Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2020 - 2025
1.152
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Penelitian dan Pengembangan Pendidikan Jurnal S2 Pendidikan Matematika Journal on Mathematics Education (JME) Journal of the Indonesian Mathematical Society AKSIOMA: Jurnal Program Studi Pendidikan Matematika Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education Journal of Mathematics and Mathematics Education (JMME) Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Journal of Educational Management and Instruction (JEMIn) Himpunan: Jurnal Ilmiah Mahasiswa Pendidikan Matematika Journal on Mathematics Education
Tri Atmojo Kusmayadi
Prodi Magister Pendidikan Matematika, Pascasarjana, FKIP – UNS
Education Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Mathematics Social Sciences Other

Published : 101 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 101 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
EKSPERIMENTASI PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DENGAN MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DENGAN PENDEKATAN KONTEKSTUAL BERBASIS LESSON STUDY PADA MATERI BANGUN RUANG SISI LENGKUNG DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS IX MTs NEGERI KABUPATEN MADIUN Umami, Farah; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Suyono, Suyono
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 4 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (322.521 KB)

Abstract

Abstract:This research aims to find out: (1) which one providing better mathematics learning achievement, Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model with Lesson Study based contextual approach, Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model with contextual approach, or conventional learning, (2) which one providing mathematics learning achievement, the students with visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learning styles, (3) in each learning model, which one providing better mathematics learning approach, the students with visual, auditory, or kinesthetic learning styles, (4) in each learning style, which one providing better mathematic learning achievement, Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model with Lesson Study-based contextual approach, Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model with contextual approach, or conventional learning model.This study was a quasi-experimental research with 3x3 factorial design. The population of research was all IX graders of MTs Negeri of Madiun Regency in the school year of 2012/2013 consisting of 13 school. The sampling technique used was stratified cluster random sampling with 259 students as the sample. The school classification based on the Mathematics score in National Examination of 2010/2011 school year obtained MTsN Kare for the sample with high classification, MTsN Sidorejo Wungu for the one with medium classification, and MTsN Rejosari for the one with low classification. The research instrument used was mathematics achievement test and student learning style questionnaire. Technique of analyzing data used was an umbalanced twoway analysis of variance.The conclusions of research were: (1) the jigsaw type of cooperative learning model with lesson study-based contextual approach provided better learning achievement than the one with contextual approach and conventional learning, while the jigsaw type of cooperative learning model provided the achievement as same as the conventional learning did. (2) the students with visual learning style had learning achievement equal to those with auditory learning style, while both of them had better learning achievement than those with kinesthetic learning style. (3) the students with the visual,auditorial and kinesthetic learning style, the jigsaw type of cooperative learning model with lesson study-based contextual approach provided better mathematics learning achievement than jigsaw type cooperative learning with contextual approach and conventional learning, while the jigsaw type of cooperative learning provided the achievement as same as the conventional learning did. (4) in Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model with Lesson Study based contextual approach, Jigsaw type of cooperative learning model with contextual approach, or conventional learning,, the students with visual learning style provided mathematic learning achievement as same as those with auditory learning style337did, while both of them provided better learning achievement than those withkinesthetic learning style.Keywords: Cooperative Learning, Jigsaw, Contextual Teaching and Learning,Lesson Study, Learning Style.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF PEER TUTORING DAN MANDIRI DENGAN E-LEARNING PADA POKOK BAHASAN ALJABAR DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN MAJEMUK Safitri, Dian N; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (305.46 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to know: (1) which one is providing bettermathematics learning achievement, students taught using cooperative learning peer tutoring, selfdirectedlearning by e-learning or direct learning, (2) which one is having better mathematicslearning achievement, students with interpersonal intelligence, students with intrapersonalintelligence or students with linguistic intelligence, (3) at each learning model, are there anydifference mathematics learning achievement between students with interpersonal intelligence,students with intrapersonal intelligence or students with linguistic intelligence, (4) at each type ofintelligence, are there any difference mathematics learning achievement between students taughtusing cooperative learning peer tutoring, self-directed learning by e-learning or direct learning.This was a quasi experimental research using 3x3 factorial designs. The