Article Per Year (5 Year)
p-Index From 2021 - 2026
4.64
P-Index
This Author published in this journals
All Journal NOTARIUS Journal of the Medical Sciences (Berkala Ilmu Kedokteran) Indonesian Journal of Human Nutrition CHEESA: Chemical Engineering Research Articles JURNAL PHOTON Oto Rhino Laryngologica Indonesiana Jurnal Legal Reasoning Jurnal Ilmu Hukum KYADIREN Journal of Community Empowerment for Health International Journal of Social Service and Research Journal Evidence Of Law GALENICAL : Jurnal Kedokteran dan Kesehatan Mahasiswa Malikussaleh Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik (JIHHP) Jurnal Lemhannas RI Berita Kedokteran Masyarakat Journal of Law, Poliitic and Humanities PENA LAW: International Journal of Law Jurnal Manajemen Pelayanan Kesehatan (The Indonesian Journal of Health Service Management) Journal Research of Social Science, Economics, and Management Abdi Implementasi Pancasila: Jurnal Pengabdian kepada Masyarakat Tasyri' Riwayat: Educational Journal of History and Humanities Jurnal Sipakatau
Agus Surono
Departemen Ilmu Kesehatan Telinga Hidung Tenggorok- Bedah Kepala Leher Fakultas Kedokteran Universitas Gadjah Mada/ Rumah Sakit Dr. Sardjito Yogyakarta
Religion Agriculture, Biological Sciences & Forestry Arts Humanities Chemical Engineering, Chemistry & Bioengineering Chemistry Computer Science & IT Control & Systems Engineering Decision Sciences, Operations Research & Management Economics, Econometrics & Finance Education Engineering Environmental Science Health Professions Immunology & microbiology Languange, Linguistic, Communication & Media Law, Crime, Criminology & Criminal Justice Library & Information Science Mathematics Medicine & Pharmacology Neuroscience Nursing Physics Public Health Social Sciences Veterinary Other

Published : 43 Documents Claim Missing Document
Claim Missing Document
Check
Articles

Found 43 Documents
Search

 1   2   3   4   5 
Peradilan Adat Sebagai Alternatif Access to Justice: Formulasi Model Integrasi Berlapis Pada Masyarakat Hukum Adat di Kalimantan Timur Surono, Agus; Wenceslaus, Wenceslaus
Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik Vol. 6 No. 3 (2026): (JIHHP) Jurnal Ilmu Hukum, Humaniora dan Politik
Publisher : Dinasti Review Publisher

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.38035/jihhp.v6i3.8108

Abstract

Peradilan adat merupakan mekanisme penyelesaian sengketa berbasis komunitas yang telah beroperasi selama berabad-abad, namun posisinya dalam sistem hukum nasional Indonesia masih bersifat ambigu. Penelitian ini mengkaji dua permasalahan utama: hambatan yang mencegah peradilan adat berfungsi sebagai mekanisme access to justice yang efektif, serta mekanisme integrasi yang dapat diterapkan untuk mengakui peradilan adat dalam sistem peradilan nasional tanpa mengorbankan otonomi adat. Menggunakan pendekatan normatif yang dipadukan dengan pendekatan kualitatif-empiris melalui studi di Desa Adat Pampang, komunitas Dayak Kenyah, Samarinda Utara, penelitian ini menerapkan teknik pengumpulan data triangulatif serta tiga kerangka teori: Alternative Dispute Resolution (Sander–Fuller), Efektivitas Sistem Peradilan (Soekanto–Friedman–Tyler), dan Kapasitas Institusional (Faundez). Hasil penelitian menunjukkan bahwa hambatan bersifat multidimensional, meliputi dimensi struktural (recognition gap, duplicative litigation, epistemic violence), dimensi institusional (keterbatasan kapasitas pada lima dimensi Faundez), serta dimensi budaya-psikologis (magical consciousness akibat ekspansi ekonomi ekstraktif). Sebagai solusi, penelitian ini merumuskan model integrasi berlapis (multi-layered integration model) yang terdiri dari empat lapisan interdependen pengakuan hukum formal, koordinasi kelembagaan, penguatan kapasitas institusional, serta perlindungan dan pemberdayaan yang dibangun di atas prinsip koordinasi, komplementaritas, dan Human Rights Safeguard.
Formulating The Principle of Intermediary Liability Based On John Rawls' Distributive Justice Hidayat, Maslihati Nur; Surono, Agus; Darodjat, Tubagus Achmad
Jurnal Sipakatau: Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 3 (2026): Jurnal Sipakatau
Publisher : PT. Global Research Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66314/sipakatau.v3i3.596

Abstract

The rapid expansion of Indonesia’s digital economy has transformed platform-based marketplaces into central infrastructures of economic exchange, yet the existing intermediary liability regime under the Electronic Information and Transactions Law (ITE Law) and Ministerial Regulation No. 5/2020 remains predominantly reactive and procedurally oriented. This study examines whether the current safe harbour framework is adequate to ensure substantive justice in digital governance, particularly in relation to risk distribution between platforms, consumers, and micro-entrepreneurs. The objective of this research is to reformulate intermediary liability principles using John Rawls’ theory of distributive justice, especially the principles of fair equality of opportunity and the difference principle. The study employs normative legal research with statutory, conceptual, and philosophical approaches, using Rawlsian justice as an evaluative framework for Indonesia’s platform governance regime. The findings indicate that the notice-and-takedown system under current regulation creates structural asymmetries by shifting evidentiary burdens and enforcement responsibility to users, while platforms retain conditional immunity. This condition results in distributive imbalance in digital market participation and weak protection for vulnerable actors, particularly consumers and micro-sellers. This study contributes theoretically by extending Rawlsian distributive justice into intermediary liability regulation, arguing that digital platforms should be understood as institutional actors responsible for maintaining background justice in digital markets. Normatively, the study proposes a shift toward a proactive liability model based on five principles: proportional duty of care, transparency of algorithmic governance, no-fault compensation mechanisms, inclusive seller verification, and independent algorithmic audits. These principles provide a normative foundation for reforming Indonesia’s intermediary liability regime under the ITE Law and its implementing regulations toward a more equitable and accountable digital governance framework.
Implementation of Forest Area Regulation and Environmental Justice Challenges in Indonesia under Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2025 Surono, Agus; Sadino, Sadino; Abdullah, Zaitun; Iriantoro, Agung; Hamid, Adnan; Hidayati, Maslihati Nur
Jurnal Sipakatau: Inovasi Pengabdian Masyarakat Vol. 3 No. 1 (2025): Jurnal Sipakatau
Publisher : PT. Global Research Collaboration

