrawinata; Carolina Marpaung; Deviyanti Pratiwi; Komariah Komariah
Journal of Indonesian Dental Association Vol. 5 No. 1 (2022): April
Publisher : Indonesian Dental Association

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.32793/jida.v5i1.719

Abstract

Introduction: Glass ionomer cement (GIC) is a tooth-colored restorative material that is often used by clinical practitioners because it can release fluoride, is easy to apply to teeth and has minimal preparation techniques. The erosion and moisture-sensitive nature of GIC becomes a problem for a long-lasting aesthetic restoration. Therefore, modifications were made to improve its mechanical properties by adding nanochitosan (NCH) from horn beetle (Xylotrupes gideon). Objective: This study aimed to evaluate the effect of adding horn beetle nanochitosan to GIC liquid on the surface hardness and compared with conventional GIC. Methods: Forty cylindrical samples of GIC (GC Fuji® IX Extra, Tokyo-Japan, Lot 1912201) with a diameter of 4 mm and a thickness of 6 mm were divided into 4 groups, namely the GIC control group, GIC modified with 0.5wt%, 1wt%, 2 wt% nanochitosan. Each sample was immersed in artificial saliva for 24 hours and 7 days. Surface hardness before and after immersion was tested using a Vickers Microhardness tester (Shimadzu, Japan). The data were analyzed using the Kruskal Wallis test to determine the effect of horn beetle nanochitosan addition and the Wilcoxon Signed-Ranked test to determine the effect of immersion time on GIC surface hardness. Results: The Kruskal Wallis statistical test showed significant difference (p<0.05) between the control group and the 24 hours treatment group with the addition of 2wt% nanochitosan, which was the highest surface hardness value (133.1 ± 49.0 HV), followed by 1wt% (127.4 ± 25.5 HV) and 0.5wt% (117.7 ± 22.5 HV). The Wilcoxon Signed-Ranked test statistic also showed a significant difference (p<0.05) between the 24-hour and 7-day immersion time with the surface hardness value at 24 hours immersion greater than 7 days. Conclusion: The addition of 0.5wt%, 1wt% and 2wt% horn beetle nanochitosan can increase the GIC surface hardness value. ABSTRAK Pendahuluan: Glass ionomer cement (GIC) merupakan bahan restorasi sewarna gigi yang sering digunakan oleh praktisi klinis karena dapat melepaskan fluor, mudah diaplikasikan pada gigi, dan memiliki teknik preparasi yang minimal. Erosi dan sifat sensitif kelembaban dari GIC menjadi masalah untuk restorasi estetika yang tahan lama. Oleh karena itu, dilakukan modifikasi untuk meningkatkan sifat mekaniknya dengan menambahkan nanokitosan (NCH) dari kumbang tanduk (Xylotrupes gideon). Tujuan: Penelitian ini bertujuan untuk mengevaluasi pengaruh penambahan nanokitosan kumbang tanduk ke dalam cairan GIC terhadap kekerasan permukaan dan dibandingkan dengan Semen Ionomer Kaca (SIK) konvensional. Metode: Empat puluh sampel silinder GIC (GC Fuji® IX Extra, Tokyo-Japan, Lot 1912201) dengan diameter 4 mm dan ketebalan 6 mm dibagi menjadi 4 kelompok, yaitu kelompok kontrol GIC, GIC dimodifikasi dengan nanokitosan 0,5wt%, 1 wt%, 2wt%. Setiap sampel direndam dalam saliva buatan selama 24 jam dan 7 hari. Kekerasan permukaan sebelum dan sesudah perendaman diuji menggunakan Vickers Microhardness tester. Data dianalisis menggunakan uji Kruskal Wallis untuk mengetahui pengaruh penambahan nanokitosan kumbang tanduk dan uji Wilcoxon Signed-Ranked untuk mengetahui pengaruh waktu perendaman terhadap kekerasan permukaan GIC. Hasil: Uji statistik Kruskal Wallis menunjukkan perbedaan bermakna (p<0,05) antara kelompok kontrol dan kelompok perlakuan perendaman 24 jam dengan penambahan nanokitosan 2wt% yang merupakan nilai kekerasan permukaan tertinggi (133,1 ± 49,0 HV), diikuti sebesar 1wt% (127,4 ± 25,5 HV) dan 0,5% (117,7 ± 22,5 HV). Statistik uji Wilcoxon Signed-Ranked juga menunjukkan perbedaan yang nyata (p<0,05) antara lama perendaman 24 jam dan 7 hari dengan nilai kekerasan permukaan pada perendaman 24 jam lebih besar dari 7 hari. Kesimpulan: Penambahan nanokitosan kumbang tanduk 0,5wt%, 1% , dan 2wt% dapat meningkatkan nilai kekerasan permukaan GIC.
Co-Authors Abdul Gani Soulisa Abdul Gani Soulisa Abdul Gani Soulissa Achmad E. Z. Hasan Ade Prijanti Dwisaptarini Advita Azalia Akhmad Endang Zainal Hasan Andrian Nova Fitri Andy Wirahadikusumah Anisa, Syafira Annisa Kesumaningrum Annisa Putri Ariyani Arianne Dwimega Ariesanti, Yessy Ariyani, Annisa Putri Armelia Sari Bernard Ongki Iskandar Binartha, Cipthadi Tri Oka Carolina Damayanti Marpaung Caroline Caroline Citra Puspandari Handayaningrum Cokro, Ingrid Aurelia Genacia Dewi Liliany Margaretta, Dewi Liliany Dewi Priandini Dewi Priandini, Dewi Dhyani Widhianingsih Dody Prayitno Dwi Harini Endah Meidianti Eddy Eddy Eddy Eddy, Eddy Elline Elline, Elline Elsa Prahasti, Anastasia Erawati, Jeti Esa Bella Ferry Sandra Fibryanto, Eko Florencia Livia Kurniawan Gabriel Rainheart Genesis Genesis, Gabriel Rainheart Harryanto Wijaya Harryanto Wijaya Helen Cyntya Andany Ingrid Aurelia Genacia Cokro Intan Farizka Iskandar, Mochammad Marshalldanard A. Izah, Nurul Janti Sudiono Jeddy Jeddy Juanita Andriani Sutrisno Kesumaningrum, Annisa Komariah Komariah Komariah Komariah Komariah Komariah Komariah Komariah Komariah Komariah Komariah Komariah Komariah Liliany Margaretta, Dewi Melaniwati Mikha Sundjojo Najla Nadiah Natanael, Christian Niko Falatehan Nuroh Arifah Octarina Prawira, William Putri Rejeki Ratnasari, Dina Ria Puspitawati Richentya Feiby Salim Richentya Feiby Salim Richentya Feiby Salim Riko Nofrizal Rosalina Tjandrawinata Rosita Stefani Salim, Richentya Feiby Santosa, Didi Nugroho Sari, Armelia Saristi, Salsabila Shafa Sastra Kusuma Widjaya Shafira Prana, Indira Shariff, Khairul Anuar Soulisa, Abdul Gani Sri Ratna Laksmiastuti Sutrisno, Juanita Andriani Swe, Thet Thet Syifa Annisa Tanaya, Namyera Tansza Setiana Putri Taufiq Ariwibowo Teguh, Sharren Thomas Aurelius Dharma Tiffany Hartono Tri Erri Astoeti Trijani Suwandi Trisfilha, Pretty Wijaya, Livia Wita Anggraini Yenny Pragustine Yoana Winardi