hypotheses testing usedtwo ways ANOVA with unbalance cell. This research concludes that: (1) students who weretaught using cooperative learning peer tutoring have better mathematics learning achievementthan the students who were taught using self-directed learning by e-learning and students who aretaught using direct instruction, as well as students who were taught using self-directed learningby e-learning have better mathematics learning achievement than the group of students who weretaught using direct instruction, (2) students achievement with the type of interpersonalintelligence are better than the students with the type of intrapersonal intelligence and linguisticintelligence type while the students with the type of linguistic intelligence have bettermathematics learning achievement than the students with the type of intrapersonal intelligence,(3) in the cooperative learning peer tutoring, students with interpersonal intelligence have bettermathematic learning achievement than students with interpersonal and linguistik intelligence,students with linguistic intelligence have better learning achievement than student withintrapersonal intelligence, in the self-directed learning by e-learning, there was no difference inlearning achievement in each type of intelligence, in the direct instruction, students withinterpersonal and linguistic intelligence have better mathematic learning achievement thanstudents with intrapersonal intelligence, (4) for the students who have interpersonal intelligence,cooperative learning peer tutoring produce better mathematics achievement than self-directedlearning by e-learning and direct instruction, for the students who have intrapersonal intelligence,self-directed learning by e-learning produce better mathematics achievement than directinstruction, for the students who have linguistic intelligence, there was no difference in learningachievement in each learning models.Keywords: E-Learning, Peer Tutoring, Intelligence, mathematics learning achievement
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE JIGSAW DAN STAD ( STUDENT TEAMS ACHIEVEMENT DIVISIONS) PADA MATERI POKOK PERBANDINGAN DAN FUNGSI TRIGONOMETRI DITINJAU DARI MOTIVASI BELAJAR SISWA KELAS X SMA NEGERI SE-KOTA MADIUN Budi, Wahyu Astuti; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Mardiyana, Mardiyana
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 7 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (227.189 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aim of this research was to find out the  effect of learning models (STAD, Jigsaw, and conventional) on mathematics achievement viewed from  learning motivation. The type of research was a quasi experimental research with the factorial design of 3x3. The population was the students in grade X Senior High School in Madiun City. The samples of the research were taken by using the stratified cluster random sampling technique. The samples of the research consisten of 257 students. Instruments used to collect data were prior knowledge test, mathematics achievement test, and motivation quetioner. The trial of instrument test includes of content validity, difficullty level, discrimination power, and reliability. Test requirements included normality test used Lilliefors method and the homogenity test used the Bartlett test. The Balance test used unbalance one way analysis of variance. The hypothesis test used unbalanced two ways analysis of variance. The conclusions of the research were as follows: (1) the STAD and Jigsaw learning models result in the same good learning achievement in mathematics and both result in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the conventional learning model. (2) the learning achievement in mathematics toward high motivation and low one were equally well, high achievement motivation  learning was better than low motivation. (3) for students who taugh by cooperative learning model of STAD, Jigsaw and conventional, the learning achievement in mathematics toward high motivation and low one were equally well, high achievement motivation  learning was better than low motivation. (4) in the each motivation learning the students with high, medium, and low,  the STAD and Jigsaw learning models result in the same good learning achievement in mathematics and both result in a better learning achievement in mathematics than the conventional learning model. Keywords: STAD, Jigsaw, Conventional, learning motivation
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK PAIRSHARE MODIFIKASI PENEMUAN TERBIMBING BERBANTUAN MICROSOFT POWER POINT PADA PEMBELAJARAN MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KEDISIPLINAN BELAJAR ANAS, MIFTACHUL; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Suyono, Suyono
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 1, No 3 (2013): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (326.423 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The objective of this research was to investigate: (1) which of the Modified TPS learning model, the TPS learning model, and the conventional learning model results in a better mathematics learning achievement; (2) which of the students with high, mediun, and low learning disciplines have a better mathematics learning achievement; and (3) which of the Modified TPS, TPS and conventional learning models result in a better learning achievement for each level of learning discipline of the students; and (4) which of the high, medium, and learning disciplines of the students result in a better learning achievement for each learning models.This research used the quasi-experimental method. The population of this research was all students of the junior secondary schools in Ngawi regency in the academic year of 2012/2013. The samples of this research consisted of 284 students who were divided into three experiment