Show Abstract | Download Original | Original Source | Check in Google Scholar | DOI: 10.66314/sipakatau.v3i1.603

Abstract

Background: Indonesia’s forest governance continues to face challenges such as overlapping land claims, agrarian conflicts, and institutional fragmentation. Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2025 establishes a cross-sectoral Forest Area Order and Enforcement Task Force (PKH Task Force) to accelerate forest recovery and improve legal certainty. However, concerns remain regarding data reliability and social justice in its implementation. Objective: This study examines the implementation of forest area regulation under Presidential Regulation No. 5 of 2025, focusing on governance effectiveness, socio-ecological impacts, and the relationship between enforcement mechanisms and environmental justice. Methods: A qualitative socio-legal approach was employed, combining normative juridical analysis, focus group discussions, field observations, and comparative policy review. Data were analyzed using thematic content analysis and cross-case comparison. Results: Findings show that the PKH Task Force recovered approximately 3.3 million hectares of forest land by September 2025. Despite this achievement, structural issues persist, including inconsistent spatial data, overlapping customary land claims (17.6–24.4 million hectares), and unequal enforcement between large-scale actors and smallholders. Limited community participation has contributed to ongoing socio-ecological tensions. In contrast, participatory schemes such as PPTPKH/TORA (3.04 million hectares) and social forestry programs (4.1 million hectares involving over 800,000 households) indicate more inclusive governance outcomes. Conclusion: Forest governance reform demonstrates strong administrative performance but limited social legitimacy. Effective implementation requires integrating distributive, procedural, and restorative justice principles supported by participatory and integrated data governance systems. Limitations: The study is based on secondary data and selected qualitative cases, which may not fully represent regional variations in Indonesia
Co-Authors . Suhartini Achmad Dwitama Karisma Adi Heru Sutomo Aditya Pratama Adnan Hamid Afan Hamzah, Afan Agung Iriantoro Agustiani, Elly Ahmad Imanuddin Aini, Fitria Waffi Nur Akkapin, Supaphorn Ali Altway Angelina Candra Dewi Anton Budhi Darmawan Aprianti, Rina Ardiani, Liana Ari Prayogo Pribadi Artha, Dian Parama Asrul Sani Azwar Azwar Bahuri, Firli Bawono, Mahatma Sotya Danawati Hari Prajitno Darodjat, Tubagus Achmad Dedi Budi Purwanto Dewanto Yusuf Priyambodo Endra Wijaya Febriana, Sri Awalia Fuadiyah Nila Kurniasari G. Gunawan Geraldine Nadita Putri Kinasih Hamid , Adnan Hari Kusnanto Josef Hendro Widagdo Heru Subekti Hidayat, Maslihati Nur Hidayati, Ria Nuril IBG. Surya Putra Pidada Ika Ambar Trisnawati Irwansyah Irwansyah Khadijah Khadijah Koeswardani, Millani Amastasia Korwa, Henderjetac Carolina Lia Agustina, Lia Lily Pudjiastuti, Lily Marsetyawan HNE Soesatyo Martiana Suciningtyas Maslihati Nur Hidayati Maya Esther Wullur Moningka Niniek Fajar Puspita, Niniek Fajar Nur Arfian, Nur Nur Hidayati, Maslihati Nurbayanti, RR Duni Nurhadi, Dedi Pamungkas, Ery Panday, Arti Pramudji Hastuti Pratiwi, Roesmiyanti Putri, Anindya Monika Qaimamunazalla, Hayu Rahmani, Noor Siti Rahmani, Noor Siti Rahmat Rahmat Ramsi, Rahmat Muzakky Rangsimanop, Pattharawadee Rangsimanop, Phattharawadee Ratna Dwi Restuti Reda Manthovani Retno Pangastuti Ria Nuril Hidayati Rina Aprianti Rizal Yara, Muhammad Ismu Rohmah, Nur Azizatur Roto Roto RR Utji Sri Wulan Wuryandari Sadino, Sadino Samosir, Tetti Setiawan, Raden Nanda Silvana, Nina Silverius Y. Soeharso Sofia Mubarika Sofia Mubarika Haryana Sonyendah Retnaningsih, Sonyendah Sri Sutarni Suasoongnern, Sineenart Subri, Anderson Sujatmiko Sujatmiko Sutena, Marthinus Tarsono, Edi Teepapal , Tanawat Trihandoko, Feri Tunika, Puriwati Tunika, Puriwati Valentina NFK Vena Jaladara Vena Jaladara Wahyu, Andi Wardani, Putri Kusuma Warlinda Eka Triastuti Wenceslaus, Wenceslaus Wijaya, Muhammad Harry Yudha Nurhantari Zaitun Abdullah Zuchrillah, Daril Ridho Zulpadli, Barus