Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
6.491
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal Jurnal Muadalah JURNAL EVALUASI PENDIDIKAN Jurnal Mudarrisuna: Media Kajian Pendidikan Agama Islam SYAMIL: Jurnal Pendidikan Agama Islam (Journal of Islamic Education) JURNAL CITRA KEPERAWATAN Al Qalam: Jurnal Ilmiah Keagamaan dan Kemasyarakatan Al-Madrasah: Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Madrasah Ibtidaiyah Jurnal al-Ulum : Jurnal Pemikiran dan penelitian ke-Islaman JURNAL MAHASISWA BK AN-NUR : BERBEDA, BERMAKNA, MULIA Khazanah: Jurnal Studi Islam dan Humaniora Jurnal Tarbiyah : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan Madrosatuna: Journal of Islamic Elementary School Riayah: Jurnal Sosial dan Keagamaan Jurnal Pendidikan dan Kewirausahaan Al-Mudarris : Jurnal Ilmiah Pendidikan Islam jurnal syntax admiration Al-Ulum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Al Hadi INVENTION: Journal Research and Education Studies Al-Ulum: Jurnal Pendidikan Islam Tadbiruna: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Fikruna : Jurnal Ilmiah Kependidikan dan Kemasyarakatan Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education SYAMIL: JURNAL PENDIDIKAN AGAMA ISLAM (JOURNAL OF ISLAMIC EDUCATION) The International Journal of Education Management and Sociology Journal on Research and Review of Educational Innovation Jurnal Internasional Al Manba ISLAMIC PEDAGOGY: Journal of Islamic Education Mu'adalah: Jurnal Studi Gender dan Anak Jurnal Penelitian Pendidikan Islam AL GHAZALI: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam AL GHAZALI: Jurnal Pendidikan dan Pemikiran Islam Jurnal Riset Multidisiplin Edukasi Ulil Albab Journal of Elementary Education Research and Practice Interdisciplinary Explorations in Research Journal (IERJ) Management of Education: Jurnal Manajemen Pendidikan Islam Indonesian Journal of Islamic Communication Quality Jurnal Sosiologi Pendidikan dan Pendidikan IPS (SOSPENDIS)
Dina Hermina
UIN Antasari Banjarmasin
Religion Aerospace Engineering Arts Humanities Automotive Engineering Biochemistry, Genetics & Molecular Biology Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Computer Science & IT Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Electrical & Electronics Engineering Engineering Health Professions Industrial & Manufacturing Engineering Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Nursing Physics Social Sciences Other

Published : 53 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 1 Documents
Search
Journal : Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education

 1 
CIPP, Stake Model, Goal Free Model, Formative-Sumative Model (Apllications in Education) Noor, Ahmad SUGIAN; Hermina, Dina; Mof, Yahya
JOURNAL OF DIGITAL LEARNING AND DISTANCE EDUCATION Vol. 4 No. 3 (2025): Journal of Digital Learning and Distance Education (JDLDE)
Publisher : RADINKA JAYA UTAMA PUBLISHER

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.56778/jdlde.v4i3.539

Abstract

Program evaluation is a crucial component in efforts to improve educational quality. This article examines four primary evaluation frameworks CIPP (Context–Input–Process–Product), the Stake Model (Antecedents, Transactions, Outcomes), Goal Free Evaluation, and the Formative–Summative Model and illustrates their practical applications in the field. The CIPP model provides a comprehensive evaluation guide from needs analysis through outcome measurement, supporting ongoing decision‑making. The Stake Model emphasizes both descriptive and judgmental activities across initial conditions, instructional processes, and final outcomes, offering a complete picture of program effectiveness. Goal Free Evaluation adopts a fresh perspective by observing all real impacts including unanticipated effects without being bound by formal goal statements, thereby uncovering opportunities for innovative improvements. In contrast, the Formative–Summative Model divides evaluation into formative feedback during the process and summative assessment at the end, enabling timely interventions and comprehensive outcome measurement. By understanding the characteristics and advantages of each model, educators can select or combine the most appropriate frameworks to create adaptive, responsive, and sustainable learning.
Co-Authors Afifah, Apriana Agustina Rahmi Ahmad Ahmad Ahmad Salabi Ahmad, Ahmad Aida, Aida Ali Akbar Arpani Arpani Assya'bani, Ridhatullah Assya’bani, Ridhatullah Fadli Rahman, Fadli Hamli, Haji Imraan, Mohd Irlina, Andi Jamal Syarif Khairunnisa Khairunnisa M, Nurhidaya M. Miftah Arief Mahyuddin Barni, Mahyuddin Mariani Mariani Mubaraq, Muhammad Zaki Muhamad Sabirin Muhammad Alfiannur Mukaddam, Muhammad Faqih Mulyadi, Rida Mushofa Mushofa Mustafa, Desyana Nina Arifa Noor, Ahmad Sugian Norlaila Norlaila Norsiva, Norsiva Nugroho Widi Susanto Nugroho Widi Susanto Nugroho, Agung Nurdi, Hary Nuril Huda Nuril Huda Nuril Huda Nuril Huda Nuril Huda Nuril Huda Nurul Huda Nurul Husna Padlianor, Padlianor Putri, Lyindira Qamaruzzaman, Muhammad Rabbi, Mim Fadhli Rahmah Rahmah Ramadani, Wahdatul Rasyidi Rasyidi Risqiatul Hasanah Rony, Zahara Tussoleha Sa'idah, Siti Sadriah, Sadriah Salsabila, Rofiqa Zulfa Sholeh, Makherus Siswahyudianto Siti Saidah Sugiharto, Muhammad Samuel Sumiati Sumiati Surya Eka Priyatna Syarniah, Syarniah Tahdianoor, Muhammad Tuah, Dilah bin Umar Umar Yahya Mof Yuliani Yuliani ZA, Ali Muammar Zahrah, Zahrah