groups. The three groups consisted of group 1, group 2, and group 3. Both of group 1 and group 2 consisted of 190 students whereas group 3 consisted of 94 students. The data of this research were gathered from test of learning achievement in Mathematics, questionnaire, and documentation. The data were then analyzed by using umbalanced Two-way Analysis of Variance.The result of the research are as follows: (1) the learning model of Modified TPS is better than that of the TPS and conventional learning models while the learning model of TPS is better than the conventional learning model; (2) the students with high learning discipline have a better learning achievement than those with medium and low learning discipline while the students with medium learning discipline is better than the low learning discipline; (3) in high and medium learning discipline of the students,the learning achievement achieved through the learning model of Modified TPS is better than that achieved through the TPS and conventional learning models while the learning achievement achieved through the TPS learning model is better than that achieved through the conventional learning model. However, in the low learning discipline of the students,the learning achievement achieved through the learning model of Modified TPS is better than that achieved through the TPS,andthe Modified TPS learning model is as good as the conventional learning model and the TPS learning model is as good as the conventional learning model; and (4) in Modified TPS and TPS of the learning models, the high learning discipline of the students results in a better learning achievement than the medium and low learning disciplines while the medium learning discipline results in a better learning achievement than the low learning discipline. However, in the conventional learning model the high learning discipline of the students results in a better learning achievement than the medium learning model, andthe medium learning discipline of the students are giving the same mathematics learning achievement with the low learning discipline.Keyword : Modified TPS learning model, TPS learning model, conventional learning model, learning discipline and learning achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL JIGSAW SNOWBALL DRILLING DAN PEER TUTORING SNOWBALL DRILLING PADA MATERI POKOK TABUNG, KERUCUT, DAN BOLA DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA P, Nelly Indriastuti; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 1 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (326.266 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The aims of this research were to determine: (1) which results better mathematics learning achievement between students who were taught by using jigsaw snowball drilling, peer tutoring snowball drilling, or direct instruction, (2) which has better mathematics learning achievement between students with visual learning styles, auditory, or kinesthetic, (3). at each of the learning model, which one has better mathematics learning achievement between student with visual learning style, auditory, or kinesthetic, (4). at each learning style, which one results better mathematics learning achievement between students who were taught by using jigsaw snowball drilling, peer tutoring snowball drilling or direct instruction. This study was a quasi experimental research with 3x3 factorial designs. The population in this study was all students of IX graders of SMPN in Blora in the academic year of 2013/2014. Stratified cluster random sampling was used to select three schools namely SMPN 2 Cepu, SMPN 1 Kedungtuban, and SMPN 1 Cepu. The hypotheses testing used unbalanced two ways ANOVA. Based on the research conducted, it can be concluded as follows. (1) Students who were taught by using jigsaw snowball drilling have better learning achievement than those who were taught by using peer tutoring snowball drilling and direct learning. While the learning achievement of students who were taught by using peer tutoring snowball drilling was better than those who were taught by using direct instruction. (2) Mathematics achievement of auditory students was better than visual and kinesthetic students have. Visual students result mathematics achievement which was better than kinesthetic students. (3) In the jigsaw snowball drilling model, there was no difference in learning achievement in each criterion of student’s learning styles (visual, auditory, and kinesthetic). In the peer tutoring snowball drilling models, students mathematics achievement which have auditory learning style better than students with visual and kinesthetic learning style; there was no difference in learning achievement between student who have visual and kinesthetic learning styles. In the direct instruction, there was no difference in learning achievement between student who have visual and auditory learning styles; there was no difference in learning achievement between student who have visual and kinesthetic learning styles; and students mathematics achievement which have auditory learning style better than students with kinesthetic learning style. (4) For the students who have visual learning style, jigsaw snowball drilling results better learning achievement than peer tutoring snowball drilling and direct instruction; there was no difference learning achievement in peer tutoring snowball drilling and direct instruction. For the students who have auditory learning style, there was no difference learning achievement in jigsaw snowball drilling and peer tutoring snowball drilling; jigsaw snowball drilling and peer tutoring snowball drilling result better learning achievement than direct instruction. For the students who have kinesthetic learning style, there was no difference learning achievement in peer tutoring snowball drilling and direct instruction. Jigsaw snowball drilling and peer tutoring snowball drilling result better learning achievement than direct instruction.Keywords: Jigsaw Snowball Drilling, Peer Tutoring Snowball Drilling, Direct Instruction, Student Learning Styles, and Mathematics Learning Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DENGAN MAKE A MATCH (NHT MM) DAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DENGAN BAMBOO DANCING (NHT BD) DITINJAU DARI KECERDASAN INTERPERSONAL Dewi, Arianti Puspita; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Usodo, Budi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (263.739 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this research were to determine: (1) which students mathematics achievement would be better, student  given NHT MM, NHT BD, or direct learning model, (2) which students mathematics achievement would be better, student with interpersonal intelligence of high, medium or low, (3) which students mathematics achievement would be better, student with interpersonal intelligence of high, medium, or low on each learning model, (4) which student mathematics achievement would be better, student given NHT MM, NHT BD, or direct learning model in each interpersonal intelligence. The instruments were used mathematics achievement test and questionnaire of student’s interpersonal intelligence. The data was analyzed using two ANOVA ways then followed by multiple comparisson tests with using Scheffe’ method. Concluded that: (1) NHT MM model has better mathematics achievement than NHT BD model and direct learning model, while NHT BD model has better mathematics achievement than direct learning model, (2) the students with high interpersonal intelligence has better mathematics achievement than the medium and low interpersonal intelligence students, while the student with medium interpersonal intelligence has better mathematics achievement than the low interpersonal intelligence students, (3) for NHT MM, mathematics achievement of students with high interpersonal intelligence was as good as medium and low interpersonal intelligence, however the mathematics achievement of the students with high interpersonal intelligence were better than the students with low interpersonal intelligence; for NHTBD, the mathematics achievement of students with high intelligence were better than medium and low intelligence, and the mathematics achievement of students with medium intelligence was good as low intelligence; for direct learning, the mathematics achievement of students with high intelligence was better than medium and low intelligence, and the mathematics achievement of students with medium intelligence was good as low intelligence, (4) the students with high, medium, and low interpersonal intelligence have the same achievement of mathematics for the models of NHTMM, NHTBD, and direct learning; for medium and low interpersonal intelligence, the students mathematics achievement treated by NHTMM was better than students treated by NHTBD and direct learning model.Keywords: Numbered Heads Together, Make a Match, Bamboo Dancing, interpersonal intelligence, mathematics achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN THINK TALK WRITE (TTW) DAN NUMBERED HEAD TOGETHER (NHT) TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA DITINJAU DARI KONSEP DIRI BELAJAR MATEMATIKA SISWA DI SMP NEGERI E-KABUPATEN BLORA Kusumaningtyas, Yekti Putri; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 2 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (239.272 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: This research aimed to find out: (1) which one is better among learning models of Think Talk Write (TTW), Numbered Head Together (NHT) or conventional one in giving mathematics learning achievement, (2) which one is better among students’ levels of self concept, students having high, medium or low self concept in giving mathematics learning achievement. (3) in each learning model, which one is better among students’ levels of self concept in having mathematics learning achievement and (4) in each level of self concept, which one is better among Think Talk Write (TTW), Numbered Head Together (NHT) or conventional model in giving mathematics learning achievement. This research was the quasi-experimental research with 3×3 factorial design. The population of research was all students of Junior High School (SMP) in Blora. The samples were chosen by using stratified cluster random sampling. The samples were 309 students; consist of 105 students in the first experimental class, 105 in the second experimental class, and 99 students in control class. The instruments used to collect the data were the test of mathematics achievement and questionnaire of self concept. Pre-requisite tests were used Lilliefors method for normality test and Bartlett method for homogeneity test. After examining the data, it showed that the data had same variance and they were in normal distribution. Prior knowledge data are examined by using one-way ANOVA with unbalanced cells. It showed that three classes had balance prior knowledge. Meanwhile, the technique of analyzing the data was two-ways ANOVA with unbalanced cells. The result of research showed that: (1) Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) learning models had better achievement than conventional model, Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) learning models had the same mathematics achievement, (2) the students having high self concept had better learning achievement than those having medium and low self concept, the students having medium and low self concept had the same mathematics learning achievement, (3) in each learning model: the students having high self concept had better learning achievement than those having medium and low self concept, the students having medium and low self concept had the same mathematics learning achievement, (4) in each level of self concept: Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) model better learning achievement than conventional model, Think Talk Write (TTW) and Numbered Head Together (NHT) model had the same good mathematics learning achievement.Keywords: Think Talk Write (TTW), Numbered Head Together (NHT), mathematics learning achievement, and self concept.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TIPE TTW DAN TPS PADA PERSAMAAN GARIS LURUS DITINJAU DARI KARAKTERISTIK CARA BERPIKIR SISWA SMP NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN PRINGSEWU Suningsih, Ari; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo; Riyadi, Riyadi
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (171.744 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of the research were to determine the effect of learning models on mathematics achievement viewed from students mind  style. The learning model compared were TTW (Think Talk Write), TPS (Think Pair Share) and conventional. The kind of research was a quasi experimental research. The population was the students of Junior high school in Pringsewu regency on academic year 2013/2014. The size of the sample was 286 students, consisted of 98 students in the first experimental group, 105 students in second experimental group and 84 students in control group. The instruments used were mathematics achievement test and questionnaire. Hypothesis analysis test used two ways analysis of variance with unbalanced cells. The conclusions were as follow. (1) TTW model gave the same effect as TPS, but TTW model  was better than conventional and TPS model gave the same effect as conventional. (2) For all types of students mind style gave the same effect for mathematics learning achievement of students. (3) In each model of learning, students with mind style types concrete sequential, abstract sequential, concrete random, or abstract random have the same effect for mathematics learning achievement. (4) In each mind style, TTW model gave the same effect as TPS, but TTW model was better than conventional and TPS model gave the same effect as conventional.Keywords: TTW, TPS, Conventional, Mind Style, Mathematics Learning Achievement.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN KOOPERATIF TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALIZATION (TAI) DAN TEAMS GAMES TOURNAMENTS (TGT) DITINJAU DARI TINGKAT KECERDASAN EMOSIONAL TERHADAP PRESTASI BELAJAR DAN HUBUNGAN INTERPERSONAL SISWA KELAS VIII SMP NEGERI KABUPATEN SLEM Hidayati, Fina Hanifa; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 3 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (409.934 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this study were to determine the effect of instructional models on student’s mathematics achievement learning and interpersonal relationship  viewed from the student emotional intelligence. The learning model compared were direct learning model, TAI and TGT Cooperative Learning Model. This study was a quasi-experimental study. The samples were 263 students: 88 students for experiment, 85 students for experiment 2, and 90 students for the controlled class,. The data were collected from mathematics achievement tests, a set of questionnaire of interpersonal relationship and emotional intelligence. The data were analysed using unbalanced two way MANOVA. Based on the research findings, it can concluded as follows. (1) Both learning achievement and interpersonal relationships of students treated by TGT are better than students treated with TAI and direct learning model while learning achievement and interpersonal relationships of students treated by TAI are better than students treated by direct learning model; (2) a. The best learning achievement is reached by students with high emotional intelligence which followed by those with moderate level and low emotional intelligence; b. The interpersonal relationships of students with moderate emotional intelligence are the same as those with low level, and students with high level are better than students with medium and low level emotional intelligence; (3) In TAI and direct models, learning achievement of the students of any level of emotional intelligence are the same. In TGT model, learning achievement of students with high level of emotional intelligence are the same as those with moderate level, also moderate and low level of emotional intelligence have same learning achievement, and high level emotional intelligence better than students with low level of emotional intelligence in learning achievement; In direct learning and TAI models the best interpersonal relationships is reached by students with high emotional intelligence which followed by those with medium level and low emotional intelligence. In TGT model, interpersonal relationships of students with high level of emotional intelligence are the same as those with moderate level, and both of them are better than students with low level of emotional intelligence; In the moderate level of emotional intelligence, learning achievement of students treated by TAI and direct learning model are the same while learning achievement of students treated by TGT model are better than those treated by direct model, and learning achievement of students treated by TGT and TAI are the same. In the low level of emotional intelligence, achievement of students treated by TAI, TGT, and direct learning are the same; At any level of emotional intelligence, interpersonal relationships of students treated by TGT are better than those treated by TAI and direct learning, and interpersonal relationships of students treated by TAI are better than those treated by direct instructional model.Keywords: TAI, TGT, Emotional Intelligence, Learning Achievement, Interpersonal Relationships.
EKSPERIMENTASI MODEL PEMBELAJARAN NUMBERED HEADS TOGETHER DENGAN PENDEKATAN ILMIAH (NHT-PI) DAN TEAM ASSISTED INDIVIDUALLIZATION (TAI) PADA MATERI POKOK BARISAN DAN DERET DITINJAU DARI GAYA BELAJAR SISWA KELAS XI SMK NEGERI SE-KABUPATEN KLATEN Nurhayati, Ambar; Mardiyana, Mardiyana; Kusmayadi, Tri Atmojo
Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika Vol 2, No 4 (2014): Pembelajaran Matematika
Publisher : Jurnal Pembelajaran Matematika

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | Full PDF (333.93 KB)

Abstract

Abstract: The purposes of this study were to determine: (1) which gives better learning achievement, NHT-PI type, the type of TAI, or direct instruction learning model (2) which is learning achievement better, students who have a visual, auditory or kinesthetic learning style (3) In each type of learning model, which better learning achievement, students who have a visual learning style, auditory or kinesthetic (4) In each learning style, which is learning achievement better, students who applied learning models NHT-PI, TAI, or direct instruction learning. This study was a quasi exsperimental research. The sample of research consisted of 280 students: 90 students in experiment 1 class, 90 students in experiment 2 class, and 100 students in control class. The data was taken from the result of mathematics learning achievement test and student learning style questionnaire. The data obtained was then analyzed using a two-way ANAVA with unbalanced cells. Considering the result of hypothesis testing, the following conclusions could be drawn. (1) The learning achievement of the students treated with NHT-PI type of learning model was better than that of those treated with TAI type and direct learning; that of those treated with TAI was same as that of those treated with direct learning. (2) The learning style did not provide significant difference in learning achievement. (2)  Either in NHT-PI and TAI types of cooperative learning model or in direct learning, the different learning style did not provide significantly different learning achievement. (4) In the students with visual learning style, the three learning models did not provide significantly different learning achievement; in the students with auditory learning style, NHT-PI was as good as the TAI types, the TAI type was a good as the direct learning, and NHT-PI was better than the direct learning; in the students with kinesthetic learning style, the three learning model had equal effectiveness. Keywords: Numbered Head Together Scientific Methode Approach (NHT-PI), Team Assisted Individuallization (TAI), Student Learning Style
Co-Authors A.A. Ketut Agung Cahyawan W Abdul Aziz Abdul Ghofur Abdul Razak Agus Darmawan Ambar Nurhayati Anggrahini Anggrahini Arianti Puspita Dewi Arinta Rara Kirana Asip Cakra Buana, Asip Cakra Atik Fitriya N author Ari Suningsih Budi Usodo Desi Gita Andriani Dewi Kurniasari, Dewi Dian N Safitri Dian Panji Wicaksono Dwi A, Yuridis Madyarsa Dwi Yuni Pramugarini Eli Widoyo Retno Endah Wulantina, Endah Farah Umami Farida Nurhasanah Fatmawati, Ulya Fauzi Mulyatna Ferri Ardianzah, Ferri Fida Rahmantika Hadi, Fida Rahmantika Fina Hanifa Hidayati Fitriana, Laila Frasetyana, Anita Diah Gatut Iswahyudi Habib Ratu Perwira Negara Hafidh Jauhari Hendriyanto, Agus Hidayat, Edisut Taufik Iim Marfuah Ika Wulandari Imam Sujadi Indra Kurniawan Irma Ayuwanti Juitaning Mustika Juliana Nasution KOMARUDIN Labiba Zahra, Labiba Linda Sunarya Lingga Nico Pradana Maarten Dolk, Maarten Mardiyana Mardiyana MIFTACHUL ANAS Mishbahul Huda, Mishbahul Muhtarom Nanndo Yannuansa, Nanndo Naraswari, Titania Putri Nelly Indriastuti P Nina Nurmasari Nindia Elisie Anggraini Nunung Juwariah, Nunung Nur Anida Laila Nurmalitasari Nurmalitasari Nurul Hidayati Shaliha, Nurul Hidayati Ony Syaiful Rizal, Ony Syaiful Puput Suriyah Putri, Saskia Rizkiana Rahayu Sri W Retno Sari Riyadi Riyadi Rosa Rosdiana Retno H Sahara, Sani Sri Indayani, Sri Sri Kuntari Sukowiyono Sukowiyono Supriyatin Supriyatin Susmono Susmono Suyono Suyono Tanti Listiani, Tanti Tri Yuliana Tunjung Genarsih, Tunjung Ummi Rosyidah, Ummi Wahyu Astuti Budi Wahyu Nofiansyah, Wahyu Wahyumiarti Wahyumiarti, Wahyumiarti Widi Lestari Winarno, Bowo Yekti Putri Kusumaningtyas Zara Mertiana RZ